Categories
antifeminism beta males crackpottery evil women I'm totally being sarcastic men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA oppressed men sex Uncategorized

>Pee-ple Power

>

Future revolutionaries?

On January 1, 2010, a day that will live in … calendars from last year, the blogger at The Futurist published a long-winded crackpot screed called The Misandry Bubble, which rehashed a bunch of standard-issue “manosphere” memes — doofus sitcom dads oppress men! beta man can’t get laid! marriage sucks!  — in one exceedingly pretentious package. While rampant misandry and uppity women were destroying American civilization from within, he argued, the “Four Horsemen of Male Emancipation” would rescue us all and put those dirty feminists and White Knights in their place. One of the Horsemen? Virtual reality sex toys for men.

To say that Mr. Futurist was optimistic about his ability to predict the future popping of the “misandry bubble”  is a wild understatement. His manifesto, he declared, was

a guide to the next decade of social, political, and sexual strife …  As the months and years of this decade progress, this article will seem all the more prophetic.

Naturally, with so many in the manosphere being pretentious douches who like having their own crackpot notions repeated back to them in pretentious language, The Misandry Bubble was a smashing success, and became for a time the talk of angry-man town.

I’ve been meaning to write about it for awhile, but that would have required me to actually reread the damn thing.

But Mr. Futurist has beaten me to the punch. On January 1, 2011, “exactly 365 days after The Misandry Bubble was posted,” he posted his long-awaited followup. It starts off as portentiously (and pretentiously) as his original manifesto:

We have completed the first year of the decade of The Misandry Bubble, and I remain as convinced as ever that The Misandry Bubble will correct by 2020 no matter what due to the Four Horsemen of Male Emancipation.  However, there is much to lose if the correction is turbulent, rather than orderly.  Millions of innocent men and women can be saved from wrenching misfortune if we act now to fight the culture of misandry that is cancerously pervading the entire Western world.

So how does one fight such a hydra-headed menace as modern misandry? Mr. Futurist, borrowing a page from third-world revolutionaries, suggests that what is needed to save “millions … from wrenching misfortune” is a “a simple, low risk solution that enable this small civilian force [of MRAs] to wage asymmetrical warfare against misandry.”

This solution?

Urinal flyers. 

Yep. His grand plan to save civilization from “misandry” is for a super seekret guerilla army of angry dudes to put up little posters above urinals in public restrooms suggesting that dudes taking a piss  … go read The Spearhead, or some other manosphere site with “a professional appearance and clean format.” He calls this campaign “URLs @ Urinals.”

I shit you not. (Or perhaps that should be “I piss you not.”)

Here’s his explanation:

Male restrooms in public buildings have urinals.  When a man is using a urinal, he has no choice but to see the blank wall that is directly in front of his face above the urinal at eye-level.  Every man taller than 5’2″, whether young or old, rich or poor, is a captive audience for that brief passage of time.  …

If a man sees a flyer that provokes a jolting thought where he leasts expects it, he will remember it for a long time to come.  Those of us who have studied and practiced Neuro-Linguisting Programming (NLP) will recognize this as a very strong anchor, and thus ensure that he will remember the seed planted in his mind in many future instances of standing in front of a urinal.  The periodic recollection will be unshakeable, due to such a strong anchor being planted.  Whenever he hears of yet another such situation again, he will think back to the thought evoked by the flyer he saw on that day. 

Mr. Futurist refers to this strategy, with utter seriousness, as “piercing the Matrix.” You know, like in The Matrix.

All that remains to be done, besides purchasing a roll of tape, is to come up with some appropriately “jolting” posters. Mr. Futurist has already come up with a bunch of them. They won’t win any awards for clever design, or clever wordplay, or even “World’s Greatest Grandpa,” but, hey, if they’re printed up on sheets of paper they can indeed be considered flyers. Here’s one:

And another one, perhaps my favorite:

Our good friend ReluctantNihilist from Reddit — who apparently is none other than Jay Hammers, whom you may remember from my The Worst of the Men’s Rights Movement post — has already come up with a few of his own slogans:

The Constitution no longer protects men and boys.What happened?

Chivalry is Dead And Women Killed It

Why do men die younger than women?It’s not just biological.The truth may surprise you.

Buying That Girl Drinks Will Get You Nowhere

All it will take to bring these sorts of messages to a million men, Mr. Futurist estimates, is a mere 1000 hours of collective action, printing up and posting these little flyers in the men’s restrooms of America. “Which could,” he explains,

plant a seed in the minds of hundreds of thousands of them.

Which could lead to tens of thousands of them reading the websites introduced in the flyers.

Which could result in several thousand more men becoming fully educated about the various dimensions of misandry that are silently enslaving them.

