>It is a fact that most turtles are misandrists.In fact, I often will get physically abusive with my pet turtle just so I can get an erection.And – it really turns my woman on.
>The really scary thing is that even medium-sized turtles (especially snapping turtles–yeowch!) can very easily destroy one's masculinity. I hope the guy in the picture is wearing turtle-resistant pants.
>HE'S PROTECTING HER. You're all blind to the facts dead in front of you. It's her and other women and their failed and flawed perceptions that lead to most of the male oppression and sometimes humiliating danger that is so well depicted here. The fact that this is from a bygone era proves the point that men have always suffered greatly at the hands of nature's biological determinism, and try as you might to make women out to be the perpetual victims of natural circumstances, men have always suffered greatly at the cruel and sadistic hands of rightly termed MOTHER nature. The turtles surely serving as sexual symbolism here explains this supposed discrepancy that these turtles are not "giant", when indeed, while gnawing and clawing at the man while he struggles to protect the integrity of this women are GIANT indeed, and the fact that the mocking patrons of manboobz can't perceive what is clearly there, speaks volumes. Sure, to the callous misandrist, those turtles don't appear as giant. This keeps in line with the constant minimizing of the obvious plights of men but beyond that, these turtles by their sheer numbers, also serve to perfectly illustrate the capacity of women to over-inflate a man's perceived inadequacies, and blow out of proportion the horror of not getting their own way in the most trivial of matters. This illustration speaks volumes to those not blind.
>Uh Mark…why do I suspect you are sitting back, feet up, keyboard in lap, with a glass of good whiskey at hand…typing in whatever you think will get a rise for your cultural anthropology research paper?
>I'm sorry, but I think I have to call a Poe on Mark. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe's_Law"Sure, to the callous misandrist, those turtles don't appear as giant." Either you are a master of satire, or you are an irrational fool of unparalleled proportions. Remember, folks, only callous misandrists correctly gauge the size of a turtle!
>Yeah, I'm Theresa, and have posted here before an did not sign this post like I signed others. This is my google account that my boyfriend set up for me, so I show up as Mark, and yeah, I was totally kidding. hee hee. Hope you enjoyed it.
We Hunted The Mammoth
>It is a fact that most turtles are misandrists.In fact, I often will get physically abusive with my pet turtle just so I can get an erection.And – it really turns my woman on.
>It's even funnier if you read "Masculine inadequacies drive women nuts!" as a word balloon being said by the turtle chewing on the guy's arm.
>Well, I somehow always manage to get my turtle to come out of its shell and be a happy little turtle.
>T-those aren't giant turtles, you monster!
>Glad I wasn't the only one to notice the evil feminist plot to get men to mistake regular-sized turtles for masculinity-destroying giant turtles.
>The really scary thing is that even medium-sized turtles (especially snapping turtles–yeowch!) can very easily destroy one's masculinity. I hope the guy in the picture is wearing turtle-resistant pants.
>Hahaha, Sam. This is at least 10 times funnier like that.
>HE'S PROTECTING HER. You're all blind to the facts dead in front of you. It's her and other women and their failed and flawed perceptions that lead to most of the male oppression and sometimes humiliating danger that is so well depicted here. The fact that this is from a bygone era proves the point that men have always suffered greatly at the hands of nature's biological determinism, and try as you might to make women out to be the perpetual victims of natural circumstances, men have always suffered greatly at the cruel and sadistic hands of rightly termed MOTHER nature. The turtles surely serving as sexual symbolism here explains this supposed discrepancy that these turtles are not "giant", when indeed, while gnawing and clawing at the man while he struggles to protect the integrity of this women are GIANT indeed, and the fact that the mocking patrons of manboobz can't perceive what is clearly there, speaks volumes. Sure, to the callous misandrist, those turtles don't appear as giant. This keeps in line with the constant minimizing of the obvious plights of men but beyond that, these turtles by their sheer numbers, also serve to perfectly illustrate the capacity of women to over-inflate a man's perceived inadequacies, and blow out of proportion the horror of not getting their own way in the most trivial of matters. This illustration speaks volumes to those not blind.
>Uh Mark…why do I suspect you are sitting back, feet up, keyboard in lap, with a glass of good whiskey at hand…typing in whatever you think will get a rise for your cultural anthropology research paper?
>I'm sorry, but I think I have to call a Poe on Mark. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Poe's_Law"Sure, to the callous misandrist, those turtles don't appear as giant." Either you are a master of satire, or you are an irrational fool of unparalleled proportions. Remember, folks, only callous misandrists correctly gauge the size of a turtle!
>Yeah, I'm Theresa, and have posted here before an did not sign this post like I signed others. This is my google account that my boyfriend set up for me, so I show up as Mark, and yeah, I was totally kidding. hee hee. Hope you enjoyed it.
>virulent morons are very hard to satirize without people getting the wrong idea. story of my internet life…
>@ DavidA few weeks ago, I ask for more kittens and instead you give me turtles. God you feminists are assholes.Random Brother
>You want kittens? You got it:http://manboobz.blogspot.com/2010/12/hey-wheres-my-comment-hint-spam-filter.htmlWell, it's one kitten anyway.
>@ DavidThank you sir. I vow to be less abrasive to a feminist in my next 5 posts in honor of this Treaty of Kittendom.Random Brother