>
 |
| Cats also love porn. |
So the guys over at MGTOWforums.com – who want nothing to do with women but somehow can’t stop talking about them all day every day – have some interesting theories on why some women like porn so much, sometimes to the point of addiction.
According to the aptly named womanhater, it’s because they’re picking up tips; apparently, the better women fuck, the better they can fuck guys over:
Women (a few exceptions aside) see sex the same way a lumberjack sees a chainsaw – a useful tool. If they’re ‘addicted’ to it then my guess is that they’re in fact just studying it because they know it is their competition and they’d better learn how to do it like the men they hope to manipulate and extort want it. It’s like any other form of physical performance – you get better by watching the professionals. There’s not a man among us whose swing wouldn’t improve if we spent several hours a day watching professional golfers.
True, at least that bit about golf. Based on my admittedly limited exposure to her work, I’m not sure that all the skills that one can learn from watching Sasha Grey necessarily translate all that well to non-gang-bang situations.
Zuberi, meanwhile, suspects that women watch porn just to spite men:
Are they really addicted to porn or are they desperately trying to keep up with the sheer number of men who watch porn? Are these harpies so insecure that they have to overtake men in everything? It’s pathetic. There’s already a number of women who are drinking themselves retarded trying to keep up with men that they think are power drinkers.
But are they really watching all the porn they say they’re watching? Shade47 is suspicious:
When women look at porn they see pixels on a screen. Just some more attention whoring from women looking for a new angle to reel men in.Almsot every trashy girl Ive met claims to be into porn but when you look at her internet history its all retarded girl games on flash websites and shit. You know they arent covering their tracks by deleting browser history because that would involve understanding computers.
Damn these computer-illiterate, flash-game-loving, only-pretending-to-like-porn slatterns!
AC101202, by contrast, is convinced that a lot of women actually do love porn, or at least the more nasty and degrading parts of it – “facials, ass in the air, DP etc.” Why? Evolutionary Psych 101, dude! Because their reptilian cave-lady brains just love gangbangs:
Pre-civilization, women thousands of years ago spent their days getting nailed by dozens of guys. We all know here a majority of women have rape fantasies …Women who are managers, in positions of power, probably get off most watching degrading actions performed on women. Their lower reptilian brain likes seeing women treated like sex objects, since the women who reproduced best were the one’s who learned to enjoy gangbanging.
Now, I’m no evolutionary psych expert, but, er, what exactly is the evolutionary advantage of facials? I’m pretty sure you can’t get pregnant from semen on your forehead, in your eyes or, say, up your nose. (At least I never have.) Perhaps someone better schooled in evo psych and the general evil of women could explain that to me.
—
If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly use the “Share This” or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it.
>Yay for Mike's circular logic, a product of his superior male brain!
>nwo, I'm well aware that we don't live in a capitalistic society. That doesn't mean that I don't adhere to the political philosophy of such.
>NWO, I realize arguing with everyone here must be stressful. I'm thinking you might want to take a break with some porn. So here's some porn designed with male viewers in mind. Clearly, with your male brain, you and your male limbic system will enjoy this porn for men!You're welcome!
>DestertRose, knowing the truth and admitting or saying the truth are two sepearate things. Thats why someone came up with the word lying.
>furthermore, my name is briget not bridget. Spell my damn name properly
>Wow dave that was harsh, What'd I ever do to you? Are you trying to blind me?
>NWOSlave: Since you are claiming among your hard-wired biological strengths the ability to create "art, music, philosophy, inventions, etc", how is it that you personally haven't created any great art, nor music, nor any technological inventions, nor achieved any scientific breakthroughs? How come you are apparently unable to do any of the things that you claim every man is capable of doing by virtue of your biology? And since you are, in fact — not in theory, but in FACT — incapable of doing any of those things, why should be pretend that you, as an individual, are equal to the tiny minority of men who actually achieved greatness in some field? Why should anyone thank YOU? Genius is a lonely endeavor. And people like you — mediocrities who like to force people into neat little boxes — have, actually, throughout history worked tirelessly to suppress both men and women who create "art, music, philosophy, inventions, etc." because they upset your safe, conservative, narrow little world. Look outside your window. Look at all the great things that are around you. And then realize that 100% of that was created by people who are NOT like you. You are not one of them. You are their enemy.
