>
 |
| Judy Chicago brings vagina to the table. Via lolvantgarde |
Careful readers may have noticed a new blog in my Enemies List, a promising up-and-comer in the world of nutbag misogyny. Yes, I’m talking about BOYCOTT AMERICAN WOMEN, a blog whose purpose is clearly stated in its name. So why should we fellows boycott — sorry, BOYCOTT — AMERICAN WOMEN? Oh, our blog proprietor has got himself a little list:
American women are the most likely to cheat on you, to divorce you, to get fat, to steal half of your money in the divorce courts, don’t know how to cook or clean, don’t want to have children. …
American women are generally immature, selfish, extremely arrogant and self-centered, mentally unstable, irresponsible, and highly unchaste. The behavior of most American women is utterly disgusting, to say the least.
So yeah, it’s pretty much the standard-issue anti-American woman crap. And for the most part the posts so far — little missives (allegedly) from different guys explaining why they hate American gals — haven’t been terribly imaginative.
But there are occasional sparks of wonderful nutbaggery. Like the little word-portrait evoked here by John from USA:
So many American woman seem to think that all they need to do is bring their vagina to the table and that I will just give them whatever they want
Vagina? Table? Paging Judy Chicago!
In case you were wondering, ladies, John assures us all that he does “not have a small penis!” But too bad, ladies, he’s taken.
A post from someone named James laments that American women have become
a spoiled, non compassionate sex that I have seen de masculinate their spouses
Mark from the USA, meanwhile, seems to have something of a hair fetish:
Many foreign women have much nicer body shapes, more feminine traits and a lot still have nice long hair, opposed to the boyish low-maintenance short cuts that most American women get by their mid to late teens and never grow back.
Damn those hair-cutting sluts! Also, Mark seems like he’s really not into the whole “communication” thing.
I’m looking for a foreign spouse too, and would NEVER accept an American woman. I don’t even care what country she’s from or if we speak a mutual language. In fact, I’d probably be happier with her if we couldn’t even understand each other, than some American bitch constantly nagging and ragging at me in English.
I don’t think I’ll be boycotting American women any time soon. But I’ll be coming back to this blog for sure.
>"However to say, foreign women only, this is not misogyny."Ahahaha to say you hate American or Western women because they aren't servile enough and all the other reasons listed in that blog, and in the things I have seen you say on this website, is pretty much textbook misogyny. "I don't hate all women, just the ones who behave and think in ways that I don't want them to!" Yeah, good luck with that. There is actually quite a lot of misogyny in being "against" feminism from what I've seen of your comments here. And considering that feminism's primary goal is the socioeconomic and political equality of women, I'd say blanket opposition to the entirety of the movement for womens human rights is pretty misogynistic. I have problems with some aspects of feminism, with some individual feminist thinkers and/or their arguments and conclusions. But to be against the whole movement of human rights for half the planet's population? Yeah, outright misogyny.
>http://omg.yahoo.com/news/hugh-hefner-84-engaged-to-playmate-24/53006?ncHugh Hefner, 84, Engaged to Playmate, 24(and no feminist will ever call her a loser…)…considering that feminism's primary goal is the socioeconomic and political equality of women…This is a joke, right?
>Oh I'm sorry, was I supposed to cite the imaginary feminism you find it useful to rail against rather than the things I actually believe?
>David Futrelle said… Somehow I think that someone hating every natural born woman in his country and in the whole English speaking world still counts as misogyny. Do you have any reliable source for that what you say?You are writing about misogyny, and you do not know what this is and 'somehow you think…'? Sounds somewhat childish to me to claim that a man who dislikes English speaking women is a misogynist. And what about a man who dislikes only French speaking women he is not a misogynist? Or how else can I understand your comment about the 'whole English speaking world'? from wikipedia:According to sociologist Allan G. Johnson, misogyny is a cultural attitude of hatred for females because they are femaleMichael Flood defines misogyny as the hatred of women and notes:"Though most common in men, misogyny also exists in and is practiced by women against other women or even themselves. Nowhere I see that the definition of misogyny applies to a man, who dislikes only women from his own country.You are also missing the point as you obviously believe wrongly in the following feminist statements:1 -Complaining against unfair legal treatment of men in Western countries = hating Western women2 -Any statement against feminism, whatever = misogyny—-Again, what is your definition of 'misogyny'?Do you even have a clear opinion about what is misogyny and what is not?Please redefine!
>said… … the imaginary feminism … Feminism is the reality in our life, it is not imaginary, if you are in jail for false rape allegations or if you pay alimony 40 years after divorce to your ex-wife.It's also not imaginary in my country to see women retired when they are less than 60 years old, and men have to work at least up to 65 years of age. 65 less 60 = 5 years difference, if you like math or not does not matter. And when I mention this difference I am a misogynist?
>Ahaha god if you "dislike women from your own country", all women, you are a total misogynist. Do you know how many individual women that its you are saying you actively dislike, just by virtue of their…I don't even know how to finish this sentence, as there is no one way to categorize that many people, at all.Also, the general idea of not liking wide swaths of women because they do not behave the way *you* want them to behave is misogyny, is misogyny blinking in thousand-foot-high letters. Women are individuals and the fact that you do not like them unless they act in a way that pleases your expectations is as misogynistic as it gets. If a person is in prison for false rape allegations that person is in prison because of a flawed justice system, not "feminism." Sorry to inform you but feminism is not what you think it is. Alimony is a court matter and again, is not "feminism." You keep talking about evil feminist countries with feminist laws, and yet…do you know how many women are in the US Senate? Like 17. There have been less than 40 in the entire history of the *nation.*As for your retirement matter, I have been reading comments on this thread and people have argued that with you before and countered your arguments with logic that you completely ignored, so you can revisit those if you want my answer. You also, oddly, brought up life expectancy as if nature itself is a feminist plot.
