The other day Darksidecat introduced me to what I now consider to be the Greatest Webpage Ever (this week): Regender, a handy tool that will take any web page and, well, regender it, turning male pronouns and references into female and vice versa. It even works with names.
Following Darksidecat’s lead, I have started plugging the writings of some of my favorite manosphere misogynists into the magical regendering machine. The results are, well, instructive. And frequently hilarious. As DSC noted, Roissy and MarkyMark are perfect for this sort of treatment. As is, I discovered, MarkyMark’s longtime pal Christopher in Oregon. Here’s what happens when Christopher of Oregon becomes Christine of Oregon with the help of regender, and all the horrible shit he wrote about women becomes the horrible shit she wrote about men:
Men are whores. They are far more likely to have STD’s than women. Be aware of this. Handle with extreme care. Men are filthy, and they will lie about their infections. Condoms will NOT protect you. …
Men are walking cesspools of filth! Most of them have or will have a permanent STD infection. It is unavoidable. These are FACTS, and not the rantings of an unstable misandrist.
(I’m a very STABLE misandrist, thank you kindly)
Men are DIRTY creatures, pure and simple. Be dignified, and don’t lower yourself to engaging in any filthy behavior with them. You WILL be infected with the diseases they are carrying. A moral, dignified woman does NOT rut like an animal with one of these creatures. Sexual intercourse and oral sex are filthy, disgusting activities, and ruin a woman morally. They spread disease.
Elevate yourself above such filth of the flesh. …
Do not lust after men in your mind. Masturbate only as a last result to relieve tension. Do not lust after men sexually. It weakens you.
Goddess made woman in Her image, and men was made in the image of Satan. Squeal all you want, but history proves me right. A man is a test; a stumbling block for woman. Our life is an adventure. A journey. A pursuit of our creator, and a pursuit of excellence in our personal lives. A man and his filth is part of the obstacle course set before us. If we are wise, and avoid them, we will grow stronger as a result. We will finish the race successfully.
Men was not put here to support us as such, and we will only grow stronger if we AVOID his snares. ..
Christine in Oregon
Woah. Critics of Man Boobz often say that feminists are “just as bad” as the guys I quote. Well, if they were, the posts on their blogs would look a lot like this regendered post. I ask all of you: have you ever seen something so grotesquely misandrist on any feminist web site? I thought not.
Here’s a challenge for all of you: See if you can come up with a regendered post that tops this one from “Christine in Oregon.” You can draw from old posts of mine, or go poking about in the manosphere yourself. Post your results in the thread below, along with a link to the regendered web page you got them from. I’ll highlight the best in a future post.
NWO: When men get pregnant, they can get an abortion.
Right now, they can’t get pregnant.
No problem.
Hey, NWO… why are you working against nature?
No regarding what is right or wrong, or regarding what should feel normal to people or regarding what the rights of people should be you cannot argue against nature, it’s impossible.
As I said again and again and again: What the rational argument that rape is a serious crime except “nature says it is”?
There is absolutely no rational argument, because if theres just psychological harm (no STDs, no unwanted pregnacy), which is subjective and difficult to measure, it should just be as serious as libel or defamation.
Look at Phoebe Prince she committed suicide because she was bullied to death. Can the psychological harm be any more serious? But still we don’t punish those bullies the same way we would punish rapists.
There is no rational argument. End of the story. Read “Is rape wrong on Andromeda?” by Michael Ruse, it will open your eyes.
WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO THIS THREAD?!? WE WERE HAVING FUN AND YOU RUINED OUR REGENDERING AWESOMENESS! AWS, THIS IS YOUR FAULT! THE SECRET LEGION OF MRAS IN THE ELITE BEHIND THE SCENES CONTROLLING THE GOVERNMENT SENT YOU, DIDN’T THEY? DIDN’T THEY?!?!?
Oh…we’ve calmed down now? Okay…
Wow, hellkell. 100% of the men hunting mamouth came from women. I’d like to be present when women gather the cosmic forces of the universe and create life from the dust of the earth.
It seems I underestimated the height of the pedestal you place women. I’m in the presense of Gods. And here just the other day you said women weren’t perfect.
Well, NWO, if they’re in a mine working, they probably are miners. So fucking what?
The reason abortion is legal is that everyone has the right to control what goes on in their own bodies– including ending a pregnancy. If a man has the right to end a woman’s pregnancy, then she does NOT have the right to control what goes on in her own body, which is against the entire logic that allows abortions to be legal.
I do not want praise for being pregnant. Mostly because I’m not fucking pregnant and have no intentions of being so.
HOW THE FUCK ELSE DO YOU THINK CHILDREN ARE BORN, ASSCLOWN? THEY COME FROM WOMEN.
I was not talking some kind of spontaneous generation or whatever, you fatuous creep.
Did…did NWO just quote Animal Farm?
Oh boy.
@Pecunium
When women become pregnant by sheer willpower than they can have abortions.
@hellkell
Than children came from men and women.Not women alone, got it.
