Poor Arnold Schwarzenegger!
Picture the scene.
It’s January 1997. Arnold’s in a good mood, sitting in his den, paging through the latest issue of Variety. He chuckles to himself. Fuck the critics! Jingle All the Way is putting asses in the seats of the multiplexes of America, and that means money in the bank to the Terminator.
Suddenly, he hears the door to the room click shut behind him. It’s that devious maid again, with her wily, sexy Latin ways! “Que pasa?” she says, running her hands through his hair. He’s still not quite sure what that phrase means, exactly, but it seems to have a hypnotic effect on him, and his penis. He pulls the maid to him.
The next minute and a half are a blur. “Curses!” he mutters to himself, as he realizes that, once again, the wily maid has lured his hapless penis into her vaginal cavity. But it’s too late. The penis has released its precious load. “Me han robado tu esperma,” she hisses. “¿Dónde está la biblioteca?”
This, give or take a few of the details, seems to be how the author of the Rebuking Feminism blog imagines the events that led to the birth of Arnold’s love-child 14 years ago. Yep: in his version of events, it’s the women – both the maid, Patty Baena, and wife Maria – who are responsible for Arnold’s indiscretions:
Maria Shriver should have known better than to let any half way decent looking woman spend so much time in the house. The whole ballgame changes when a man reaches Arnold’s status. Women come begging to be f***ed by you. Women practically disrobe and spread when guys like Arnold walk in the room. I’m sure he abstained plenty of times but women like this maid wait for her opportunity when in such close proximity.
It’s tough, I guess, to be a freakishly huge, fabulously wealthy alpha male who wants to fuck everything in sight. But tougher indeed to be a beta:
As is quite common with the type of situation that took place with Arnold, I’m sure this little whore took her prized bastard back home to be raised by her oblivious, committed, and cuckolded beta male husband.
Some people might say, hey, isn’t Arnold partially to blame for cuckolding that little whore’s cuckolded beta male husband? No. It’s important to remember: he’s a victim too, and obviously not responsible for the sexual activity that Mrs. Baena lured him into with her fiery Latin vagina.
Maria may now file for divorce. The only people to end up completely fu*ked here will be the two men…Arnold for engaging in adultery (and the price only men have to pay for it) and the man that was cuckolded by his adulterous whore wife and will have to pay for it as well. Men bear liability to women on both sides of the equation. Men have no rights.
Now all Maria and Patty need to do is sit back and collect the cash. Ka-ching-gle All the Way!
EDITED TO ADD: The author of the post has added a response to my post as a addendum to his original post. The gist of it:
Arnold and his impropriety was not the intended focus of this article. I take it as common knowledge among my readers that what Arnold did was obviously wrong. This was not the point of the article.
The point of this article was to illustrate how adultery is supported by law on one end (the female end) and not supported by law on the male end.
So… as soon as the kid is born, then?
Oh, and Arnie, just in case you hadn’t noticed… I’m a guy.
Arnie,
I posted a while ago listing what I believe would be the requirements for male “abortion” to be equal to female abortion. You haven’t addressed it, so am I correct to assume you agree?
Are you saying that it could have happened any other way? That women would have built civilization up to this point? Voting is about management and distribution of resources, something which women never bothered to acquire on their own because men did it for them. Men know the only way to gain the favor of women is if we get these things. You’ve been coddled since the beginning of time.
Where to begin.
1: I do think women could have built civilisation.
2: I think the reason they didn’t is because men refused to let them (see above, as with the vote).
3: I think you are misanthropist.
“You are bullshit, man. “Women’s families”? “Women’s children”? Just — What?”
Yes silly, women have their own families if they want to remove the male worker bee and pseudo father meet.
Women’s families consist of a matriarch, her children, sometimes from multiple men which is surrounded by Isolated Resource Producing Males that deliver their earnings to her doorstep. Men are not members of the matriarchal family. Men are not members of the lives of children in the matriarchal family. A family can be dissolved in this fashion even when the male worker bee lives in the home.
At any moment the grand matriarch can cast him out of the home, remove him from his children and force him to go to work for her. This is all men are good for. Understand that men know this and there is not point in being an involved father.
I’m not joking with you. It happened to my father, my brother and it sure as hell is not going to happen to me.
I’m not saying I will not have children. I just don’t think I could handle being an involved father.
Wow…. I am amazed. I didn’t think someone more confused about the way the world works than NWO was ever likely to turn up.
It’s neck and neck right now, but I’m thinking Arnie is pulling ahead.
Pecunium it sounds like you are confused about the matriarchal family along with marriage and divorce laws. If there is anything I can do to clarify things let me know.
I don’t really see the point of signing onto the marriage contract of liability to a matriarch. There is nothing in marriage for men. It could be terminated at any moment. I could not handle that.
