>
 |
| Guys, they’re hiring! |
I’m beginning to suspect that the Happy Bachelors who populate the Happy Bachelors Forum are not quite as happy as they let on. Why is this? Well, when anyone suggests that their single status might in any way be undesirable, they don’t brush the comment off like most of us reasonably well-adjusted unmarried guys do. No, they get mad. Really mad. And they start talking about “femhags,” “fem-nags,” bitches and hoes (not the garden implement).
Here’s the thread in question. “analyzing” starts off the festivities by pointing to an email from a lovelorn 42-year old lass to an online relationship advice column:
Maybe I shouldn’t have waited [to get married], because it seems like every unmarried guy in the age range I’m looking for (40 to about 50) is a loser of one sort or another. If the guy has never been married, he’s either got commitment issues, or he’s lacking in social skills, or he drinks too much or has some other unattractive qualities. If he’s divorced, he’s either angry at women or so desperate to find a new one that he wants to hook up before he even knows you.
This comment is like a red flag to the Happy Bachelor bulls, who release a torrent of abuse that inadvertently reinforces every negative stereotype in the woman’s email. After a few comments lauding the superiority of young Thai and Filipina women over fortysomething American gals, spocksdisciple gets the woman-hating orgy underway. (I’ve bolded some of the best — as in worst — bits in his comment and some of the others.)
Women like this lack an essential quality to even begin to comprehend why they are such total failures in their relationships.
That essential quality is that of introspection and reflection, instead of asking what bad choices she’s made and her role in making these choices, she goes on the typical female tirade about how it’s the fault of all the men around her. …
I see lots and lots of cats in her future and nothing else, I will enjoy the upcoming decades as more and more of these useless bitches end up alone and going stir crazy. I’m betting that many of them will end up abusing drugs or alcohol to make their pain bearable. I will laugh at them because even then they will not look inwards to see if they were in part responsible for ending up alone.
Marcus Aurelius commends what he sees as an excellent analysis, and adds his own thoughts:
[W]omen are not capable of introspection, its always someone else’s fault. They don’t realize that their being cum dumpsters, going for Alphas, and their hypergamy destroys their chance at landing a mangina. They don’t have a beta male mangina…because…they overlooked them…and still are. I think you are right, these aging women that are alone will be screwed up mentally. …
Women just don’t know what to do with themselves. … Coming home to a quiet and empty home for them…is like descending into hell because they don’t know what to do once they get there. Men get hobbies. For them Its get drunk, or watch So You Think You Can Dance or the Bachelor…hahaha…..nothing goes on inside those heads of theirs.
I’m assuming he’s not the real Marcus Aurelius — I’m pretty sure the original Marcus Aurelius never used the term “cum dumpster.”
Others contribute their own insights about women. In the process, Curiepoint explains why he never became a firefighter:
I find it an honor to be so offensive to the likes of women. After a lifetime of looking after everyone else, bowing and scraping for a meagre paycheck, and kissing the ass of a woman who voraciously consumed everything I had (two of them, actually) I am more than proud to stand in defiance of any woman’s shitty personality.
I wouldn’t piss on a woman if she were on fire. Chances are, that would amount to one huge, spitting grease fire, given how “hot” women are comprised mostly of blubber and cheap rayon clothing. …
Women aren’t worth the effort to work up enough spit to hurl at them. And, any man who would actually cave in to her demands deserves to burn right along side them. They are not men. Both barely qualify as being vaguely humanoid.
Lavastorm suggests that perhaps being a winner isn’t what it’s cracked up to be, based on the following (apparently typical) scenario:
So a “winner” is a “man” who follows society’s pre-programmed path to self-destruction (gets married, becomes the wife’s tool to keep up with the neighbors, works in a soul-destroying job, is destroyed by wife when she gets “bored,” gets blamed for “destroying the marriage,” is thrown to the gauntlet of dread judges, retarded pit bulls, and menopausing succubi who commence sucking his blood.
In case you’re wondering: No, he never closes the parenthesis. He’s Going His Own Way, grammatically.
