>
This weekend, Something Awful gives its readers a little tour of The Spearhead Forum and some of its more colorful fauna. I’ve borrowed the screenshot above from them. Hagslave entrainment! Yeasty oblivion!
The Spearhead Forum is if anything a little weirder than The Spearhead itself. It is also the main stomping ground of a fellow named Zebert, who has many, well, innovative ideas about how to solve all the problems of the world (e.g. forbidding education for women, prohibiting gatherings of more than four women at a time, removing the voiceboxes from baby girls at birth).
The Something Awful folks have gathered up quite a few of his most intriguing posts, and many others of equal value. Head over there now and enjoy.
>Isn't the Scum Manifesto supposed to be a satire?
>WHOA EVERYBODY IT TURNS OUT THAT THERE WAS ONE WOMAN IN 1968 WHO HATED MEN WE NEED TO STOP THIS FEMINISM THING IMMEDIATELYI repeat "modern, popular." Valerie Solanas is severely neither.
>@NWOSlave – well, clearly you don't know anything about feminist history if you think there is no dissent whatsoever within the feminist movement. There's plenty of debate within feminism itself and plenty of modern feminists who strongly disagree with what Dworkin and the "classical" feminists have said. Just recently, Naomi Wolf got a lot of shit for stuff she said about Julian Assange FROM FEMINISTS. Also, have you ever heard of the pornography wars in the 80s and 90s? And let's not get into "feminism" vs. "womanism".Plus, David put up a post some time ago systematically debunking each of the most controversial quotes attributed to radical feminists as the most man-hatey of them all.
>NWO: "Again I wait for the Dworkins, Steinens, Solaras, ect, ect, ect to be denounced. But none of you can do it can you?"Dworkin denounced: http://articles.latimes.com/1997-03-16/books/bk-38664_1_andrea-dworkinSteinem denounced:http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/reading-the-feminine-mistake/Content?oid=879148Solanas denounced: Valarie Solanas, I denounce you! (And so does every feminist I've ever known.
>Lady Vic: Well, yeah, it is supposed to be satire. But I fell she sort of muddied the issue a little when she shot Andy Warhol, so I'm taking some points off for that. And by "some" I mean "all."
>Thanks, David. It's probably a mark of just how revered and influential Solanas is that I had never heard of her until I started reading this blog and hearing the accusations of MRAs.
>Can't link to it as I am posting from my phone at the moment, but there is a site dedicated solely to the nutjob Peter Nolan, called Peter Nolan Psychopath that is very interesting. The very fact that this person is so welcomed and admired by his MRA buddies at the-spearhead, who upvote him and support his violent rhetoric continually makes the MRM very creepy. There are many dangerous men among them. I've seen similar comments on the-spearhead before. Certain men do take shots at cops as he describes, most cops killed on DV calls are ambushed and never had a chance, and when I see stories like that, I always wonder if the suspect was connected to the MRM.
>What kind of life is it to spend all your time "wrapped in such bitterness, loathing, and hatred, to be honestly convinced that the kind of stuff they're spouting is true? It's not a life I would ever live. I find myself mingling pity with being creeped out."This very much reminds me of feminists. Especially the obsessed zealots such as the ones who hang in this blog.But I understand, it's okay for feminists to be shameless hypocrites. It's okay for feminists to whine whine whine about men on a daily basis.These feminists are magically not deemed as being creeps or sexist monsters. Only such labels can be put on men.
>NWOslaveWatch the movie Who shot Andy Warhal, then get back to the feminists about how she was one of their greats. (feminist producer or definitely feminist influence in the creation of this movie)Not everything you read on the internet is true. Even if Angry Harry told you so. As a side note your stats on child support dollars, etc are very very off. Actually not just off, when you get your stats from mra bloggers you should not hold them up as factual. Try this. Google average child support paid first. (that would be for all children) then google cost of raising a child.Dig deep outside of mra blogs and forums. Then get back to me. Come back with factual numbers then we can talk. Speaking of numbers while you are out there perhaps you can run the numbers of the cost of childcare and the quality of childcare you want for your children. Our nanny was paid 25$ an hour, private daycare starts at 40$ a day, last time I was updated government subsidized was 25$ a day. Seems that child support isn't such a cash cow? I realize that most mra's seem to think all it takes is feeding children fish sticks and sticking them in front of the t.v. In my home raising children meant engaging them in activities that would promote their intelligence and world view, being active and engaged. That is really a full time good for society as a whole job.
>"Given the contempt that many MRAs display for women's emotional needs or women's sexuality, is it any wonder they end up being left by their wives?" ROFL do feminists care about men's needs? Fuck no! When ever men express their issues,99.9 percent of the time, feminists scoff at it.Stop being hypocrites.It never ceases to amaze me how the feminists whine about sexism from the MR movement and yet they are totally sexist/hateful themselves.
