Categories
feminism MGTOW misandry misogyny MRA rape sex

Hating female sexuality: Is it normal?

You'll see why I used this picture in a minute.

So I recently ran across a site called “Is It Normal?” The idea behind it is simple, and kind of wonderful: people confess some possibly odd thing about themselves, and others tell them if it’s normal. Now, normally (as it were) I’m against the too-rigid enforcement of what is considered “normal” behavior, especially when it comes to sexuality and sex roles. But that’s not really what we’re talking about here. Ohhhh, no. We’re talking about grown men and women eating their own boogers; having sexual fantasies about zombies; feeling an urge to jump off of high places;  or wanting to be turned into a doll or manikin. (Hey, whatever floats your boat.)

Naturally, I did a search for “misogyny” just to see what turned up. Is that a normal thing to do? I don’t know, and I don’t care, but I did it and the search pulled up a couple of pretty interesting little discussions.

The one that really grabbed my attention was from a guy who said he hated female sexuality. Which may not be “normal,” though as readers of this blog know it’s not uncommon. But this guy is  no Christopher from Oregon, whose hatred of female sexuality is part of a package deal that includes hatred for pretty much everything female.

No, this guy hates female sexuality in part because, well, he thinks the male body is ugly and so assumes – or at least feels on a gut level —  that any woman having sex with a man is being coerced, bamboozled, or raped. Yep, we’re talking about a rich and toxic stew of misogyny and misandry here. Let’s let him explain:

I Hate Female Sexuality

What little mysogyny I have in me is directed at female sexuality. I can’t stand it that females are attracted to males, ever. I hate them a little for it, just feel it in my gut. I thought for a long time when I was younger that females were basically asexual, not interested in sex, and that romance for them was something far removed from physical love. It didn’t occur to me that anyone might find the male form attractive, and I always suspected males were using some form of deception or raping women in some way when they were with them. I don’t understand this hate and distrust for my own sex. It really bothers me.

I hate that I feel there’s something wrong with a female having an active sexuality when I know intellectually there’s not. I’m a passionate feminist and attracted to females myself. I don’t really understand this feeling.

I think maybe a small part of it is jealousy when I see a couple, and the rest mostly my wierd, incongruous hatred for the male sex.

I don’t think females are doing something wrong but that something wrong is being done to them when they engage in sexual activity, even consentual, with a male, and they’re allowing it to happen, are complicit in it. This is just a feeling I have and can’t shake. It’s not overwhelming, like I’m freaking out whenever I see a couple but it’s there a lot, subtle but persistent. I’m atheist and I’m not someone who belives sexual promiscuity is wrong or even undesirable in male or females. This is just a wierd, lingering emotional problem, like fear of the dark or something like that.

Is it normal?

So, yeah. For what it’s worth, only 14% of those reading this confession rated it normal.  But, as I said, I don’t think it’s uncommon. We grow up, after all, in a society that treats sexuality as a commodity that women possess, and that men try to “get” from women – by charming them into “giving it up,” by buying it directly or indirectly (by going to a prostitute or paying for dinner), or simply taking by force.

This way of thinking about sex is pretty deeply embedded in our culture; as regular readers of this blog know all too well, many MRAs, MGTOWers, and PUAs (especially) seem unable to conceive of sexuality in any other way. Neither does the questioner on Is It Normal (who goes by the name SamuraiPeeper), even though he’s a self-described feminist.

Like a lot of misogynistic ideas, this “women own sex, men must fight to get it” idea contains a heaping helping of misandry as well – suggesting that women basically don’t enjoy or desire sex with men because male bodies and male sexuality are inherently disgusting. It’s only a few small steps from this to SamuraiPeeper’s whole muddled mixture of desire and disgust, hatred and self-hatred.

The biggest difference between SamuraiPeeper and the MGTOWers and other misogynists I write about here is that he’s aware that his views are fucked up, and is trying actively to work through his issues. And he’s actually gotten some good responses to his query on Is It Normal?

PoisonFlowers suggests that some of his hatred and disgust probably stems from a fear of female sexuality:

Is it misogyny? I don’t think it’s as clear cut as that. Perhaps because the image you had of women (almost an idealised impression it seems) when you were younger has been destroyed (instead of having romance that is above sex, it turns out that women can be just as animalistic as men), you feel a sort of resentment and that mixes with the jealousy and then as you say “a weird, incongruous hatred for the male sex.” This then becomes a strong dislike for female sexuality.