>@ PAMPAM SAID: "What a narrow, simplistic rewording."It's not a simplistic rewording, cow. It is boiling your statement down to the essence and that essence is either you believe that theft today is okay because of past theft or not. That simple. If you are too much of a coward to take a stand fine, but it would be great if you put your big girl panties on and try to answer it, okay skirt?PAM: "And do you believe that it's all in the past? Do you believe that human trafficking and slavery no longer exist? Do you not see Imperialist America for what it truly is?"Understand something. America has done some of the most fucked up things in history. But that does NOT mean that firstly other countries are more moral and secondly the answer is punishing men today who are NOT involved in human trafficking and the like. If you punish these men do you think they are going to be more or less likely to not give a shit about human trafficking?After men get screwed in divorce court and feminists tell them too bad because years ago men treated women poorly, you think they're gonna rush and become pro feminist? You say too bad Mr. "Loser" gets screwed in court, Mr. "Loser" isn't gonna give 2 shits about you or the government that enforces laws they think are unfair. How is that good for this country? Seriously, more than any other question I'm asking you, cow, this one I'd really lke answered. How is a large number of men feeling they've been screwed good for America?America needs to work towards a true meritocracy. It can't do that if people keep pulling out historical arguments that are used for continued unfairness. It will not work.PAM: "Well, I'm not considered white, some refer to me as yellow, so I guess I DO have damn things to complain about." What does this mean? Are you white, asian, multiracial, what? What is this vague bullshit?PAM: "Actually, my pampered western ass is the direct recipient of the impetus behind consumerism, targeted primarily at women to lure them back into the private, domestic sphere in the affluent times post-WWII. And this push for consumerism was dreamed up by mostly… **GASP!!**… MEN!"So. . .men made consumerism so it's okay to steal from men. . .what? You know you can be a consumer with money that you actually earn yourself! A novel concept for you feminists but try it you might not be as lazy as you think! (But I doubt it). Random Brother
>@ TECJesus Haploid Christ you're a stupid skirt. TEC SAID: "wtf do African women not brushing their teeth have to do with basic hygiene?"Are you fucking joking?Random Brother
>@Tec – yeah, no shit, huh? Has absolutely NO CLUE that the reason that MEN pushed for women to get out of the public sphere (i.e., stop earning at wage-paying jobs) and, instead, start consuming more from the domain of the private sphere was to give men (back, as the men see it) the wage-earning jobs that women were already performing in the public sphere, and also to ensure that there would be MORE jobs for MEN (and, more importantly, MORE PROFITS for the companies producing consumer goods). Yep, it's perfectly okay for a woman to be a consumer, so long as she's paying for her consumer goods out of the earnings she received at the job that she stole from a man.But what's REALLY hilarious is when he dips into his secret stash of condescension and shaming language….that's when you know his blood pressure must be ABSOLUTELY SOARING!! Hope he doesn't bend over to tie his shoes, else his head might blow up!!
>Going his own way against the dentist – That cracked me up! Thanks, Tec.
>@Pam – Quit it with your snark and conspiracy theories. If you've got some facts, we'll be glad to hear them. Otherwise, your feelings, emotions, and half-baked crackpot theories can take the back shelf. You sure don't care about our feelings and emotions about our quantifiable oppression (provider role, increased incarceration rates, earlier death) so we sure don't care about your hallucinations.If it can't be seen and recorded, don't bring it up. Nobody cares.
>@ PamPAM SAID:"@Tec – yeah, no shit, huh? Has absolutely NO CLUE that the reason that MEN pushed for women to get out of the public sphere (i.e., stop earning at wage-paying jobs) and, instead, start consuming more from the domain of the private sphere was to give men (back, as the men see it) the wage-earning jobs that women were already performing in the public sphere, and also to ensure that there would be MORE jobs for MEN (and, more importantly, MORE PROFITS for the companies producing consumer goods). Yep, it's perfectly okay for a woman to be a consumer, so long as she's paying for her consumer goods out of the earnings she received at the job that she stole from a man."Prove this. Oh wait, you can't it's a patriarichal conspiracy!!!! But you moo cows know the truth! That along with the truth about the hidden city of Atlantis, the Amazons, Elvis being alive and Bigfoot. You used your female intuition! As for condescension, remember skirt, it was Katz who started busting my chops on this thread because, apparently, I asked a question she didn't like, then the rest of the vagina herd joined in, not the other way around, got it penis warmer? Also, you're right, hearing you cows emote all over the place and call it logic could make someones head explode. Now go cry to David to come save you.Random Brother
>OMFG, there's a PLETHORA of information about post-WWII America, women's roles during the war and after the war, etc. Are the two of you willfully ignorant or just plain ignorant?LOL!! Why on earth would I go cry to David to come save me? I'm quite capable of defending myself, seeing as I'm not the one who's emoting all over the place and calling it logic, that's what MRA forums are for.
>@ PAMPROVE IT.Futher, your belief is that men born in the 60's, 70,s, 80's, 90's and so on owe you alimony because of things that occurred in WW2?Another entitlement princess oozing delusion.And you cows talk about privilidge.Random Brother.
