Categories
chad thundercock homophobia lesbians don't real men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny reddit

Bad news, lesbians: You aren’t real, according to some dudes on the internet

That’s what you think, lady!

By David Futrelle

Lesbians around the world face a deep existential crisis today as it has been revealed that they do not, in fact, exist. At least according to some dudes on the internet. Specifically, some dudes on the Men Going Their Own Way subreddit, long a hotbed of Lesbian Denial.

In a recent discussion, a commenter by the name of NathanHollister explained that so-called “lesbians” are just straight women who can’t find quality men.

Lesbianism is not real. It’s just women who are sick and tired of unmasculine, wussy, spineless soyboy men. They will magically turn straight for a real sexy, charming man.

Basically, women who cannot find a top 20% man become lesbians. Women who can find a top 20% man but also are kinky sluts become “bi”, but mainly because they know a threesome with another girl would turn their man on.

Other commenters agreed with the “can’t get a man” theory.

“Lesbians only exist because Chad said ‘no’ and didn’t give them attention,” declared edgysecularist.

Still others feel that lesbianism is more about the hatred of men than the lack of them. According to bbhuntt:

Any ‘lesbian’ Is really a straight person who doesn’t like men and is willing to have intercourse with women rather than not have intercourse. …

Being a lesbian is the ultimate move of feminist and nothing more. It’s all a giant game

Sir_manalot suggested that it was also about status, as no one apparently has more status than women today.

[W]omen just fuck whoever they believe is highest on the social chain. Right now, women are being given a bunch of unearned power and so lesbianism is in.

Fortunately for men — or at least for the cis men who make up the overwhelming majority of MGTOWs — they have one great advantage over all these fake lesbians. And it can be found in their pants.

“You have a dick and they don’t,” wrote rejac218.

They will never know what a woman’s pussy really feels like from balls deep. You should laugh right at them.

But of course as MGTOWs they don’t spend any time at all fantasizing about said pussies. Nope! As SprinterLyfe reminded his fellow Own-Way-Goers:

Pussy is all women have to offer. By placing little or no value on pussy, we regain control of ourselves, finding legitimate freedom from feminized cultures bent on enslavement and domination of men by women.

And there’s no greater proof of the freedom these men have from women than their tendency to discuss these completely unimportant-to-them women angrily on the internet all day every day while talking about how cool their dicks are. That’s what male freedom looks like!

Send tips to dfutrelle at gmail dot com.

We Hunted the Mammoth relies entirely on readers like you for its survival. If you appreciate our work, please send a few bucks our way! Thanks!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

242 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ohlmann
Ohlmann
8 months ago

Cool ! I alway wanted not to exist. And frankly, having a free will or a consciousness was dragging me behind. Acting like an automaton feel much fresher and less stressing. Where do we sign up ?

Naglfar
Naglfar
8 months ago

According to bbhuntt:

Any ‘lesbian’ Is really a straight person who doesn’t like men and is willing to have intercourse with women rather than not have intercourse. …

Being a lesbian is the ultimate move of feminist and nothing more. It’s all a giant game

Mr. bbhuntt is sounding a bit reminiscent of political lesbians here. Oddly, I’ve seen MGTOWs compared to political lesbians, with the key difference that MGTOWs get very angry if you in any way insinuate that they might be attracted to each other.

Women who can find a top 20% man but also are kinky sluts become “bi”

Wait, so I’m not bi because I’m attracted to both men and women but because I’m a kinky slut who can find a top 20% man?

You have a dick and they don’t

And I’m guessing trans* women don’t exist to them either.

Daughter
Daughter
8 months ago

Migtoes just hate it when WGTOW.

Battering Lamb
Battering Lamb
8 months ago

Wait, so I’m not bi because I’m attracted to both men and women but because I’m a kinky slut who can find a top 20% man?

Not only that, but were you a man you’d clearly be really gay and unwilling to leave the closet. Regardless of gender, if you claim to be bi, clearly it is all about the menz.

Oddly, I’ve seen MGTOWs compared to political lesbians, with the key difference that MGTOWs get very angry if you in any way insinuate that they might be attracted to each other.

You’d think they’d be more open to it since they all seem to think dicks are magical attraction devices. And how much they loathe their attraction to women. I’m sure their stance on asexuality isn’t particularly enlightened either.

