Quiz: Which of the following is an example of female infidelity? (Check all that apply.)
a) A man and a woman are in a monogamous relationship; neither one sleeps with anyone else.
b) A man and a woman are in a monogamous relationship; the man sleeps with someone else.
c) A man and a woman are in a monogamous relationship; the woman sleeps with someone else.
d) A woman, who may or may not be in a monogamous relationship, works hard at a job she enjoys.
ANSWER: If you answered c, congratulations! You are correct. If you also answered d, you are probably PUA guru and freelance internet asshole “Roissy” or one of his douchey fans. In a recent post Roissy argues, quite sincerely, that women who take their careers seriously are committing a sort of psycho-social-sexual crime against men.
In the post, Roissy quotes a reader of his who’d suggested that “female career obsession [is] a form of infidelity to the family and marrage.” Roissy seconds this opinion and goes on to argue that:
Women who place their careers front and center are committing a kind of betrayal of their sex’s biological and psychological imperatives. It’s like a big middle finger to everything that distinguishes the feminine from the masculine, the yin from the yang.
Is it possible that these women are just, you know, really into their careers? That they’re good at what they do and enjoy doing it? That they want to make a difference in the world? That they might have a family to support? Or that, you know, they simply like making a lot of money?
Of course not. For Roissy, careers are little more than psychological crutches for women who are 1) trying to distract themselves from loneliness and/or sexual boredom:
It’s quite possible that the worst offenders — the 14 hour day lawyercunts and the graduate school hermits — embrace the male-oriented rat race and achievement spectacle because it offers a welcome distraction from either spinsterly loneliness or boring beta male partners who, while intellectually are rationalized as good matches, do not viscerally excite them.
Or, 2) imagining themselves as the heroines in some glamorous romance novel:
Maybe, too, these careerist chicks see their jobs as a way to enter the world of the alpha male, to have a taste of what it would be like to be part of his life. The office cubes and doormen and glassy skyscrapers have given legions of plain janes the daily stimulation to mentally masturbate fantasy romances with the alpha males who run their companies or the alpha salesmen who greet them at the front desk with a twinkle in their eyes.
Or, 3) trying to magically ward off the case of the uglies that apparently infects each and every woman when she hits the age of 40:
When a woman’s SMV [Sexual Market Value] inevitably craters in her 40s, her career might be all she has to lift her spirits, especially if she has no husband she loves, no kids, or even just one kid who spends most of his time playing CoD or robbing convenience stores.
Of course, in Roissy’s mind, these women aren’t quite women to begin with, even before they get hit with the 40th birthday ugly stick:
[T]here is something “off” about women who are excessively devoted to their careers and to obtaining an acronymic parade of pointless credentials. Careerist shrikes are some of the most unpleasant, unfeminine women to be around. They must have more androgen receptors than normal women to be so grating to the male sensibility. Sure, they can fuck like Viagra-laced male pornstars, but as soon as you relieve yourself in them you will feel a second powerful urge to escape their aggro nastiness.
Yeah, somehow I’m guessing that urge to flee is pretty strong in these women as well, as soon as they realize that they guy they’ve just had sex with is a pretentious narcissistic windbag who hates women.
Roissy continues, revealing far more about his own sexual insecurities than about any actual career women:
The women for whom career success is their comfort and their purpose are some sort of weird, monstrous amalgam of man and woman, halfway between both worlds, their sexual polarity askew. These types tend to attract either intense short term flings with alphas or plodding marriages with dweeby, effete kitchen bitches.
Roissy is vaguely aware that feminists – not to mention pretty much anyone who isn’t a complete douchebag misogynist – might have a few issues with his theories here.
The dumbfuck feminists will naturally ask, “Why doesn’t this same theory apply to men? Aren’t they escaping sad love lives by retreating to their careers?”
Don’t you know it’s different for guys? Unlike women, men are evolutionarily programmed to be resource providers for women. It is not a betrayal of a man’s innate purpose in life to ambitiously pursue achievement and accolades. In fact, just the opposite; it’s an affirmation of that ancient purpose.
Remember this, you ungrateful career ladies: WE HUNTED THE MAMMOTH TO FEED YOU!
If it’s “against nature” for a woman to have a career, then isn’t it also unnatural to use computers? Isn’t it “against nature” to use modern medicine to treat deadly diseases? We should also be living in log cabins, without air conditioning, refrigerators and the like. Oh, and no more grocery stores; we must now hunt and gather again.
