>
 |
| See, they ARE children! |
More insane misogyny from the “manosphere.” Part 4 in what could easily turn into a 10 billion part series.Today’s theme: Women are children. I’ve bolded the best — as in worst — bits.
Women are: Children who don’t deserve the right to vote.
Just as those who oppossed the female vote 100 years ago predicted, women will vote for what’s best for women as a group only, and the politicians that cater to them. Little else matters to them, especially men and children. Convincing them to give up any power at all, for the good of society as a whole, is absolutely fruitless. They won’t do it unless forced to through a period of civil instability or anarchy, which is exactly where the breakdown of the family and disenfranchisement of men has us headed towards. But don’t tell THEM that. They don’t want to hear it. They’re high-functioning children, and they vote.
Women are: Retarded children with guns
Some say that women are children.
I think that women are way below children.Imagine a retarded child playing with a machine gun and you will have an accurate picture of women.
Pathetic, yes they are…
What a curse it must be to be born a woman..
Women are: Lying, cookie-stealing children
I think one of the absolute best things men can do with women is follow the advice of so many of those “misogynists” of old, and view women as children. … Of course, it is not actually that they are children. It is more likely that they do not develop the same sense of principle and justice to navigate the world, because society enables them not to have to. … They exist somewhere in between child and man. …
You can catch a woman dead to rights in a lie – like a child with cookie crumbs still stuck on the corner of her lips insisting she wasn’t in the cookie jar – it simply does not matter to them. They just create a new truth in their heads and carrying on as if nothing matters.
Women are: Children who need a time-out
Women are like children. They need clearly defined limits. They will test those limits continually, but they MUST know they are there, and that they are enforced.
Both children, and women, are happiest when there are clear limits and those limits are enforced.
A smart man will NEVER lower himself to child’s level, nor a woman’s.
Women are: Infants.
Some men in the men’s movement have accused feminist women of being children. This is inaccurate. They are one step behind children — they are still infants. … This grown-woman infant consciousness is so widespread that most of us don’t even comment on it any longer. We take it for granted that many women are going to act like infants. I suggest that it’s time for the men’s movement to address the fact that feminists are suffering from arrested development, that feminists are acting like infants. … It’s time that the men’s movement pointed out that infants are dependent, and must not be given positions of responsibility, such as a public office or a top management spot at a corporation. … Until women start acting like adults, until women are forced by our laws and customs to shoulder both responsibility and accountability like all other adults, they should have no right to even ask to be promoted to leadership positions.
Well that was random. Should David have mentioned Mozart too? If we’re just mentioning people who’re good at their jobs in general…
Wait, is Good making an appeal to authority? “Well, Freud and Schopenhauer held these views, so you can’t argue against that”
Good, it doesn’t matter if a person is the world’s greatest philosopher or the world’s worst fry cook; if they’re being a misogynist asshole, it’t pretty easy to ridicule them.
I’m still kind of pissed David didn’t mention Antonion Panizzi.
^^ That should be “Antonio” ^^
I was thinking of onions.
Well, since this is now the ‘random exclamation’ thread, I’m likely getting paid to write my characters piloting a giant robot and punching abominations.
BEST CALLING EVER Y/Y?
“the greatest psychoanalyst”
Um, only because he invented it. Bit like saying Einstein was the greatest physicist to study relativity. Except Einstein wasn’t all coked up.
Good: (which I misdoubt) Why didn’t you include Arthur Schopenhauer in your ridicule list for similar views as well as Freud? Maybe it is a bit harder to ridicule one of the greatest philosophers as well as the greatest psychoanalyst.
Umn… even if one accepts the argument about them being “the greatest” 1: they weren’t included in the discussion, and 2: are you seriously trying to compare the Spearhead to “the greatest” on any sort of moral/intellectual level?
Because my orchids show higher moral function than the vast majority people who comment there, and than all of those who have top-posting privileges.
Back in 2010, was the tagline “Misogyny. I mock it. Also. I mention every single famous person that has ever existed?” Because, if so, I would like to second Good’s objection. If not, I’m good.
“Because my orchids show higher moral function”
It’s true, they’re gorgeous, put my little guy to shame (though I think it’s got a flower stem starting). Your forsythia shows higher moral functioning and it’s trying to take over. Plant take over, more moral than the Spearhead.
