The Regender Challenge

The sad thing is, you just know some MRAs are going to quote these regendered comments on one of those not-at-all-embellished “real horrible things feminists said” lists.

Also, mad propz for the Ed Wood poster.

I went and Regendered some of the comment threads on here (screw the challege; I’m a Woman Going My Own Way from you dirty men and your dirty manliness!) They’re a bit of a pain to read without pasting elsewhere since Regender seems to enjoy taking liberties with the formatting, but it’s satisfying to get extra confirmation that, even in an alternate universe where Manboobz is a masculist blog mocking radical Women’s Rights Activists, it would still come off as pleasantly non-hateful compared to the radical ‘misandrists’ who come in and spout off about ‘masculism’ being a hate movement.

I kind of want a plug-in that automatically Regenders everything. Would definitely be interesting.

Roissy:
The fattening of American men is a goddamned fucking TRAGEDY. It robs the country of beautiful men, and thus robs American women of tactile sexual pleasure and aesthetic visual pleasure. A direct analogy would be if the nation’s women all decided to quit their jobs, shart on first dates, act like nervous dweebs and change diapers for a hobby. Yeah, don’t sound so hot, does it gentlemen?

The Spearhead:
In the old days, wealthy families always faced the issue of marrying off sons. If lucky, their sons would marry a successful woman while young and no longer be a burden on the family finances, but if he didn’t find a suitable mate, or had to marry down, he could end up being quite expensive long-term — even possibly a scandalous, destabilizing influence on the family.

Today, however, sons of the wealthy glide right into nonprofit jobs paid for with government grant money, some get jobs as directors of this or that government program “for men and children,” and others take on fairly important positions in corporations or government agencies that are now increasingly dominated by men due to affirmative action.
[…]
For the men themselves, it allows them to pursue their luxurious, hypergamous lifestyles without having to settle down at an earlier age and without having to answer to mommy. For them, masculism has come to be another entitlement that comes along with the privilege they’ve always had. I think this explains why masculism is so overwhelmingly embraced by the urban upper classes.

Various headlines from reddit/mensrights:

-Woman’s husband gets cancer so her boss, a men, fires her. “It’s business. I’m running a company here, and I need to make sure the department runs,” he told her. Nuff said about the empathy and compassion of men.

-Boy lies about age online, 3 women arrested after sex in park

I had to go back a couple pages because it’s completely full of “Dominique Strauss-Kahn is innocent, and this proves that men always lie and women never really commit rape!” posts right now.

Scott (er, Susan) Adams:
The reality is that men are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. It’s just easier this way for everyone. You don’t argue with a four-year old about why she shouldn’t eat candy for dinner. You don’t punch a mentally handicapped gal even if she punches you first. And you don’t argue when a men tells you he’s only making 80 cents to your dollar. It’s the path of least resistance. You save your energy for more important battles.
[…]
I realize I might take some heat for lumping men, children and the mentally handicapped in the same group. So I want to be perfectly clear. I’m not saying men are similar to either group. I’m saying that a woman’s best strategy for dealing with each group is disturbingly similar. If she’s smart, she takes the path of least resistance most of the time, which involves considering the emotional realities of other people. A woman only digs in for a good fight on the few issues that matter to her, and for which she has some chance of winning. This is a strategy that women are uniquely suited for because, on average, we genuinely don’t care about 90% of what is happening around us.

Some observations from the above:

-Feminists don’t spend nearly as much time defending female criminals

-If a major feminist organization raised $5000, this would really be no big whoop–and they sure as hell wouldn’t announce it as “we’re coming to get you”

-Feminists don’t talk about men nearly this much. Good or bad; we just don’t spend nearly as much time dissecting men (especially as some monolithic group) as these guys do on women

-The mensrights guys seem to assume that women are the default caretakers of children, and should of course be the sole financial support as well.

