Good news, ladies and manginas: Apparently some MRAs don’t think it’s time to go out and start shooting people. At least not quite yet.
Some background: In recent days numerous MRAs have taken up the cause of a man named Thomas Ball – who burned himself to death outside a courthouse in Keane, New Hampshire in a protest against what he saw as unfair treatment in family court. Ferdinand Bardamu of In Male Fide has declared him “a martyr for the cause of men’s rights, a casualty of feminism’s stripping one half of the population of their humanity.”
Before killing himself, Ball wrote a long manifesto outlining his grievances and suggesting that the time had come for men “to start burning down police stations and courthouses,” describing the inhabitants of such buildings as “[c]ollaborators who are no different than the Vichy of France or the Quislings of Norway during the Second World War … So burn them out. “ (He offered specific advice on how best to do this, including tips on how to select the proper bottles to use for Molotov cocktails.)
All this has inspired some in the MRA to start talking ominously about violence. On The Spearhead, W.F. Price has responded to this talk with a piece suggesting that the time isn’t quite right for the MRAs of the world to take up armed struggle. Not just yet, anyway. As he puts it:
It is never a good idea to pick up a gun and start shooting to address some vaguely defined injustice — that is savagery. Before the American Revolution, for example, patriots took pains to spell out a long list of grievances that justified rebellion. …
We have to make our own lists, air our grievances, and give the state the opportunity to redress them. … Before anyone resorts to the same methods the state uses against us, we must put every reasonable effort into working with the law and the political system we have. Because this effort is still in its infancy, any calls for armed resistance are entirely premature and counterproductive, and shouldn’t be taken seriously.
Obviously, the flip side of this argument for delay is a justification for killing people if these “grievances” aren’t dealt with in the way that those in the MRA would like. Price’s reference to the American Revolution is an interesting one, because of course the central issue of that struggle was, you know, taxation without representation. The colonists couldn’t vote out the king if they didn’t like his policies. In case anyone has forgotten: we actually do have the vote now, which was kind of the whole point in the first place.
Of course, many of Price’s readers are a bit more impatient than he is. In a comment that drew (last I checked) more than 40 upvotes and only two dissenting downvote, Taqman took issue with Price’s call to delay the armed struggle:
Tell that to men who are facing imminent imprisonment for failure to pay child support.
They don’t have the luxury of time and can’t wait a couple of decades for the manginas of the world to wake up and decide that a gentlemanly form of armed resistance is now acceptable.
The ironically named Firepower, meanwhile, took a little swipe at Ball’s own actions, but didn’t challenge his advice for the rest of the men of the world:
What IS crazy is having to point out that setting YOURSELF on fire is a ridiculous way to “win” anything.
Set your enemies on fire. To even have to remind this questions the long term chances of victory for such a pathetic lot.
Jean Valjean suggested that political action was pointless — due to all those damned women who vote:
No amount of “stoic logic” will make politicians see our point of view.
Politicians are in the business of getting re-elected rather than the business of good governance. So long as women are the majority there will only be tyranny of the majority.
Peter-Andrew:Nolan(c) — you knew we were getting to him, right? — expressed his profound disappointment that more Spearheaders weren’t willing to embrace a violent solution:
Gee you guys are whimps and tiptoe around the ‘use of force’ like freaking ballet dancers. Are you so scared to speak about this when it is CLEAR the guvment LOVES using force against you and lots of other people too?
And he made the argument personal, explicitly denouncing, by name, the judge he claimed had “criminally abused” him with his rulings:
Judge [name redacted’s] life is now in my hands. He lives by my consent and my consent alone. …
And, like Ball, he declared judges to be essentially treasonous:
These judges pretended to be your servants. They are evil, evil people who deserve the kind of treatment reserved for those who commit treason.
There is more to Nolan’s comment(s) than that, but to get into it would require going down the rabbit-hole into his particular brand of crackpottery, which seems to involve him setting up his own courts to try judges he doesn’t like. (I frankly don’t understand his belief system and don’t care to.)
