>
 |
| Grr! Argh! |
As I pointed out in The Cupcake Files: Part One, the Men Going Their Own Way movement has taken the deliciously innocent word “cupcake” and turned it into a synonym for evil-she-bitch-from-hell.
Today we continue our look at the characteristics of a truly modern cupcake — relying, this time, on the words of the good fellows at NiceGuy’s MGTOW forum. (I’m too lazy to provide links for every example; they all can be found by searching for the word “cupcake” on NiceGuy.)
Cupcake: A fan of cocaine. And abusive criminals.
What attracts the hottest females today? Simple. He has to physically and emotionally abuse her, have a police record and a cocaine habit (and must share the coke with cupcake) then he fucks her up and down the stairs, gets her pregnant, then leaves her forever off to the next hairy hole.
Cupcake: Less interesting than your dude friends, except you can fuck her.
[T]ake away hormones and what’s left?? You’re going to hang around cupcake for: her intriguing political views?, her love of sports, cars and motorcycles?, her culinary skills and the fact that she’s a selfless friend? Point is most women these days have NOTHING to offer a man & reply solely on exploiting men.
Cupcake: The cause of global warming.
Global warming is caused by women, why do you think rich men tear down the planet to make so much money, because some gold digging cunt has to have $20K in cloths a week, 3 SUV’s a year, 8 million shoes, etc, etc
Women constantly brag that they control the world, well why are we blaming the guy destroying the forest to supply cupcake with bubble bath oil. That’s like blaming the slave picking cotton.
Cupcake: Controller of the Nookie Faucet. Not obligated to stick around if she doesn’t want to.
You can have all the discussions you want, but Cupcake has the unalienable right to Change Her Mind, at any time, for any reason or none.
Social convention, the divorce courts, a tradition of chivalry, and Cupcake‘s control of the nookie faucet all conspire such that if you don’t meet her demands, as they change and evolve, you’re fucking toast, Jack.
Stay tuned for The Cupcake Files: Part Three.
—
If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly use the “Share This” or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it.
>To be fair, cocaine is a Hell of a drug.
>Its absolutely ridiculous to suggest that women are the cause of anything. Men have ruled women's lives, "careers", sexuality, and health with an iron fist for thousands of years. To think that they have been afford autonomy long enough to do anything major is quite absurd.
>These guys don't seem very nice at all!
>"$20K in cloths a week"cloths? As in cloths of purple and gold? Oh, tis royal raiment indeed!
>jeeze I wish I made enough to have 8million pairs of shoes and the room to store them all. Must tell bf to get on that… *rolls eyes*
>I like how the nookie faucet guy clearly finds it horrible that a cupcake can just leave you if she wants to. The nerve.
>http://westernwomensuck.blogspot.com/
>Finally! Someone willing to speak the truth about bath oils and their shameful role in deforestation. Also, comparing hypothetical men wealthy enough to drop 80K/month on royal raiment for hypothetical women to slaves: tactful and totally appropriate.
>Point is most women these days have NOTHING to offer a manAu contraire, the mere fact of our being gives some men plenty to obsess about (whilst they go their own way, of course).
>…the fuck? Do they even know some real women, not just the ones from RomComs or Sex And The city? This sounds so…. surreal and weird.On one side, it's hilarious. On the other side it gives me the creeps. Do they really think like that about all women?
>These guys don't seem very nice at all!I think that, perhaps, their extreme gratefulness that the disease-ridden, hairy hole bearing whores don't select them to partner or mate with just comes across the wrong way over the internet.
>Buffy reference! Hee!Women constantly brag that they control the world…Do we now? The stuff about women demanding expensive things is funny because my mom was just talking to me the other day how men used to talk about buying their wives fur coats – they really wanted to buy them. Because it was a status symbol for the man if his wife had a fur. The "nookie faucet"? Really? How dare women deny these poor men sex just because "they don't feel like it"! Don't women realize that sex has nothing to do with how they feel? That their bodies exist for the sexual gratification of Nice Guys? /sarcasm
>Nobody said:"Its absolutely ridiculous to suggest that women are the cause of anything. Men have ruled women's lives, "careers", sexuality, and health with an iron fist for thousands of years"Citation please!Sheesh, dumbass feminazi propaganda
>@nick, well the bible is two thousand years old, was written by men and tells women exactly what they can do. Proverbs, song of soloman, matthew, exodus, and leviticus all tell women the types of careers they can have. Genesis, exodus, leviticus, proverbs, paul, matthew, john, and song of solomon all control womens' sexuality, exodus, leviticus, and revelations all discuss health care. Do I need to go on?
