Today, as many of you no doubt know, is Gay Pride Day. Here in Chicago, that means the annual Pride Parade, a celebration of all things LGBTQetc — and a nice aerobic workout for parade participants. (Gyrating on a float for three hours dressed in a leather harness and thong will burn roughly 1000 calories. But beware of chafing!)
Rookh Kshatriya, proprieter of the Anglobitch blog (devoted to the notion that women in the Anglosphere are, well, bitches), has evidently decided to celebrate Pride Weekend by offering us all his theories on gay male sexuality. Which is to say, his theory that there is no such thing as gay male sexuality, and that all those gay men out marching today would much rather be spending their Sunday eating bagels and doing the New York Times crossword puzzle with some comely (non-lesbian) lasses.
Yep, in Rookh’s World, gay men – or, as he puts it, “gay” men — are actually nothing more than exceptionally horny straight men who have been unfairly denied sex-on-demand with women of their choosing.
Let’s let him explain this:
Despite their rhetoric about lifestyles and the contemplation of flowers, gay men are clearly entranced by orgasm to an extent far surpassing that of heterosexual men.
Alas, in our Feminazified world, women sometimes refuse to have sex with men. Deprived a natural outlet for their sexy urges, horny dudes have to, well, improvise a bit. Why try to finagle your way into a vagina assiduously guarded by some dumb lady, when other dudes just as horny as you have holes of their own available for the asking?
As Rookh sees it, these uber-horny dudes really have no other choice.
[A]re most gay men just hyper-sexualized males – a self-selecting group whose priapic urges can only be satisfied by rejecting the relative sexual deprivation inescapably attendant on heterosexuality? The more one considers this possibility, the more plausible it seems. Even some badass with the looks of Apollo, the Game of Roissy and the confidence of a warlord would struggle to enter a nightclub and say: “I want sex NOW!” and expect to get it.
A terrible, terrible injustice. But there is a way out:
Yet homosexual men can enter any gay bath house in any Anglosphere city, say the very same words and expected to be sexually serviced by several men in a matter of minutes! In short, the sexual mismatch between the sexes makes the heterosexual lifestyle a poor option for any hyper-sexualized male – a non-option, in fact, if he wants to fully slake his sexual thirsts. By contrast, adopting homosexuality allows him to instantly indulge his every sexual whim in every manner conceivable.
Unless, of course, these whims involve sex with, you know, women. But lust is apparently stronger than mere sexual orientation. As Rookh sees it, homosexuality is the only rational choice for uber-horny men – even if they’d rather be boning women.
Since sex is so scarce and difficult to acquire in a heterosexual context, it simply makes no sense for an Anglo-American male with priapic urges to remain heterosexual – hence the self-selection of hyper-sexualized males towards homosexual lifestyles, not to mention the hyper-sexualized nature of homosexuality itself.
Is this all a prelude to a touching coming-out announcement by our man Rookh?
No such luck. It’s actually an excuse for, yes, more feminism-bashing. For it is the evil feminists who, in Rookh’s world, have been encouraging the “female sexual ostracism” of poor suffering straight men:
As we all know, women seek to control men by limiting sexual supply, be it representational (pornography) or actual (prostitution) – and that feminism is, essentially, an institution created for that purpose.
And so, in Rookh’s world,
homosexuality has advanced in lock-step with feminism. … [F]eminism – by assailing marital monogamy and allowing women to indulge their primordial attraction to dangerous thugs, moronic bullies and swaggering plutocrats – produced an unwanted ‘rump’ of educated, economically stable but sexually disenfranchised males. Given that gay males are disproportionately intelligent, solvent and educated, it is fairly obvious that members of this group have opted for homosexuality as a means of escaping the living death of involuntary celibacy, that the two phenomena are in fact closely related and that feminism is directly responsible for the advancement of homosexuality across the Anglosphere.
Feminism, by encouraging women to say “no” when they don’t actually want to have sex, may have created modern homosexuality, in Rookh’s view. But that doesn’t mean that feminists actually like gay dudes. No. Ick!
[T]he vast majority of Anglo females detest gay men as vehemently as they hate men in general. … the real link between pan-Anglosphere feminism and homosexuality [is that] the latter is a reaction to the former, which hates it with boundless counter-reactionary zeal.
Yeah, seems to me that the only one here who really “detest[s] gay men” is, well, Rookh, so much so that he’s decided to completely erase gay male sexuality – to put “gay” in scare quotes – in order to give himself another opportunity to run down feminists and women in general.
Now, human sexuality is a weird, messy, complicated, wonderful thing. It may well be that some bisexual men end up having sex with men more often than with women because they find it easier to find male sex partners for casual sex. But guys who are thoroughly gay – who would score a 6 on the famous Kinsey scale – don’t actually want to have sex with women. They really don’t. Drop a beautiful, eligible, horny (straight or mostly straight) woman in the midst of a bunch of Kinsey 6 guys, and this is what you get:
Court’s free!
Futrelle, it all really revolves around the actions of the beta women (who I would say make up roughly 50% of the female population). As I said, these betas chase alpha cock, but for the most part can’t lock it down. They can get one-night stands from alphas, but (in general) they won’t be in healthy relationships. They also usually get treated like crap because they’re trying to date out of their league. But I feel no sympathy because, in other words, beta women choose this shit over a normal, healthy relationship with a beta male (their natural male counterpart). I think part of it might be the fact that women have inflated views of themselves due to a female supremacist society, and so beta women can’t accept their beta status. In this sense the old motif “treating women like crap makes them love you” holds some water, except it’s not the “treating them like crap” part that they like. It’s just the fact that they’re so fucking desperate for alpha attention they’ll put up with that shit over being treated like a normal person by a male beta.
