>
 |
| Guys, they’re hiring! |
I’m beginning to suspect that the Happy Bachelors who populate the Happy Bachelors Forum are not quite as happy as they let on. Why is this? Well, when anyone suggests that their single status might in any way be undesirable, they don’t brush the comment off like most of us reasonably well-adjusted unmarried guys do. No, they get mad. Really mad. And they start talking about “femhags,” “fem-nags,” bitches and hoes (not the garden implement).
Here’s the thread in question. “analyzing” starts off the festivities by pointing to an email from a lovelorn 42-year old lass to an online relationship advice column:
Maybe I shouldn’t have waited [to get married], because it seems like every unmarried guy in the age range I’m looking for (40 to about 50) is a loser of one sort or another. If the guy has never been married, he’s either got commitment issues, or he’s lacking in social skills, or he drinks too much or has some other unattractive qualities. If he’s divorced, he’s either angry at women or so desperate to find a new one that he wants to hook up before he even knows you.
This comment is like a red flag to the Happy Bachelor bulls, who release a torrent of abuse that inadvertently reinforces every negative stereotype in the woman’s email. After a few comments lauding the superiority of young Thai and Filipina women over fortysomething American gals, spocksdisciple gets the woman-hating orgy underway. (I’ve bolded some of the best — as in worst — bits in his comment and some of the others.)
Women like this lack an essential quality to even begin to comprehend why they are such total failures in their relationships.
That essential quality is that of introspection and reflection, instead of asking what bad choices she’s made and her role in making these choices, she goes on the typical female tirade about how it’s the fault of all the men around her. …
I see lots and lots of cats in her future and nothing else, I will enjoy the upcoming decades as more and more of these useless bitches end up alone and going stir crazy. I’m betting that many of them will end up abusing drugs or alcohol to make their pain bearable. I will laugh at them because even then they will not look inwards to see if they were in part responsible for ending up alone.
Marcus Aurelius commends what he sees as an excellent analysis, and adds his own thoughts:
[W]omen are not capable of introspection, its always someone else’s fault. They don’t realize that their being cum dumpsters, going for Alphas, and their hypergamy destroys their chance at landing a mangina. They don’t have a beta male mangina…because…they overlooked them…and still are. I think you are right, these aging women that are alone will be screwed up mentally. …
Women just don’t know what to do with themselves. … Coming home to a quiet and empty home for them…is like descending into hell because they don’t know what to do once they get there. Men get hobbies. For them Its get drunk, or watch So You Think You Can Dance or the Bachelor…hahaha…..nothing goes on inside those heads of theirs.
I’m assuming he’s not the real Marcus Aurelius — I’m pretty sure the original Marcus Aurelius never used the term “cum dumpster.”
Others contribute their own insights about women. In the process, Curiepoint explains why he never became a firefighter:
I find it an honor to be so offensive to the likes of women. After a lifetime of looking after everyone else, bowing and scraping for a meagre paycheck, and kissing the ass of a woman who voraciously consumed everything I had (two of them, actually) I am more than proud to stand in defiance of any woman’s shitty personality.
I wouldn’t piss on a woman if she were on fire. Chances are, that would amount to one huge, spitting grease fire, given how “hot” women are comprised mostly of blubber and cheap rayon clothing. …
Women aren’t worth the effort to work up enough spit to hurl at them. And, any man who would actually cave in to her demands deserves to burn right along side them. They are not men. Both barely qualify as being vaguely humanoid.
Lavastorm suggests that perhaps being a winner isn’t what it’s cracked up to be, based on the following (apparently typical) scenario:
So a “winner” is a “man” who follows society’s pre-programmed path to self-destruction (gets married, becomes the wife’s tool to keep up with the neighbors, works in a soul-destroying job, is destroyed by wife when she gets “bored,” gets blamed for “destroying the marriage,” is thrown to the gauntlet of dread judges, retarded pit bulls, and menopausing succubi who commence sucking his blood.