>Nick: Well, "men have ruled women with an iron fist" is a bit oversimplified (class and race also play crucial roles; there are elite women who gain from patriarchy, etc), patriarchy was/is a real thing. Not that you'll actually read these, but:http://faculty.mdc.edu/jmcnair/Joe10pages/the_creation_of_the%20Patriarchy.htmhttp://mark.degrassi.ca/papers/ma/soc-family-kinship/gerda-lerner/creation-patriarchy.htmlFor the full argument, complete with detailed historical evidence for her claims, get the book.
>3 SUVs a year?Holy smokes – what have I been missing? I've been driving the same SUV for 3 years now, and the one before that for 6.I gotta find a better gig.
>"Its absolutely ridiculous to suggest that women are the cause of anything. Men have ruled women's lives, "careers", sexuality, and health with an iron fist for thousands of years. To think that they have been afford autonomy long enough to do anything major is quite absurd."Thanks for the LOL.
>Who knew that cupcakes went so well with whine?
>The Prospect Before Her: A History of Women in Western Europe, 1500-1800 by Olwen Hufton was a good book on women's roles in Europe that shows the lack of control many women had and how they worked their way around it.
>David, they are just another link that creates a skewed view on what patriarchy is. And patriarchy is to blame for everything in the world blah blah blah yada yada yada women are perfect princesses who could do nothing wrong.That's pretty much the laughable feminist stance.For an example, feminists wahhhh about objectification; yet it's easy to say that this is the fault of women who simply objectify themselves for their own personal gains.Oh I am forgetting, I am talking to feminists here. I know, I know, it's never the womenz faultLet’s just blame men for everything. Just how feminists do when women fail at getting high status careers. Once again, it can’t be the fault of the womenz…Hey lets use men/patriarchy as a scapegoat, that way women can’t be held accountable for their failures. yay its great to be a femitwit
>In the late 17th century Arcangela Tarabotti, a woman living in Venice wrote a book called "Paternal Tyranny". Restrictive marriage laws and a lack of available land had led to the practice in Italy of committing daughters into the nunneries against their wills, so that fathers could save on the dowries and not have to worry about deeding already meager portions of and to more potential heirs. Through this practice, by 1581 54% of upper class Venetian women were nuns and by 1642 as many as 81% may have been. This coincided with widespread exploitation and sexual abuse of lower class women.There were men with bad lots in Renaissance Venice, sure, but they weren't dealing with the same kind of institutionalized bullshit.Tarabotti wrote about this in "Paternal Tyranny" as well as other colorful works such as "Convent Life as Hell". She was, apparently, considered "one of the most celebrated and controversial authors of her day" and "thought like a feminist two hundred years avant la letre Worth checking out if you're into that sort of thing.Source: Muir, Edward. "The Culture Wars of the Late Renaissance: Skeptics, Libertines and Opera." 2007: Harvard University Press.
>That is just one of manifold historical examples, of course. I'm not here to give a lesson in the history of sociology. As the poets, Rage Against the Machine once said, "pick a point on the globe, yeah the picture's the same".
>I tell you, ain't nothing drops panties faster than leveling an acre of rainforest. Chicks go CRAZY for that shit.
>"yay its great to be a femitwit"Shut-up, shit tits.
>NickBecoming equal in bitterness as a radical feminist makes you their equal and nothing more. You sir, are what you hate. Pot = kettle black. Please tell us all how females dominated the world for the last two thousand years. Most mra’s seem to long for the good old days in the fifties when the men were in charge. Also I have found that when people post views opposing mra's on mra boards they are called things like trolls. I'm interested in knowing if you've ever called someone a troll for posting a viewpoint that was against the theme of the board? If not did you speak out and say that everyone should have their right to their own opinion?