…nobody mentioned Freud at all in this thread
Uh, that was the point. At least chibigodzilla tried to comprehend while playing the misogyny card.
But the truth is the truth. Women share a lot of behavior with children:
Easy to cry.
Easy to whine.
Greater desire to be taken care of.
Enjoys being physically picked up.
Screams easily.
Loves stuffed animals.
More likely to bully each other.
More superstitious than men.
The “Gimme. Gimme. Gimme” attitude of women that men so often give into is similar to how adults give in to the same attitude in children.
Children need and seek emotional validation. So do women.
Women and children are more self-absorbed/self-centered than men.
The list goes on….
There are not enough sad trombones in the world for this guy.
Nor tiny violins.
“Enjoys being physically picked up.” WTF. Please don’t do that.
Demonstrate for me the following:
A) Why sharing qualities with children are bad.
B) Why children don’t share qualities with women – the link is children first in your mind, why? Mere chronology?
C) Why the things you have listed are negative qualities
D) Why children are a negative concept to you.
——-
Crying isn’t bad. Whining isn’t bad. Enjoying being picked up categorically cannot be bad. Screaming isn’t bad. Loving stuffed animals cannot possibly be a negative thing. Seeking emotional validation is not a bad thing. Being self-centered is not inherently a negative trait.
So we’re left with bullying, superstition and entitled attitudes, as a list of three negative qualities (that, by the by, you haven’t demonstrated anyone has, merely stated that it is so).
On bullying, I disagree with you, because I know for a fact that children a generally terrible, but male and female children are equally terrible, and both grow out of it.
On superstition I know you are wrong, because “chicks dig weird shit” is tired and old and unrelated to the reality that you so prize.
And on the entitled nature of women, children and human beings you misunderstand people giving in for people giving things, gifts for required payments and emotional blackmail for merely wanting something. If men and adults often give into the demands of women and children, then the fault is obviously with those men and those adults, and not with the people who find theirdemands are constantly being met and treated as decently and perfectly all right to have.
The list goes on, but only because the list is a never ending example of the phrase “No, it ain’t so” next to every assumption you make.
Oh look he’s back to spout more fallacious bullshit, how droll.
Good: No one mentioned Jung, or Hume, or Nietzche, or Aristotle, or Heisenberg, or Frederick Douglass, or Thomas Aquinas, or Hildegaard of Bingen, or Junia, or any number of other irrelevant names.
Now, if you have some actual argument (Women are icky, they act like human beings with empathy isn’t really an argument, no matter how you try to dress it with intimations of it being weak to have empathy) feel free to present it.
You could even try to tie it to Freud (or Hilidegaard, or Abelard), but I suspect that’s beyond your capabilities. But if you insist on removing all doubt, feel free to open your mouth.
chibigodzilla: I think you used the consonant.
But the truth is the truth. Men share a lot of behavior with children:
Quick to anger.
Quick to sulk.
Greater desire to be taken care of, picked up after, run around after.
Enjoys claiming they’re bigger or stronger than the next. Cannot admit to not knowing or to being wrong.
Shouts easily.
Loves toys and games.
More likely to hit each other.
More stubborn than women.
The “Feed me, pick up after me, let me stay up and watch TV/play video games” attitude of men that women so often give into is similar to how adults give in to the same attitude in children.
Children need and seek emotional validation. So do men.
Men and children are more self-absorbed/self-centered than women.
The list goes on….
/Good
No.
No no no no no.
as a woman, I have not wanted those things since… being a child.
Than manosphere men? Thats gotta be hard.
I am slightly creeped that Good talks of women enjoying being physically picked up and screaming easily.
Loving stuffed animals? Women were not responsible for Teddy Babes, may I remind you.
Hey good, what are your thoughts on man-children who try to get the last word in ancient threads?
Fuck off, chickenshit.
Flat chests. No periods. (Well, for cis men.)
@pecunium – Well, T and D are pretty close to each other on the keyboard….
@”good”
Depends on the woman. (or man! Or non-binary person)
1)citation needed
2) children are still learning how to take care of themselves. I don’t know if there’s a ‘great desire’ to be taken care of there. It’s part of growing up.
wrongwrongwrongwrong.
Go pet a cactus, fucker.