You can always count on men’s-rightser-turned-conspiracy-maven Henry Makow for sound and sensible commentary on the sexual and social mores of today.
Oh, wait, it’s not Opposite Day. You can count on Henry for loopy misogynist paranoia.
Henry recently took a trip to Toronto, where, he explains,
signs of the elite’s psychological attack on heterosexuals are everywhere. Young females are the main victims.
His evidence for this? He noticed some people fundraising for a program designed to help girls in the Third World. He read about a conference of feminists in Winnipeg. (No, it’s still not opposite day: in his mind these things are terrible for girls.) Oh, and he read about one oddball couple that is raising their kid to be genderless.
All this leads him to conclude, naturally, that the powers that be are trying to make women obsolete. Huh? Let’s let him explain it, because I sure can’t:
WOMEN BECOMING OBSOLETE
If a woman will not accept her husband’s just leadership, she does not love him. …
A woman loves by surrendering power to her husband in exchange for his power (protection) expressed as love. Men want power; women want love. …
Masculinity is defined by power. Power = penis. Empower women and you give them a psychological penis. You neuter them.
Well, damn. That doesn’t sound good. Who exactly is giving women these psychological penises?
By sabotaging their gender identity and their faith in marriage, the Illuminati are transforming females into their sexless worker-drones and amateur whores.
Oh, right. Those guys. Those guys must be really, really busy.
Anyway, back to Henry’s trip to Toronto:
Most of the young women I saw on the street clearly defined their self-worth in terms of sex appeal. …
But they seemed to regard male attention as predatory. They were like amateur streetwalkers who were both too self-enamored and gender-confused to relate to males.
There’s also a chance that these women looked at Mr. Makow and thought, “huh, a weird angry dude old enough to be my father is staring at my tits like they belong to him. I will definitely not be having sex with him.”
Oh, and apparently ol Henry has heard about the Slutwalks:
Yet they will actually demonstrate for the right to behave like sluts without suffering any consequences. Their younger sisters are also being sexualized and look like Brooke Shields in the film Pretty Baby.
Um, THAT’s your cultural reference? Brooke Shields in Pretty Baby? Not, I dunno, the Bratz? And seriously, if you want to reference a 70s movie that creepily sexualizes underage girls, at least be a little original about it: go with Jodie Foster, in Bugsy Malone.
If you’ve never heard of Bugsy Malone, or simply want to remind yourself of its icky weirdness, the trailer below should help.
Ol Henry again:
The Illuminati are turning young women into mutants, unfit for marriage, and unfit for motherhood.
They are fit only to betray themselves and their society as cannon fodder in the New World Order.
Our world is increasingly zany because it is controlled by a Cabalist satanic cult, the Illuminati.
Dude, way to totally sell yourself short. The world is zany because of people like you. And the producers of Bugsy Malone.
@darksidecat…You can visit the tomb of the great Andrew Jackson, heres what the inscription reads, “I KILLED THE BANKS.”
Look it up if you don’t believe me. He thought it was his greatest achievement, and it was.
@Spearhafoc, who is changing his nym
Your question doesn’t deserve an answer.
Say, David, wouldn’t you agree that those dirty, no-good triskaidekaphobes are a threat to America’s racial purity?
Fine, how about the Futurama episode, Roswell that Ends Well?
@kirbywarp… Than how is it they “control” The CFR. If in adjusted dollars I gave that much money today to the public education system, you’re telling me I wouldn’t “control” it? You must be smarter than that.
Okay, let’s see:
* Eliminating restrictions on contraceptive information and actively trying to educate the public on contraception. Well, it’s no longer illegal to send contraception information through the Postal Service, and there’s certainly a lot of information available through the Internet.
* Making contraception information and contraceptives available to minors. Fortunately, condoms are not an age-restricted purchase, but most states still implement abstinence-only education, keeping students in the dark about what works and what doesn’t to prevent pregnancy and STDs.
* Removing restrictions on voluntary sterilizations. This, I admit, I don’t know much about. I know lots of doctors are reluctant to do the procedure, especially on young people, but I don’t know of any currently existing legal barriers.
* Removing restrictions on abortions and publicly funding abortion services. So not true. Many states are trying hard to restrict abortions, and the Hyde Amendment, and now the Stupak Amendment, restrict federal money spent on abortion services.
* Give priority funding to reproductive research so couples who don’t want to have children won’t; and couples who do want children but can’t will be able to. Not sure if there’s priority funding, but I do know strides have been made in both sectors.
* A national program to reduce unwanted fertility. Halfway there, halfway not.
I fail to see what is so nefarious about these recommendations. Why shouldn’t people be able to control their own fertility? Why should people be forced to bear unwanted children? Why should the discussion of contraception be fraught with such shame?