Now, Mt. Futurist realizes there will be naysayers amongst the evil misandrists of the world. As he explains, with typical understatement:

Already in a stupor of castrative bloodlust, ‘feminists’ will be tipped into hysteria by the thought of more men being sent information from outside the plantation.  Their reactions will span the whole range of derangement, from demands for taxpayer-funded armed guards to apprehend flyer posters, to feminists barging into men’s rooms to inspect for evidence of ‘misogyny’, to calls for outright bans on urinals themselves as ‘male supremacist’ appliances, to increasingly bold statements regarding the need to reduce the male population to a fraction of what it currently is … .

Also, he observes, some people might actually tear down the flyers. But do not be daunted, good men, for

that action is futile as due to the viral nature of ‘URLs @ Urinals’ they have no idea where or when the next flyers will be posted.  They will, as mentioned before, double down on their pedestalization of women.  But they can only double down so many times, and this will accelerate the process of them cracking under the burdens of their ignorance.

So onward and upward, urinal-flyer-posting men! I guess I’ll have to check back in a year to see if the revolution has begun.

111 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hide and Seek
13 years ago

>I think that's a great idea, bringing in more men might move the MRAs out of their SCUM phase.

clairedammit
13 years ago

>Maybe those guys will google like the fliers suggest, read a bit, think "this is stupid" and google again. And find Man Boobz! One can hope.

Bee
Bee
13 years ago

>The Constitution no longer protects men and boys.What happened?Well, and since originalist/bigot Scalia has repeatedly said that it never protected women, we are left with the idea that Marshall had it 100% ass-backwards when he said that every word in the Constitution should be assumed to have meaning. Apparently, none of the words in that document mean a damn thing. Unless … Jay Hammers is (gasp!) spouting garbage.

Sam
Sam
13 years ago

>If I know anything about the graffiti on men's room walls, expect someone to write "for my cock" or something similar beneath the first flyer within an hour of it going up.

WIAW
13 years ago

>How did your brain not explode trying to read that Bubble thing? I tl;dr'd after the first paragraph.

nicko81m
13 years ago

>Yes, how dare men mention that men have problems too. Feminists seem to get pissed because it threatens all the focus being on the female victim status. That's why when it comes to feminism, discussing gender issues is terribly one sided. That's why it's called feminism to begin with and not humanism.Have you read this piece of writting, David?Guilt by genitaliahttp://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1007/1007thomasguilt.htm

Joe
Joe
13 years ago

>This is priceless.The ref to Neuro-Linguistic (not "Linguisting") Programming comes completely out of left field. So: given NLP's basis in treating psychological disorders, what does our Futurist have to say about grandiose paranoid delusions?

Pam
Pam
13 years ago

>The ref to Neuro-Linguistic (not "Linguisting") Programming comes completely out of left field. So: given NLP's basis in treating psychological disorders, what does our Futurist have to say about grandiose paranoid delusions?He might tell you to quit clouding the issue with factsOR maybe he knows kung fu…… and a few other Chinese words.

Elizabeth
13 years ago

>"Buying That Girl Drinks Will Get You Nowhere"Exactly where does it say a woman who has a drink purchased for her is obligated to do squat for the person purchasing the drink?

doctor
13 years ago

>"They will, as mentioned before, double down on their pedestalization of women. But they can only double down so many times, and this will accelerate the process of them cracking under the burdens of their ignorance."What a delightful cacophony of mixed metaphors. Are feminists playing black jack? On a pedestal, for some reason? No, they're speeding up! While carrying a crumbling burden.

witman
13 years ago

>@Elizabeth,Obviously not on that sign. That is the point. She'll lead you to believe you have a chance if you buy her drinks, but we all know she is not obligated. This is just enlightening the men so they can save a few bucks when they go out.I love this campaign! I think they should use QR Codes on the posters so men with smart phones can scan them in and get all the info they need online. I think ManBoobz's site should be included so they can see how mens' issues are so readily scoffed at.

nicko81m
13 years ago

>Elizabeth said:"Exactly where does it say a woman who has a drink purchased for her is obligated to do squat for the person purchasing the drink?"I agree 100 percent. But the thing is, there are too many women out there that have the mentality in thinking if a guy doesn't buy them drinks or dinner, he is a cheapass that's not worthy to her time and presence. The fact of what doesn't make her a cheapass gets pulled under the rug. Yet most of these same women are all in for equal pay or against any privilege they imagine a man has.If that's not female chauvinism/supremacy, what is? This form of sexism is socially acceptable. This can be defined as social female privilege.Feminists may say they are against such chivalry, yet I don't see any passion or aggression from feminists that fights against this type of privilege as they do towards male privilege.