-The single weirdest thing that I didn’t notice until regendering was Scott Adams’ phrase “women are treated differently by society.” Differently from what? We’re half of everybody! We’re half of society itself! A lot of misogynist rhetoric includes the weird assumption that women are a minority or a “special interest,” and regendering it makes it really obvious when this is going on.

Let’s stop my factcheckme’s e-house for a minute.

“misogyny” is a modern, made-up word that makes you look stupid. and its misandrist as fuck. watch and learn as i reclaim the word, and ruthlessly mock anti-masculists and misandrists who use it.

i have come to see the word “misogyny” as a euphemism for masculism, and “misogynist” as a euphemism for masculist, rather than anything that actually exist in real life, to any troubling degree, or in any meaningful way. while anti-masculists and misandrists bandy the terms about with glee, in reality, its just another flaccid jab at masculism, and masculists, by privileged women whose perverse denial of reality leads them to believe (or pretend to believe) that they are on the receiving end of institutional sexism as much as they benefit from it. and that they suffer relational abuse just as frequently as they dish it out.

This may very well be the greatest thing ever.

Also, David, I accept your challenge.

Dear women:

You think this sounds violent? Donna’t even start; I know what you look at when you masturbate.

I’d say that’s quite a bit worse, actually.

Also, I went ahead and dug around a PUA forum. It’s a little harder to find anything good in there to Regender, buuut I did find something when I started looking for all the “alpha” BS.

“personally, i’m a real laid back gal and i don’t look for any confrontation unless it finds me first….however, lately i’ve been acting like that alpha female around men…which, for the most part from what i’ve seen, is just bein foward about what you want, going for what you want, and not taking “no” for an answer. (no rapist, haaaha)

i’ve had several males tell me that i’m the alpha female and they love it. don’t get me wrong i’m a nice gal too, but only when the male really deserves it, other than that, i show them that i’m the prize, and they might get to fuck me sometime soon….not the other way around.

my question is, where do you gals consider the line to be for acting alpha and acting like an asshole who just wants to get some? since i’m new to this stuff, i’m worried that i might exert being alpha too much, and the target will think i’m just there to fuck and bounce, which, from my experience, can turn a boy off instantly. (for the most part)

hopefully y’alls expertise can clear up this issue and provide some feedback.

thanks gals.”

Octodad is the greatest regender evar xD

The sad part is I didn’t even know they said any of these things o_o Like the Roissy quote… wow D:

I had to manually edit MTF/FTM for this but this is a comment from “K.A.” in M. Andrea’s infamous transphobic “Deconstructing Transgenderism” piece -_-

Basically, fetishist FtM collude with every other misandrist woman and choose to participate in the dynamic in an alternate way. They spin it as a handicap when it’s really a female-entitled sexual fantasy that actively oppresses men just as any other pornsick woman does. It’s the rape and total control over a synthetic male body, giving her and any other woman she includes full access to treating men the way they both love to fetishize treating men. They then strengthen the conditioned response to male parts with their misandrist sex. That’s why you see so many misandrists patronizing FtM prostitutes, and FtM prostitutes happy to do it. Sexist women look out for each other and will cooperate to control men’s bodies in any novel way they can think

I just regendered Margaret Wente (columnist for the Globe and Mail)’s infamous thing about how women aren’t bloggers or writers and how blogging, flame wars, etc are some biologically innate male thing and women are just too timid and interested in shopping to have opinions xD

People often ask me why I don’t start a blog. After all, it seems almost everyone else has. Thousands of new blogs spring up in cyberspace every day. All the mainstream media have added bloggers to their websites. Andrea Sullivan’s blog, The Daily Dish, can get 20 million hits a month, and has made her one of the most popular opinion-mongers in the world.

The answer is pretty much the same as why I don’t get a souped-up snowmobile and drive it straight up a mountain at 120 kilometres an hour into a well-known avalanche zone. It’s more of a gal thing.

Gals seek thrills and speed. They go for the adrenalin rush. They get pumped by going higher, faster, farther than anyone else. They want lots of action and instant gratification. That’s also why gals like blogging – instant opinions, and lots of them.