Why do you have these feelings about men? Is it the people you’ve been surrounded with throughout your life and their behaviour/attitudes? Have you witnessed a man being abusive towards a woman at any point in your life? …

You say that you feel as though “something wrong is being done to them,” which could point to an urge in you to protect women, or perhaps it is more accurate to say to protect the _idea_ you have of women that stems from the concept you had when you were younger.

randomsensuality offers some similar observations:

It definitely sounds like you want to protect the idea of females as pure, with an almost divine stature. It also sounds like you have been taught or embraced the idea that penetrative sex is inherently degrading or immoral: therefore a woman who enjoys it is equally so.

Another bit on the matter is that many men do not find it attractive when women lead the hunt, as it were. They want to be the ones in control, in the pursuit of the sex and relationships. If a woman is as much “on the prowl” as he is, then he can’t say that it was a full conquest. He wants to know he’s been where others have failed to enter, that it took his prowess to crack the nut, setting him apart and making his mate a trophy and attribute to his stature.

Lets also not forget the angle of loathing the male form, which you say you can’t understand a woman being attracted to. If you are heterosexual male, this makes sense. Of course it’s easier to wrap your brain around lesbian sex, you like women, you understand innately attraction to women. Attraction to men, is scary for more than that reason though. If a woman is attracted to a man, then she could be attracted to any man the way a man can be attracted to any woman: this vision of the situation can induce pre-emptive jealousy and defensiveness.

Meanwhile, a 19-year-old girl calling herself so_damn_unpretty offers a blunter response – and one that might do the questioner as much good as the longer, more thoughtful responses:

I love men… and cock.. and sex… so i really cant relate.

In the end, that’s probably the most important takeaway here, as they like to say in the business world. Women – most women, anyway – genuinely like and enjoy sex as much as men. Sometimes more. When a guy “scores” with a woman — she is also “scoring” with him. Rigid gender roles that define man as the sexual pursuer and women as the sexual prize may make it hard to see this, but it’s true. Not only that, but women – heterosexual women, anyway – actually like and enjoy the male body.

Guys, know this: while you are watching sports, or playing video games, or playing with yourself, or knitting (or whatever your favorite hobby is), there are thousands of women writing, sharing, and reading slash fic about dudes (from various TV shows and movies and books) getting it on with each other. There are no women in these stories, at least not in the dirty parts. Just dudes, and their dude bodies, having dude sex with each other. Freud once asked: what do women want? And to that we have a partial answer: stories about Sam and Dean from Supernatural penetrating one another’s deepest  mysteries.

491 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fuck MRAs
Fuck MRAs
13 years ago

As much as I do enjoy this blog… What’s with the Dworkin hate? Yes, she is more on the radical side of the spectrum. So am I. However, radical does not equal hateful.

And some of her concepts are still quite influential, I hate to break it to both sides here…

mediumdave
13 years ago

I, personally, agree that Dworkin was influential. A lot of avowed feminists would like to run away from her persona while still believing in her concepts. My thought on radfems vs. MRA’s in general is: Anti-feminists, especially MRA’s, should not read Dworkin or feminists like her until they understand something about the basics of feminism. Guys who are already nervous and defensive about their sexuality will only be frightened and confused when they read her writings.

It’s not because they’re not intelligent; it’s that they lack the vocabulary to understand the radfem point of view. It’s kinda like trying to understand string theory without learning basic physics first. It makes no sense, really, to start with the “hard stuff” when approaching an unfamiliar topic.

But of course, the MRA’s only read snippets of radfem writings; just enough to take out of context and freak out about. Which is quite deliberate, and more than a little cynical.

katz
13 years ago

MRAs are like blog fertilizer

Because they’re full of shit! *rimshot*

Fuck MRAs
Fuck MRAs
13 years ago

Mediumdave, I personally believe that a lot of feminists who are anti-Dworkin are so because they have bought into anti-feminist lies about her.

mediumdave
13 years ago

Sure, and that’s understandable in a movement which is very diverse, and also widely misrepresented and maligned. Since Dworkin’s writings look scary at first glance, she’s an easy target for the “you’re all like her/no we’re not all like that” dance.

I think that whole dance is a mistake; it accepts the framing of anti-feminists and forces feminists on the defensive. Giving ground by saying things like NAWALT is similarly a mistake (not saying you personally do that). Some women are “like that” because they’re doing their best to survive in patriarchal society. It’s nothing to be ashamed of, when the situation is not of their making.

