>
 |
| Pick a stereotype. Art by Margaret Kasahara. |
Today, on the blog Objectify Chicks — devoted to women, not bird children — the would-be “relationship expert” behind the site attempts to explain why so many men of his ilk prefer Asian women. Naturally, he spews forth an assortment of stereotypes which manage to be insulting towards American and Asian women at the same time.
American women, he writes, echoing a widespread sentiment amongst manosphere men,
are worthless. They are fat, ignorant, self-absorbed, and sexually unskilled. They are so stonehearted that they have been murdering their unborn at the rate of 4,000 innocents a day for 30 years. They are psychologically unstable, romantically unreliable, and more prone than not to use the legal system as a weapon to merely get their way. American women are brash, obnoxious, loud, and irrational – and that is on their very best days.
Asian women, by contrast,
are (largely) diminutive, petite, and feminine. They are quiet and submissive, and have genuine values. … They are devoted to their family, and recognize that sexual skill is a necessary part of being a woman. They recognize that their primary loyalty is to their husband and do not have the “party” attitude of young American women. They are clean, manageable, marriageable, and sane.
Mr. Chick Objectifier shows how much he values these women with values by illustrating his post with a picture of a young, attractive Asian women, with the following caption: “Hello There …. You must be the birthday boy!!! I am your gift!!! I am here to love you long time!”
Clearly, Mr. Objectifier suggests, the best way to knock those smug American women down a peg or two is to import as many of these Asian “gifts” to the US as possible. Alas, evil feminists — sorry, “femtards” — have put a some barriers in the way, in the name of protecting women and girls from “human trafficking.” Mr. Chick Objectifier objects, arguing that
the femtard interest in Western men’s attraction to foreign women has nothing to do with their purported concern for “human trafficking.” Femtard attempts to criminalize foreign matchmaking services and the ease with which foreign wives can obtain visas is rather an attempt to squelch competition from real women (which Western, femtard women are NOT) so that Western men are forced to settle for the screeching, obnoxious, and fat-laden banshees of the femtard left.
That’s right: In his mind Asian women are basically sexual strikebreakers, and feminists want to keep them out of the US so they can have … bitter, woman-hating dudes like the Chick Objectifier all to themselves?
I was following his logic up to this point, but then my head exploded.
—
If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly* use the “Share This” or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it.
*Yes, that was a Bioshock reference.
>It's very sad that confused, miserable individuals like Chick Objectifier exist. Is there a sudden dearth of therapists in this country, or what?
>I am intensely curious to know what Mr. Objectify Chicks considers to be 'sexually skilled.' I suspect it has more to do with 'blow jobs and anal on demand' than anything else.
>The main contact these guys have with women is watching porn with Asian pornstars in it. That's why these guys constantly fantasize about Asian and East-European women. These guys are very easy prey for golddiggers and that's the type of things that will happens to them :http://www.stickmanbangkok.com/Reader/reader2112.htmhttp://www.pattaya-live.com/index.php?showtopic=1072
>These guys really need to stop whining about the International Marriage Brokers Act. It has like no teeth whatsoever. If you got your panties in a knot because your prospective bride can request a copy of a poorly-done background check and gets a brochure that tells her she won't be deported for divorcing a guy who beats her, then maybe an arbitrary limit on the number of fiance visas you can apply for is not the biggest thing between you and happiness.
>And also, I believe it only applies to women you meet through a broker. If you have the gumption to get your ass over to Asia and meet a chick on your own, I'm pretty sure it's still game on for lying about your income or previous criminal history.
>Reminds me of this: http://boycottamericanwomen.blogspot.com/2011/02/american-women-hate-asian-women.htmlNevermind the *flipside* of the stereotype, of Asian women who pose as young, frigid girls to "please" their man by being "unskilled" virgins. Women are women. *chuckle* These MGTOW blokes will never GET it…they'll just keep on slappin' the salami and hopin' for 1950.
>Holy racist stereotyping batman! I can't help but notice that the abortion thing is so blantantly wrong. Asian countries in general have roughly equivalent rates to western european and american ones http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/wrjp334pd.html Abortion tends to be less of a political battle in Asia, but it every bit as common as in the west. Oops, better forget things like China's high abortion rate if it does not fit into your racist anti-choice rants.