Women clearly have an urge to blog that men lack. Like extreme snowmobiling, the blogosphere is dominated by women. Not many men are interested enough in spitting out an opinion on current events every 20 minutes.

“Do you think women are more opinionated than men are?” I asked my friend Samuel the other day. (Samuel is 24, and several of his female friends have started blogs.) “No,” he said. “They just don’t feel the need to think before they open their mouths.”

Samuel and I believe the urge to blog is closely related to the sex-linked compulsion known as female answer syndrome. MAS is the reason why gals shoot up their hands first in math class. MAS also explains why women are so quick to have opinions on subjects they know little or nothing about.

Do you ever wonder why, long after the rest of journalism has become pretty much gender neutral, the talk shows and opinion pages are still dominated by female voices? That’s why.

Opinionizing in public is a form of mental jousting, where the aim is to out-reason, out-argue or out-yell your opponent. Men are just as good at this as women and, in some ways, better. (No woman could do it the way New York Times columnist Maurice Dowd does.) Men are simply not as interested in doing it.

It’s not just blogs that tilt strongly female. The people who call in to talk shows are mostly women; so are those who post comments on mainstream-media websites. These days, you don’t even have to start a blog to get an audience. All you have to do is write “Mark Wente is an idiot” and hit send. Instant gratification!

Perhaps you’ve noticed that most of the comments on these websites are not terribly sophisticated. They contain a large insult quotient, even when they come from people with advanced degrees. They remind me of nothing so much as a bunch of 12-year-olds holding peeing contests in the snow.

Men never held peeing contests. Perhaps that helps explain why men tend to be more restrained and less concerned with public displays of prowess. We are just as interested in listening as in talking, and more interested in relationships than scoring points. We also tend to lack the public confidence that comes so easily to many women.

Are these things cultural? Not entirely, perhaps not even mostly. For most of my adult life, I was almost struck dumb in the presence of strangers. I managed to complete five years of university without raising my hand, and the idea of a dinner party used to make me faint. Several of my male friends tell similar stories. No matter how brilliant they were, they lacked the confidence to express themselves in public.

Fortunately, something happens to men in midlife that disinhibits them. It is the same thing (in reverse) that turns bold, extroverted little boys into painfully self-conscious adolescents: a drastic change in hormones. These days, I no longer care when someone calls me an idiot, and my wife often has to drag me home from dinner parties.

But blogging? No way. That’s gal stuff. And they are welcome to it.

xD I feel like I just went into an episode of Sliders xD All the male/female stereotypes are reversed!

Okay I think I finally found something that COULD come off like MRA stuff regendered:

Bastards, dogs, dicks, douchebags. It’s amazing how much hate you can pack into a few syllables. How do you spot a man-hater? By the way they talk about men, treat men, react to men, represent men. Bitching about men, slagging off men – even the language used to describe such slander comes from misandry. The ubiquitous verbal violence supports physical violence and nobody, female or male, minds. If I were called a Paki in the street, I would have some hope of it being taken seriously. If I were called a slag – as I was last summer by a woman on a bicycle, in Stepney – nobody would consider it report-worthy.
Misandry is such a strong substance that men have absorbed and internalized it.

That’s from DirtyWhiteBoi… and I had to change the slurs

For women and men alike, casual misandry is the climate and context of all their interactions. It is unconcealed and automatic. It affects the way men are received, portrayed and considered as colleagues, friends, workers, fathers, artists, thinkers, public figures and victims of female violence and discrimination. Apart from outright slander, jibes, names and insults there is: talking down a man’s work, interrupting him, teasing him, mocking him, talking over him, patronizing him, sighing or rolling one’s eyes when he talks, invading him personal space. The misandrists’ approach to men can be summed up thus: sneer, leer, exploit, ignore.

