>
 |
| Feminist Training Camp |
There’s only really one rule to follow if you want to get upvoted on The Spearhead: make sure you say something hateful about women! If you follow this rule, you can say almost anything you want, no matter how completely batshit insane it is, and still get a couple of dozen upvotes. Works every time!
Consider, for example, this peculiar wisdom from one fellow calling himself Anonymous age 68, taken from a long, rambling comment that, the last time I checked, had 35 upvotes and only 11 downvotes. Take it away, you lovable old kook:
For 45 years, the man-haters who run this country have been saying privately they want to kill most men. I read MS. in the 80?s, and it was there. In recent years, they have shushed the stupids who have been saying it publicly, but you can be sure they are privately saying, “NOT YET, STUPID!” …
Killing large numbers of men is the only one of the original feminist goals which has not yet been achieved. And, all the other things they have done to men were directly or indirectly in the original lists.
I subscribed to MS magazine in the 70?s and 80?s, until my stomach would not take it any more. They told right out in there, their original goals. The world cannot be safe until most men are terminated.
I tried to tell other men, who treated me like s**t. “Why do you worry about things like that? This is the USA, and nothing like that will ever happen. …”
Exactly what the Jew leaders told worried Jews in the 20th Century.That worked out real well.
Just in case you didn’t subscribe to Ms. in the 70s and 80s, and you’re wondering what the other original feminist goals were, here’s the whole list:
1) Buy comfortable shoes
2) Create Lilith Fair
3) Kill men.
4) ???
5) Profit!
—
If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly* use the “Share This” or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it.
*Yes, that was a Bioshock reference.
>Yeah, but don't you think 11 thumbs down on the spearhead is a record? I mean your looking at the glass half empty, I'm thinking, ELEVEN? WOW. Who visited there? The guy is flat out lying about MS. I'm so sick of lying psychopaths on the internet. I'm getting physically ill.
>Well, any group that would go after innocent children in and out of the womb, even to the extent to smear a toddler as a rapist, well, those sort of low lifes might do anything.Random Brother
>If anyone else said that, I would know they are being satirical but this is Richard so I will just roll my eyes.
>Reading MS magazine on a regular basis? In the 70s and 80s?What was the guy doing – trying to get in touch with his feminine side?
>I read MS back then because my mother did. One thing I clearly remember is an article about circumcision and how negative the practice is. I always get a chuckle when I read the mra's blaming feminists for this practice, considering as far as I know feminists were the first to stop doing it!
>So, because some feminists in the 70's and 80's (perhaps) wanted to kill some men, we current feminists, who were either not yet alive or who were (at the time) much more interested in watching He-Man in our Care Bears footie pajamas, now want to kill a bunch of men? We're just biding our time before the man-killing begins?Attack of the inter-generational feminist hive mind!! Trust no one!! Guard your testicles!!
>Well, any group that would go after innocent children in and out of the womb, even to the extent to smear a toddler as a rapist, well, those sort of low lifes might do anything.Yes, and a lie repeated often enough becomes true.
>Well, anyone who would claim their enemy was after the lives of innocent children and saw children as rapists would clearly stoop to accusing them of a plot to murder adults.
>You know, if this were true, one would expect to see quite a few feminists jumping the gun not just rhetorically, but in actuality. And as far as I know, the murder rate has not risen significantly for women perp/male victim. And for the cases that do occur, I doubt that many of the women identify as feminists.
>Attack of the inter-generational feminist hive mind!! Trust no one!! Guard your testicles!! Oh, I've been doing that for years. They laughed at me back in Jr. High, but see who's laughing now! Ha HA!!!
>"There's only really one rule to follow if you want to get upvoted on The Spearhead: make sure you say something hateful about women!"And if you want to be upvoted and famous within the feminist movement, be a misandrist like Andrea, Ensler and the other hateful well known feministsAlso, blame everything that's wrong in the world on men and perceive women as perfect princesses who are hardly or never at fault. In other words, be a femichauvinist
>I love that none of the MRA/MGTOW-ite guys who read this blog aren't willing to simply step up and say, "you know, that Anonymous age 68 guy might just be a tiny bit off in his statements here." Most feminists I know are perfectly willing to criticize other feminists they disagree with. nick, I'm no fan of Dworkin, as I've said about 40 zillion times, and as plenty of feminists have said over the years. And I have no more interest in seeing the Vagina Monologues than I have in, I dunno, being stuck in an elevator with you for an entire weekend.Well, maybe the Vagina Monologues might be slightly preferable to that. Also, the only perfect princess I know is my cat.
