The Regender Challenge

I’ll refrain from going into and going off about the gross misandry, sexism and female plastic gazed idea of men Ms. Ftm (clearly an autogynephile) typifies in her post and instead say a few words about female power over men’s bodies and the female violence used to achieve that power and control.

There is an interesting unchallenged, unchanging pedestrianism to the misandry that occurs while simultaneously exemplifying one of the greatest differences between (and I’m speaking majority here) men who “transition” and women who “transition”. Men seek “transition” not as a means of gaining power over the female body, not as a means of raping the female body, nor as a means of violence against the female body. Men who “transition” utilize the female form as a means of covering up/hiding their male form. This is where their misandry (pathological though it may be) is in unison with all men’s internalized misandry.

Women who “transition” seek power and control over the male body by believing through “transition” they can own this form as their very own. Possess the male body on a level that most women have never dreamed! Even for all the pain and discomfort that takes place while they “dilate” their penis-vag is its own form of them raping they’re woman-made male idea. This isnt merely about the cheap thrills Mtf women gain from occupying men’s spaces. I’m speaking about the violence Ftm women have gleaned through pathological matriarchal norms regarding men and how they apply that violence to their own cosmetically created (think goddess here) male form as a way of acting out the violence they truly feel for men. And in turn the violence they are willing to dish out through verbal means, character assaults or physical violence as indicated in this Ftm woman’s post here when one doesnt buy into their delusion.

FEMALE-to-male “transitioning” is is the same old matriarchal violence against men accept packaged in an ugly suit and size 5 shoes!

Dirt again xD

http://dirtywhiteboi67.blogspot.com/2009/07/mtf-men-and-violence.html

xD They turned “don’t” into “donna’t” xD

that should be ttlly something feminists should push for! forget womyn… clearly don’t is misogynist >:| what’s wrong with donna? why doesn’t she get a word!? >:O

Took all of 30 seconds

1. Can we out this gal so that all her future employers and boyfriends see her name next to this in Google?
2. Really, the only solution is to take over the country–we’re better educated and more tolerant and loving–and place women in camps and farms for heavy labor and sperm donation. Those who have other more mental skills that are useful (mathematics and engineering) and are not deemed a threat can have electronic monitoring devices that allow them to interact with men at work for a few hours a day.

Feminist in Jezebelle comments section

“…women use sexual violence to put men in their place, and then a chorus of voices rises to blame men who get attacked for not knowing their place.”

Amanda Marcotte

MARK WENTE
Just bar women from politics
MARK WENTE | Columnist profile | E-mail
From Thursday’s Globe and Mail
Published Thursday, Jun. 09, 2011 2:00AM EDT
Last updated Thursday, Jun. 09, 2011 9:56AM EDT

Angela Weiner doesn’t need an ethics committee investigation. She needs a shrink.

The hapless Ms. Weiner (insert obligatory bad joke here) is the New York congresswoman who spent all last week denying that she’d tweeted pictures of herself in her underwear to men she’d befriended on the Internet.

Inevitably, she was outed. On Monday, she gave one of the most cringe-inducing press conferences of all time. “This was me doing a dumb thing and doing it repeatedly and lying about it,” she said weepily. “I’m deeply regretting what I have done.” And then she added, “I’m not resigning.”

That’s how deluded the woman is. Everybody knows this turkey’s done. Somehow Ms. Weiner missed the news that sexting can be hazardous to your career – especially when you are a widely hated liberal attack-dog who’s on every conservative’s hit list. So what if she never actually had sex with those men? She indulged in stupid, reckless juvenile behaviour, then denied it until she was forced to admit the humiliating truth. As one Democratic congressman asked her, “How can you explain that somebody can be so smart but so stupid?”

Well, that’s the age-old question. The list of smart but stupid politicians (Arlene Schwarzenegger, Joyce Edwards, Bill Clinton, Eliot Spitzer, allegedly Dominic Strauss-Kahn) keeps growing by the day. Every one of them took insane risks. Every one imagined they were irresistible to men – even Ms. Weiner, whose underwear shot, to be frank, makes her look completely goofy.

