>
 |
| See, they ARE children! |
More insane misogyny from the “manosphere.” Part 4 in what could easily turn into a 10 billion part series.Today’s theme: Women are children. I’ve bolded the best — as in worst — bits.
Women are: Children who don’t deserve the right to vote.
Just as those who oppossed the female vote 100 years ago predicted, women will vote for what’s best for women as a group only, and the politicians that cater to them. Little else matters to them, especially men and children. Convincing them to give up any power at all, for the good of society as a whole, is absolutely fruitless. They won’t do it unless forced to through a period of civil instability or anarchy, which is exactly where the breakdown of the family and disenfranchisement of men has us headed towards. But don’t tell THEM that. They don’t want to hear it. They’re high-functioning children, and they vote.
Women are: Retarded children with guns
Some say that women are children.
I think that women are way below children.Imagine a retarded child playing with a machine gun and you will have an accurate picture of women.
Pathetic, yes they are…
What a curse it must be to be born a woman..
Women are: Lying, cookie-stealing children
I think one of the absolute best things men can do with women is follow the advice of so many of those “misogynists” of old, and view women as children. … Of course, it is not actually that they are children. It is more likely that they do not develop the same sense of principle and justice to navigate the world, because society enables them not to have to. … They exist somewhere in between child and man. …
You can catch a woman dead to rights in a lie – like a child with cookie crumbs still stuck on the corner of her lips insisting she wasn’t in the cookie jar – it simply does not matter to them. They just create a new truth in their heads and carrying on as if nothing matters.
Women are: Children who need a time-out
Women are like children. They need clearly defined limits. They will test those limits continually, but they MUST know they are there, and that they are enforced.
Both children, and women, are happiest when there are clear limits and those limits are enforced.
A smart man will NEVER lower himself to child’s level, nor a woman’s.
Women are: Infants.
Some men in the men’s movement have accused feminist women of being children. This is inaccurate. They are one step behind children — they are still infants. … This grown-woman infant consciousness is so widespread that most of us don’t even comment on it any longer. We take it for granted that many women are going to act like infants. I suggest that it’s time for the men’s movement to address the fact that feminists are suffering from arrested development, that feminists are acting like infants. … It’s time that the men’s movement pointed out that infants are dependent, and must not be given positions of responsibility, such as a public office or a top management spot at a corporation. … Until women start acting like adults, until women are forced by our laws and customs to shoulder both responsibility and accountability like all other adults, they should have no right to even ask to be promoted to leadership positions.
NO YOU MAY NOT
LA LA LA LA LA EVERYTHING IS ROSES AND KITTENS AND UNICORNS AND NOTHING IS PLUSH FUCKDOLLS LA LA LA LA LA
I kind of lost interest after he got to be 3 and started murderizing people.
He killed someone at 3. Greatest. Tactician. Ever.
Wait, ender killed someone wen he was three? I thought it waited until he was six.
/I have not read that book ever since I found out orson scott card was a bag of shit, tho, so my memory may be off.
Huh, Wikipedia doesn’t say how old he was, just that he was in school, so I’d say you’re probably right that he was six, or close to.
You can see how much of an impression it made on me.
Falconer — whatever do you need unicorns for? Toys for the wee ones perhaps? You have your own personal brain bleach!
Fade — excellent choice 🙂
I’ve never dug the Ender books, but they’re an interesting case where they have strong fans and strong detractors who are both totally aware of the series’ strong and weak points–whether you like them or not is entirely dependent on which aspects you value most.
I don’t think kids want parents of ‘higher status’. Most of the kids I know actually like their parents. They don’t want any parents they want their mom(s) and/or their dad(s).
You guys are simple. Kids look up to their parents, idolize them, depend on them, look to them for reassurance, protection, guidance, etc. etc. When a woman looks to a man in similar fashion, she is playing a childlike roll to him. Nobody said anything about children wanting to replace their parents.
GAAAAH STOP NECROING
RE: Good
You guys are simple.
Pot, kettle, black. And you and I know very different children and women.
Okay, that’s true. I’ll give you that.
It’s okay for adults of any gender to seek reassurance, protection, and guidance from the people they love. That’s what love is about.
I don’t know about the idolizing part. That sounds more like infatuation, but that’s not a bad thing unless the person they idolize takes advantage of them.
That childlike roll… Is it by any chance a cinnamon roll?
In fact, idolizing your parents isn’t a very good idea, either. Kids can develop very unhealthy relationships that way.
Well, that, and it’s kind of tautological to say that “When women look to their men in the same way a child does its parents, she is acting in a childlike role”.
uh, yeah. That’s… That’s kind of assumed in the first part of the sentence.
RE: thebionicmommy
Okay, that’s true. I’ll give you that.
It IS? *flabbergasted* I guess when I was little, I did… but that was the stupidest thing I could possibly have done!
@LBT,
That’s sad. I wish all parents could be worthy of the admiration of their children, and could be a source of guidance and reassurance. I don’t know the right thing to say except I offer Jedi hugs.
It’s okay, bionicmommy. I guess it’s still startling to realize that my upbringing may have been unorthodox.
Somebody please explain to Good that saying the same thing over and over again doesn’t make it true. And that noone beyond kindergarten has won an argument by repeating the same thing again and again with no supporting data. He’s giving me a headache.
He is also demonstrating beyond reasonable doubt that he doesn’t actually know any women.
It’s okay for adults of any gender to seek reassurance, protection, and guidance from the people they love. That’s what love is about.
Yet women find men who seek such things as unattractive.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1754631
http://www.drglover.com/blog/x_post/feeling-needy-around-women-00025.html
FTFY
You heard it here, folks. Good Morning America and some random dude’s blog are SCIENCE.
RE: Good
You act like that’s FEMINISM’s fault. Also, research fail.
Does anyone else get the idea that Good is in high school? Seriously. (No offense to the Boobzers in high school here. I just get the sense that Good is very, very young, and not the most sterling example of your demographic.)
Good, do you actually think that an ABC news article is going to make us go “Oh, oops, I thought I liked one type of guy, but a dude professor who provides no studies to back up his claims says I must like another type of guy, so I guess I’m wrong?”
At least he hasn’t linked to any Cracked articles yet.
That first link is not a scientific study. It’s just a pop culture fluff piece. It said
Those two things aren’t mutually exclusive. A man can be sensitive and and provide for his family. And a woman can provide for her family too. So while some straight women may not find sensitive men attractive, a lot of them do. Women have all sorts of preferences.
And the second link is just a mess of sexist stereotypes. He said
Men take action, and women meekly sit in the background trying to please men!