Now, it should be noted that a few Spearheaders actually objected to Nolan’s violent talk. But the last I checked, the comment I just quoted had more upvotes than downvotes. W.F. Price took more flak for suggesting men wait a little longer before taking up arms than Nolan did for, well, you saw what he wrote. That tells you a lot about The Spearhead, I think.
EDIT: Added quote from Ferdinand Bardamu; removed similar quote from The Spearhead.
Scary stuff … The saddest part is that WF Prices is one of the more moderate ones ….
I find this to be terrifying.
I’ll point out that setting yourself on fire is an extremely effective tool if your goal is to make your ex-wife’s life a living hell, and if your anger at losing control over her overwhelms all other desires. Which is common enough with abusers, who will ruin their own lives and their own shit and turn their children against them in an effort to hurt the woman they’ve fixated on.
MRA = crazy, evil douchebag
every one of them.
Am I the only one who read the manifesto and thought, “She called the cops on your ass for BUSTING OPEN YOUR DAUGHTER’S LIP – good for her!”?
Was he truly incapable of seeing the problem, there? Terrifying.
This makes me not want to leave the house/talk to any men I do not know in elevators/make eye contact with any male I’m not already familiar with…Seriously, I think I’ll stay home with my cats and watch ‘Supernatural’ and ‘House’ reruns.
@ Clementine: Just the idea that W.F. Price is the more moderate one freaks me the fuck out.
Yes, there certainly are miscarriages of justice, but:
Most men who are not given partial custody or visitation of their children were either abusive or completely absent. The courts do tend to err toward giving primary custody to the mother, but when a man is denied all contact with his children or has it severely limited, it’s usually because he did something to prove himself unworthy of contact.
(I suspect, in the case of MRAs, that often that contact has less to do with loving the kids and wanting to play with and teach them, and more to do with the fact that it represents power and ownership.)
And in the case of a guy whose response to a family court ruling is to make violent and explicit death threats, I’m going to push that “usually” up to a “yeah, probably.”
Ok, first off. When women complain about pregnancy/child rearing, or abortion rights, responses from MRA types that I’ve heard range from “don’t get knocked up” to “don’t sleep with so many dudes SLUT”. Can I reply to Father’s Rights MRAs with “Don’t impregnate people”? Just as helpful, right? (sarcasm)
Second, treason is defined as either helping someone else to overthrow your country, or plotting to overthrow it yourself. So, aren’t these people doing that? The judges are upholding the law, which is basically the opposite of what treason is. source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason
I do feel pity for Ball, the same I would feel for any human being who was in so much pain that they committed suicide.
But the rest of the people who talk about him terrify me.
Holly- And sometimes, abusive father still get visitation rights. I’m just one data point, but: My mom had an order of protection against my dad in the first, iunno 6 months or so of their divorce. We still had to finagle the every other weekend, and every Wednesday BS around that order. It got convoluted, and sometimes involved friends of my mother’s dropping us off in busy parking lots, and my dad picking us up, that way there were witnesses, just in case. My dad still didn’t think it was enough contact.
I’m so glad I wasn’t reading what people like this were saying after Marc Lépine or George Sodini went on their murder sprees. That there are people advocating for more atrocities like those is sickening.
Wow, swedishfish- that sucks. I’m sorry you had to experience that.
Had my father not died when he had (I was about 12, and it was melanoma that killed him), I think my parents would have gotten divorced (I really don’t know if they would have… I’d have wanted them to). My father was very abusive to my mom and my oldest sister, and I think I was about 7 or 8 the first time I called the police on him for physically attacking my mom in front of me and my sisters. I called the cops on him numerous times, but he was never arrested, or even cited as far as I could tell. I sometimes wonder if he’d have tried anything violent if my mom would’ve divorced him or just taken us and left him (although she really had nowhere to go).
Doctress: Well, my dad was never arrested, mostly because cops in my town felt that the woman deserved what she got, but also because the law in Illinois saying that police can press charges, even if the woman doesn’t want to, didn’t change until the mid-nineties. I remember them having loud, loud fights as early as when i was 4 or 5, about the time I went to kindergarten, and my mom started going to college.
Also, if you are still interested, I can give you the email to see if we’re still hiring for a receptionist. Also, I am going to yoga tonight at 7:15 in Fitchburg, and have an asston of free Guest Passes.