My father was pathetic, he would drive an hour and a half each way almost every day during the summer when my mother was working and sometimes after I walked home from school. I was what was known as a “latch key kid”. This is a child of a matriarchal family who has no parental supervision at home after school and during the summer.
My father had to sneak up to see me. I remember how special it was for me. I appreciate his effort but it was not worth it for him, none of it was worth it. I understand what men are worth to the family.
Arnie: If I ever feel I need your opinion on marriage, or divorce, or kids….
I’ll just save myself a lot of grief and put a bullet through my head.
“1: I do think women could have built civilisation.”
“2: I think the reason they didn’t is because men refused to let them (see above, as with the vote).”
Yea, keep believing that women played no important role in civilization and that their role was so unnecessary that they could have done other things. You were just cattle right…I get it. You were the only victims of the human condition and the victims of male oppression..I get it. Just so you know, men resent just about every view feminism has of the world.
“Arnie: If I ever feel I need your opinion on marriage, or divorce, or kids….”
“I’ll just save myself a lot of grief and put a bullet through my head.”
No only men are 10 to 15x more likely to do kill themselves after divorce not women. Women have nothing to lose.
You see the matriarch demotes him to fatherlessness and indentured servitude unable to ever start another family. She makes him work for her and send her money or he gets put into a cage. ONLY MEN ARE SIGNIFICANTLY MORE LIKELY TO KILL THEMSELVES AFTER DIVORCE.
Arnie: I am going to repeat something I said upstream.
I am a man.
I realise this probably comes as a shock you, but I am a man.
Everything I’ve said, was said by a man.
Arnie: You are missing the point. If (got forbid) I am ever in a spot where your advice (on pretty much anything) is the best option I have…
I think I would be better off dead.
Okay, so my gay uncles, who have just adopted their second son, have a family. Who’s the matriarch? Is it my 91 year old grandmother? I’m pretty sure she was only the parent to her eight sons and she’s only met the newest grandson twice, but clearly she holds all of the power. Or something.
Talk about not making sense.
I’m sry for what happened to you as a child 🙁 It sounds like your father rly loved you 🙂 Father’s like your dad are why so many ppl (incl the ppl who posted above if you read what they have to say about fatherhood and love 🙂 ) want to change things so that ppl like your dad can easier raise their children when a separation happens 🙂 (life is f-ed up 🙁 I know : trust me… I know 🙁 )
It sounds like this discussion is rly triggering for you and rly personal and I can tell you’re getting rubbed rly raw 🙁 I’m sorry to hear what happened to you as a child 🙁 If you need to or want to, I think everybody here would understand if you need to step away to be in a safe space or something for a bit 🙂
Your father sounds like a courageous amazing person 🙂
Arnie: It’s kind of like you don’t even understand what you’re saying. Not sure.
Anyway, it sounds like your dad sacrificed a lot for you. That doesn’t make him pathetic. That makes him a loving father. I understand that you suspect all women have it in for the generalized category of Men, just as you feel your mom had it in for your dad. I also see now where your deep investment in financial abortion comes from. Please know that there are many, many men out there who want to be (and are) a part of their child’s life (as your dad did, apparently), and that their participation in their child’s life is something that the enjoy very much and gives meaning to their life. Generalizing from your particular childhood experience (colored through a very biased lens) is probably not helpful in understanding how things are or should be for other people.
Sorry Rachel I missed it as your comment was not approved yet.
You Said: “Arnie,
I don’t know whether I agree or disagree with your argument that men should have the same right as women to “abort” parental responsibility, a part of me thinks if I were to get pregnant and have options, so should the man I slept with (which is why in our current legal situation I would discuss the available options with him), but anothe part of me thinks that once there is a child, there is a child who needs love and support (both emotional and financial).
However, I do have a couple of comments on the idea of male “abortions” and how they would have to work to be truly equal to the right to an abortion women currenty have.
First, women are required to go to a specific clinic to have an abortion (unless it is medically necessary). In the state I live in, there are only three such clinics available, so women who want an abortion are required to physically show up at an abortion clinic (which may be hours from where they actually live) and face the stigma of having an abortion. If men want to “abort” their parental rights, they should have to show up at the same place to complete whatever paperwork is required.
Second, many states impose strict requirements on who actually is able to have an abortion. Some states require a woman to show up at the clinic, request an abortion, have a sonogram and hear the description of the fetus development, wait two days, and then come back. Some states require parental consent if the woman is under age 18 (with the option of a judicial bypass if necessary). For a male “abortion,” the requirements should be the same.
