When the dudes at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog aren’t wistfully looking forward to the days in which sexbots and artificial wombs make mere flesh-and-blood ladies obsolete, they’re pondering the crucial spiritual questions of our age, like how to pick up hot sluts at church. Any church, really, so long as it’s full of hot sluts. The blogger there – who doesn’t give his name, so let’s just call him Anti – recently highlighted this observation, from commenter The Fifth Horseman:
[C]hurch would be a great place for a PUA to run Game …
1) There is a built-in structure to meet women that takes out the difficulty of doing a cold approach.
2) All other men there are so pedestalizing, that the competition to a man who actually runs moderate Game is nil.
3) Sunday morning = where else would you Game at that time?
4) Once you have slept with a couple women in that church, simply move on to another church. Who cares if one is Baptist and the other is Episcopalian and the third is Lutheran? Just use up the desirable women and move on.
Jesus wept.
But Anti didn’t, and added his two cents to the discussion:
All you need to do to use the “Sunday Morning Nightclub” is find a church with single women. Some churches are pretty much all families so avoid them. Other churches are supertraditional where everyone gets married before 20. … I would also avoid Eastern Orthodox churches. …
When it comes to meeting the women there, you already have built in openers to use such as how “you have been looking for a church”. These women will put out for you. You aren’t going to find any virgins waiting for marriage (with the exception of a few outliers with very unusual issues). The women there are better described as “sluts for Jesus”.
Absolutely. All you need to do, fellas, is to approach them calmly and confidently, look quickly down at your crotch, then directly into their eyes, and ask them: “Would you like to meet … Little Jesus”
Verily, I say unto you, it works every time.
Thats right, theLaplaceDemon…mutation. In a day a week a virus will mutate as much as your theory of evolution takes us back to 2 foot tall lucy walking out of Africa. We wouldn’t stand a chance.
Actually, most mutations, in general, either have negative or no effect. A virus can mutate it’s outer shell all it wants, the immune system (usually) keeps up well enough for the species to go on.
Also, the “wanting to kill its host” question has already been answered. Multiple times.
Again, learn ecology and then we’ll talk. A basic understanding of how ecology works is necessary to address competition for resources in evolution. Not every organism directly competes, and many help each other. Also, let’s not give natural selection all the credit – read up on drift too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_drift
er, NWO’s bit was supposed to be in quotes.
@Victoria technically animals don’t “want” nething… I know what you mean (and I think everybody else here does too) xD but you know NWO will read it as “WELL WHAT IF A DOG WANTS TO FLY HUH!?”
So we’ve got that evolution works the way it does in Babylon 5 and Stargate, with things evolving along a “straight line heirarchy” which inevitably leads to humanoids and then from humanoids to energy beings. xD
And now we’ve also got that viruses are like Thrax from Osmosis Jones. Or a Captain Planet villain that creates a pollution machine (instead of pollution being a by-product, it is the raison d’etre) xD Things that are consciously evil… and for the sake of being evil and killing. xD
We rly should compile everything one day into the Book of NWOslave
The Gospel of Holly
The Gospel of Pecunium
Theory, upon theory, upon theory, upon theory.
No facts. Ima believer.
Hey, wanna know the end result of your theory. Universe expands into nothingness. When ya die your dead and nothing matters. So in the grand scheme of things, does it really matter? Child abuse, rape, murder starvation. Who cares?
Why do you hate the elephants NWOaf? Jesus loved them-you still claiming to be better than Jesus?
Well than write your congressman because every time a virus kills it’s breaking the law. And theres a lotta law breakers out there, by the millions in fact.
You’re an idiot. Evolution is not some ‘law’ put in place by human intelligence. Humans are really bad at controlling evolution – the most we can do are breeding programs that exploit known theories, with a little bit of gene fuckery at the top end. Evolution is just they way the world is. You’d have as much luck complaining to Congress about evolution as you would circulating a petition to change the gravity of the Earth.
Cuz I think this is a definition problem xD What’s considered a “fact” to you? o_O;;; What do you know? And what are your theories? What’s YOUR explanation? xD
You DO hate elephants! You think they are less evolved than us!
You DON’T hate elephants! You think they’re more evolved than us!
the theory of evolution, which is based on the theory of the big bang,
Well, that was the best laugh I’ve had in days.
“how to pick up hot sluts at church”
There are hot sluts at church ? I though you only find asexual old ladies and pedophile priests there.
Maybe I have it all wrong and and I should repent my sins after all.
So in the grand scheme of things, does it really matter? Child abuse, rape, murder starvation. Who cares?
What matters is life. You’re here, you have what you have, time to make the best of it and maybe a better world for your offspring. The point of life is just to be. Find joy, find pleasure, find fulfillment – because if the reduction is just down to nihilism, if nothing matters, then why not kill yourself right now?
We humans are herd animals, which mean we’ve evolved a sense of empathy and the ability to feel the pain of others. That’s why so many people are passionate about issues of justice and equality – it’s that herd instinct to build a better society.
And even if evolution is the objective truth of existence, that doesn’t negate the presence of other spiritual truths. God(s) can exist alongside evolution.