Naglfar
Naglfar
8 months ago

@Battering Lamb

Regardless of gender, if you claim to be bi, clearly it is all about the menz.

And I’m pretty sure I know how the MGTOWs feel about bi men (not good). I’ve also heard red pillers claim that gay men don’t exist either, though I haven’t heard MGTOWs in particular talk about it.

I’m sure their stance on asexuality isn’t particularly enlightened either.

They probably think asexual men are men who’ve just given up, and they probably think ace women are lying like the lesbians. Just a guess, but that could well be what they think.

Lumipuna (nee Arctic Ape)
Lumipuna (nee Arctic Ape)
8 months ago

Basically, lesbians are women coming their own way.

Nentuaby
Nentuaby
8 months ago

Mr. bbhuntt is sounding a bit reminiscent of political lesbians here. Oddly, I’ve seen MGTOWs compared to political lesbians, with the key difference that MGTOWs get very angry if you in any way insinuate that they might be attracted to each other.

Honestly a lot of PLs get that way too. They just layer it under a lot of babble about “reproducing the male gaze” and “the sex class” because they’re not supposed to be repulsed by the idea of actual lesbianism.

Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
8 months ago

OT, but implicates neoliberalism and plutocracy:

I’m noticing a recent and disturbing trend in webshite misdesign lately. Seems to have been initiated by Facebook, natch, or at least they were among the first high profile sites to do it, but others are following suit, including Canada’s theweathernetwork.com site.

The affected sites have in common the following preexisting traits: they are generally relatively slow and “bulky” to load, and generally have key functionality that requires enabling Javashit.

What they’re doing that’s new and annoying: Punishing users who won’t just sit twiddling their thumbs and staring at the pulsating browser throbber until their site has fully loaded. They detect if the user focuses a different browser tab and retaliate in some way if they user does so rather than just sit and wait.

Facebook’s approach is just to drag out the loading process indefinitely, so the page can still not be done loading ten minutes later, so you will have to wait about as long after switching back to the Facebook tab as if you had just sat there waiting to begin with; thus, there’s no benefit to switching to another tab for a minute or so and back again anymore (before this change, the Facebook tab would have finished loading for sure by then).

TWN’s is rather more nasty: you’ll come back to intentionally broken functionality, e.g. the current sky conditions and temperature for your location won’t be displayed. It will work normally again if you reload the page and then sit put rather than switch away and back.

Both exhibit a clear desire to monopolize attention and have a captive audience. I’m not sure what the underlying business benefit is, if any — the ads will still be there (or not, if an ad blocker is used) when the user switches back. Perhaps they’re trying to maximize a time-on-site metric that affects their advertising revenues? Gaming it by starting the clock early in the page load process, then bloating up and dragging out the page load process to rack up time before the user can even start to do what they’re there to do (since sooner started, sooner finished), and then when users predictably react by habitually switching tabs immediately after (re)loading their site and coming back after a minute or so, acting to neutralize this (as presumably the advertisers’ time-on-site clocks stop running when the tab isn’t focused).

So, neoliberal capitalism meets domineering and jealous behavior, basically. And as usual the commonplace products in our lives center the needs of rich people like Mark Zuckerberg, who need added help the least, over the needs of us people who merely are the ones actually using those products.

Fortunately, there is a workaround: the scripts being used to pull these shenanigans don’t seem to be able to detect the browser itself losing focus, so you can leave it on the FB, TWN, or whatever tab and alt-tab over to an entirely different app without the site slowing down/misrendering itself to force you to still spend as much time waiting and watching it load. The other app can even be another browser (I don’t know if a second top-level window of the same browser will work, or will be detected like a tab switch). So: install e.g. Firefox and Chome side-by-side and just surf a bit in the other one while $(SLOW_SITE) loads in the background and you’ll have defeated this rather poorly-thought-out and cack-handed attempt to punish you for defeating their attempts to game the metrics collected by the third-party advertising scripts embedded on their site.

moregeekthan
moregeekthan
8 months ago

“You’re not really a lesbian. You’re just a straight women who doesn’t like men and has sex with women.”

Add “sex with” in front of “men”, and it’s just a convoluted way of saying the same thing.*

*There are very likely some rounding errors in my statement, but I hope the main point is clear.

