>
 |
| Probably not the woman of your dreams. |
Hey fellas! Are you tired of dealing with actual women? Would you rather spend a nice evening at home chatting amiably with a tiny virtual woman who lives inside your computer instead? If so, would it be OK if instead of resembling any woman you’ve ever met in real life this tiny virtual woman instead acted as though she’d been designed by some dude who’s never actually spoken with a real woman?
Also, I should add, if you chat her up cleverly enough, she’ll take off her virtual clothes and show you her virtual lady bits.
If this all sounds like heaven to you, you may want to check out a little “game” called Virtual Woman Millennium Edition. A friend of mine found it on Download.com theother day, and naturally thought of me. The game, such as it is, allows you to create the woman of your dreams. As the game publisher, an outfit calling itself CyberPunk Software, put it:
Virtual Woman users can build, talk, and compete against Virtual Women with full artificial intelligence. You choose their ethnic type, personality, location, clothing, etc
By “compete against,” the game makers mean, basically, that you chat with her until she either tells you to fuck off (you lose!) or she takes off her clothes (you win!). Sex, evidently, is something that women own, and the point of dating, for guys at least, is to sweet talk – or wheedle, or con — the ladies into giving it to them. Women “win,” by contrast, when they force guys to listen to their inane blather without giving the poor schmucks even a glimpse of their titties. (I’d like to think that when my dates take off their clothes we both win.)
I played the game the other night – or at least as much of it as I could stand. The first time, the game crashed before the conversation started. The second time, I played as a raging misogynist and offended my date by calling her a “whore” and a “cunt,” and she left in a huff. The third time, I chatted long enough to convince my date to remove her top. At which point real life asserted its demands, and I set the game aside, never to resume it.
Let’s just say that the conversations I had with each of these imaginary women were something less than sparkling. The woman who eventually took off her top blathered happily away about her hair for a few minutes, then segued into a conversation about how she hated going to new supermarkets because she wouldn’t know where to look to find the milk. She was shallow, silly, and self-absorbed, a virtual incarnation of every sexist stereotype of modern womanhood. In other words, she seemed to come straight from MGTOW central casting. My “conversation” with her only lasted a few minutes, but it seemed to take forever. If real women were like this, I think even I would consider Going My Own Way.
As one review on Download.com put it:
the girls are just plane stupid, they … keep repeating themselves over and over again, and allot of what they say makes no sense, I say something to them, and they asked me some silly question that makes no sense, once I said what to one about something stupid it said that made so sense, just to see what it would do, and it said ( why are you so worried about me being what?) and it did that with other things I said to it too, its stupid, don’t waist your time with this.
That pretty much hits the nale on the hed.
So many questions:
Were the makers of this game deliberately trying to make the women as annoying as possible, or do they think women are actually like this? Was the inanity of the conversation a bug – the result of shitty artificial intelligence programming – or a feature? Probably a bit of both.
More to the point: who could possibly enjoy a game like this? You’d have to have a pretty low opinion of women to be able to put up with the game’s casual misogyny. But if you hate women that much, why would you want to spend your evening talking to an imaginary woman about shopping and hair?
Perhaps that’s why the publisher seems to have abandoned the game; the latest update on its web site is from 2008.
As I’ve pointed out before, a small but significant number of “mansosphere” men are eagerly looking forward to the day when sex robots and/or “virtual” women will give men what they see as a real alternative to real women, thus putting supposedly spoiled “western” women in their place and destroying feminism to boot. One of the many fatal flaws in this scenario is that the only people who seem to be interested in making sexbots and VR women are guys who have no fucking clue what actual human women are like. But, hey, if it gets these guys out of the dating pool, that’s pretty much good news for everyone.
—
If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly use the “Share This” or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it.
>Or work.. when is it you have time for work?Again… math skills NWO.
>Tool and Die makers are good at their trade but make poor machinists, and vise versa.I'm afraid I only do 2d autocad, ooops I mean cad. You see when I took cad 3d was in its infancy. And really you come from a family of tool and die makers. Gee I saw a Zebra once at the zoo, so now I'm an expert. You don't know anything about machining. Your father and brother worked, not you.
>18 hours a day on forums…. 17 or hours a day at work depending on the mood now 20 feet up.That's quite a accomplishment NWO
>In fact Kave I could make up words about design or machining, or really anything in manufacturing and you'd have to google it and hope wikipedia tossed you some useful info.Comical, have you ever even done an honest days labor in your life? Doubtful.
>Thats 40 feet up Kave, again keep up.
>NWOslave:Ahhh… Now we get to the heart of the matter. You are absolutely convinced that in our society all a woman has to do is snap her fingers and the man will be sent packing.Care to give one example of a case where, on a woman's word alone, a man was "evicted from [his] home, kicked out of college, incarcerated and placed on the sexual offenders registry?" If not, then its yet another baseless assertion that only convinces others that you are delusional.
>When does your work week start NWO?And yes.. you did google it.
>It sounds like NWO is one of those older technicians whose training is now all obsolete (his cad certainly seems to be) and who is now slinging blame at whoever he can for his own lack of relevance: blaming other demographics for stealing his job, blaming employers or the workplace for not recognizing the value of his obsolete skills, etc.He may well be unemployed or underemployed, which would explain his inconsistent descriptions of his work situation and his ability to be online at all hours.