(OK, soapbox off. 😀 )

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

I don’t see any Dworkin hate from the feminist douchebags here. I hate her, sure, but I’m not a feminist to begin with. Dworkin was a radical, while Futrelle is a very moderate feminist (and thus that is also the type of feminist that is attracted to the comments section). He’s still full of crap, as are all feminists, but it’s a very different form of crap than Dworkin. Thus, obviously they’re not going to agree on pretty much anything.

Francois Tremblay
13 years ago

http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/a-rant/

Sadly, there are violent bigots on both sides of the sexist fence. Female supremacists are not immune from being screaming lunatics. I have not yet seen a non-sexist write a rant of this magnitude. So I think we have the moral high ground…

mediumdave
13 years ago

MRAL, you think you hate Dworkin… I’d be surprised if you can give a cogent explanation of which ideas of hers you oppose and why. The Andrea Dworkin of anti-feminist imagination bears little resemblance to the real person.

Futrelle’s take on her is at least informed by familiarity, FWIW, though I might disagree with some of his conclusions.

Fuck MRAs
Fuck MRAs
13 years ago

mediumdave, you seem to be one of the ost informed and nuanced posters I have come across here, big kudos for that. Does my radfem heart good to see it.

Fuck MRAs
Fuck MRAs
13 years ago

err…sorry, here’s your missing “m”

mediumdave
13 years ago

erci beaucoup! 🙂

David, I don’t think that an honest expression of one’s experienced reality can ever be “destructive”. Dworkin’s experienced reality made people unhappy, it shook them up, it made them profoundly question their assumptions. Is that a bad thing? I think dishonesty is bad. And that’s really the underlying problem with the MRM: They are liars. They deny their own experienced reality. And they know it.

The young man who wrote the “is it Normal” entry, despite his obvious problems, is the opposite of them, because he’s honest about his feelings and experiences.

(MRAL, I saw the picture of your eyes that you posted. I’m sorry that you’ve been convinced that this minor facial abnormality renders you unlovable. That’s also a lie.)

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

FYI, I haven’t read any of Dworkin’s writings, and I don’t plan to, because I have better things to do than read the blatherings of an idiot who is my intellectual inferior, and was also fat. All the same, I’ve read summaries, and I think I get the basic idea. Radical feminism, like most other radical positions, looks to “the system” (in this case the mythical patriarchy) as the Source of All Evil. Taken far enough, as inevitably it does with “radfems”, it becomes a highly theoretical exercise in which individuals are denied any form of agency in this pervasive, nefarious, and strangely invisible societal system which ultimately guides our every word, deed, and fart. Thus, it is impossible to dialogue with radical feminists, because everything, including opposing viewpoints, are dismissed as serving the system in some sinister and impenetrable way (not unlike religious fundamentalists and God).

That’s why I don’t like Dworkin, also, as said before, she was fat and I don’t like fat people (as has been established).

Fuck MRAs
Fuck MRAs
13 years ago

Indeed. If anyone believes that the idiot above me is unlovable because of his eye or any other physical feature, they are 100% lying.

It is quite obvious that he’s unlovable because he’s a delusional, evil idiot.

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

Haha, I’m evil now.

Fuck MRAs
Fuck MRAs
13 years ago

I’ve read a lot of your comments, and yes, you are. All signs point to that being your goal so… Well done?

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

Thanx.

Yaz
Yaz
13 years ago

Note that there’s no denial about being delusional.

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

I’m not delusional.

speedlines
speedlines
13 years ago

Radical feminism, like most other radical positions, looks to “the system” (in this case the mythical patriarchy) as the Source of All Evil. Taken far enough, as inevitably it does with “radfems”, it becomes a highly theoretical exercise in which individuals are denied any form of agency in this pervasive, nefarious, and strangely invisible societal system which ultimately guides our every word, deed, and fart.

Hmm, sounds kinda like the equally invisible “Greek System.”

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

Average “beta” men are generally tolerable- 5’9 to 5’11 usually, average facially, average build, middle class.

mediumdave
mediumdave
13 years ago

OK, y’know what, MRAL? You’re trolling us. No way you’re for real. That probably is not even really your photo.

Laura
Laura
13 years ago

Yeh, luckily no one that ridiculous is a real person…!

Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant
13 years ago

I assure you those are my real eyes. And I am not a troll.

1 11 12 13 14 15 20