>I wonder if any of them have noticed the extreme gender imbalance in places like China. Last I saw it was 130/100 for male to female ratio. That is not going to end well and it will make it a great deal harder to find some random Asian woman to marry.
>Is anyone else impressed that David wrote this while having no head as it had exploded? 🙂
>DarkSideCat is right. I have heard, but have not confirmed myself, that Japanese don't like hormonal birth control (and in poorer countries it's not as likely to be available anyway) and it can be tricky to get. Condoms fill a gap, obviously, but abortions are common as well. Ah, Wiki to the rescue. Japan is my point of reference, so here we go:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_JapanThey are really good at hiding their reliance on abortion, but it is available. I find it interesting that they'll punish a mother for performing a self-abortion rather than going to a properly certified clinic, which isn't a bad policy as long as access isn't an issue. We just had the septic wards of the 1950s that no one ever talked about.
>@avpd0nmmng: Holy cow! That first story was awful. Poor guy!
>"I suspect it has more to do with 'blow jobs and anal on demand' than anything else. "Ha! I was coming to remark on that exact quote. I'm also betting it means anal and blow jobs on demand. Also, the woman never requests a man go down on her. Oh, and something about how they're "tighter" than western women. I'm pretty sure these guys believe any female genitalia myth that there is. Right down to the, "All virgins bleed from the vag like shooting geysers when penetrated." In fact we know they believe that last one. I can't tell you how many men think ridiculous things about me for being Asian. First off these types of men don't know the cultural differences between Chinese, Japanese, Taiwanese, Korean, etc… They latch on to whatever Asian stereotypes they like and associate them with me. I'm submissive? Ha! Spend an hour with my Grandmother and find out exactly how submissive she is, and she's not American born. Truly, if an Asian woman is "acting" submissive, it's just that, acting. It's not like some inherited genetic trait either. It's a symptom of oppression and how they MUST act in certain situations. JUST like American women in the 50s, 60s and long before that. Even today, we still can't act however we want or how a man would because we'll be judged or punished in some way.
>I hope when the writer from Objectify Chicks looks for his mail-order bride, he goes here.
>avpd, I have no doubt that there are plenty of western guys who get in way over their head with Bangkok bar girls whom they've convinced themselves are perfect submissive women, but I have to say I don't believe that first story. He ends up in an insane asylum? iodine, FWIW, Mr. Objectifier claims to have a properly "submissive" and "sexually skilled" American wife.
>All married guys in the manosphere claim their wife is submissive but they are lying.
>"I suspect it has more to do with 'blow jobs and anal on demand' than anything else."Doesn't "sexually skilled" in this case just mean, "Holy crap, this chick actually let me have sex with her!"?
>What he says about American women is mostly accurate.What he says about Asian women is entirely inaccurate.
>@forweg:When he was discussing American women, which part do you feel was inaccurate?
>The funny part is that my personality in relationships vaguely resembles that of the Asian woman described here. (Except that I'm only quiet when in large groups of people and I'm fairly tall.) Of course, the reason my personality resembles the Asian woman's is because I have terminally low self-esteem and believe on a gut level that if I'm not a perfect girlfriend whoever I'm dating will come to their senses and date someone else. So… yeah.
>As women in western societies have a PRIVILEGE in the dating game, why should this even matter?As you feminclowns complain about male privilege a lot, this type of female privilege doesn’t seem to matter to you idiots.
>I love how MRAs are so convinced that Asian women don't think they should have rights or autonomy or equality. No feminists in Asia, no sir. ^_^
>As women in western societies have a PRIVILEGE in the dating gameNo they don't. Your idea of "privilege" in this context is having the right to reject advances and have standards for who you want to date. Men have that right, too, of course, but when women claim that right you pretend that women are repressing you by not following your orders. Lame.
>Oops, better forget things like China's high abortion rate if it does not fit into your racist anti-choice rants.Not to distract too much from the "that guy is an idiot" point, but… I'm not sure I'd assume that abortions in China are a matter of free choice.
>Speaking as someone who has dated a Japanese woman (from Japan), the truth is far more complicated…
>Or, yeah, what Keiko said.