>
 |
| She’s out of your league, pal! |
You may recall a little ditty from days gone by called “If you wanna be happy.” The song, the one hit of one-hit-wonder Jimmy Soul, was a song with a message for men in love. That message? Well, if my mere mentioning of the song hasn’t already gotten it stuck in your head, let me remind you of its basic thesis:
If you wanna be happy for the rest of your life
Never make a pretty woman your wife
So from my personal point of view
Get an ugly girl to marry you
Why is this? Well, put simply, pretty women are entitled bitches who will ruin your life and break your heart, while ugly women will be so grateful for your attention that they’ll treat you well and prepare meals in a timely fashion:
A pretty woman makes her husband look small
And very often causes his downfall
As soon as he married her and then she starts
To do the things that will break his heart
But if you make an ugly woman your wife
A-you’ll be happy for the rest of your life
An ug-a-ly woman cooks meals on time
And she’ll always give you peace of mind
By “piece of mind,” I believe Mr. Soul is referring to “blowjobs.”
But, alas, this simple formula for male happiness has been rendered ineffective. And it’s all the fault of evil manginas. A fellow called Lincoln, posting on NiceGuy’s MGTOW forum, reports that these dastardly woman-worshipping half-men have upset the old order by actively pursuing ugly women and making them think they’re all that. The horror! All this mangina attention has given
even the most ugliest man faced mountain beasts [an] overinflated sense of their own self-importance, and the net result is the most repulsive, vile, and ill-tempered skanks you could ever meet. Even now I can’t understand it, I can’t even look at these women much less want to bang them, but there it is. It’s already a given that the really attractive ones will of course behave the same way, but if even the ugliest ones behave like prima donnas, who’s left?
It seems an unsolvable dilemma. But Lincoln believes he’s found a way out: amputees.
The ideal is to find a beautiful woman that no mangina wants. it’s possible, but they usually have some kind of trait that puts men off for sometimes the fucking stupidest reason. One example was this one armed woman I knew of once. She had lost her arm in a car accident, and she was the sweetest, most kindest girl you could have met, but for some reason guys weren’t lining up the door for her. Stupid. If I ran across her again I wouldn’t hesitate to ask her out.
Love will always find a way.
If you now need to get “If you wanna be happy” out of your head, this ought to do it:
—
If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly* use the “Share This” or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it.
*Yes, that was a Bioshock reference.
>I'm not worried for the potential disabled women who might date this jerk. He will cruise nightclubs looking for missing hands, they will say no to him, then all disabled women will have the same label he gives the attractive and ugly women before her.
>I'm reminded of a band-mate of mine many years ago. He was the lead singer and at the time we were playing top 40 clubs. After the gig was finished he would go from table to table quite literally asking women to go home with him. He would on any given night go through three quarters of the women in the nightclub before he hit on one that would say o.k, but I'd say that at least half the time he would find someone to fuck that night.The overwhelming majority that said no he had a standard line. “You would be just a pity fuck anyways”. This antidote is not in a vacuum. Men and boys alike understand that if they fish long enough they will catch one. Also the alpha bad boy thing does not sway the overwhelming majority of women. Also he felt the need to insult them if they said no.
>"No, Bisquit Queen, men who think the only value a woman has is her appearance are not seeing women as whole people"It's strange how feminists never whine about women only wanting wealthy men who can offer them a better lifestyle. This example clearly shows that these women don't see men as people.Oh I am forgetting, when it comes to feminism, the problems heterosexual men face are not importantHere, I will say it for you. “what about the menz”
>And before a femitwit comes in and starts saying crap like "what are you doing about it?". Why is it that feminists support white privilege for blacks, gay rights etc. Why feel the need to do something about that but when it's the heterosexual white male, no feminist is willing to protest against oppression/discrimination in that factor? Is it because feminism discriminates against heterosexual white men while claiming they are against discrimination?
>nicko81mYou are talking about 000.2 of the female population regarding women who could be gold diggers.What is this white privilege that feminists support for blacks and gay rights?
>Man how many pussy passes for sheer assholery is David gonna give to booboonation? Random Brother.
>Damn it, Lincoln! It's either "most ugly" or "ugliest;" it's either "most kind" or "kindest!" Gesus! It's really not that difficult! Do not put "most" and a word ending in "est" together! Just don't do it! Oh. And "O noes! How dare women you don't find fuckable be proud and think themselves beautiful and worthy!" Get over it. Women deserve to deny any man or woman they want just like any man can deny any man or woman he wants.
>"You are talking about 000.2 of the female population regarding women who could be gold diggers."Have you got substance to back this statistic up?David expects it when the claim is against women
>Why is it okay for feminism to claim that females are oppressed by objectification…meaning that more than some men do it and see women solely as sex objects and not people. But when the other side of the story comes up, such as not seeing men as people, a feminist can say, "oh wait, only 000.2 of the female population do this" ?