>Seems to me most women would relish coming home to a quiet and empty house… no screaming kids, no other-people dishes and laundry. Sounds like paradise.As for those guys not washing or brushing their teeth, and dressing like they're homeless, well, that's just redundant.
>"PROVE IT."As I said, there's an abundance of material available on the topic. Do your own research and reading."Futher, your belief is that men born in the 60's, 70,s, 80's, 90's and so on owe you alimony because of things that occurred in WW2?"Yeeeaaaaahhhh. Wouldn't hurt for you to work on your reading comprehension skills, also.
>@thedelphiad – What's your opinion on spinsters who put on 50 pounds and live alone and miserable? Typical feminist, can't see past that pathetic series of handouts she calls a life.
>… after a few comments lauding the superiority of young Thai and Filipina women over fortysomething American gals…What feminists do not want to understand is that Western men also have a choice. Men might accept what feminists are telling them, but they have still the right to say NO. Western men might remain single, they might look for a wife somewhere else…Western men have also the right to travel and to relocate. A step forward which I recommend.… those guys not washing or brushing their teeth, and dressing like they're homeless… For sure such low-life men novadays have better chances with Western women than ordinary single young men, who are working full day, do not have a criminal record, keep their body clean and try to avoid spending money for nonsense like bars or porno.Most Western women are looking for men however, who are rich or otherwise exciting, or at least 'not boring', this includes thugs.A Western man who is working regularly and keeps himself and his little room clean and tries to save up some money has not much chance to find even a girlfriend for 30 minutes.I do not believe in superiority of Thai or Filipina women however and I do not recommend to bring them into USA/UK and other Western countries for various reasons. If you are able to relocate in those countries however you will find people's behavior generally better than in Western countries. Less materialistic, less demanding … Countries like Thailand and the Philippines are very communicative – People are friendly and not mistrusting to each other – free of feminism, simply said.
>@BishopIt's privilege. You're illiterate.
>@ TECSo you concede you have no logical argument and have stooped to criticizing my spelling? God you're a pathetic cow.Random Brother
>@ PamIn other words you can't prove it and are just shuffling about to save face. You and lunatec love to dance around the truth of your sickening beliefs. Random Brother
>Yohan, I had no idea that American women went for dudes who don't brush their teeth! Time to throw out my toothbrush and see how many hotties I can lure back to my (messy) apartment with my hot halitosis!(Seriously, where exactly do you get your information about the dating habits of American women? It sounds almost as if you live in a different country and get all your information on the subject from MGTOW message boards and your own imagination.)
>@David:We live in America.It is a fact that there are a lot of women who "go" for sociopathic thugs. And some of them (the thugs) do not practice good hygiene.This can be seen in play: Serial Killers getting flooded with love letters – Ted Bundy actually fathered a child while on death row.There are many examples – however, instead of listing them, I suggest you do the research yourself.Ted Bundy did not have to make an effort to attract women – being a psychotic killer of even women was enough – the babes came to him.Most of us (like you and I), have to brush, groom, make an impression etc…The killers and other thugs – they do not have to make an effort – all they have to do is be psychotic.You are in deep denial aren't you?
>Yes, some women are attracted to serial killers. They make up a tiny portion of women. The fact that you can point to some women who like psychopaths does not mean that most women like psychopaths and thugs. Let's switch this up: some small percentage of men like women to poop on them. We cannot conclude from this that most men like women to poop on them, or even that they like it when women fart near them.
>I read a story about Casey Anthony getting tons of marriage proposals from men. By MRA logic, that means that most men like sociopathic baby killers.
>@bishopsinisterNo, in other words I'm not about to waste my time reinventing the wheel. The information is readily available, do your own research if you're truly interested.
