Poor Arnold Schwarzenegger!
Picture the scene.
It’s January 1997. Arnold’s in a good mood, sitting in his den, paging through the latest issue of Variety. He chuckles to himself. Fuck the critics! Jingle All the Way is putting asses in the seats of the multiplexes of America, and that means money in the bank to the Terminator.
Suddenly, he hears the door to the room click shut behind him. It’s that devious maid again, with her wily, sexy Latin ways! “Que pasa?” she says, running her hands through his hair. He’s still not quite sure what that phrase means, exactly, but it seems to have a hypnotic effect on him, and his penis. He pulls the maid to him.
The next minute and a half are a blur. “Curses!” he mutters to himself, as he realizes that, once again, the wily maid has lured his hapless penis into her vaginal cavity. But it’s too late. The penis has released its precious load. “Me han robado tu esperma,” she hisses. “¿Dónde está la biblioteca?”
This, give or take a few of the details, seems to be how the author of the Rebuking Feminism blog imagines the events that led to the birth of Arnold’s love-child 14 years ago. Yep: in his version of events, it’s the women – both the maid, Patty Baena, and wife Maria – who are responsible for Arnold’s indiscretions:
Maria Shriver should have known better than to let any half way decent looking woman spend so much time in the house. The whole ballgame changes when a man reaches Arnold’s status. Women come begging to be f***ed by you. Women practically disrobe and spread when guys like Arnold walk in the room. I’m sure he abstained plenty of times but women like this maid wait for her opportunity when in such close proximity.
It’s tough, I guess, to be a freakishly huge, fabulously wealthy alpha male who wants to fuck everything in sight. But tougher indeed to be a beta:
As is quite common with the type of situation that took place with Arnold, I’m sure this little whore took her prized bastard back home to be raised by her oblivious, committed, and cuckolded beta male husband.
Some people might say, hey, isn’t Arnold partially to blame for cuckolding that little whore’s cuckolded beta male husband? No. It’s important to remember: he’s a victim too, and obviously not responsible for the sexual activity that Mrs. Baena lured him into with her fiery Latin vagina.
Maria may now file for divorce. The only people to end up completely fu*ked here will be the two men…Arnold for engaging in adultery (and the price only men have to pay for it) and the man that was cuckolded by his adulterous whore wife and will have to pay for it as well. Men bear liability to women on both sides of the equation. Men have no rights.
Now all Maria and Patty need to do is sit back and collect the cash. Ka-ching-gle All the Way!
EDITED TO ADD: The author of the post has added a response to my post as a addendum to his original post. The gist of it:
Arnold and his impropriety was not the intended focus of this article. I take it as common knowledge among my readers that what Arnold did was obviously wrong. This was not the point of the article.
The point of this article was to illustrate how adultery is supported by law on one end (the female end) and not supported by law on the male end.
You know, all I want is to be able to have a family where the woman can’t just pick up the kids, walk away and then demand I send her money to support her…that’s all.
So you want Joao Batista Groppo’s approach to marriage legalized?
Mark this one down for MRA’s wanting marriage to be an institution where men do absolutely nothing to make themselves desirable to their wives and that the wife’s feelings about her husband and marriage should be given no consideration, and her right to pursuit of happiness, travel, and freedom should be revoked upon signing a marriage license.
Yes actually it’s interesting you mention that because I read an article that clearly outlined why these women are also clear losers in our changed structure. In times past they were ensured a husband.
Oooh, was that “article” on Spearhead? Or, perhaps I should put it differently: Which asinine MRM site wrote and published this article?
And what about those women who weren’t ensured a husband? OH MY GOD — why am I even asking? The thing is, (1) what you’re saying isn’t true. Women in the past weren’t guaranteed a husband. (2) Then, as now, some women didn’t want a husband. And it’s really, really nice not to be more or less forced into a life that you don’t want. (3) Not all people are straight. Just so you know.
