>
 |
| Women are totally into this shit. |
Sperm: It’s What Women Crave. At least according to a post today on What Men Are Saying About Women. So where does that leave lesbians? Up shit creek without a paddle, or, more precisely, up the vagina without a flagellum:
The MRA who posted it, who quite conveniently goes by the name of MRA, is basing his highly scientific conclusion on a weird study from a number of years back which found that women who had unprotected spermy sex with men were happier than women whose partners used condoms; apparently semen is a kind of magic happy juice. Never mind that according to his logic, men who wear condoms should also be considered “sad, pathetic imitators of the real thing” as well.
>So, according to MRAs, the only good thing about guys is their sperm?
>No wonder my 5'4" 36DD 130lb Girlfriend is always so happy! Now I know…This weekend I'll be sure to give her lots of my magic happy juice…Pity there is not enough to supply the whole world of women with such happiness.I would encourage men everywhere to seek women out, and give them their magic happy juice.COME ON GUYZ!!! LETS MAKE THOSE WOMEN HAPPY!Happiness (ah – pee – niss) = A Penis!!!It almost sounds the same doesn't it…Coincidence?I think not!@marissa – in case you are not aware – its not just the sperm – but the process we give it to you…Hopefully, you'll find a man to do this with – and experience the joys of it.
>Well I feel pretty good after a hot beef injection myself.That's some specious reasoning there, Marissa.
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5j-S6Eq81g
>Oh man, that quote and the bragging troll are hilarious. He should apply for a job writing "male enhancement" spam emails. It sounded like that kind of advertising pitch.I probably shouldn't dignify anything with a response, but… Gee, it sure is boring around here. I wonder if fluid-bonded couples in general tend to be happier just because people are more likely to forgo protection in stable, long term relationships? Guess I need to turn in my woman card… my happiness doesn't fluctuate with condom usage. Orgasms make me happy, but there are many wonderful ways to share them. I could even share them with a person who doesn't have a penis!They (MRA or researchers) obviously didn't bother to consult any bisexual people or lesbians. Offer me a man au naturel, a man wearing a condom, and a woman, and I'd be 3 times as happy.
>"Never mind that according to his logic, men who wear condoms should also be considered "sad, pathetic imitators of the real thing" as well."Err, no. You see, the man wearing the condom has a shitload of sperm in his epididymis, with more being produced in his testicles.By the way, lesbians are the most violence group on the planet. Go look at the incidence rate for lezzo-on-lezzo violence if you don't believe me. Then go look at all of the satanic murders that have been committed by lezzos.
>I probably shouldn't bother, since you're obviously completely batshit, but where exactly are you getting your info on "satanic murders?" The Department of Satanic Statistics? Henry Makow? A voice in your head?
>http://men-factor.blogspot.com/2010/10/lesbian-relationships-are-more.htmlStop being lesbians and cum and get your magic happy cream ladies!
>"http://men-factor.blogspot.com/2010/10/lesbian-relationships-are-more.html"Did you read the text of the source:For brevity's sake, [women and men who reported living with a same-sex intimate partner at least once in their lifetime] will be referred to as same-sex cohabitants, and [women and men who reported marrying/living with an opposite-sex partner but never with a same-sex partner] will be referred to as opposite-sex cohabitantsSo, for brevity, a sort of "one drop of blood" rule applies. A women who cohabited with men on thirty different occasions but with a women on one occasion is put into the "same-sex cohabitation" category.This group of women are more likely to be victimised by an intimate partner than their exclusively-heterosexual counterparts, but the source doesn't tell us the sex of the partner who victimised them. You just assumed that it was the same-sex partner.
>Also we know that women are more likely than men to report violence by their partner, so it is not surprising that lesbians report more violence then gay men. This doesn't mean that gay men are experiencing less violence.
>That reminds me, anyone hear about the new pill that cures lesbianism? It's called Trycoxagain.
>"I probably shouldn't bother, since you're obviously completely batshit, but where exactly are you getting your info on "satanic murders?" The Department of Satanic Statistics? Henry Makow? A voice in your head?"I can think of at least two murders in Australia that were committed by vampiric lesbians. Both murders involved lesbians who were either linked to a vampiric cult or, chose to ritualistically drink the blood of their respective victims."Sick lesbian vampire killersAAP | January 26, 2008 12:00AM TWO lesbians who kissed over the body of a girl they killed to prove their love smiled as a Perth court heard it took the teenage victim half an hour to die. The pair bludgeoned 16-year-old Stacey Mitchell with a concrete block, strangled her with a chain and then videoed her blood-splattered bedroom and semi-naked body while they mocked her English accent, a court in Perth heard.One of the girls was a member of a vampire sub-culture, interested in violence and drinking blood."http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw-act/sick-lesbian-vampire-killers/story-e6freuzi-1111115401206"Tracey WiggingtonTracey Wigginton (born 1965) is an Australian murderer who achieved notoriety for killing a man in 1989, supposedly in order to drink his blood.Wiggington was the only one of the four co-accused who pled guilty to the charge of murder. Therefore, there was no trial and few details were disclosed to the court as to why this incident occurred. Her then-girlfriend, Lisa Ptachinski, and two other women fuelled rumours about Wigginton having vampiric tendencies, stating that the reason for the murder was to enable the drinking of the man's blood.[1]On the night of the murder, Wigginton, Ptaschinski and two other women lured 47-year-old Edward Baldock to a park on the banks of the Brisbane River. There, Wigginton stabbed him 27 times, nearly severing his head.[2]In 1991, she was sentenced to life imprisonment by the Supreme Court of Queensland with a minimum of 13 years. Four parole applications have been turned down."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracey_Wigginton
>Aileen Wuornos was introduced to satanism durning adolescence. She was a lesbian.