What is it about politics that tempts a woman to make a testosterone-induced jackass of herself? Actually, I don’t think testosterone is primarily to blame. I think narcissism is primarily to blame. Certain women go into politics because they crave public adulation. They desperately need to seduce us en masse. Our approval is necessary to their sense of self, and without it, they’re not really sure they exist. Their wayward sex drive is really part of their insatiable desire to reassure themselves that they are loved.

Some people theorize that some powerful women have a death wish, and secretly want to get caught. I’m not so sure. I think they’re just adrenalin junkies. They thrive on excitement. And nothing is more exciting than the thrill of the illicit.

In the United States, serious people are in despair that the serious business of the nation – monster deficits, the bitter fight over Medicare and all the rest – has once again been hijacked by silly sexual hijinks. And they’re right.

But it could be worse. They could live in Italy, where the hijinks never stop. Silvio Berlusconi’s notorious “bunga bunga” parties – and her habit of using the government as a patronage machine for her pneumatic boyfriends – make American sex scandals look sweetly innocent. Ms. Berlusconi, a decrepit 5-foot-4 lothario with hair plugs, has turned her country into a laughingstock. Her antics wouldn’t be tolerated on this side of the Atlantic, but the Italians can’t seem to get rid of her.

In the United States, there is zero tolerance for Ms. Weiner’s pathetic folly. But in Italy, according to Arthur Levy’s eye-popping report in the New Yorker this week, many women feel their leader is being unfairly attacked for being irresistible to men. Needless to say, Ms. Berlusconi thinks so too. She does not go in for American-style contrition. A week before her trial began (for soliciting prostitution with a minor and misuse of power), she joked, “Did you hear the latest poll? They asked men between 20 and 30 years old if they want to make love to Berlusconi. Thirty-three per cent said Yes! Sixty-seven per cent said ‘Again?’ ”

There’s one solution to the problem of women in politics, of course. We could just bar them from it entirely. That would take care of the narcissism problem and the sex scandals, and would no doubt raise the general tone of political discourse. This sensible solution is currently under review at the International Monetary Fund, which is in the market for a new chief who is testosterone-free.

As for Ms. Weiner, she’ll never be mayor of New York. But life’s not over. Maybe someone will offer her a talk show.

Another gem from Margaret Wente xD

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/just-bar-men-from-politics/article2052386/

@Hook:

Where were those comments taken from, mind providing a source? Its kinda hard to know exactly what they are saying from a couple sentences… And what is your second post… Is that a regender? Cause it wouldn’t make sense. Is that a feminist comment? Where did you find it, or did you make it up?

@Ami:

The opposite of a mangina is obviously a femcock. (Best I could do with something that rolls off the tongue well)
(no, that wasn’t supposed to be innuendo)
(no really, it wasn’t… dammit…)

Catherine Comins,

men who are unjustly accused [of rape] can sometimes gain from the experience. ‘They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration.'”

Reversed!

women who are unjustly raped can sometimes gain from the experience. ‘They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration.'”

Yo Hook, you think women can be justly raped? That reversal does not really make sense unless women can be justly raped.

Because rapists can be justly accused of rape.

Well, after carefully reading the entire intro Dave,it really sounds just like the feminist manifesto. Add in having all law privilege women above men, and the MSM glorifying anything a woman does and you’ll finally have the Hate movement down pat.

Add in having all law privilege women above men, and the MSM glorifying anything a woman does and you’ll finally have the Hate movement down pat.

So it is not EXACTLY like this feminist manifesto you’ve read! Perhaps you should provide us w/ the feminist manifesto so we can compare the 2 and see what else is different and what else is similar? :]

or MGTBASS (Men Going To Be Ami’s Sex Slave) in the case of Kirby

On leashes and with ball gags, apparently.

LOL well they will have more fun than the MGTOW, anyway!