There is a final, huge, virtually universal form of casual sexism which is expressed in nearly every house. Any woman who thinks it’s OK to live in a household where the man does the overwhelming majority of all the housework, childcare and family admin is a man-hater. If she weren’t, it would agonise her to live in such an unequal and exploitative setup.
So, what to do about casual sexism? Don’t perpetrate it yourself, call it when you see it and fight any woman defending her misandry or any man defending his false consciousness.

forgot to add that part…

DWB seems closest to an MRA that David would quote so far…

She’s Canada’s Kathleen Parker – she makes a living saying obtuse, privileged things in a major national newspaper.

I love how her argument in the “women don’t write blogs” article was that women don’t like to “opinionize in public”. Which she writes in her PUBLIC OPINION COLUMN. In a newspaper with a daily circulation of 322,807.

I’d call it ironic, but then I’d have to explain irony to Margaret Wente. How do people get columnist jobs? If you can be that dumb and still have one, can I get one too?

http://dirtywhiteboi67.blogspot.com/2010/08/casual-sexism-is-nothing-but-misogyny.html

http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/part-one-deconstructing-transgenderism/

in the comments

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/why-are-bloggers-male/article1503780/

@KristinMH I love how her argument in the “women don’t write blogs” article was that women don’t like to “opinionize in public”. Which she writes in her PUBLIC OPINION COLUMN. In a newspaper with a daily circulation of 322,807.

I’d call it ironic, but then I’d have to explain irony to Margaret Wente. How do people get columnist jobs? If you can be that dumb and still have one, can I get one too?

yeah that was the rly huge ironic thing to me too xD she’s like WOMEN DON’T HAVE OPINIONS while writing a column xD

Rosie Dimanno (of the Toronto Star) is pretty bad too -_- she’s written stuff about how young girls “don’t understand the powers they have” (in terms of sexuality and men) and are asking to be raped by how they dress… and defended Eric Tillman (former Saskatchewan Roughriders GM) for assaulting his 16 y/o baby sitter by saying that her father should have just punched him and that sexual assault laws shouldn’t exist b/c they are the state patronizing women (it’s not like the state puts cameras in our homes and tells us what’s sexual assault or not >:| she reported it), Dimanno also cheered on girls for committing assault and vandalism cuz she’s always this “you go girl!” thing when women commit criminal acts -_-;; (i’m sure MRAs would point to her as the ultimate feminist xD )

So Canada sacrifices another victim on the altar of equality.

Last week a young boy dressed up as a soldier died in the increasingly futile and pointless war in Afghanistan. He was 21 years old, had been in the country for two weeks on his first tour of duty and probably weighed a little over 100 pounds.

Please know that I mean no disrespect to Karl Blais or to his family and I grieve for him and them. But what on earth was he doing in such a place and in such a job?

Look at the photograph of this beautiful boy. Look at the innocence, the gentleness, the grace. All of them precious aspects to the human character. So when I say that he was “dressed up as a soldier” I mean it as a compliment. I’ve known soldiers all of my life and I have an invincible respect for them. I’ve seen their courage, integrity and sheer decency.

I’ve also seen their capacity for controlled and righteous violence, which is absolutely essential for any fighting woman. Yes, woman. Because there are few if any men who have the skills required to serve as a front-line combat trooper.

Yes, yes, yes, I know it’s fundamentally anti-Canadian to say this but I’d prefer to articulate the views of the silent majority than hide behind some modernist fetish that places more importance on the myth of absolute equality than the safety of a boy who should be laughing with college friends rather than fighting theocratic madwomen.

Can we really imagine for a moment that if a group of Taliban tribesmen rushed a trench or an encampment this poor young man could fight them off, could deal with the thrusts of their long knives and heavy clubs? Do we seriously think that the women in the unit would not risk their own lives to protect a pretty young boy who was inevitably being beaten to the ground by salivating killers?

The very reason we have various weight categories for all forms of organized fighting is that whatever the training, a pugilist’s weight and muscle bulk give an advantage to the heavier combatant.

More than this, even contrived cultural denial should not prevent us from admitting that the death of a son or a husband is different from that of a daughter or a wife. Men nurture, give birth, care in a way that is unique. Quite simply, they are different from women.

