data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/320e0/320e0da4d384bea5ae042380aca241e30ca1da12" alt="pro-life"
Three young women wake up, confused and terrified, in a room that looks like a cross between a normal hospital room and the creepy underground lair of some mad scientist from a horror movie. A video screen flickers on and a creepy older man, looking a bit like Academy-award-nominee Robert Loggia, appears on it, telling the women that he’s their “jailer.” The women, you see, had all been getting abortions when their jailer’s shadowy accomplices kidnapped them and brought them to this strange prison, where they will be forced to live for the next seven months until they gave birth. “You were all on the operating table, all ready to commit murder,” announces a mysterious doctor. “Your babies will be given life just as God planned.”
This is the premise of a new horror film called The Life Zone, which recently had its world premiere at the prestigious, er, Hoboken International Film Festival, a festival that was, perhaps not coincidentally, founded and chaired by the film’s writer and producer, Kenneth del Vecchio. In case you think I’m making all this up, here’s the film’s trailer, which makes The Life Zone look a bit like an equal-parts mixture of Saw, Human Centipede, and The Handmaid’s Tale, with Robert Loggia in the role of Jigsaw/Dr. Heiter/The Commander:
Now, if you thought that something seemed really … off about that trailer, well, you’re not alone. For the film is not, as you might have assumed from my description, a warning against the fanatical misogyny of many in the anti-abortion movement.
No, the film – produced by a pro-life former judge, crime thriller author, and Republican New Jersey state senate candidate – is meant as pro-life propaganda. As the offical press release for the film’s premiere put it:
The film, which appears to cut right down the middle [of the abortion debate], examining the topic from both sides, offers a powerful, anti-abortion climactic twist. Del Vecchio and the cast invite pro-lifers to come to this historic event.
During the months the three women are held in captivity, you see, they are exposed to a barrage of films and books intended to, er, educate them about abortion –what their attending obstetrician Dr. Wise describes as “an abortion think tank.” Two of the captive women do indeed convert to the pro-life side; apparently we in the audience are supposed to develop Stockholm Syndrome along with them. The third, as we see in the trailer, tries to induce a miscarriage, which doesn’t go quite as planned.
And this sets us up for the final twist, which I’m just going to go ahead and reveal: once all three women have given birth, Dr. Wise tells them she’s going to sew them all, mouth-to-vagina, into a Human Abortion-pede!
Actually no: the twist is that the “life zone” the three women in has actually been … purgatory! All three “captives,” you see, had died on the operating table while getting their abortions. (Apparently they went to the world’s worst abortion clinic, as first-trimester abortions don’t involve anything more surgically invasive than the insertion of a suction tube; the risk of death from a legal surgical abortion is 0.0006%, one in 160,000 cases, making the procedure many times safer than childbirth itself.) Their time in the “life zone” was a test: the two women who changed their minds were whisked up to heaven, while their miscarriage-attempting, stubbornly pro-choice companion is sent straight to H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks. Dr. Wise, despite being on the right side of the abortion question, also goes to hell for committing suicide. And, oh yeah, their jailer – Loggia – was Satan. Why Satan and a hell-bound doctor were the ones trying to convert the abortion ladies to the pro-life side I can’t tell you; del Vecchio’s theology is evidently more sophisticated than I am.
The real twist here? As Jersey Journal writer Alan Robb notes:
The Life Zone went viral across the internet [last] Friday after blogs The Frisky and Talking Points Memo picked up on the film’s trailer. … But despite garnering more than 20,000 hits on YouTube in the last four days, only fifty people – including the film’s cast and producers – attended this weekend’s screening, and even those who starred in the movie didn’t know how to interpret its twist ending.
It’s impossible to tell from the trailer if the film is bad in a so-bad-it’s-good way, or if it’s just plain awful. I will try to get hold of it when it hits video, and will report back with my results.
In the meantime, if you’re looking for a good horror film set in a creepy hospital, try renting Infection, a Japanese film from 2005. Or, if you’ve got a longer attention span, try Lars Von Trier’s supernatural soap opera The Kingdom, a darkly comic miniseries which takes place in what one might call, paraphrasing Bill Murray’s character in Tootsie, “one nutty hospital.” Both are conveniently available on Netflix instant watch, so you don’t even have to leave your pregnancy dungeon to see them.
EDITED: Added some info on the minimal dangers of abortion procedures.
950 comments exactly! (951 after this comment ): ) quick we need another troll!
952! Closer and closer we come!
But in all seriousness…
@MRAL,
“women who support circumcision/circumcise their sos and boys”
I wonder if you could answer me a question. It was my father’s choice to have my brother circumcised for one thing. My boyfriend has been circumcised and we hope to have children one day, one of which may be a son. I personally don’t like the idea of circumcision, but my boyfriend wants whatever son we have to be circumcised because he wouldn’t know how to teach the kid to keep it clean properly, among other reasons. I’ve decided to let it be his choice, but it seems a lot of MRAs are really upset about male circumcision, so what are your feelings when it’s the mother who doesn’t want the procedure done, but the father does? Should the mother simply leave it to the father, or should she insist that it’s wrong? If she allows the father to have the son circumcised, is she not protecting her son? If she insists the procedure not be done, is she butting into a male issue? In all honesty, what are your thoughts on this?
lol! Left Behind! You want to talk best worst movies, those are it!
Those had movies!?
I kinda don’t get circumcision.. I had it done to me way before I could remember it, and honestly I haven’t noticed much. Apparently there is some loss of sensitivity, but having never known it, I can’t exactly miss it.