I don’t think any question is too stupid for someone who believes in the Illuminati.
I’m disappointed he’s not an alien conspiracy guy. Those are the only really entertaining ones.
The “International (cough)Jewish(/cough) banker” people are just so boring.
@Lady Victoria von Syrus…Don’t you find it odd that a private organisation would “recomend” anything to our Guv? Also the rest of the chapters are quite good if you have the time. Plus remember this was 1969, when morality wasn’t as loose as it is today.
Also if you’ve seen my other links all the cash into education. They run a Guv agency, (CFR). Fund feminism, ect. Don’t you even find any of this disquieting? That a private organisation has that much “power” in our Guv.
Not to mention old-fashioned. I mean, that one goes back centuries!
Actually Lady Victoria von Syrus, theres a section in the report where the people who did the research commented. You can almost hear the “fear” in what they said about the report.
@NWOslave
Let me ask a clearer question then. Do you evidence of a policy that was instituted by the donators through giving charity money? Or is the fact that they donate money enough to incriminate them? I hear all this talk about “x is controlling y” and, beyond claiming that the Rothschilds “funded both sides of every war of the last 200 years,” nobody has mentioned exactly what these nefarious buisness men are actually DOING.
NWOslave,
I refuse to read another word you write until I hear your opinion of “Roswell That Ends Well”.
If you need me to refresh your memory: that was the one where they went back in time and accidentally caused the Roswell incident, and Fry became his own grandfather.
Private organizations make recommendations to the government all the time. The government is not bound to follow those recommendations.
@Johnny Pez…If you knew anything about economics you would Know that usury goes back centuries and was illegal in virtually every country in the world at one time or another. The reason being is paper money/credit backed by neither labor or precious metals that is being essientally taxed by interest always reverts to it’s inherent value. Paper.
Right now a dollar is worth about 7 cents in adjusted value. When the timer hits 0 thats what it’ll be worth.
You didn’t answer my questions. Again, I fail to see what is so nefarious about these recommendations. Why shouldn’t people be able to control their own fertility? Why should people be forced to bear unwanted children? Why should the discussion of contraception be fraught with such shame?
Capitalism is impossible without banks. What are you, some kind of socialist?
He won’t even give his opinion on a classic Futurama episode. I wouldn’t expect much out of him in the way of answers.
NWO:
If you’re referring to the gold standard, that is just as arbitrary as any other form of currency. Who says whether gold is worth 200 dollars or 300 dollars? Someone might have to check this, but I think that even back in gold standard days the exchange rate from paper to gold changed, creating inflation or deflation.
Money, no matter how you look at it, is arbitrary. Even a bartering system relies on users putting some sort of value on the goods traded, paper money just makes the process much easier.
Okay, then, Slavey, since you refuse to comment on Futurama, how about DS9? Was the Roswell Incident caused by time-traveling Ferengis?
Wouldn’t the more pressing question be to ask him about what he’s doing about Xanatos’ links w/ the Illuminati and about the Gargoyles? xD And isn’t it suspicious that Xanatos and Commander Riker sound exactly the same? :O
@kirbywarp
Well heres how it goes. Before the Fed was install in 1913. If it was say 1850 and you saved $50.00 in 1880 that held the same value. So a loaf a bread was 5 cents we’ll say in 1850, so in 1880 it was the same and you could save knowing the value wouldn’t change.
Now when I started working way back in 1980 I was making $3.00 an hour. Infalation runs at about 7% a year which means I have to double my wage every ten years to maintain the same level of wealth. So by 1990 I need $6.00 an hour in 2000 I need $12.00 an hour and 2010 I need $24.00 an hour. I may have gained property/material goods that I now own but my wealth is actually lower. Plus if I saved $1000.00 the actual value of that in now only $125.00. This is planned
The way it works is by flooding the market with money and people think theres lotsa money and of course this drives up inflation. They then raise the interest rates and pull back the money supply. When the market crashed in 08 this is what happened, for years they poured in the money than they cut the supply. They, the bankers then bought all those companies and properties for pennies on the dollar.
The best part is they, the bankers, don’t even have any money, its fake. If everyone in this country both personal and corporate would pay off their debt, do you know how much money would be left in circulation? Nothing, all money under the system of usury is based on debt. This has been going on for thousands of years. The battle has always been between the people and the bankers, and we’re losing. This is exactly how the present system works today.
Never trust a man with a ponytail.
PS: Fnord.
Not really relevant to anything, but I was sort of amused by the missing comma in this comment from NWO:
The Constitution Bee sounds like a character on some saturday morning cartoon civics education show.
Also, meet several other bees:
http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll5l6a6y0Y1qabj53o1_500.jpg
I have to admit that I’m sort of a Don’t Bee. Though I’m a lot happier than that dude.