In case you’re wondering: No, he never closes the parenthesis. He’s Going His Own Way, grammatically.
>The Happy Bachelors site is the People of Wal-Mart site for the MRA community. That's the place where I found advice amongst bachelors to stop showering, toothbrushing, and start dressing like a homeless man so marriage-hungry women will leave you alone.
>All of those are very good tips!
>I'm so glad I paid attention during that fire prevention safety training video. STOP DROP and ROLL!!
>But is anything that lavastorm said in his post untrue?Random Brother
>Bishop: every word is TRUE. We are wimmen; we are evil. And we do want to steal your "resources!" Don't think you can pick up a nice thirteen-year-old bride in Thailand either; we are going to corrupt those sweet children – it's the next wave of feminism.But you can keep us away: stop brushing your teeth, stop washing yourself, and stop changing your clothes. That should do it.
>Shhh, Katz, you're giving away our secrets.
>"Well, when anyone suggests that their single status might in any way be undesirable, they don't brush the comment off like most of us reasonably well-adjusted unmarried guys do." This is so true. It really isn't that hard to opt out of relationships. You just say 'no' if folks who ask you out and never ask anyone out. I have an asexual friend who tells me this strategy works wonders.
>@ KatzKATZ SAID: "Bishop: every word is TRUE. We are wimmen; we are evil. And we do want to steal your "resources!" "If women didn't want to steal men's resources they'd never take any alimony now would they? So in fact you know that women do steal resources but try to cover it up with sarcasm and snark. Women also file 75 – 80% of all divorces, usually IMHO, after they've got the next provider lined up. As is the norm feminuts distort everything and then enlist the echo chamber.KATZ SAID: "Don't think you can pick up a nice thirteen-year-old bride in Thailand either; we are going to corrupt those sweet children – it's the next wave of feminism."Great more obese man hating societal leeches, you go girlfriend.KATZ SAID: "But you can keep us away: stop brushing your teeth, stop washing yourself, and stop changing your clothes. That should do it."Sort of like you femincows not shaving your legs or underarms and cutting off all your hair? Aren't feminists by nature ugly enough without trying at it?Random Brother
>While I do love blankly staring at a wall when I'm by myself, it's just not true that I don't have hobbies.I work very hard at my all-consuming passion of DESTROYING MEN'S LIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!111one!eleventyAlso getting fat, which is part of destroying men's lives. Oh, and Plants VS. Zombies.
>lol – "This comment is like a red flag to the Happy Bachelor bulls, who release a torrent of abuse that inadvertently reinforces every negative stereotype in the woman's email." Yup, nothing proves how "happy" you are as proving you're actually miserable, hateful, and deranged! Proves the "happiness" even more when the email wasn't even directed at them…Seriously, lou-zehers. And by the way, being an alcoholic isn't a hobby… it's a way of self-medicating more serious conditions like clinical depression, bi-polar, anxiety, etc…yup, these guys are seriously oooozing "happiness"….
>How do I steal resources from thee? Let me count the ways…I steal resources from thee from my first breath of life, in being a dependent child.I steal resources from thee when employed in the public sphere, in that I have stolen a job that rightfully belongs to a man.I steal resources from thee when NOT employed in the public sphere, when I am a dependent housewife (ooops, I mean "parasite") and, perhaps, a mother.I steal resources from thee when we separate, in that if I am granted primary custody, I am also granted to receive child support and sometimes alimony as well (seeing that I chose NOT to steal a man's job away from him).I steal resources from thee when I am a single mother who chooses to stay home with my child(ren) rather than "pawning them off" to relatives or a daycare facility so that I can work at a job, or two or more, that I stole from a man or men.What a cruel joke it was for women to have been created, as we exist only to steal the resources that were divvied up equally amongst all men in the beginning.I think that WOMEN, by nature, are ugly enough in that it was nature itself that endowed many of us with hair on our legs, arms, underarms and, **GASP!!**, pubic area. How DARE we not spend some of our time and our stolen resources to have some of this offensive hair removed! Oh god, NO!, we spend some of our time and our stolen resources cutting off the NON-offensive hair!! We can't even get THAT right!!