Also, Doctress- I am looking at your blog and i love you. Borderlands?!? DnD!?!
Oh, fuckkk…. that’s TOTALLY what the cops thought about my parents. My dad was high-income earning, a member of the local school board, yadda yadda… and they just let him get away with it- leaving my mom crying and hurt and me ENRAGED that they didn’t arrest my dad. I remember this one time, him crying and ASKING them to arrest him… and they didn’t.
One night after he hit her, she put me and my sisters in the van and we were going to leave, I guess? But, where to go? We ended up driving around for hours and then returning home and going to bed- it was like it never happened the next day. I think that may be when I decided to never get married.
Which studio is it? I could email them a resume… I am doing some auto fixin’ (I specialize in Hondas and Volkswagens!) and a bit of IT stuff, freelance like- but I am always up for trying something new.
Oh, my sad neglected blog.. yeah, I am hooked on Borderlands! I’ve been waiting to post on there again until I have another crazy dream or when something awesome happens. And, I have yet to find a good DnD group to play with that doesn’t include at least one creepy misogynist. My half-elf thief is a radfem with a katana. :3
So this Thomas Ball man slaps a 4 year old child repeatedly until she bleeds, gets off with only counseling, refuses to stand for this slap on the wrist punishment and won’t attend, rendering him ineligible for visitation with his children, and somehow that’s the family court’s fault and we should all feel sorry for him? Sounds like the perfect MRA “hero” to me!
But hey, at least Thomas Ball knew the only thing on Earth he was good for… Kindling.
But hey, at least Thomas Ball knew the only thing on Earth he was good for… Kindling.
Really not okay.
The guy committed suicide. I don’t think this means he was right to abuse his child or refuse counseling, but it gets him some sympathy from me–his pain was genuine even if it wasn’t justified, and he likely had mental problems beyond just “being a jerk.” It’s gross when the MRAs try to exploit a suicide to make it somehow “prove” how serious they are; but it’s gross when we make fun of suicides. Let’s please not go there.
Doctress- I was cooking up supper, but it’s BlissFlow Yoga and wellness. Recepting there is really, really part time. I have three shifts a week and it’s a Big Deal. But hey, free yoga, half off massages and private yoga classes? DONE. Also, I haven’t played since probably high school or my first year of college. But I miss it, and I loved the shit out of Borderlands. Sadly, I don’t have it anymore, and I let my XBL account expire, or we could play! I was always big on templates, and big hulking fighters myself. My favorite was a half-dragon barbarian prestiging as a frenzied berserker! She was basically feminist hulk.
@Holly they tend to list Marc Lepine and George Sodini as proof of how “serious” their cause can be too :
*gives Doctress Julia a huge giant hug* 🙁
Also- Doctress- Boyfriend and i share a VW that needs some bodywork. I got t-boned a while back, and he managed to t-bone somebody else a while later. We need a quote for insurance wink-ink nudge-nudge. However, I don’t know if you do engine work, or body work, so…
I wonder, because I don’t know. How unusual is this talk about violence? I was under the impression that MRAs said a lot of things, but never actually did them. Has there been talk of revolution before, or is this a new thing? If the latter, I’d be rather worried. If the former, wouldn’t even break a sweat.
Also, I second Holly, “Fuck MRAs”, not here.
Kirbywarp: A few weeks ago, David featured calls for corrective rape from an MRA site. And I remember hearing about how they agreed with what George Sodini did. I’d say calls for violence aren’t unusual, even if acting on them is.
@kirbywarp:
From my readings over the past two or three years that I’ve been aware that people like MRAs/MGTOWers/etc existed, this isn’t really new subject matter for them. I’ve seen some bloggers/posters on forums take their violent rhetoric to more extremes than others. I actually feel as though calls for violence have gotten a little rarer as the ‘movement’ has garnered more attention. Now that there’s more people taking notice of who they are and what they stand for, it seems like they’re trying to clean their act up a little bit…but I dunno. That’s just what I’ve observed, and I don’t really follow it incredibly closely to say one way or the other with a great deal of confidence. I personally am not terribly concerned, but time will only tell where these guys end up taking their vitriol.