Well now these women can become lesbian
You know, all I want is to be able to have a family where the woman can’t just pick up the kids, walk away and then demand I send her money to support her…that’s all.
“So you want Joao Batista Groppo’s approach to marriage legalized?”
“Mark this one down for MRA’s wanting marriage to be an institution where men do absolutely nothing to make themselves desirable to their wives and that the wife’s feelings about her husband and marriage should be given no consideration, and her right to pursuit of happiness, travel, and freedom should be revoked upon signing a marriage license.”
Mark this one down where feminists want marriage to be and institution where women do absolutely nothing to make themselves desirable to their husband and marriage should be given no consideration, and his right to pursuit of happiness, travel, and freedom should be revoked upon signing the marriage license.
At least when women bared liability men did not then, nor now abandon their families and divorce their wives. Open the flood gates of female entitlement and…here we are in a manboobz forum necessitated by the advent of gender conflict.
Well now these women can become lesbian
Or, rather, in areas of the world where it has become more acceptable to do so, lesbian and bisexual women can live as lesbian and bisexual women and not have to hide their partners and preferences as if there were something wrong with them.
Yes, Arnie. This is true, and it’s an improvement over the forced hetero marriage option you were talking about.
“At least when women bared liability men did not then, nor now abandon their families and divorce their wives.”
It’s really disconcerting to try to discuss issues with someone who clearly adheres to a past that never existed.
People have always shirked marriage and family. Some stick around and stay just for the kids. Some have great relationships. At this point I really can’t discern what your basic thesis is or what you want from women other than to chain them in the basement so they can’t leave and will do everything you say.
The reason that more people used to be married was because they were FORCED into marriage by their families. There weren’t a few people who chose to stay single after their first spouse died… (Just to show off my REAL history skills)
@Lady Victoria von Syrus
Damn power outage.
You must be joking when you say lesbians have the lowest rate of DV and child abuse. C’mon theres nothing lesbians love more than to beat the shit out of each other. They have the hightest DV rate by far.
As far as child abuse…
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=14612
Lesbian child abuse is simply called celebrating sex between adult women, young girls. Cause when women do it, it’s good. I’m of course against this, but since I’m the bad misogynist it must be because I want to control female sexuality.
Wow. When did anyone say that any sort of pedophilia was ok? Oh, they didn’t! That’s right!
In other words, Arnie wants nothing less than he wants equality-because he thinks women are subhumans only good for making babies. He just can’t figure out why those damned uteri keep trying to run away from him and keep telling him to fuck off, like they are attached to people with minds of shome shit like that.
Also, ladies, even though your baby making and child raising is so valuable that it automatically elevates you above men, it is in no way shape or form to be viewed as production, labor, of contributing to society-because that makes sense.
Now, I haven’t done a lot of research on pedophilia but I know that they say men who rape children aren’t gay. Being gay would indicate that the person is attracted to other adult males. I am going out on a limb here and say I am fairly certain the same would apply to women who are pedophiles.
@spitfire
Or maybe the reason more people were married was because women weren’t slutwalking with pride. I mean it must be pretty embarrasing for a guy to show up with his “new” girlfriend and everyone in the bar/tavern what have you has been with her. She’s got a loyalty factor of 0.0.
I mean c’mon on the other thread you’re all bragging about how many dick’s you’ve handled, and who does what boy/girl/fill in this years new construct. That just screams loyalty.
Arnie: At least when women bared liability men did not then, nor now abandon their families and divorce their wives.
That’s why Henry VIII didn’t divorce his wives (or kill them) when he was tired of them.
Also, if, 70 percent of roughly 50 percent (and dude.. WTF, is it so hard to do a spot of simple math [50*.7] and just say, 35 percent) of women are, “just walking away”…. why are you telling me that less than ten percent (a flat lie) of men have custody?
Because you are saying that 15 percent of marriages are the one’s the women aren’t “abandoning”. If if only ten percent of those marriages see men getting custody, that’s still “roughly” 38 percent where the kids are just dumped on the man.