>Bishop: you forgot one of the other major MRA themes. Cuckolding. 70% of all babies actually are fathered by another man, not the actual husband. Not positive about that 70% figure, but hell, nether are you manboobz. I used the MRA methodology; pull any high figure out of your ass and make a claim.
>@Pam – sad reality of the typical MRA (double) standard… Also, gotta love that not bathing and brushing teeth in men = not shaving in women to Bishop. Shaving the underarms isn't even practiced worldwide. Um, someone needs to go back to gym class and relearn the part about basic hygiene…
>@Tec – Oh, I know!! And the sad reality of the privileges that ensure that they remain blind to their own hypocrisy. MRAs who spout off about how feminist ideology is centered around the extermination of all men are quite happily oblivious to how their ideology actually rails against the very existence of women (or, rather, the existence of women as sentient beings).AND, gotta love these "Happy Bachelors" who might be better off renaming themselves as MGTOW-BOAW (Men Going Their Own Way-By Obsessing About Women)
>@ PAMPAM PUKED: "How do I steal resources from thee? Let me count the ways…I steal resources from thee from my first breath of life, in being a dependent child."Did I say this? No, but don't let facts stop you.PAM SAID: "I steal resources from thee when employed in the public sphere, in that I have stolen a job that rightfully belongs to a man.I steal resources from thee when NOT employed in the public sphere, when I am a dependent housewife (ooops, I mean "parasite") and, perhaps, a mother."Nor did I say this, seriously, can you read?"I steal resources from thee when we separate, in that if I am granted primary custody,"If? If? Who the hell are you trying to fool? You mean when you are arbitrarily granted custoday.MORE PAM SNOT: "I am also granted to receive child support and sometimes alimony as well (seeing that I chose NOT to steal a man's job away from him)."Oh! So by taking alimony you're actually helping men! You're doing us a favor! Wow! I had it all wrong! It's like you're a superhero! Lazy Lying Resource Stealing Parasite Woman! They should do a tv show about you where you sit around your home lounging on the couch collecting alimony and child support and defending our nation by watching Oprah and the View! You keep us safe from doom by ensuring that your butt stays on the couch keeping it from attacking the president, you are amazing, thank you! Thank you for your sacrifice of TAKING SOMEONE ELSE'S MONEY. You're a find example of humanity. No really, you really are one of a kind, thank you.MORE GARBAGE: "I steal resources from thee when I am a single mother who chooses to stay home with my child(ren) rather than "pawning them off" to relatives or a daycare facility so that I can work at a job, or two or more, that I stole from a man or men."Get new material. This is not what I said and is beyond lame.PAM AGAIN: "What a cruel joke it was for women to have been created, as we exist only to steal the resources that were divvied up equally amongst all men in the beginning."And that's the problem you greedy immoral person. Resources have to be developed. They are not gift baskets sitting on a lawn that the evil men all took and wouldn't give to you. You deserve nothing in this world except what you can earn. Not what you can steal from someone productive. Still I'm not surprised that a feminist cannot understand this."I think that WOMEN, by nature, are ugly enough in that it was nature itself that endowed many of us with hair on our legs, arms, underarms and, **GASP!!**, pubic area."So then, you keeping your wisdom teeth too, right? How about all the diseases of nature you just gonna keep them cause they're natural, right?PAM: How DARE we not spend some of our time and our stolen resources to have some of this offensive hair removed! Oh god, NO!, we spend some of our time and our stolen resources cutting off the NON-offensive hair!! We can't even get THAT right!!"If you want to look like a linebacker for the New York Jets fine by me.Random Brother