>When I was a kid guys would tell me to never "gas a bitches head up." Meaning don't swoon over her or tell her how great she is, because her response would be to think "Well then I'm too good for you." I've found this to be often true. The guy who constantly kisses his girl's ass is never respected for long. It's why women are so found of using phrases like he's not on my level and the like.What this guy is saying is that more and more women have had their heads gassed up despite not having any of the traditional standards of beauty, talent or ability. You have a culture where somehow Lady Gaga and Queen Latifah, objectively hideous looking women, are somehow called beauties and are featured in magazines and on television. Hell, in this socieity, every woman is told she is beautiful no matter how ugly she is. And quite frankly most feminists are extremely fucking ugly. It's almost a requirement to be a feminst to look like the ass end of a donkey. And I know some feminut is going to say, what about how men look. Men are fat, men go bald, blah, blah, blah. Men don't tell Steve Buscemi that he is beautiful just the way he is, he's told "Hey you bug eyed fucker, you'd better be talented." Men don't demand that you take Fabio (or whoever)off the cover of some chick porn romance book because "all men are beautifulz" or some other feminst pro woman clap trap and replace him with some overweight construction worker. Random Brother
>richard: "Man how many pussy passes for sheer assholery is David gonna give to booboonation?"So far, not anywhere near as many as I've given you.Nick: most feminists I know think that real, honest-to-goodness gold-digging women are awful, shallow human beings. I have no idea what percentage of the population fits this particular stereotype. If you run into them all the time, maybe you should think about going to different places. They're not that difficult to avoid.Also, I'm as baffled by your line about "white privilege" as D is.
>Hell, in this society, every woman is told she is beautiful no matter how ugly she is.This is true, if a man dares to criticise a woman, he is an asshole or misogynist. Yet it's perfectly okay to criticise a man for any reason of not being good enough for women.It's funny how the word "loser" is mostly or only directed at men
>David David David"If you run into them all the time, maybe you should think about going to different places. They're not that difficult to avoid."Can I say the same about men who oppress women or men who don't see women as people one way or the other?If feminists feel the need to complain about this (which means it’s a big problem, that’s why they are complaining… If it wasn't, they would believe only a small amount of men do) it means they should go to different places right? Why don't feminists get this lecture? Why do men get blamed for bad women but women don’t get blamed for bad men?
>@ DavidIn other words she's a woman, and we don't punish women for breaking no rules around here!So Davey, does you feminist owner keep your balls in her purse or has she thrown them away? Not like you're using them either way. Random Brother
>Lady Gaga is pretty without her overdoing the weird stuff and Queen Latifah is not attractive to you but that does not mean she is some how "objectively hideous looking."Each person has their own standard of what is beautiful or attractive.
>richard, as you know, I rarely delete comments, even obnoxious or insulting ones. And in fact you have posted comments far more obnoxious than anything booboo has posted. Like, for example, the last couple of comments you've posted here. You've actually sort of outdone yourself with the latest one, complaining that I don't punish women for breaking rules while in the very next sentence breaking my rule about gratuitously nasty personal attacks. But it's such an incredibly dumb and unoriginal attack I'll just let it stand. nick: "Why do men get blamed for bad women but women don’t get blamed for bad men?"You realize that on MRA/MGTOW sites it is ALWAYS the other way around. A woman gets attacked or killed by a thug, and, well, she had it coming because she went for a thug. A man is treated badly by a woman, and it's all about the woman's evil, not the fact that he chose to be with her.
>Elizabeth, at this point I think richard is just hurling random shit in an attempt to provoke people.
>@David FutrelleThe video in this post should be taken out because it detracts from your post. The lyrics for "Come to Daddy" talk about taking souls. Feminism hates the patriarchy. Religion is seen by feminists as a construct of the patriarchy. The idea of a soul was developed by the patriarchy. So feminist are against the idea of their being such an idea of a soul. So they have no soul that can be taken. The lyrics would only enhance if women were taking souls.
>Well I find it a pretty lame suggestion that I should not express what assholes these guys are in the post. WHY NOT? These people are continually judging and trying to control an entire gender to dehumanizing standards. Read my lips, they are assholes. The deserve the disdain that racists get. Then some of them have the nerve to get on here and try to shame and control me. It's because I have you pegged, that's why. No good men do anything but laugh a this post and nod at my frustration, but you know what? There is a reason people like that are having a hard time passing their genes along. For once something seems right with evolution. It's sheer assholery not to dance around this nonsense and placate racists? LOL
>"You realize that on MRA/MGTOW sites it is ALWAYS the other way around. A woman gets attacked or killed by a thug, and, well, she had it coming because she went for a thug. A man is treated badly by a woman, and it's all about the woman's evil, not the fact that he chose to be with her."Some MRA's may be assholes and/or shock jocks. But to me, this is about politically correct standards
>And what rules did I break? I lament the post and pepper my sentences with HBO language. I didn't address anyone but the subject of the post. Then I make a wild prediction that a whiny MRA is going to come along and throw a manbaby tantrum and try to control me. What rules did I break? And what's "obnoxious" I post the way I do here because of the subject matter. Like I said, this stuff should be viewed as deserved ridicule of racism. Coming from a group that claims not to understand my posts, it's very interesting.
>booboo, your posts are fine. You're blunt, I'm blunt, richard is blunt, though he's the only one resorting to nasty personal attacks here.
>When you are listening to yet another mainstream media article lamenting the lack of eligable men for high powered women, do you think it is bad advice for women to start looking at men who perhaps make less money than them?
>"It's strange how feminists never whine about women only wanting wealthy men who can offer them a better lifestyle. This example clearly shows that these women don't see men as people."—nicko81mYou got that right.
>" . . .do you think it is bad advice for women to start looking at men who perhaps make less money than them?" The Biscuit Queen.These women (in general) don't date down very much, and feminists—despite the claims otherwise—have no problems with women marrying up and justify those who don't want to marry down. How many high profile/high status women are itching to date a garbage collector?Crickets chirp.