>David Futrelle said… Yohan, …..Seriously, where exactly do you get your information …..you live in a different country and get all your information on the subject from MGTOW message boards and your own imagination A part of my information is out of my personal experience – how I was treated by women as a child, as a student, as a young employee.Another part of my information is out of my observation and comparing it with the news…And all fits together…http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1316203/US-shows-UK-Father-Howard-Veal-jailed-paying-child-support.htmlWhen reading your comments, David, I sometimes think, you are living in a cave as a hermit.You have no idea about the daily life in feminist countries, where girls 11 year old are getting contraceptives and abortion free of charge and there is no right for parents even to be informed what is going on.And this is about how men are treating in USA…http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1322426/Alan-Newton-cleared-rape-awarded-18-5m-compensation.html
>@David "Seriously, where exactly do you get your information about the dating habits of American women? It sounds almost as if you live in a different country and get all your information on the subject from MGTOW message boards and your own imagination." Bingo. Hit that nail right on the head. Yohan has said before that he is not American, if I remember right, he is Scandanavian and lives in Japan. Yet, somehow, he has absorbed great deals of experience about American women from halfway around the world. He's just skilled like that. Also amusing: his sole source regarding the US is from a UK site."where girls 11 year old are getting contraceptives and abortion free of charge and there is no right for parents even to be informed what is going on." Free of charge? Has this man ever seen the US health care system? We ain't getting shit free of charge. Abortion isn't covered by medicaid, so even those few who manage to get some sort of state paid health care cannot get abortions under it (by law, federally funded health programs do not cover elective abortions). The US has a patchwork of laws regarding parental consent, some states mandate privacy in medical decisions, even from parents, others mandate parental consent. Anyone informed about the debate surrounding abortion in the US would be aware of this, regardless of what side they were one. 35 states in the US have some sort of parental notification or consent law, that's a pretty big chunk of the US. This is a huge political issue in the US and gets fought over in pretty much every election. Congratulations, you have picked a highly contentious political issue and made it clear you are oblivious of facts you could have learned from a quick google search. Shoot, you could have learned about parental notification laws even if you only visited US anti-abortion sites, because anti-abortion groups in the US are constantly trying to get such laws passed or continued. Next time, try using google once before you start blabbing.
>I referred to USA concerning this poor man who spent 30 years in prison, innocent.This shows how men are treated in USA…http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1322426/Alan-Newton-cleared-rape-awarded-18-5m-compensation.html———————About the other issues, hopefully you will understand that feminism is not only in USA, it is an annoyance everywhere.Below is a good example of a single mother and her daughter…http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1330689/Portrait-VERY-modern-14-year-old-Tattoos-piercings-drinking-alcohol.htmlAbout condoms etc…As you know, feminism says, a woman (regardless her age) can do with her body whatever she wants…http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1093487/Outrage-13-year-olds-free-condoms-school-parents-knowledge.htmland about Canada…http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Thousands+of+girls%2c13%2c+on+morning-after+pill.-a0140678093THOUSANDS of 13-yearold girls have been handed the morning-after pill by Health Service staff without their parents' permission, it emerged yesterday. Hundreds have also been given contraceptive implants or injections that allow them to have sex for three years with little risk of pregnancy. Health workers are not required to inform parents about sex advice or treatment given to their children. This means that in the majority of these cases the girls would have been able to obtain contraception without their parents knowing – and it is likely they will never find out. The Department of Health does not break down contraceptive distribution into age groups.
> David Futrelle said… ….The fact that you can point to some women who like psychopaths does not mean that most women like psychopaths and thugs. This statement is correct, however you fail to mention that the feminist biased law nevertheless protects the woman and not the man.As a man how do you know about the girl's reaction in the future? She might attack you for no reason, she might accuse you for any reason or no reason at all – and if found out, what will happen to her? Nothing…http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1314122/X-FACTOR-2010-Escort-Chloe-Mafia-charges-shes-show.htmlFor sure NOT a good girl for a long-term relationship. Do you agree?And of course, all laws are gender neutral, but law execution is NOT…http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1311004/Judges-ordered-mercy-women-criminals-deciding-sentences.htmlJudges have been told to treat female criminals more leniently than men when deciding sentences.Luckily there is the Men's Rights Movement… However, campaigners for male victims of domestic violence claimed that men are being treated as second-class citizens by the new guidelines.They also point to analysis of official figures by the Parity campaign group which last week concluded that four out of ten victims of domestic violence were men .Brooks, of the ManKind campaign group, said: ‘For a document that claims to be about gender equality, it clearly leaves the impression that male victims are seen as being second class when, of course, all should be seen the same.USA is even worse, can you imagine to live together with such a woman?The US-justice system believes the woman in general, everything she says must be true, well in this case too much was too much despite feminism. But how many other men are in jail innocent? Feminists will never protect an innocent man against a malicious woman, this is for sure. http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=Plotting+ex-wife+gets+7-14+years+in+jail&articleId=14addb23-2910-4e11-8279-d6466abd6fe5BRENTWOOD – Kristin Ruggiero will spend 7 to 14 years in state prison for what police say was part of a years-long ploy to use the criminal justice system against her ex-husband, who was thrown in jail and nearly lost his career during a bitter divorce. If you read this article carefully, David, you will see, this woman is NOT a psychopath. She is a cold bitch, who lies and manipulates.
>Well, thanks for another list of random news articles about evil women.