This is actually something that irritates me when talking about it like its some sort of genital mutilation: sure you are cutting off skin, yes there are some detriments, yes the boy in question has no say in the matter (and that is almost enough to convince me that it shouldn’t be allowed, almost), but then some people compare it to the real genital mutilation of girls, where the clit is nicked or cut off entirely. I mean really, circumcision =/= castration…
But of course, like on any other subject I don’t have my thoughts clear about, I’m open to being convinced either way. Just as a man who has been circumcised, the thought doesn’t bother me much. (And may have actually helped me last a little bit when I first had sex.. *shrug*)
@Ami:
Yes… Yes they did. I actually, bizarrely enough, liked the books and the movies (until it got to an entire book where Jesus was walking around and nothing important happens). I probably wasn’t quite old enough at the time to get the full force of heavy-handed proselytization.
I wish my fiance hadn’t been circumcised because I think uncut cocks are more fun to play with but I try not to harp on it ’cause, really, what’s the point. It’s done and there’s no undoing it. And he’s still plenty of fun 🙂
Alex, it’s not really a man vs. woman thing. Circumcision should be illegal regardless of which parent “wants” it, on the simple grounds that it’s a violation of bodily autonomy. I don’t give a shit about the consequences (which, anecdotally, range from nonexistant to severe), the procedure is completely unethical on the simple grounds of autonomy. No it’s not comparable to FGM, but then again, FGM isn’t widespread and indeed encouraged in the modern world.
Hugo Schwyzer (hehehe) has a good piece on circumcision.
http://hugoboy.typepad.com/hugo_schwyzer/2006/10/in_january_2005.html
I honestly don’t have an opinion on it.
“This seems to be the standard fundy wish-fulfillment fantasy: “You are going to be damned to hell for all eternity and my only regret is that I won’t be there to get all Nelson Muntz in your face. Therefore, I am creating a work of fiction that will allow me to vicariously enjoy your suffering.” This is pretty much the whole motivation behind the “Left Behind” books.”
It’s also the plot of just about every Chick Tract. “If you disagree with me you’ll die and go to Hell!” The blog Enter the Jabberwock isn’t active anymore, but it’s still online, and it has some lovely Chick Track dissections . . .
http://www.enterthejabberwock.com/index.php?s=chick&submit=Search
We can make it to 1000!
@Hippodameia:
Nice to see I’m not the only one who is annoyed at the difference. I’m curious as to what other people think actually, because I could still see a problem in the idea of the guy not being able to make a decision if its done as a baby. Hum…
Oh man.. Chick Tracts… I kinda find them hilarious, they’re just so bad. The bizarre charicatures, the absurd claims, the setup of a narrative far worse and more removed from reality than The Life Zone could ever dream… Beautiful.
Circumcision? Basically, what kirby said, and for the same reason. Not only did I not miss my foreskin, I never even knew I was missing anything until I reached my late teens.
Also, if I ever decide to convert to Judaism, I’m ready to go!
@Johnny Pez:
So much for not throwing the first stone, loving thy neighbor as themselves, or letting God know his own, huh?
I haven’t read that particular series – I heard it was pretty good, but didn’t ever do it. I also, for some reason, always think it was written by Stephen King (maybe because of “The Things They Left Behind”?). I don’t get that whole revenge-fantasy thing. Like, I don’t want to see some movie where a pro-lifer is forced to abort pregnancies in the most horrific ways or something. That’d be a massively creepy way to deal with things.
No mention of the Left Behind books is complete without linking to Slactivists’ ludicrously exhaustive Left Behind mockery/dissection:
http://www.patheos.com/community/slacktivist/category/left-behind/
Fred is brilliant, honestly changed my whole perspective on Christianity, and takes these books far more seriously than the authors themselves took them.
Not only do I find Fred Clark to be brilliant, I think it’s cool that he works at my old home-town newspaper, the Wilmington News-Journal.
OH HELLZ NO!
Circumcision caused a kerfuffle at Sadly, No, that is still talked about to this day.
I…. I still have nightmares. NIGHTMARES, I TELL YOU, in which I am short fingered and circumcised!
My biggest problem with the Left Behind series was the first chapter (I could not get beyond that one so I have no idea what the rest of them are talking about): “Israel became the world’s premier economic powerhouse. The reason is because “God can do anything.”
Of course God can do anything if you believe what is said about God but to reverse all known rules of economics, physics, linguistics and a dozen other things? No…that is just too bizarre for God to do and this is the guy who would melt his followers’ eyes for looking at him.
Last night I dreamed that someone was dumping frozen broccoli over my head, and when I woke up there was hail falling outside.
This isn’t relevant to anything but we’re so very close to a thousand posts.
Holly, all relevance is out the window by this point. EPIC THREAD AWESOMESAUCE 1000-NESS PARTY! I once dreamed I was eating a giant marshmallow, and when I woke up my giant marshmallow was missing…
PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth – I just get ticked off at the idea of a God who punishes people for making a totally uninformed decision–didn’t guess the Christian God was the right one? To Hell with you!
Although you’d think that after a freaking Rapture and sundry miracles it would be an extremely informed decision, but the authors are more interested in painting their enemies as idiots than in telling a story with any hope in it.
Kirby – I just bought a bunch of giant marshmallows!
I was planning to take them camping. (Marshmallows need to spend time in nature; it’s good for their growth.)
Now I am planning to sleep with my head on them and see if I can’t make this happen.
This isn’t relevant to anything but we’re so very close to a thousand posts.
Actually, Holly, it’s not such a bad simile for this thread.
I don’t know what I was dreaming, but I woke up one morning with a mouthful of pillow stuffing . . .
@Holly
I.. love that image, though I first thought you said “go to sleep with one on my head.” ^__^
Yeah…that actually comes up in a book I read recently-if a town is thrust back into time before the birth of Jesus, how do you still have a church based on someone who was not born yet or will not be born for over a thousand years if at all at this point?