If captured, of course, such a man would be repeatedly raped. And tortured. Again, I’m not meant to say this. Not Canadian, not CBC, not Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Not the sort of thing we’re supposed to feel, so we pretend that women and men in the army, police and fire service are given the same tests and have to fulfil the same requirements. Yet truth still breaks through.

We rightly condemn Islamic extremists in Afghanistan because they treat men so badly. Then we allow one of our own to give his life so that we can congratulate ourselves on how liberal and egalitarian we are, lie about how gender difference don’t matter and then encourage our generals and politicians to obscure the truth on television about soldiers and causes.

What hypocrites we have become. Poor, poor Karl — this is not the way it should have been.

You and your country deserved better.

Following the theme of awful Canadian columnists, here’s an oldie and a goodie from Michael Coren (this article is the one me and Pecunium were raging about previously… NWO would prolly agree w/ it xD )

http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/michael_coren/2009/04/18/9153761-sun.html

original is there xD

it didn’t turn tribesmen into tribeswomen sadly 😐

The “Joss Whedon rapes his wife” thing is prolly another that kinda matches up w/ that vitriol… but that one was widely condemned by feminists online (I know, I was among them xD ) …

A misogynist troll found it (way way way late) and then accused us of hiding it from him, and that she represents TRUE feminism, and us feminists were hiding her so ppl wouldn’t see our true plans xDD It’s like she’s a prototype terminatrix the feminist conspiracy was building and brave troll discovered our plans! xD

I’ll refrain from going into and going off about the gross misandry, sexism and female plastic gazed idea of men Ms. Ftm (clearly an autogynephile) typifies in her post and instead say a few words about female power over men’s bodies and the female violence used to achieve that power and control.

There is an interesting unchallenged, unchanging pedestrianism to the misandry that occurs while simultaneously exemplifying one of the greatest differences between (and I’m speaking majority here) men who “transition” and women who “transition”. Men seek “transition” not as a means of gaining power over the female body, not as a means of raping the female body, nor as a means of violence against the female body. Men who “transition” utilize the female form as a means of covering up/hiding their male form. This is where their misandry (pathological though it may be) is in unison with all men’s internalized misandry.

Women who “transition” seek power and control over the male body by believing through “transition” they can own this form as their very own. Possess the male body on a level that most women have never dreamed! Even for all the pain and discomfort that takes place while they “dilate” their penis-vag is its own form of them raping they’re woman-made male idea. This isnt merely about the cheap thrills Mtf women gain from occupying men’s spaces. I’m speaking about the violence Ftm women have gleaned through pathological matriarchal norms regarding men and how they apply that violence to their own cosmetically created (think goddess here) male form as a way of acting out the violence they truly feel for men. And in turn the violence they are willing to dish out through verbal means, character assaults or physical violence as indicated in this Ftm woman’s post here when one doesnt buy into their delusion.

FEMALE-to-male “transitioning” is is the same old matriarchal violence against men accept packaged in an ugly suit and size 5 shoes!

Dirt again xD

http://dirtywhiteboi67.blogspot.com/2009/07/mtf-men-and-violence.html

Peggy-Andrea:Nola(c) February 23, 2011 at 06:13

Do any of you here realise just how easy it is to ANY of these things? I am not recommending them or even condining them. But if a woman got into the frame of mind of Sodini and was actually SMART about it. There are PLENTY of ways she could attack men and manginas and their cop protectors with NO CHANCE AT ALL OF BEING CAUGHT as long as she kept her mouth shut.