>I love that none of the MRA/MGTOW-ite guys who read this blog aren't willing to simply step up and say, "you know, that Anonymous age 68 guy might just be a tiny bit off in his statements here." Maybe not here, but they do it with each other. A while back Paul Elam wrote a critique of another MRA's (Jack Donovan) conceptions of masculinity that wouldn't sound that far out of place coming from you (and I don't mean that as an insult).
>Vagrantsvoice, I think David mentioned that before. Do either of you have a link?
>Sandy,If you're referring to Paul Elam's critique of Jack Donovan's conceptions of masculinity, I believe this is it.
>Nick wrote:Also, blame everything that's wrong in the world on men and perceive women as perfect princesses who are hardly or never at fault. In other words, be a femichauvinist And you'll be providing evidence of this…when? Dave offered you the front page. Let's see the proof!Until then, I will assume that you got nuthin'.
>That list up there reminds me of list that Scott Adams made to let a boss be "helpful"1. Think of toy2. Make Toy3. Assassinate the President of Valenzuela4. Market ToyThe boss would think something is not right with the list and say "maybe number three should be taken out" and then you were supposed to be reluctant but take it out. Thereby harmlessly resolving the boss's need to be a buttinski.Maybe that is what is going on with the alternative universe Ms magazine's articles…it was giving men the opportunity to "help."
>Hey, the President of Valenzuela totally has it coming!
>Sandy, here you go:http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/01/20/what-the-fuck-is-wrong-with-jack-donovan/
>Hey, the President of Valenzuela totally has it coming! And don't get me started on the president of Zimbaboobooland. What a putz! Seriously, I hate that guy.
>I am insulted, not just by the suggestion that feminist women are all out to kill men, but by the suggestion that, even if they were, they would be so terrible at it. I mean, men are killing men at seven times the rate of women killing men and men are killing women at double the rate women are killing men. Men seem to be doing much better at accomplishing the goal of "murder all men" (simply by virtue of the fact that they murder far more men). Ah, no, wait! They are so clever that they can gendercide men by having men kill each other! They are also heartless to their own, given their willingness to sacrifice the quarter of murder victims that are female just to throw clever men like Anonymous! How could I have missed that one?
>I am waiting here for my orders from my sleeper cell leader, so I got a little time to kill. (Excuse the pun! Ha! Feminist man-killer humor.) I spent some of that time reading the rest of what Mr. Anonymous age 68 has to say. And friends, let me tell you, it was awesome. A short history lesson about the African American Civil Rights Movement: Malcolm X scared all the racists of Anonymous age 68's acquaintance, and *poof!* civil rights happened. All because of Anonymous age 68's scared little racist buddies changing their minds. One to grow on!So, he clearly has a really good grasp on a broad view of history. I totally trust his memory on the Ms. thing, given how darn right he is on everything else!
>They are so clever that they can gendercide men by having men kill each other!Precisely. Those wily feminist conspirators are pulling strings behind the scenes to start all the wars. Probably by threatening to withhold sex, like some kind of reverse Lysistrata.
>"I love that none of the MRA/MGTOW-ite guys who read this blog aren't willing to simply step up and say, "you know, that Anonymous age 68 guy might just be a tiny bit off in his statements here." Most feminists I know are perfectly willing to criticize other feminists they disagree with. "I've never seen you criticize one of your posters ether. In fact, you have actively made excuses to justify their hateful sayings, or brush them off as "a joke", such as "rape is a natural response to seeing an attractive woman".You have no problem criticizing Dworkan, true, but that's easy to do, given she (likely) won't read your criticism and respond.As for Anon age 63… I don't read the spearhead, so I don't know him. I also don't even know what magazine MS is, let alone read it through the 70's and 80's, as such, I can't comment on the validity or lunacy of Anon Age 63's claim. For all I know, there may very well be such an article as he suggests, after all, Dworkan got published (10 books, plus who knows what else) and presented as a speaker, why should it surprise me that some other hateful feminists could have managed to get some print/face time?
>Kratch, if you're so ignorant of feminism that you've never heard of Ms. magazine, it's really hard to take any assertions you make about the subject with any seriousness at all. It's a bit like pontificating about astrophysics without ever having heard of, I dunno, Uranus.