Quiz: Which of the following is an example of female infidelity? (Check all that apply.)
a) A man and a woman are in a monogamous relationship; neither one sleeps with anyone else.
b) A man and a woman are in a monogamous relationship; the man sleeps with someone else.
c) A man and a woman are in a monogamous relationship; the woman sleeps with someone else.
d) A woman, who may or may not be in a monogamous relationship, works hard at a job she enjoys.
ANSWER: If you answered c, congratulations! You are correct. If you also answered d, you are probably PUA guru and freelance internet asshole “Roissy” or one of his douchey fans. In a recent post Roissy argues, quite sincerely, that women who take their careers seriously are committing a sort of psycho-social-sexual crime against men.
In the post, Roissy quotes a reader of his who’d suggested that “female career obsession [is] a form of infidelity to the family and marrage.” Roissy seconds this opinion and goes on to argue that:
Women who place their careers front and center are committing a kind of betrayal of their sex’s biological and psychological imperatives. It’s like a big middle finger to everything that distinguishes the feminine from the masculine, the yin from the yang.
Is it possible that these women are just, you know, really into their careers? That they’re good at what they do and enjoy doing it? That they want to make a difference in the world? That they might have a family to support? Or that, you know, they simply like making a lot of money?
Of course not. For Roissy, careers are little more than psychological crutches for women who are 1) trying to distract themselves from loneliness and/or sexual boredom:
It’s quite possible that the worst offenders — the 14 hour day lawyercunts and the graduate school hermits — embrace the male-oriented rat race and achievement spectacle because it offers a welcome distraction from either spinsterly loneliness or boring beta male partners who, while intellectually are rationalized as good matches, do not viscerally excite them.
Or, 2) imagining themselves as the heroines in some glamorous romance novel:
Maybe, too, these careerist chicks see their jobs as a way to enter the world of the alpha male, to have a taste of what it would be like to be part of his life. The office cubes and doormen and glassy skyscrapers have given legions of plain janes the daily stimulation to mentally masturbate fantasy romances with the alpha males who run their companies or the alpha salesmen who greet them at the front desk with a twinkle in their eyes.
Or, 3) trying to magically ward off the case of the uglies that apparently infects each and every woman when she hits the age of 40:
When a woman’s SMV [Sexual Market Value] inevitably craters in her 40s, her career might be all she has to lift her spirits, especially if she has no husband she loves, no kids, or even just one kid who spends most of his time playing CoD or robbing convenience stores.
Of course, in Roissy’s mind, these women aren’t quite women to begin with, even before they get hit with the 40th birthday ugly stick:
[T]here is something “off” about women who are excessively devoted to their careers and to obtaining an acronymic parade of pointless credentials. Careerist shrikes are some of the most unpleasant, unfeminine women to be around. They must have more androgen receptors than normal women to be so grating to the male sensibility. Sure, they can fuck like Viagra-laced male pornstars, but as soon as you relieve yourself in them you will feel a second powerful urge to escape their aggro nastiness.
Yeah, somehow I’m guessing that urge to flee is pretty strong in these women as well, as soon as they realize that they guy they’ve just had sex with is a pretentious narcissistic windbag who hates women.
Roissy continues, revealing far more about his own sexual insecurities than about any actual career women:
The women for whom career success is their comfort and their purpose are some sort of weird, monstrous amalgam of man and woman, halfway between both worlds, their sexual polarity askew. These types tend to attract either intense short term flings with alphas or plodding marriages with dweeby, effete kitchen bitches.
Roissy is vaguely aware that feminists – not to mention pretty much anyone who isn’t a complete douchebag misogynist – might have a few issues with his theories here.
The dumbfuck feminists will naturally ask, “Why doesn’t this same theory apply to men? Aren’t they escaping sad love lives by retreating to their careers?”
Don’t you know it’s different for guys? Unlike women, men are evolutionarily programmed to be resource providers for women. It is not a betrayal of a man’s innate purpose in life to ambitiously pursue achievement and accolades. In fact, just the opposite; it’s an affirmation of that ancient purpose.
Remember this, you ungrateful career ladies: WE HUNTED THE MAMMOTH TO FEED YOU!
Makes you want to hug someone…*sings New York, New York off key*
I suspect NWO is rly angry right now and is either screaming some place or will show up tonite or tmrw with some angrily sarcastic thingie about how the feminist queer agenda state has done it and how happy we prolly all are and how we’re supporting pedophilia by cheering gay marriage on xD
Surely anything that increases the marriage rate is OK by NWO?
Good point, Magpie. And it benefits lots of men too!
Although I suspect the fact that the new law also will benefit stinky women is enough to cancel out any man-points.
It’s weird. I’m super happy about the law — and immediately my mind goes to how much more work there is to be done.
he doesn’t care about the marriage rates… just the amount of divorces per 1000 people (not married people) and the more ppl being married, the more chances there WILL be a divorce xD and he will be upset : he knows every time there is a divorce, a kitten dies : and a feminist hatches o_o
I really like the part about the recession being caused by female managers and feminized CEOs. Methinks someone has not been around any C-suites or investment bankers. Calling them them retrograde is an understatement.
Nice try, lil’ troll.