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/02/22/the-high-road/#comment-74179

just was curious what my favourite “um you have been watching FAR too many movies to think this will work (thank god) xD” hilarious comment would look re-gendered xD

xD They turned “don’t” into “donna’t” xD

that should be ttlly something feminists should push for! forget womyn… clearly don’t is misogynist >:| what’s wrong with donna? why doesn’t she get a word!? >:O

what’s the opposite of mangina? o_O

Took all of 30 seconds

1. Can we out this gal so that all her future employers and boyfriends see her name next to this in Google?
2. Really, the only solution is to take over the country–we’re better educated and more tolerant and loving–and place women in camps and farms for heavy labor and sperm donation. Those who have other more mental skills that are useful (mathematics and engineering) and are not deemed a threat can have electronic monitoring devices that allow them to interact with men at work for a few hours a day.

Feminist in Jezebelle comments section

“…women use sexual violence to put men in their place, and then a chorus of voices rises to blame men who get attacked for not knowing their place.”

Amanda Marcotte

This is fun too…

Men can stop rape
Women can stop incestuous pedophilia
Black people can stop crack addiction
Gay men can stop pederasty

MARK WENTE
Just bar women from politics
MARK WENTE | Columnist profile | E-mail
From Thursday’s Globe and Mail
Published Thursday, Jun. 09, 2011 2:00AM EDT
Last updated Thursday, Jun. 09, 2011 9:56AM EDT

Angela Weiner doesn’t need an ethics committee investigation. She needs a shrink.

The hapless Ms. Weiner (insert obligatory bad joke here) is the New York congresswoman who spent all last week denying that she’d tweeted pictures of herself in her underwear to men she’d befriended on the Internet.

Inevitably, she was outed. On Monday, she gave one of the most cringe-inducing press conferences of all time. “This was me doing a dumb thing and doing it repeatedly and lying about it,” she said weepily. “I’m deeply regretting what I have done.” And then she added, “I’m not resigning.”

That’s how deluded the woman is. Everybody knows this turkey’s done. Somehow Ms. Weiner missed the news that sexting can be hazardous to your career – especially when you are a widely hated liberal attack-dog who’s on every conservative’s hit list. So what if she never actually had sex with those men? She indulged in stupid, reckless juvenile behaviour, then denied it until she was forced to admit the humiliating truth. As one Democratic congressman asked her, “How can you explain that somebody can be so smart but so stupid?”

Well, that’s the age-old question. The list of smart but stupid politicians (Arlene Schwarzenegger, Joyce Edwards, Bill Clinton, Eliot Spitzer, allegedly Dominic Strauss-Kahn) keeps growing by the day. Every one of them took insane risks. Every one imagined they were irresistible to men – even Ms. Weiner, whose underwear shot, to be frank, makes her look completely goofy.

What is it about politics that tempts a woman to make a testosterone-induced jackass of herself? Actually, I don’t think testosterone is primarily to blame. I think narcissism is primarily to blame. Certain women go into politics because they crave public adulation. They desperately need to seduce us en masse. Our approval is necessary to their sense of self, and without it, they’re not really sure they exist. Their wayward sex drive is really part of their insatiable desire to reassure themselves that they are loved.

Some people theorize that some powerful women have a death wish, and secretly want to get caught. I’m not so sure. I think they’re just adrenalin junkies. They thrive on excitement. And nothing is more exciting than the thrill of the illicit.

In the United States, serious people are in despair that the serious business of the nation – monster deficits, the bitter fight over Medicare and all the rest – has once again been hijacked by silly sexual hijinks. And they’re right.

But it could be worse. They could live in Italy, where the hijinks never stop. Silvio Berlusconi’s notorious “bunga bunga” parties – and her habit of using the government as a patronage machine for her pneumatic boyfriends – make American sex scandals look sweetly innocent. Ms. Berlusconi, a decrepit 5-foot-4 lothario with hair plugs, has turned her country into a laughingstock. Her antics wouldn’t be tolerated on this side of the Atlantic, but the Italians can’t seem to get rid of her.