Katz
13 years ago

>The self-delusion of these bombastic tools! Go ahead, plaster your stickers and posters above the urinals; but don't stop there. Post some flyers above the toilet paper roll so the crapping gents will also be enlightened. I'm sure the cleaning staff will appreciate more shit to scrape off the walls.And no, I don't think we wimmenz want to invade your pee space and look for the offending flyers. We don't really care about you mens righters at all.

nicko81m
13 years ago

>Katz said:"We don't really care about you mens righters at all."That pretty much explains the feminist movement. The right's for men always come last

Elizabeth
13 years ago

>So basically the two of you have a rejoinder of "we assume X about the woman."Witman: A woman who accepts a drink is not leading a male on-she is accepting a gift given to her that a male has no obligation to provide her. And if we all know that a woman has no obligation to put out for a $2 beer, there is no reason to put it up on a wall anywhere. Only a stupid male needs a reminder and so either you or this person who came up with the slogan thinks men are idiots. Nick: A male who goes to a bar and does not buy a woman a drink is not going to be thought of as cheap by the woman automatically nor does it negate her right to demand equal pay for equal work even if she does think that. Nor does it mean that any other area where a male has privilege because of gender is wrong for her to work to eliminate because she thinks the guy who asked her out on a date but refused to pay for it, is cheap.

Katz
13 years ago

>You've always had "your" rights, pal. Some of you just got a little pissed because you're not the big kings of the hill anymore and buying the little lady a girlie drink doesn't guarantee you some instant nookie.By the way, who or what exactly is forcing you to buy the damn drinks and dinner? Just don't.

witman
13 years ago

>@Elizabeth,Are you offended that this will prevent women from swindling beers from men or just that it may prevent rape by enlightening some Neanderthal as to how wrong what he has in mind is?If the slogan does not hurt anyone and, in fact, might prevent a crime, what is your issue? You think it is stupid? Great retort!

nicko81m
13 years ago

>You've always had "your" rights, pal. Some of you just got a little pissed because you're not the big kings of the hill anymore and buying the little lady a girlie drink doesn't guarantee you some instant nookie.How can I be pissed off not being the so called kings of the hill no more when I was born in 1981, dumbass? These types of comments I hear from women like you always make me laugh. They are so illogical and dumb. I was never born and never existed back in the times when men were the so called kings of the hill.It's like saying that just because the Japanese were mean to the Americans generations ago, we must now all criticise Japanese people in American society about the past if they complain about discrimination against them in the present.Obviously, this is racism. But in a skewed feminist point of view, its not sexism to criticise men in the present when they complain about a present issue for what other men did generations ago that had nothing to do with them.Taking about always having our rights? That pretty much explains that we have little rights right there as we always get put down in guilt and shame from what happened in the past when we complain about our issues in the present. “By the way, who or what exactly is forcing you to buy the damn drinks and dinner? Just don't.” I never said that I am being forced. But in a wide social crowd, if I was to say that I don’t owe women shit on a date, there would be people left, right, and centre telling me that I am a cheapass that doesn't deserve a woman. The fact that's its female privilege is because this behaviour is 100 percent socially acceptable.

Katz
13 years ago

>Not really the same thing, Witman. Flyers with fairly bland messages vs. a butt ugly urinal that says "piss in the WOMAN's mouth!" Extremely tacky and bad taste, dontcha think? I don't think even a strip joint would have anything so gross.If they had toilets in the women's restrooms designed like a man's face ("pee and poop on the man!") I would support men's groups to have them removed as it would be equally offensive.

witman
13 years ago

>@nicko81m"How can I be pissed off not being the so called kings of the hill no more when I was born in 1981, dumbass? "Obviously your male privilege is showing :)Seriously though, best sentence ever!!

Elizabeth
13 years ago

>I am not offended-I think that there is no reason to have something like that up on the wall because it is a given that no woman anywhere has any obligation to do anything outside of saying "thank you" when a man buys her a drink. And I find it telling that you think men are either that stupid or that violent to think they have the right to rape a woman over a $2 beer.

Katz
13 years ago

>Nicko: You need to find a new crowd or go after a different type of woman. That is not 100 percent socially acceptable; going "dutch" is more the standard of the day; also, if you're making verbal statements like "I don't owe women shit on a date," you may want to tone down the hostility when out in public, it tends to be offputting to most women.

Elizabeth
13 years ago

>Might have something to do with Australia-most of the men I have met from there get offended if I mention that a woman should pay for the date if she does the asking.

witman
13 years ago

>@Elizabeth,Now you're just being deliberately obtuse. Women only drink $2 beers when they are paying for it themselves. When somebody else is footing the bill it can get quite high.And yet you suggest that women do not flirt to get drinks. This is such a crock of horse shit I'm having trouble believing you believe it. Flirting is an implicit contract (non-enforcible) for some type of sexual attention. There are a lot of men who don't know this and will keep trying. We are here to help those men and free them from the bonds of the flirting female.

1 2 3 5