Am I the only one who finds it amusing that since I did my big reveal as professor (academia, ivory tower, yadda yadda yadda), NWO keeps snarking about everybody here being academics? While there may be other academics in this group (never assume anything about a group online or offline for that matter), I”m the only out academic. And you won’t see me posting about evolution and such since I have no training beyond basic undergrad biology class (also took geology and astronomy) –because, well, ENGLISH teacher. (YOu won’t see me doing the cool stuff Spearhafoc does either–sorry if misspelling–because I only edit people’s writing for money–i.e. my students–or for friendship–i.e. friends/colleagues who will give me feedback on MY work).
But even so, having read a lot of fairly good sf, I can tell NWO is totally off about what those nasty academic jargony terms like theory, evolve, etc. actually mean.
It kinda matters to the people who are right here right now. When I’m dead, I’m dead. But until then, I don’t want bad things to happen to me and I don’t want to bad things to other people.
But if you’re looking at the “grand scheme of things”, I hope you’re not looking to that monster in the Bible for life and moral guidance.
Hey, wanna know the end result of your theory. Universe expands into nothingness. When ya die your dead and nothing matters. So in the grand scheme of things, does it really matter? Child abuse, rape, murder starvation. Who cares?
We’re alive now, and it matters now.
And I am curious what your religious beliefs are, actually. Do you believe in salvation through Jesus? This suggests that you believe that women can, under certain circumstances, go to Heaven! (And people who hate their neighbor and never repent… they’re a little iffier.)
I have a feeling you’re about as likely to address that issue as you are the elephant thing.
@theLaplaceDemon
I read your link which I’ve already seen and been taught as fact.
Basically what you have, and this is exactly what it is.
Scientist arguing whose “theory” is correct.
Don’t any of you see an inherent problem with basing everything off of theories, and then using theories to support your unsupported theory?
Okay, since he’s rly bad at answering open ended questions about what he believes (shocking xD ) and cuz I’m bored… let’s see so far what we’ve learned about what he believes to be true:
1) Viruses want to kill
2) Viruses exist simply to kill things
3) The Earth is 5000 years old
4) Things do not evolve
5) The immune system does not adapt
6) HIV is the boss of all viruses
(ok that’s not rly something he believes (i think) but I couldn’t help myself xD )
and that’s just on science! we should make a comprehensive list on everything, and David can put it up somewhere “Things NWO believes to be true” xDDDD
Though I’m sure zombie will appreciate it.
No thank you.
From his description of his understanding of evolution, and his definition of theory, I am pretty sure Slaver’s brains have gone bad.
Now I’m sure he’s sitting there gleefully cackling that his trolling appears to be working.
@Victoria – On the plus side, we’re very tough and adaptable. I mean, how many tropical creatures can survive in the Arctic or Antarctic with the kind of minimal protection we can? In that sense, our “broad dietary requirements” are as much of an advantage as a disadvantage. An omnivore has more sources of food available than a strict carnivore or herbivore. True, you do get sick if one part of that diet is missing, but you’re still more likely to survive long enough to find a new source than if you were limited to that food.
Don’t any of you see an inherent problem with basing everything off of theories, and then using theories to support your unsupported theory?
Actually, I do. But it’s the best human knowledge–inherently subjective, inherently limited–can give us.
Do you have something better?
@ithiliana I just assume that if ppl respond by going “Hey, I only have a high school education!” then it’d be bringing that up all the time as how stupid ppl are xD (or some other troll will xD ) besides, I think it’s a silly game to play b/c it justifies the initial premise “being an academic makes you an out of touch ideologue whose opinions should be discounted” >_>
Also there’s no point in me even mentioning that cuz I think everybody alrdy just ASSUMED that at most I have a HS diploma xD (which is true! also i’m an author in 2 papers published in bio chem medical research journals xD which looks so awkward on my resume xD )
Wolves don’t want to… design houses,
umm, I know some architects that might as well be feral….
“Don’t any of you see an inherent problem with basing everything off of theories, and then using theories to support your unsupported theory?”
Didn’t you get the part where evolution isn’t really based off any other theories, but instead observable evidence and rigorous, hypothesis-driven testing?
Seriously, what does evolution really need to support itself? Genetics, which is well-established and verified. Variation within populations. Variaton within environments. And the whole universe-operates-under-consistent laws thing. Done.
Off for at least a few hours…have fun.
Don’t any of you see an inherent problem with basing everything off of theories, and then using theories to support your unsupported theory?
You don’t understand what a theory is, obviously. Let’s take the theory of gravity, a fairly uncontroversial theory. The theory states that everything which has mass in the universe exerts a gravitational pull on everything else, and that the more mass something has, the more gravitational pull it also has.
So far, according to everything scientists have observed, this theory holds true. However, to conclusively prove it, every single atom of matter in the entire universe would have to be analyzed and tested to prove that it had gravity. Since this is impossible, gravity remains a theory – however, one which has held up under all sorts of testing, and which is internally consistent with other theories, like electro-magnetism. If gravity didn’t work the way we think it does, then something would have fucked up when we tried to send rockets to the moon and to Mars. But we got rockets there, and fairly accurately – in part because our theories about gravity proved to be correct enough to be workable.
Therefore, to conclusively prove the theory of evolution, scientists would have to study every bloodline in existence, including the ones that went extinct millions of years ago. But evolution has held up under repeated testing, and works so far as anyone can tell. Science just has an exceptionally rigorous definition of ‘proof’.