>That's a good one, being called "batshit" but an insane, pussy-begging cunt who aligns himself with the nutjobs on feministing.com. Any argument he may have had against radical MRAs lost all credibility when he decided to align himself with a group of batshit insane radical feminazis. A review of the insane, misandristic ramblings on feministing.com makes the most radical MRAs look saintly!
>Hey Futrelle,Don't you get sick and tired of being wrong?Our conversation under "Women behaving badly, meet men behaving worse" is a good example.—-"Uh, CITATION NEEDED. All this stuff about black widows is fantasy on your part." — FutrelleLOLDid I or didn't I tell you that the statement was made on The FBI Files or Cold Case Files? Yes I did.Here it is again:"I recall hearing this on either The FBI Files or Cold Case Files."If I recall correctly, the person who made the comment was a law enforcement officer. The fact that you've written it off as "fantasy" proves that you're an ideologically driven bigot. You refuse to accept this information because it clashes with your agenda. But if you're still delusional enough to believe I live in a fantasy world, then take a look at this:"The typical pattern of a black widow killer is to murder six to eight victims in a period of 10 to 15 years. Numbers of victims have been known to be higher in areas where law enforcement is minimal and investigators are either less vigilant or less suspicious."The aforementioned excerpt is from Domestic Homicide of Male Spouses by Females: A Review for Death Investigators. You can see the full article here:http://www.forensicnursemag.com/articles/391lifedeath.html http://manboobz.blogspot.com/2010/09/women-behaving-badly-meet-men-behaving.html?showComment=1285854635003#c8231638415954294454
>So now most murders are commited by lesbians, despite the fact that most murders (90%) are committed by men, and, of women who do murder, the most common victim is a male intimate partner (and, before you jump on that, no, women don't kill intimate partners in larger numbers then men, they just don't commit as much stranger murder in addition). From the Department of Justice "Wives were more likely than husbands to be killed by their spouses: wives were about half of all spouses in the population in 2002, but 81% of all persons killed by their spouse. " There's this thing called reality, you could try living in it."Go look at the incidence rate for lezzo-on-lezzo violence" Same sex domestic violence happens at comparable rates as opposite sex domestic violence (meaning that the risk of one partner being battered is comparable to that of a hetero woman being battered). It should be noted that trans women with hetero male partners are at enhanced risk for being the victims of abuse, which is the exception to the rule where LGB people are only abused by partners at comparable rates. Also, the fact that you could find a grand total of two murders by occultist lesbians in the entire world does not show statistical significance. Shoot, I could probably find a huge number of occultist murders by hetero men with a quick google search. Neither of these cases prove that this is common amoung lesbians any more than Luke Mitchell's murder of his girlfriend shows that pot heads do them all the time.Of course MRAs hate lesbians, because lesbians assert they have lives outside of being brainless fuckholes for MRA asshats, which doesn't do at all. And, they would have to stop being homophobes for them to not hate lesbians, something which they are obviously unwilling to do.A note to you all from a bisexual-dick ain't magic. Sure, it can be fun, just like pussy can be fun, but it sure as hell ain't magic.
>cat,Don't put words into my mouth. I never said most murders re committed by lesbians.Obviously you haven't read anything that I've said. If you did then you wouldn't have bothered citing a whole heap of statistics that I'm fully aware of. As I pointed out the other day, the sort of stats you've cited prove nothing other than man-on-woman homicide is detected more often than woman-on-man homicide, and, that the courts are better equipped to convict men. You can say this is "bullshit", but doing so will only reveal that you're a narrowminded simpleton who does not live in the real world. Anyone who knows a thing or two about crime is aware that women's choices for murder usually go undetected. This means women are more likely than men to get away with murder. The Department ofJustice's statistics don't take this fact into equation — even though it has been acknowledged by other experts — yet they have the audascity to say that the conviction rate for rapists does not represent the incidence of rape!Are you going to stay true to your logic and say that rape is one of the rarest crimes in society — the Bureau of Justice's stats indicate only a small number or accused rapists are convicted — or, like a true hypocrite who has an age4nda, will you abort your logic and argue that it only represents a flaw in the system? If you're going to say it's the latter then don't scoff at the idea that most women who murder get away with it.Let me remind you that the Australian Bureau of Statistics admitted that convicted women routinely receive ligher sentences and, that female defendants are more likely to be acquitted. This supports my theory nicely.