Nature’s great and all, but the nice thing is that, as a species, we evolve to separate ourselves from the more…unpleasant parts. In this case, society has evolved enough to accept that women can be just as fulfilled as men when it comes to their careers– well, except for the individuals who are still stuck in a 19th-century mindset.
So, careers in general are unnatural. Men shouldn’t be doctors, lawyers or coal miners, when they should hunting mammoths. I hearby declare that I will quit my job and never work again the day a mammoth is laid before me. I’ll gather blueberries instead.
Ohh, thanks Ami – I’ll check now 🙂
Poor, poor pitiful kirby has no logic skills and continually uses at least one of the seventeen methods of truth suppression in each of his delusional feminist retorts. .
Feminism is sadism. Those who are sadistic engage in sadistic rituals. Modern feminism is a creation of the NWO/Illuminati who are satanists. Some sadistic rituals include rectal sodomy, treachery, sadomasochism, child abuse, psychological abuse, physical abuse, homosexuality, vulgarity, cat porn, male bi-sexuality and a turning away from God.
Those that abuse children take jobs as teachers mainly say the statistics. No surprise there are so many teachers wannabees here seeing as how this is a site where sadists/feminists attack anti-feminists.
As far as clean energy goes how many people here are using thin film solar panels? I am. How many people bike or have a small car. I do.
Modern feminism has nothing to do with equal rights. It is a way for the powers that be to cause conflict and plunder the USA’s wealth.
Feminism hurts women the most. Man and woman are naturally meant to work together and not compete. If females want to compete with testosterone then go ahead. In the long run men win because we are more understanding of socio-economics then women are. Men can adapt and build. Feminists are destroyers of society while anti-feminists are builders.
The teaching profession will be radically different soon. School will be free over the Internet after the USA collapses financially. That is just a business reality.
Feminism is just one tool of the sadistic powers that be. False flags such as Northwoods and 9/11 operations are other sadistic tools used to plunder the wealth of a country. Feminists are easily duped and turned into mindless zombies and shills like kirby..
I am posting here for various reasons. y posting here I also confirm my research on the posting patterns of feminists. i also determine what professions feminists tend to go into. It is clear the feminists are not able to compete with adults so they are targeting children. That is a very clear pattern
I get called names but they don’t effect me. I am not a kid. Sadists abuse kids so their tactics don’t work on me seeing as how i am an adult.
Feminists promote the most unhealthy, unnatural and violent sexual behaviors. Look to catholic priests as an example. Yes, the catholic church is feminist.
It’s no surprise to me that many feminists here go out of their way to be around young kids. It’s no surprise that many here are teachers which has an extremely high rate of abuse against children. .
I for one will donate my time to ensure school is put on the Internet for free so anti-feminists can have a safe place to learn.
“could take him to court for libel”
Lol, oh yeah what statements seeing as you have posted slanderous and libel against AWS. Fact is I don’t believe the females here should be leading children. Fact is teachers most often are the group that abuse children. I do believe feminists are sadists. You admit you are a feminist and I believe you are a sadist.
Anytime you want to meet in court let me know where I can file to sue your delusional, feminist, illogical bones.
Yes, I do believe you are nitwit with poor reading comprehension levels. Also you should wait until you are 21 to start drinking even though the feminist females here are p[pushing alcohol onto you especially the ones that lead cub scouts.
“AWS: What’s wrong with the MGTOW movement?”
http://www.theghostnation.com/forums/topic/14638-niceguymgtow-gang-stalking/
Ok, cat porn, this guy has to be a joke!
Also:
Man and woman are naturally meant to work together and not compete.
So when my fiance and I cook dinner together are we working together and therefore being anti-feminist or am I driving him away with my horrible feminist inability to cook on my own? Inquiring minds want to know!!
“my horrible feminist inability to cook on my own?”
You are driving him away with your horrible feminist inability to cook.
The cat porn was for David who has a feminist fascination with it. Another trait of feminists is that they have no sense of humor while anti-feminists are always ready to have a good time responsibly.
Here is a link to a very cool anti-feminist housewife: http://www.happyhousewivesclub.com/
“that means that feminists are mostly child molesters’
So the stats say.
Ah, so inability to cook (which was a joke – I can actually cook just fine on my own, we just like to do it together) trumps working together. Got it.
What stats would those be? The stats you pulled out of your ass?
Another trait of feminists is that they have no sense of humor
I promise you, we are totally laughing at you. That counts as a sense of humor even if you don’t like it.
“Modern feminism is a creation of the NWO/Illuminati who are satanists. Some sadistic rituals include rectal sodomy, treachery, sadomasochism, child abuse, psychological abuse, physical abuse, homosexuality, vulgarity, cat porn, male bi-sexuality and a turning away from God.”