>So that's why I watch porn? Silly me, I thought I did it to get off.I wonder what these nutbars would think it means when my boyfriend and I watch pron together. Obviously I'm somehow oppressing him.Also, watching porn to learn how to have good sex is like watching fantasy movies in the hopes of learning how to swordfight. All that stuff looks cool on film, but it practice… not so much.
>It could have just stopped at the "I'm wrong" part…Anyway, great link David! LOL
>Oh, is that how Mike's been conditioned to say that he can be conditioned at all when in fact he cannot be conditioned to believe despite what he's been conditioned to say? So, we can be conditioned to say things, but not believe them. And that is how Mike says things of which to say he had been conditioned, but still believes the sciency truth of sciency sciencyness.Makes perfect sense.
>To deny this is to deny reality. It's like saying someone is a musical genius got that way by practice. When that is not the case. I could practice music every day for the rest of my life an never write a piece of music that is even passably good. Think the movie Amadeus.Actually, it's more complicated than that. Malcolm Gladwell, in his book Outliers posits the 10000 hour rule–i.e., that it will take 10000 hours of practice for a person to get really good at something. He gives as examples The Beatles, who spent an enormous number of hours playing in Hamburg strip bars in their early career, and Bill Gates, who had nearly unlimited access to a computer in his youth, at a time when few people had regular access to computers.So, yeah, innate abilities matter, but so do hard work, focus, and opportunity. It's doubtful that Mozart would have been a musical genius had he not been steeped in music from the time he was born (his father was a composer). He had extraordinary innate talent, to be sure, but that talent would not have been developed had he not had the opportunities presented. Also, using a Hollywood movie as an example is probably not the best way to prove a point about neurobiology. Just sayin'.
>…Except that you said we couldn't be conditioned. At all.
>Well Amused I was a machine designer of prototype machinery for 8 years, but as you know all those manufacturing jobs went overseas. Something about quotas and such making the US uncompetitive. Among the machines I singlehandedly designed is the machine that produces the capacitors for every motorola phone in use today. Also the machine that checks for purity in molten steel use in the production of all Ford vehicles, amongst other things.
>By the way Amused I had no schooling in design other than a home course in autocad. Just something I'm good at, I guess.
>What, it was obviously an attempt to show you what your male brain desires NWOslave.
>Capt Bathrobe, did you say Mozart had an extrodinary innate talent. Impossible I tells ya, that would mean biology. And as we all know biology doesn't dictate ability.
>Now you are claiming to be an American NWOslave on top of being a Canadian.Wow. That makes your ignorant point about the size of the US government doubling 10 years after the vote (and the equally bizarre claim that full voting rights only happened thirty years ago in 1981) even dumber because you ignored what happened ten years after women got the vote. Cue blaming women for that mess as well by NWOslave.
>No, it does not. It contributes to it.
>I'm afraid I'm straight Lizzy. And to be honest I prefer still pictures of naked women. Freaky almost like a biological thingy.
>I never said I was a Canadian, just because I know a little more than US law and goings on just makes me diverse.
>Nice of you to acknowledge something that most nutters like you do not-that being LGBT is what a person is born with rather then a choice.
>But if 1 man is straight,surely they must all be!
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosalind_Franklinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curiehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelacehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia
>You actually do not know anything NWOslave-it shows when you make such insanely stupid statements like "the size of government doubled ten years after women got the vote" (implying it was women no longer being taxed without representation that caused the expansion rather then what actually did happen.)
>Perhaps they are lying about being gay, as Mike was lying about knowing the truth?