>"Not one iota of sympathy for the millions of men who have been and are in prison for the crime of being poor."And that is not one bit surprising coming from the feminist movement. The biggest complainers about sexism are the biggest offenders of sexism as its hard to find a feminist who actually cares about men's issues or has equal concern towards men's issues as they do with women's issues."If we lived in a Patriarchial Society, men would be given default custody. Patriarchy meaning men are oppressors and women are the oppressed."Feminists are too fucking dumb to figure this out. Anyone is highly delusional and not right in the head if they believe a so called patriarchy exists in American society and other western societies in 2011.The delusions displayed from these bigoted zealots is amusing though in a disturbing way
>NickI doubt very much that you are ROFL about anything in your life.Please give some evidence that 99.9 percent of the time feminists do not care about the men in their lives?
>"She was not, is not, and should not be ever considered one of the "greats."As I have said a few times in this blog, feminists such as Valerie are well known from the support of a large number of many other feminists. If many feminists didn't support people like her, she wouldn't be heard of.This says a lot about the feminist movement.
>"Please give some evidence that 99.9 percent of the time feminists do not care about the men in their lives?"Please give evidence where they do?
>Well nick we could start with giving birth and breast feeding, and work from there as far as caring about men. If you are in a place where you truly feel people around you hate you then you really need to get help. Can we agree that help is not "let's rip out their voice boxes"?
>There simply aren't MILLIONS of men who have been or are in prisons for INABILITY to pay child support. This is an outright lie. And I don't have sympathy for those deadbeats had the ABILITY to support their children but refused to do so.
>No nick.. Valerie is known because of the movie "Who shot Andy Warhal" That's it.Some feminists have tried to deconstruct her actions as being radical feminist instead of an act of a crazy person. I have never heard her acts celebrated but I have heard a few excuses for her. Some mra's have tried to deconstruct Marc Lepines actions as being mra instead of the act of a crazy person. I have heard his actions celebrated on mra forums, and the rest excuse him. I have never seen on a mra blog or forum anyone stand up and say Lepine targeted women. (and this was a bad thing)What they both have in common is mental illness. If your thinking is going in either of their ideals perhaps you should see a doctor?
>Kave, you are avoiding the question. How and where is it evident that the majority of feminists actually care about men's issues? Or even if some do, show where they express "equal concern" towards male issues as they do towards women's.That said, I find it laughable how you are going on with crap about being mentality ill. So in your little sheltered feminist world, anyone is mentality ill if they believe most feminists are sexist. Yet, a person is not if they believe most MRAs are sexist. Wow these femitwits love their double standards.No wonder why I don’t take you bunch of bigoted clowns seriously. This is why I hardly post in this blog as its full of feminist zealots who are lost in their delusional little feminist world.I won't bother carrying on in this thread as it will just be the same old bigoted crap over and over again about feminist/women are perfect princesses and any man who criticises women/feminists are evil and creepy.yawn
>ROFL do feminists care about men's needs? Fuck no! When ever men express their issues,99.9 percent of the time, feminists scoff at it.Well, yeah, if your 'need' is to feel better about yourself by denigrating women (or gays, or other races, or other religions), that's a need I feel pretty comfortable scoffing at. Maybe that makes me evil, but at least I can sleep at night (and don't waste my time coddling man-children or stroking their egos).Feminists totally agree that men have emotional needs, too… though they do take the position that a man isn't entitled to this from any given random woman he so desires. Her wishes and needs matter, too.
>yes Nick you are posting the same old bigoted nonsense about women and feminists you always do. Why not come up with something new or in this reality at least?
>NickI'm still waiting for you to cite evidence that 99.9 percent of the time feminists (women) do not care about men's issues. Until you come somewhat close to citing some kind of statistical data I'm going to consider you someone that is mentally ill.Fair enough?
>Nick said " How and where is it evident that the majority of feminists actually care about men's issues"What do you really mean by feminist? Do you really mean women caring about men?I could cite many right wing female bloggers which mra people seems to eat up as gold. Sarah Palin is in some mra's eyes the ultimate woman (and yes I can provide links) yet she's also considered a feminist in mra eyes."I 'm unsuccessful with women hence all women/feminists are bad. Rinse and repeat with no internal pressure until my xbox (or other video gaming device) is threatened. "Nick.. you know you'll end up the loser in any of the above situations not because you're male but because the vast majority of humans are uncomfortable around you regardless of sex. Do you really think you'd do that better off if you desired to date males?
>I could cite many right wing female bloggers which mra people seems to eat up as gold.And don't forget "self-proclaimed feminist" authors, such as Christina Hoff Sommers, who is highly venerated in MRA's eyes.
>Nick seems to be starting with the assumption that "feminist" is simply a synonym for "world's worst poopyheads," and not really thinking or researching anything beyond that.
>I must say I have never seen a person jailed for child support where the state was not actively involved in throwing a welfare fit about the mother. Seriously. Our intensely negative views of women on welfare are a huge factor here. I knew one very poor women who would joke that the only time anyone cared that her ex worked under the table so as not to have to try and help feed the kids was when she went to renew their benefits. It is sad because it is true. The Bradley Amendment actually had significant conservative anti-feminist support, because it was largely sold as a way to get women and kids off of the welfare rolls.Oh, on another note, I can't be the only one who noticed the irony of NWO's language based criticism in regards to refering to kids as women's children when he explicitly did the same thing with them being men's children ("kidnap a mans child") a few comments before, can I?