>"Also, the fact that you could find a grand total of two murders by occultist lesbians in the entire world does not show statistical significance."I didn't go out of my way to find vampiric murder cases involving lesbian perpetrators! I cited those cases because they occurred in my country and I'm familiar with them. I've never heard of a case involving a heterosexual man — or a gay one, for that matter — committing an offence like this against a woman. Lesbians make up less than 2% of Australia's population. If two of the highest profile Australian murder cases from the last 21 years involve lesbians killing in a vampiric manner, then it suggests there is something unusual about Australian lesbians.So tell me, why is it that I've never heard of a similar Australian case that was perpetrated by a man? If Australian men do it as often as Australian lesbians do, then for every vampiric murder that's committed by a lesbian, there would be numerous cases involving male perpetrators. If you cannot understand the logic, then I'll explain it more clearly for you: the fact that men outnumber lesbians by a very high percentage means there would be numerous acts committed by men (if they are as likely to do it as often, that is). Yet I've never heard of this happening. It's fair to conclude that it's a form of murder that is predominantly performed by lesbians. It much be rare as hell, but when it does happen, it's performed by lesbians.
>""Go look at the incidence rate for lezzo-on-lezzo violence" Same sex domestic violence happens at comparable rates as opposite sex domestic violence (meaning that the risk of one partner being battered is comparable to that of a hetero woman being battered). It should be noted that trans women with hetero male partners are at enhanced risk for being the victims of abuse, which is the exception to the rule where LGB people are only abused by partners at comparable rates."You're either a liar or uneducated.In harm's way: Higher level of abuse among same-sex couples than straight ones, Hong Kong studyby Nigel CollettFour times as many individuals in a same-sex relationship than in a straight one have reportedly been victimised by physical assault, according to a landmark study by the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) and the Women Coalition of HKSAR.The study, which is the only rigorous study made to date in Asia of same-sex partner violence, found higher levels of abuse than a Hong Kong study into heterosexual couple violence had found using the same measurement tool in 2005 (see note 1), For instance, whilst 9.6% of heterosexual individuals responding in 2005 had been victimised by physical assault, in this new study the comparative figure for same-sex individuals was 38.9%. For psychological abuse, the figures were 59.2% for heterosexual and 74.6% for same-sex individual members of partnerships. The results of the study titled ‘Same-sex Intimate Partner Violence in Hong Kong’ were made public on Jun 16 at a press conference by Professor Winnie W.S. Mak of CUHK’s Department of Psychology, her two students from the University, Mabel Kwong and Eddie Chong, and two spokespersons of the Women Coalition of HKSAR, Connie Chan Man-wai and Yeung Wai Wai.The results support the need for a speedy extension of the coverage of same-sex relationships under Hong Kong’s Domestic Violence Ordinance (DVO).
>http://www.fridae.com/newsfeatures/2009/07/17/8636.in-harms-way-higher-level-of-abuse-among-same-sex-couples-than-straight-ones-hong-kong-study?n=sec
>"Of course MRAs hate lesbians, because lesbians assert they have lives outside of being brainless fuckholes for MRA asshats, which doesn't do at all. And, they would have to stop being homophobes for them to not hate lesbians, something which they are obviously unwilling to do."MRAs hate radical lesbian feminists, such as the second-wave cunts who called for the mass killing of men. Radical lesbian feminazis like Mary Daly were in favour of culling men. Big difference.
>Uh, lesbian-obsessed Anonymous? Don't cut and paste entire articles into the comments. A link is sufficient. I've deleted the comments that are nothing more than pasted bits.
>Also, a quick Google search turned up a bunch of male vampire killers: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/vampire-man-who-killed-best-friend-is-jailed-for-life-582694.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rod_Ferrellhttp://abcnews.go.com/US/video/man-arrested-vampire-murder-11333462&tab=9482931§ion=1206833&playlist=&page=4http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brennan_Crutchleyhttp://articles.sfgate.com/1999-11-30/news/17706329_1_homeless-men-homeless-woman-assault-chargesAnd a heterosexual couple:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/vampire-couple-jailed-for-satanic-murder-672009.htmlI don't know why it needs to be said, but both men and women are capable of horrible things.
>That's nice Futrelle, but it's completely irrelevant to the conversation with cat. I spoke about vampiric murders that took place in Australia. None of the men on your list are Australian. Nor did they commit their crimes in Australia. As it stands, the only two Australian vampiric murders that we know about were committed by evil lesbians. 😀
>This is possibly the dumbest discussion I have ever been in. Here's an male Australian vampire murder:http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/father-guilty-of-vampire-site-murder-of-carly-ryan/story-e6frf7kx-1225822274002