>In the porn thread on April 21, NWO posted at the following times:11:41 AM11:5412:3912:481:01 PM1:291:371:391:461:541:592:182:242:402:563:033:093:203:504:104:154:555:025:075:155:215:235:315:335:365:435:455:485:545:576:066:106:136:196:256:286:306:366:486:556:577:067:137:167:207:287:578:238:278:318:388:428:508:538:599:049:11Dizzying, isn't it? As you can see, that's 10 1/2 hours of constant commenting with no breaks longer than 40 minutes. No 17-hour workday here, and this was on a Thursday.Compare that with my comments, for instance, and you'll see that I may post several times in succession in the evening, but then I'll be offline for a good 18 hours for sleep and work.
>I did not remark at all on "your value as a man". I did remark on your self awareness, which as you once more demostrate is very weak. Once you beome solid in yourself, you will find you attract better women (which you have been complning about often)but also better friends, employment, and all other things that make life good. Until then you will continue to miss the mark. At this point this blog is functioning as therapy for you and may result in happy progress. (You probably want to look up hubris as well.)Nighty night all. keep up the good fight.
>Night b-string (sorry, I like the sound). Though it does seem as if the fight is over. Perhaps NWO is taking one of his rare 20 hour hibernations?
>Bob fucking Dobbs, NWO, what is your purpose in being here exactly? What psychological need does it fulfill? Do you feel like a brave hero facing the slings and arrows of outrageous feminism? What?
>Attention, pure and simple. When NWO posts on the MRA forums he's probably ignored, because he's just one more voice echoing the same sentiments. When he posts here he's guaranteed a response because his tone is so obnoxious. So he gets the attention he seeks – and I guess also some sense of superiority, as he's already decided everyone who posts here has been brainwashed by the new world order feminist conspiracy and are therefore less intelligent than he is. In his mind he's toying with us, not the other way around.(I took Armchair Psychology 101 so I know this stuff.)
>A bunch of comments ago– NWOaf, the male equivalent of a vibrator is a fleshlight. I highly support all men buying a fleshlight and all women buying a vibrator. Sex toys for all!Robots, however, seem to fulfill an emotional need, not just a make-masturbation-feel-better physical need.
>Wow, seeing how NWO twists his story again and again, just to see commenters squirm, is quite a learning experience.And by learning experience, I mean: UGH.
>Seriously Dave, much as I enjoy this site, and read it every day, now that NWOaf has moved in all his stuff, and settled in with his laz-e-boy recliner to hold court for hours and hundreds of posts a day, I'm out of here.
>NWOslave, more than twelve hours and thirty comments later, not a single person has contested my assertion that you are an incredibly annoying person, and that that's at least part of why you can't find love.Just sayin'
>NWO starts posting first thing in the morning, goes all day, posts some bullshit about how busy he is and how evil women are, then slithers away once the questions come too fast. Sounds like an older guy who can't afford a trip to Thailand to buy a woman.
>I propose that we just ignore the goomba. Off topic: has anyone read the Liz Jones piece (I refuse to direct link to the Daily Fail) that's making the rounds on all the feminist blogs? I do believe that we've finally found the elusive sperm-stealing, gold-digging feminazi of myth. …oh wait, she's explicitly opposed to feminism and is a conservative colluder. Never mind, my bad. Guess the boogeywoman is still relegated to the shadows of the imagination.
>I read a part of it. She was pretty effed for doing what she did. Feministe had a good breakdown of what she was wrong and so was he.
>NWO SlaveI am a CNC Machinist for about 6 years now and two things are evident. People who are real Machinists don't consider "knowing CAD/CAM" as being an actual Machinist. Hands on, getting dirty, being able to machine parts either manually OR on a CNC with or without CAD/CAM software is a person who can call themselves a Machinist.The average Machinist who is properly trained (either by a trade school or through their work) laughs at the types who sit around diddling with software (but don't actual set-up, run, or use the programs) as office-lackeys. Not Machinists.If you can't make a part with your own two hands without the aid of a computer guiding you….you are far from a Machinist.
>NWO did you ever consider that the reason women don't want to date you is because you don't actually respect them? You are too busy making judgements about them and pushing them into tiny little boxes because you lack the ability to empathize and understand other people, further I would second ozy's statement of a fleshlight. The difference between a vibrator or it's male equivalent the fleshlight and a sexbot is that sexbots are actually designed to be pretend people. Women are very well aware that their vibrators are toys, where the current sexbot owners treat their sexbots as their girlfriend.
>I've never heard of women considering their vibrators to be "the same as/better than men" or whatever the claim here is. More commonly, you hear women saying that their vibrator is simply faster and more efficient (which is quite logical).I don't think I've ever heard a woman comparing her vibrator to her relationships and interactions with a human male. And certainly not as a replacement for one.
>Ladyraine, exactly. I'm not mocking anyone who uses sex toys, just those who think these toys are somehow a replacement for an entire gender. Island, NWO will get tired and move on.
>NWOSlave:You know, here's the thing: the fact that your handle includes "NWO" tells me that you are absolutely not to be taken seriously under any circumstances. The fact that you casually throw around the term "Marxist" reinforces that.Just sayin.