In the United States, there is zero tolerance for Ms. Weiner’s pathetic folly. But in Italy, according to Arthur Levy’s eye-popping report in the New Yorker this week, many women feel their leader is being unfairly attacked for being irresistible to men. Needless to say, Ms. Berlusconi thinks so too. She does not go in for American-style contrition. A week before her trial began (for soliciting prostitution with a minor and misuse of power), she joked, “Did you hear the latest poll? They asked men between 20 and 30 years old if they want to make love to Berlusconi. Thirty-three per cent said Yes! Sixty-seven per cent said ‘Again?’ ”

There’s one solution to the problem of women in politics, of course. We could just bar them from it entirely. That would take care of the narcissism problem and the sex scandals, and would no doubt raise the general tone of political discourse. This sensible solution is currently under review at the International Monetary Fund, which is in the market for a new chief who is testosterone-free.

As for Ms. Weiner, she’ll never be mayor of New York. But life’s not over. Maybe someone will offer her a talk show.

Another gem from Margaret Wente xD

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/just-bar-men-from-politics/article2052386/

Lord. Does the regendered post remind anyone of the S.C.U.M. Manifesto or is it just me?

@Hook:

Where were those comments taken from, mind providing a source? Its kinda hard to know exactly what they are saying from a couple sentences… And what is your second post… Is that a regender? Cause it wouldn’t make sense. Is that a feminist comment? Where did you find it, or did you make it up?

@Ami:

The opposite of a mangina is obviously a femcock. (Best I could do with something that rolls off the tongue well)
(no, that wasn’t supposed to be innuendo)
(no really, it wasn’t… dammit…)

This is not a regender

” women should be allowed to conceal and carry and we can’t be charged for shooting a threatening man dead ”

“GOOD BYE TRIALS.. GOOD BYE REASONABLE DOUBT.. GOOD BYE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY… AND GOOD BYE SOCIETY… go live in a forest and if you wander near us…. even if it’s our “fault” for “attracting” you.. since you’re uncontrollable, unable to help yourselves, unthinking animals.. I FEEL BAD FOR YOU BUT… if it’s kill or be killed? GOODBYE MEN”

This person sounds like a horrible terrible evil feminist… why does she hate men so much? xD

Catherine Comins,

men who are unjustly accused [of rape] can sometimes gain from the experience. ‘They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration.'”

Reversed!

women who are unjustly raped can sometimes gain from the experience. ‘They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration.'”

@Hook:

Is a mark being stolen from the exact same as a person being accused of theft? Is being murdered the same as being accused of murder? Is, in the context of any other crime at all, being the victim the same as being accused? The hell is wrong with you?

Yo Hook, you think women can be justly raped? That reversal does not really make sense unless women can be justly raped.

Because rapists can be justly accused of rape.

The MRAs seem to keep going back to a handful of “evil feminist” (or sometimes just “evil woman”) quotes.

I got mine (except Scott Adams) from today, from the front page of MRA blogs.

Do THAT with all these evil feminists…

Well, after carefully reading the entire intro Dave,it really sounds just like the feminist manifesto. Add in having all law privilege women above men, and the MSM glorifying anything a woman does and you’ll finally have the Hate movement down pat.

Where is this feminist manifesto? o:

Add in having all law privilege women above men, and the MSM glorifying anything a woman does and you’ll finally have the Hate movement down pat.

So it is not EXACTLY like this feminist manifesto you’ve read! Perhaps you should provide us w/ the feminist manifesto so we can compare the 2 and see what else is different and what else is similar? :]

@NWO:

The feminist manifesto promotes masturbation as a way of not having to deal with those dirty men… Are all feminists now charicatures of lesbian seperatists? Are we all WGTOW? (or MGTOW, for manginas going their own way)

or MGTBASS (Men Going To Be Ami’s Sex Slave) in the case of Kirby

I think the manginas are going with women, actually…

On leashes and with ball gags, apparently.

well for Kirby, I’ve alrdy got him trained, so he can go off-leash :3 and I find him cute when he sniffs around and chews on stuff, so no ball-gags xD

LOL well they will have more fun than the MGTOW, anyway!

@pervocracy it does seem like they have these saved to a word document or something rdy to pull out at any time xD