Please explain how homosexuality and bisexuality are sadistic. Also…the Illuminati created feminism? Citation please.
“Those that abuse children take jobs as teachers mainly say the statistics. No surprise there are so many teachers wannabees here seeing as how this is a site where sadists/feminists attack anti-feminists.”
[citation needed]
“If females want to compete with testosterone then go ahead. In the long run men win because we are more understanding of socio-economics then women are.”
[citation needed]
“Men can adapt and build. Feminists are destroyers of society while anti-feminists are builders.”
[citation needed]
“The teaching profession will be radically different soon. School will be free over the Internet after the USA collapses financially. That is just a business reality.”
[citation needed]
“I am posting here for various reasons. y posting here I also confirm my research on the posting patterns of feminists.”
What type of analysis do you do? Please explain your methods in more detail, I’m curious.
“i also determine what professions feminists tend to go into. It is clear the feminists are not able to compete with adults so they are targeting children. That is a very clear pattern”
And how do you determine that? Again, methodology please. Do you have clear data on how accurate you are? What profession am I in?
“Feminists promote the most unhealthy, unnatural and violent sexual behaviors. Look to catholic priests as an example. Yes, the catholic church is feminist.”
[citation needed]
Here are the keywords that feminists, sadists, psychopaths, delusional pathological liars and criminals use frequently:
little
inability
shit
confused
promoting rectal sex
bat-shit insane
crap
gay old time
conspiratorial
my penis
dude
homophobe
gay animal sex
racist
doing your girlfriend in the ass
snicker
PiV sex
dipshit
BWAHAHAHAHA
took a big shit
*shrug*
And I’d still like to know your views on the moon landings.
Add “pulled out of your ass” to the list of keywords that feminists, sadists, psychopaths, delusional pathological liars and criminals use frequently.
Oh no, something I said got added to the list?!?!??? BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! Oh no now I’m on the list again???? (snicker) Oh wait, did I just say something else that was on the list? *shrug* Aw man, I guess I must be some kind of super feminist sadist psychopath delusional pathological liar. And criminal. Doing your girlfriend in the ass.
OK, now I happen to know from watching The Rockford Files that the keywords frequently used by criminals actually consist of “hit”, “ice”, and “whack”.
AWS, those are your “results”, not your methodology. You also ignored everything else I said.
@AWS:
BWAHAHAHAHA! You are either profoundly confused or utterly inable to comprehend what actual argument is. Every post is as if you took a big shit of false information, then further pulled statistics and… labling certain words and phrases as sadistic? out of your ass. You are a conspiratorial racist homophobe, as depicted by you ignoring that gay sex is natural (animals do it all the time), and think that anying other than PiV sex is just a big gay old time. Well guess what, if I put my penis in my girlfriend’s ass, that doesn’t make me homosexual. You are factually incorrect.
Dude… listen… While I appreciate you taking the effort to explain why you think feminism is sadistic, your explanations are still repeated assertions with no basis in reality. And now your just taking keywords from each of us and declaring those as indictive of a sadistic persomality. *snicker* Your logic is still abhorrant, because each and every premise of yours (that sodomy is sadistic, that teachers are the main group that abuses children…) are not only demonstrably untrue, but profoundly idiotic. You are just making crap up, and thats not an argument, that’s inane bluster that only reflects on how poorly you reason.
You really are just a little dipshit.
Kirby, I salute you. You are by far the most feminist sadist psychopath delusional pathological liar and criminal ever, according to the list of keywords compiled by the renowned scholar AWS.
@Snowy:
Thanks. I only wish I remembered to fit my diabolical *shrug* in there. Oh wait. Score!
Man Boobz Bingo!
I’m actually surprised he hasn’t added [citation needed] as another criminal, sadistic, psychopathic, delusional pathological liar and feminist phrase. But seriously… Every bit of his “logic” is ass-backwards, starting with a conclusion like feminists are sadists, gathering evidence, like saying everything a feminist does is indicitive of sadism, then justifying the first opinion, by saying such evidence is now proof-positive that feminists are sadists.
Kirby – I’m surprised too! But I think you give him too much credit…I think he starts with his conclusions and then makes up evidence, no gathering necessary 😛
I am a bit of [citation needed] troll, I suppose, but I’m not convinced that’s a bad thing. Without being able to evaluate people’s sources, it mostly just turns into “You’re wrong!” “Nuh uh, YOU’RE wrong!” back and forth…