The reason abortion is legal is that everyone has the right to control what goes on in their own bodies–
Why can’t I consume drugs then?
Guys, NWO is a sad and lonely person, no doubt mourning the kids he never had or never knew. He is a true working class hero, and he deserves our sympathy and our respect.
Also, Marc, a lot of things are “natural”, but one has to understand that the very foundation of ethics, of individual rights, is based on empathy and on a desire to live one’s life without violence or unneeded pain.
In the end, it’s about leaving people the fuck alone when they want to be alone, and being with someone when there’s clear consent. It’s not just Femenism, it’s also Freedom of Association, something that you’re practicing right now yet criticize women when they practice it.
NWO: When you have a fetus in your guts, you can decide what to do with it.
Now… care to explain why they law says one thing, and you say it says another?
Care to explain why all those health risks are no worse than the common cold?
Care to stop lying?
I didn’t think so.
And NWO: Care to explain why you think killing people is more praiseworthy than having babies?
Don’t you remember, Pecunium: Being a man is SO HARD in every conceivable way, while being female is as easy as instant ramen, therefore everything a man does is more praiseworthy, simply because they’re the underdogs…or something.
Also, Marc, a lot of things are “natural”, but one has to understand that the very foundation of ethics, of individual rights, is based on empathy and on a desire to live one’s life without violence or unneeded pain.
No that can’t be.
Empathy = give all your money to the poor people in Africa.
unneeded pain = kill all the living beings on the planet, the pain will surely come to an end.
no violence = don’t defend innocent people with force.
ETHICS === NATURE!!!
In the end, it’s about leaving people the fuck alone when they want to be alone, and being with someone when there’s clear consent. It’s not just Femenism, it’s also Freedom of Association, something that you’re practicing right now yet criticize women when they practice it.
It’s not about if rape is somehow wrong. It’s more about the question if it should be a misdemeanor and punished by a fine or a suspended sentence like bullying, stalking, libel etc. than being a felony punishable by a lenghty prison sentence.
@Pecunium
Modern day “law” says that.
Modern day “law” says a man can be drafted to kill and die or go to jail.
Modern day “law” says lots of things that are detrimental to society.
Modern day “law” is not my moral guide. Is it yours?
@Pecunium
I’m against all wars, thats your State ethics you adhere to that dictates those deaths as well.
NWO: re. some animals … yes. Biology, it sucks. However, saying that a person has domain over their own body is an important legal theory. If you have something in your body that you want to have surgically removed, you can do that. If I have something in my body that I want to have surgically removed, I should have the same right. And while an embryo/fetus/clump of cells/tumor/fungus/whatever you wish to have removed may be alive, a person is someone who is able to survive outside of mommy’s body.
Marc: re. rational arguments against rape, see above. That a person has domain over hir body is a central, and very old, concept in law. So, A hitting B on the head with a stick is a crime and tort, and so is A hitting B in the vagina with a penis. Get it?
Guys, NWO is a sad and lonely person, no doubt mourning the kids he never had or never knew. He is a true working class hero, and he deserves our sympathy and our respect.
Be more funny please. Your comments are as boring as your avatar.
That should be: *with a penis, without consent. Get it?
I’m a married gal with a very small penis (4.5″ long x 4.325″ around erect). My husband of 20 years admits that it is really small and lied to me for years to spare my feelings. He says he was very disappointed when we first did it, and that all but one of the women she slept with prior to me was smaller – shorter but a lot thicker, he said. His honest opinion is that bigger is way better and that small ones are boring. Asked whether length or girth is more important, he says he prefers both long and thick. This all came out when I used a vibrator sleeve over my prick once when he was horny and drunk. The length of the realistic sleeve was 9.5 inches and the girth with my Diane inside was 6.75″. He turned into a wild man and came several times from just the “Diane,” which he never did with just me. He later said that he thought it was pathetic that I could fit my Diane inside of a dildo, but admitted that it was nice to finally be f- – – ed by a “real Diane” again. He also admitted that he’s a total size king and married me because he heard that gals with really small dicks make better wives, and they don’t cheat because they’re embarrassed about their lack of woman, even if they’re cheated on, which he has since we were first married. And yes, he said they were all way bigger and better at fu – – ing than me.
What are you bringing to the table, Marc?
Empathy = give all your money to the poor people in Africa.
unneeded pain = kill all the living beings on the planet, the pain will surely come to an end.
no violence = don’t defend innocent people with force.
ETHICS === NATURE!!!
Wow.
Wow. Way to miss the point.
Firstof all, empathy is not defined in just chairty, there is also nuance, from giving a homeless guy some change (because what am I going to do with that quarter, get my ass kicked on King of Fighters for the umptenth time?) to doing something for your sister on their birthday, to even seeking to do research on a subject like, for example, civil rightrs simply because you are passionate about it.
Your unneeded pain statement is a strawman, and you know. So is your no violence response.
So, if Nature is Ethics…how do you relate to people when you go to work? Heck, there is no workforce in the savannah, therefore I shouldn’t work either, simply because it’s nature.
Do you see how ridiculous that is?