That, of course, would be dishonest of me. Sorry. Since only about 60 percent of divorces involve children it would be about 70 percent of 35 = 21 + 3 (because men get custody in 10 percent of the contested cases; according to you), so in your version of things, men are the custodial parents in more than 70 percent of all divorces.
So, what’s your complaint?
Oh right… you can’t abandon a kid because you were careless enough to avoid someone getting pregnant when you had sex with them.
I forgot. The kid doesn’t matter to you. You want the right to abandon them, completely, just because you don’t like being responsible for your actions.
First of all, I don’t recall bragging about dicks here. Are you getting your girls confused?
Second of all, no I’m fairly certain it was the fact that you’re parents set you up with people 😛 Because those are the actual facts, not silly slanderous assumptions I made up afterward. It’s fun when you do things that way!
@spitfire
When you said…
“Wow. When did anyone say that any sort of pedophilia was ok? Oh, they didn’t! That’s right!”
Why Lady Victoria von Syrus was telling me that lesbian child abuse was near 0% rate. I just wanted to correct her and show her how when lesbians sexually abuse little girls, they the lesbians actually want to be praised for it.Wow. When did anyone say that any sort of pedophilia was ok? Oh, they didn’t! That’s right!
Plus I get to lower my stats on being wrong 95% of the time.
Your post implied that someone said it was ok, which no one did.
And “close to” is completely different than “is at.” Do we have statistics for children molested by women other than men? I’m sure they exist.
@spitfire
My post was in reply to von lady, who first made excuses for women abusing child far more than men. Then her statement of lesbians having a near 0% child abuse rate. She needed correction for her denial/excuses on both points.
Of course I did forget that correcting a woman violates the VAWA power and control wheel.
@Pecunium
If 11% of child custody is given to men it was because a woman allowed it. It hinged on her word alone.
Her word alone is what determines any custody arangement. If she say joint its joint, if she says shared its shared. Her word is final. The vast majority of men want shared custody. They fight for this and lose 85% of the time. Her word alone determines this.
“At least when women bared liability men did not then, nor now abandon their families and divorce their wives.”
–“It’s really disconcerting to try to discuss issues with someone who clearly adheres to a past that never existed.”
I suggest you look at the numbers. Male initiated divorce rates were and still are very low compared to women’s.
“Wow. When did anyone say that any sort of pedophilia was ok? Oh, they didn’t! That’s right!”
Actually it is part of Eve Ensler’s Vagina Monologues. The story of a lesbian raping a 12 year old girl is celebrated. I believe the segment was “the little coochie snorcher that could” Pretty sick shit.
Actually, in the Vagina Monologues she was 16, the adult was 24. It is illegal, but I have seen that work with adult men and teenage girls *shrugs*
(She also wasn’t raping her, it was pretty consensual)
“In other words, Arnie wants nothing less than he wants equality-because he thinks women are subhumans only good for making babies. He just can’t figure out why those damned uteri keep trying to run away from him and keep telling him to fuck off, like they are attached to people with minds of shome shit like that.”
Are you finished? Now…what does this have to do with equal parenting and presumed shared custody? What does this have to do with women having ZERO liability in divorce?
“it is in no way shape or form to be viewed as production, labor, of contributing to society-because that makes sense.”
You don’t read very well:
“Unlike todays economy human beings WERE the unit of production. Having more of us was an asset. 15 children meant wealth. Women, just like men were utilized for our best use to suit the circumstances.”
“That’s why Henry VIII didn’t divorce his wives (or kill them) when he was tired of them.”
When did men have this king status to discard wives? Again, men do not and have never in the past abandoned their families at the rate that women do.
“Oh right… you can’t abandon a kid because you were careless enough to avoid someone getting pregnant when you had sex with them. I forgot. The kid doesn’t matter to you. You want the right to abandon them, completely, just because you don’t like being responsible for your actions.”
Are you saying you are against abortion?