Third, women are not allowed to get an abortion whenever they want during a pregnancy. In the first trimester, there are few (if any) restrictions, but after that, most states impose heavy restrictions. Practically speaking, for many women this restricts their right to an abortion to the first trimester. Some women (I’m not saying most, I’m saying some) aren’t even aware they are pregnant at this point. Some women aren’t able to get in to the clinic. Some women haven’t made their choice. Men should have the same time restrictions as women. By this, I don’t mean that men should have a specific amount of time after learning that they have impregnanted a woman. I mean that if a man finds out that a woman he slept with is pregnant in her first trimester, great, abort away. If not, sorry, but the state imposes restrictions on us all.
Finally, abortions aren’t free. In fact, abortions can be quite expensive depending on the timing in the pregnancy. Men who want to “abort” their parental rights should have to pay the same amoutn as it would cost to have a medical abortion. I’m not sure who they should have to pay this amount to, but they should have to pay.
Those are just a few of my thoughts on how your theory of a male abortion would have to work to be truly “equal.” Again, not sure if I agree with it, but I am sure that it should be as difficult for men as it is for women to exercise their “right.””
Yes I think you are on track. The onus of responsibility for our continued welfare as a civilization would then depend on how many women brought to term children with a father that aborted. It would not be a good situation. I do think that women don’t really see fathers as necessary so I imagine quite a bit would have the child. I’ve read up on what fatherlessness does to children especially to boys and the results are not good at all.
So far though if I’m not mistaken women and society don’t really value the role of father and the law reflects likewise.
WP’s automatically animating my smileys makes my post look less sincere than it is : But it is abs sincere.
It’s just the way I write and express my emotions :]
This discussion is moving so quickly I just wanted to highlight a couple of posts that got held in moderation that everyone should read:
Kendra, on gender and self-sacrifice, and also on this:
http://manboobz.com/2011/05/22/arnold-schwarzeneggers-adultery-blame-the-bitches/comment-page-3/#comment-19857
Kendra, sorry to hear this, and glad you’re ok!
darksidecat on women and coal mining, basically showing that the garbage MRAs spit out on the subject is, as usual, based on utter historical ignorance:
for the rest:
http://manboobz.com/2011/05/22/arnold-schwarzeneggers-adultery-blame-the-bitches/comment-page-3/#comment-19895
Back from a lovely walk. The cats say hi.
Women did, in fact, play quite a large role in building civilization, but it’s so hard for empathy-challeneged MRAs to see that. Just as they can’t really fathom being put in a woman’s position, I don’t think they understand what life was like before the Industrial Revolution.
I can walk across the street and buy a ham and cheese sandwich, soda, and pair of pants for the money I earn for about two to three hours of work.
Now, just imagine doing that in a time without the aid of advanced machinery, before mass production when everything was made by hand and even luxuries were transported by horse or ox.
If you want a pair of pants, there’s no going to the Levi’s store for you. Harvest your fibers, spin them into yarn, weave the yarn into cloth, dye it (and where are you going to get dye), cut it and sew the pants. Want some food? Better be able to make it yourself. And since there’s no such thing as a refrigerator, hope you’re happy going to the market every day for your food – or at least can pay a servant to do that for you. But since most people were slaves or peasants, you’re probably the servant. No cars or even buses – you walk to the market, and you walk home with what you can carry. There’s no microwave, either, so no instant soup or TV Dinners. Forget about working a 9 to 5, too – unless you can afford regular candles, your work schedule is determined by when the sun rises and sets.
Of course, cooking, sewing and cleaning is all women’s work, same with tending children. I wonder what those civilization-building men would have done if there were no women to make sure they were fed, clothed and had a decent home. Or without mothers to raise them, or wives to give them sons.
That’s not even going into the women who have been enslaved in one form or another. Because I guarantee you, if a man paid good money for a female slave, he’s not giving her a ‘pussy pass’, he’s making sure he gets his money’s worth.
Well it doesn’t matter is all I’m saying. Fatherhood is not important by law. We have a 50% divorce rate which means there is a 50% chance of this happening to me.
I don’t know why divorce is so high but it is and frankly I really don’t want that in my life.
Lady Victoria: Hear! hear!
I’d like to introduce a new term to the discussion:
The NWOslave Ratio, named in honor of our own NWOslave. The ratio would refer to the 95% chance that any given sentence by NWOslave is likely to be factually incorrect and/or empty sarcasm or rhetoric.
Here’s an example of the term used in a sentence:
“Arnie’s recent comments have been getting perilously close to the NWOslave Ratio.”
I want to give Arnie an e-hug 🙁
@Lady Vic I already said the below:
“Yea, keep believing that women played no important role in civilization and that their role was so unnecessary that they could have done other things. You were just cattle right…I get it. You were the only victims of the human condition and the victims of male oppression..I get it. Just so you know, men resent just about every view feminism has of the world.”
So let me ask you…what more do women want???