>Yohan:Reading your comments is like watching someone try to make toast with a curling iron. There's a certain avant-garde sort of artistry to it… and yet the entire thing is absurd and meaningless.
>men like this don't just "hate the men from their own countries", or whatever. I'm not American, and neither are plenty of other feminists I know, but something tells me that dude won't like us, either.
>Yohan said… http://omg.yahoo.com/news/hugh-hefner-84-engaged-to-playmate-24/53006?nc Hugh Hefner, 84, Engaged to Playmate, 24 (and no feminist will ever call her a loser…)Wrong again Yohan. SHE IS A LOSER. There, I said it. If she's already going to pose naked for money she could probably make a decent living and get in a position to meet a man in the entertainment industry to marry for money that is not 84. So she is also stupid and lowest of the low. I'd rather go on welfare than be anywhere near his 84 year old, saggy, liver spotted balzack. Most women would say the same. Powder probably comes out when he ejaculates. Yep, she's a loser.
>Great. Now I've got the image of Hugh Hefner shooting little puffs of powder out of his dick stuck in my head. Also, yeah, his new bride is a loser. FWIW, I suspect that Hugh has about as much real interest in her as she has in him, which is to say none. He's 84. Even with Viagra, is he even interested in sex at this point? I think he's probably doing it for the publicity, to try to prop up his sagging image as a swinging playboy.
>I'm amused by the idea of a "boycott". As if American women would react with anything other than relief to the news that these men were ignoring them.
>American women are the most likely to cheat on you, to divorce you, to get fat, to steal half of your money in the divorce courts, don't know how to cook or clean, don't want to have children. In other words, "American women won't be perpetually beautiful slaves who will stay with me no matter how terrible I am! These bitches suck!"I love how easy they've made it for us. The more of these assholes we have out of the general dating pool, the better.
>Yohan, I have to say that hating on one group of women while holding up other women as exemplars certainly counts as misogyny. Particularly when the dream girl outlined on the site seems to be one who is less individualistic, more servile and who knows their place.As an Englishman, I have a soft spot for American women. I dated several and it was their smarts, their individualism, their assertiveness and self-confidence that attracted me. I suspect that these boycott losers would be horrified at the prospect of dates who would expect to be respected as equals.I pity them.
>So manginas and feminists, hows that racism and xenophobia going for yah?
>percyprune said… Yohan, I have to say that hating on one group of women while holding up other women as exemplars certainly counts as misogyny. Do you have any reliable source to support this statement or is this merely your own definition?In general, misogyny is considered to be a dislike/hate against ALL females regardless their nationality, race or age, wealth or religion etc… To prefer one woman to another, or to prefer a certain group of women to another cannot be seen as 'hate against all women'. Just my opinion.Following your logic, misandry refers to a woman who prefers rich men to poor men, or a woman who rejects honest men with a regular job and prefers a life among thugs and drugs.—–A major concern for many Western men are less the women themselves, but existing pro-feminist laws of some certain countries. To be concerned about a certain legal situation for sure cannot be classified as misogyny.Any marriage/divorce in US/UK could be the financial out for a man over decades even in case of severe wrongdoings by a malicious woman. MRAs recommend young men in these countries to remain single under any circumstances due to high risk.About foreign women, all of them are exposed by feminists to be poor, submissive etc. by derogatory comments.However, women living beyond the borders of Northern America and Europe are not all poor and submissive. That's for sure.What I do not really understand when reading your comment is how you define poor, servile or less individualistic.I suspect that these boycott losers would be horrified at the prospect of dates who would expect to be respected as equals. I pity them. Why are they losers? Because they prefer to remain single?A woman in USA/UK is NOT your equal. She is superior to you because you are only a man.She has the legal power to harm you anytime, to ask for your arrest, to take away your property, or to spit in your face or punch you in the stomach, whatever she wants to do with you…all depends on her good or bad mood. She can kick you out of your house and claiming alimony 30 years after divorce…This is an equal?
>AAAHAAHAAAHAHAAAAAA! This blog- and the recurring morons that comment- hilarious!
>doctressjulia said… AAAHAAHAAAHAHAAAAAA! This blog- and the recurring morons that comment- hilarious! Is this your picture in this avatar?Now I know why I prefer Asian women…
>The boycott american women guys are ridiculous. They seem to be throwing a tantrum just because they've had bad experiences with a few women in the past.But really, other than being ridiculous and possibly misogynist, they're not much else. If some women said that all men are pigs, I wouldn't take them seriously for a moment. This is the same kind of pedestrian "I hate women" or "I hate men" crap that you find everyday.What I do find more concerning though, is the shaming of individual's choices in the realm of sexuality (in this thread). I don't find the need to talk about older women as dried up, and I think doing the same thing to older men is equally insulting. Maybe at some point people will realize that cynicism and hypocrisy is out of style – and that being positive about other people – even people we don't like is much more productive.