Just to spell things out for NWO here – 4.77 hours a day includes: grocery shopping, cooking, preparing food, planning meals and not just doing the laundry. I also calculated it off of a 5 day work week rather than 7 days – at 7 days a week it would be 3.4 hours daily (this might be more understandable – doing dishes and cooking a meal usually takes me upwards of an hour every single day and that’s just for me and my partner). You might have neglected to notice that I was also going off of someone elses list of what someone would have to do to keep a house properly tidy (you know, the kindof tidy when you have small children who put everything in their mouths?), not actually what I do. MRAL gave a guesstimate of how long each activity would take and surmised that this was not much time at all – so I added it up to demonstrate that it was actually a significant chunk of time. Doing all of the washing, cooking, child-minding etc. for a family would take a lot of time – stay at home mothers (and fathers) are not lazy. Note too, that keeping your house tidy just for you is not the same as keeping a house tidy/doing the laundry etc. when you have to do it for a whole freaking family. This should be evident. You are (still) a moron. Try reading things before commenting on them.
“MRA trolls are like the heads of the Hydra; cut one off and three more take its place.”
There are no MRA’s that post here. Only feminists and anti-feminists. i am an anti-feminist as defined by theghostnation.com Name me a legitimate MRA on the Internet? There are none.
Mgtow are 100 times below the feminists and the ghetto of the Internet. There is no more disgusting misogynist group then mgtow.
“So what you’re saying is that men are terrible at making hiring decisions”
Yes, when it involves women. Women become managers and they systematically run anti-feminist men out. Once the good men are out the corporation crashes but not before women ensure total fascism in the work place. Just look at the shape the USA is in financially. The USA’s dire financial condition is a direct result of feminism.
“Men lose all cognitive ability in the face of blowjobs?”
Feminist men do.
Career women are rotten and bad for business and the sadists planned this all along.
The future of America is that it will be run by females so expect it to collapse into severe fascism. The only thing that can stop the collapse is the Internet and putting school on the Internet for free.
Men do not love women they are competing with. Women can’t naturally compete with men so the sadists enact unnatural anti-male laws that hurt the economy. Feminism is unnatural and sadistic.
Make blowjobs affordable by legalizing prostitution is my answer to that disgusting SNL video.
Disclaimer:
There will be spelling mistakes in my posts so deal with it punks.
Did you just confuse Mr. Show with SNL?
Spelling errors I can deal with, but if you just confused Mr. Show with SNL, somebody better hold me back.
HOLD ME BACK, I SAY!!!
I’m sorry, did you just deride MGTOW for being misogynist and then accuse career women of being incapable to do their jobs properly…because they’re women?
I don’t know. I’m just one of those uppity women who got an education because of blow jobs (or something) but that doesn’t seem like very good logic to me.
Great minds, etc. etc. I owe Spearhafoc a Coke!
Somebody is touchy xD
“I really like the part about the recession being caused by female managers and feminized CEOs.”
http://tinyurl.com/jsfod
Not-so-good year for female CEOs
This is going to go down as a miserable year for female CEOs of Fortune 500 companies.
http://tinyurl.com/2cpos2
Failed start-up landed among scandals’ debris
http://tinyurl.com/6cblvpn
It was the corporate collapse that appeared to come out of nowhere. In late 2001, the Enron Corporation—a darling of the financial world, a company whose executives were friends of presidents and the powerful—imploded virtually overnight, leaving vast wreckage in its wake and sparking a criminal investigation that would last for years. But for all that has been written about the Enron debacle, no one has yet to re-create the full drama of what has already become a near-mythic American tale.
“Did you just confuse Mr. Show with SNL?”
What is the difference?
“I’m sorry, did you just deride MGTOW for being misogynist and then accuse career women of being incapable to do their jobs properly…because they’re women?”
No, you just did. Feminist women and feminist men are who I am talking about. Feminism, Zionism, and sadism are interchangeable words.
Mgtow are misogynists and sadists who are mostly males. manbooz are uber feminists male and female.
We’re Zionists? xDDDD
“I’m just one of those uppity women who got an education”
What do you do for a living? What do you produce? Feminists actually devolve the more college they get. Did you even watch the video? It is all men. Women do the same thing only they carry strap-ons to work.
It’s like NWOslaveLite (TM), except with even worse taste in entertainment choices. For shame, not knowing the classics! It is to weep.
So … you like sadism, I guess? The last one of you had this thing for feet.
@AWS:
So promoting female rights, a political group for a jewish homeland, and the enjoyment of causing pain to others are all interchangable?
“Yes, when it involves women. Women become managers and they systematically run anti-feminist men out. Once the good men are out the corporation crashes but not before women ensure total fascism in the work place. Just look at the shape the USA is in financially. The USA’s dire financial condition is a direct result of feminism.”
You don’t mention feminism until the last line, so unless all women are feminists, you are saying that women are incapable of their jobs because they are women. (And they only get to where they are because of feminism)
But seriously, do tell. How are feminism, zionism, and sadism the same thing? At all?
@AWS:
Also, what video are we talking about here? The comedy sketch? So women do the exact thing, ask new hires to give them blowjobs, but bring strap-ons so they have something to blow? This.. is just bad enough to be absolutely hilarious..
There is so much wrong in your analysis of the collapse, but I don’t have time. It’s cute that you think there’s oh-so-many female CEOs.
WTF is THIS:
I can’t even. Are you NWO? Because I understand all the words on their own, but together it’s indecipherable word vomit.
Well, one is SNL and one is Mr. Show. So there’s that difference.
And, um, prostitutes aren’t the only people who perform oral sex.
The rest of it is just beyond idiotic.
And that first article is from 2005. A tad outdated, no?
Wow, another who doesn’t understand that words have meanings. Please, without using a dictionary, define fascism.