So this is the situation. Alpha men and alpha women are all good, they’re mostly in relationships. Beta women are spending countless time and energy getting randomly fucked by alpha men over just talking to beta men (their counterparts). Omega women are omega by choice, so whatever. Omega and (for the most part) beta men (60-80% of the population) get to be basically involuntarily celibate for most of their lives, maybe getting a few lucky lays and a lucky marriage at 45 after a lifetime of frustration.
Uh oh… I’m a physical construct! :O
I imagine myself as some giant walking mechanical terror now xD Like… an AT-AT! Or an AA-AA for me! 😀
*tromps around shooting lasers* xDDD
Jesus, is this still the MRAL Therapy Board?
I flatly do not want tobelieve men are as mean as women. I don’t want tobelieve it. I simply don’twant to believe it. I choose tosee truckloads of evidence every fucking day.
FTFY.
@MRAL (if you didn’t read my comment above, which you SHOULD b/c you can imagine us clubbing and hanging out 😀 I think it’d be fun! And I’d ttlly get you into the best clubs and to meet the hottest ppl 😀 )
How do you know all this? o_O How are you so sure?
Actually I like Spearhafoc’s thing better
I’m a ring construct! 😀
Okay, who’s ring was I constructed from? o_O
(also spear, which comic shop do you frequent? maybe we’ve met before o_o)
@NWO:
Hooray! I’m so honored to accept this award, I want to thank all the people who made it possible.
…
hmm….
Really, its just because Ami screwed with his work day. Thanks Ami!
@MRAL:
So basically, you feel sorry for all those beta women who are chasing the guy of their dreams that will never love them, never realizing that they could find love if only they could look away? Towards you? Or is it more “I’m never getting laid if all these beta women keep chasing alphas, and I don’t want to sleep with Omegas because why would I want to date someone below me on the scale?”
I’m more straight than not, but there’s something about Tom of Finland…
Not so. The statistics just don’t agree with you. The average age that males lose their virginity is 17. You and I are statistical outliers.
Comics N’ More, usually. Silver Snail, occasionally.
MRAL, so how exactly did you arrive at these conclusions? They sound a lot like MRA/MGTOW/PUA soundbites and most of them bear very little resemblance to the real world as I know it. So, [citation needed] for most of these assertions.
Some of them are so ludicrously wrong I can’t believe you can type them with a straight face. 60-80% of men involuntarily celibate? Uh, no. According to the Kinsey institute:
90% of men and 86% of women have had sex in the past year
18-29 year olds have sex an average of 112 times per year, 30-39 year olds an average of 86 times per year, and 40-49 year olds an average of 69 times per year
http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/FAQ.html#frequency
Lesee… Roissy says I’m an Omega (or a mangina, or both). This guys says I’m only straight because I’m “undersexed”, and MRAL says I’m a 5’9″ inch, 120 lb. Alpha.
No wonder people say greek is hard.
MRAL, you do realize that about 60% of adult women are overweight?
If all overweight women are all omegas; and 20% of women are alphas; how can 50% be betas?
Are you a hypocrite, or do you just really suck at math?
Men lie about this stuff, because out misandrist society shames men who don’t Fuck Like An Alpha. And that’s taking into account ALL men, including 30-35+ married people.
@David:
You know just as well as I that only Alpha assholes and bitches answer polls like that. Beta males are so opressed they can’t even answer in anonymous polls for fear of being ridiculed.
Well Fuck. Fucking hell. MRAL, why the hell do you have to go POE on me and prove my sarcasm correct? Just.. Why would you do that?
MRAL – we’re just going to have to agree to disagree. My partner who is 6’3″, a little overweight and a nerd (plays D&D, got bullied a lot at school for being a ‘wog’) and by your rough outline is a beta, has had LOTS of sex with a variety of women. I mean, his ‘number’ is in the high teens. And one of my friends refers to him as an ‘honorary skirt’ because he is perfectly happy to hang out with groups of women and isn’t phased by lengthy discussions of periods/uncomfortable sexual experiences etc. So, yes, he treats women like human beings…and he has gotten lots of heterosexual sex.
Facts be damned. If it feels true to MRAL, it must be gospel.
I’ll use this as an excuse to post one of my favourite Kids in the Hall bits.
Lol! Though, seriously, JUST herbal tea and pain killers? The list is much longer: hot water bottle, tea, chocolate, pain killers, back rub… just to name a few 😉
He’s 6’3, I knew it. That’s automatic Beta Status (at least). As I said, women have a FUCKING CLINICAL OCD-like obsession with height.
And despite the posturing on this site, almost all the boyfriends mentioned are tall. Bunch of fucking hypocrites.
I have OCD. I fail to see how that fits, even if we assume the motives you do.
More Kids in the Hall. Similar subject matter.
@MRAL:
Nope. You just ignore everyone who says their boyfriends are short. But in a fair society, you’d expect an even distribution across height (or at least the same distribution that height is). So some will have tall boyfriends. *shrug*
No, 8/10 of the boyfriends mentioned are above 5’11. Fuck this place.
In a way I prefer classic alpha bitches. It’s analogous to the North and the South during the civil rights era. Many black activists actually preferred the South because they were upfront about their racism and hatred- “we don’t like you, and that’s it.” Whereas the North was much more difficult, and smiled out of one side of their mouth while grimacing distastefully with the other.
Feminism is the North.
“And despite the posturing on this site, almost all the boyfriends mentioned are tall. Bunch of fucking hypocrites.”
I have dated one person much shorter than me (5’4″), one much taller (6’8″), two slightly shorter (5’7″-5’8″) and two slightly taller (5’10”-6’ish). I realize I’m just a single data point here (an anecdote, if you will) but just speaking up to fight the possibility of confirmation bias….