>@ KATZKATZ SAID: "Bishop: you forgot one of the other major MRA themes. Cuckolding. 70% of all babies actually are fathered by another man, not the actual husband. Not positive about that 70% figure, but hell, nether are you manboobz. I used the MRA methodology; pull any high figure out of your ass and make a claim."If modern day "liberated" women could keep their legs closed for more than ten seconds at a time there wouldn't be this problem. But hey, then they wouldn't be liberated to spread STD'S across the world now would they? Girl power!Random Brother
>@ LUNATECLUNATEC SAID: "Also, gotta love that not bathing and brushing teeth in men = not shaving in women to Bishop. Shaving the underarms isn't even practiced worldwide. Um, someone needs to go back to gym class and relearn the part about basic hygiene…"I'm sure in those starving far off African countries they're brusing their teeth every day. Dim dumb woman. Random Brother
>Should read "brushing their teeth every day.'Random Brother
>Bishop's comments illustrate perfectly why one can only respond with snark and sarcasm; there is no reasoning or intelligent discourse to be had with a manboob.But you keep going your own way, o brave soldier; push aside the Meagan Fox look-alikes reaching for you with their clutchy hands!
>@ KATZAll you ever post is snark you mindless cow. You haven't once attempted a cogent argument. That's good because it is clearly beyond your ability.BTW: When you get your cats please consider a shelter as many worthwhile animals need adoption.Random Brother
>How egocentric of you, bishopsinister, to think that I did my Elizabeth Barrett Browning revision in honour of you alone. @Katz,"Bishop's comments illustrate perfectly why one can only respond with snark and sarcasm; there is no reasoning or intelligent discourse to be had with a manboob."Reminds me of one of my favourite movie lines, from the movie Se7en, "It's impressive to see a man feeding off his emotions"
>"You deserve nothing in this world except what you can earn. Not what you can steal from someone productive. Still I'm not surprised that a feminist cannot understand this."ROTFLMAO!!! You have GOT to be KIDDING me!! The entire history of much of this world revolves around stealing from others in order to "earn" what one "deserves"!! War, colonizing, slavery, Indian Treaties and Reservations, and on and on. Still, I'm not suprised that an MRA cannot understand this.
>@ PamSo what you're saying is in the past other people stole so now it's womyn's turn? I guess two wrongs don't make a right never occur to feminists. BTW YOU you pampered western princess are one of the recipients of that theft. Unless you're non white you don't have a damn thing to complain about.Also, your pampered western ass is the direct recipient of feminuts hijacking the civil rights movement as well. Another appeal to history for evil behavior in the present. Random Brother
>"So what you're saying is in the past other people stole so now it's womyn's turn?"What a narrow, simplistic rewording. And do you believe that it's all in the past? Do you believe that human trafficking and slavery no longer exist? Do you not see Imperialist America for what it truly is?"BTW YOU you pampered western princess are one of the recipients of that theft. Unless you're non white you don't have a damn thing to complain about."Sure we are, just as you privilege princes are one of the recipients of that theft.Well, I'm not considered white, some refer to me as yellow, so I guess I DO have damn things to complain about."Also, your pampered western ass is the direct recipient of feminuts hijacking the civil rights movement as well"Actually, my pampered western ass is the direct recipient of the impetus behind consumerism, targeted primarily at women to lure them back into the private, domestic sphere in the affluent times post-WWII. And this push for consumerism was dreamed up by mostly… **GASP!!**… MEN!
>@Bishop – wtf do African women not brushing their teeth have to do with basic hygiene? Are you saying you're going your own way against the dentist too? @Pam – lol, it's hilarious reading the absolute hypocrisy of Male Privilege Apologists like Bishop. Completely oblivious to their own blatant double standards. How can I "work" for resources when those resources really belong to the poor manz whom I "stole" the job from???Also, gotta love how he thinks of housewife = Peg Bundy from Married with Children.