Moggie
Moggie
8 months ago

Again with that “top 20%” figure, which seems popular in those circles. It must be difficult to maintain that kind of denial of reality. Even if you limit your friends to guys as embittered as yourself, you can hardly walk down a city street without seeing couples where the man is average-looking at best. At work, your homely male coworkers talk about their wives and girlfriends. You probably have male relatives in long-term relationships despite looking worse than you. But you must suppress that inner voice which says “looks like a lot of really ordinary guys have no trouble finding a partner. Maybe the problem you have isn’t that you’re not hot?”

Oh, and: these are guys who apparently have never talked to a lesbian. Do they all just live in the arse end of nowhere, where they never encounter anyone new?

Tyko
Tyko
8 months ago

Dick is abundant and of low value.

My life would be easier if I was straight, but
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Nequam
Nequam
8 months ago

Has Surplus been replaced by a script generator?

Naglfar
Naglfar
8 months ago

@Moggie

Again with that “top 20%” figure, which seems popular in those circles.

They claim it’s based on the Pareto distribution, but a minute of Googling reveals that that is not what the Pareto distribution does (it actually models distribution of wealth, where the rich have a disproportionate share of all wealth).

It must be difficult to maintain that kind of denial of reality. Even if you limit your friends to guys as embittered as yourself, you can hardly walk down a city street without seeing couples where the man is average-looking at best.

It’s probably made easier by both confirmation bias and assuming the absolute worst about everyone you see. Then, you’ve distorted everything enough that you could mistake this for reality.

Oh, and: these are guys who apparently have never talked to a lesbian. Do they all just live in the arse end of nowhere

How do you talk to something you don’t believe exists? They probably have talked to lesbians, they just refused to accept that a woman wouldn’t be attracted to Grade A++ Alpha specimens like themselves. I’m not a lesbian and I’m still not attracted to MGTOW idiots.

weirwoodtreehugger: chief manatee

If MGTOW were actually going their own way, you’d think they would love lesbians for not trying to lure men into marriage or child support. So curious how they’re not pleased about it, huh.

Definitely not Steve
Definitely not Steve
8 months ago

The world is so much simpler and makes so much more sense when you simply assume that people are exactly what they say they are.

What a concept.

Definitely not Steve
Definitely not Steve
8 months ago

@Surplus to Requirements,

Have you considered that the behavior you describe may in fact be the result of the behavior of your browser, and not a script written by website designers to deliberately make your life worse?

I mean, it’s not like it’s in Facebook’s best interests for you to feel annoyed every time you visit their site. On the other hand, a browser has a lot of resources to manage, especially when many tabs are open, and it is very much in the interests of browser programmers to keep the browser functioning as smoothly as possible, especially for users on lower-end hardware and on slower internet connections who like to open lots of tabs.

Steph
Steph
8 months ago

Imagine being this certain that every women desires a man that you come out with this nonsense or genuinely think it’s true!

What about married women who realise their sexuality in later life and then leave their husband for a woman?

What of the many many many female singers, starlets, women who these men would consider highly desirable, who are openly bisexual / lesbian?

What of the many many (straight) single women who still have not “turned” lesbian?

Heck I am a 40 year old unmarried woman who has never had a *real* relationship (yet zero interest in women)…am I doing life wrong?

Snowberry
Snowberry
8 months ago

As someone who could reasonably be called a “kinky bisexual slut” I’m going to throw out there that I *have* dated men much more often than women (3 women versus 16 men¹, a number not likely to change any time soon due to currently being in a long term monogamous² relationship), but that’s more a function of availability than anything else.

Bi and Lesbian women I usually have to go out of my way to look for, and I’m not going to hold them to lower standards than I would for men. Straight and bi men are everywhere (collectively, I’m not trying to imply that bi men alone are common) …and usually quite open about their interest in women, even if they’re often subtle and don’t realize they’re doing it thanks to heteronormative socialization. I’m just not very inclined to seek 50/50 relationship parity just for the sake of it, even if my attraction is about 50/50. I also don’t value my relationships with either sex any more or less than the other.

¹If you include people I’ve had sex with without really dating them, make that 5 women, one of whom was trans, and 21 men, also one of whom was trans, plus an uncertain number of clients from when I was a sex worker, which I didn’t keep track of and mostly blur together, but all were men or at least male-presenting and I’d put them at something like 30-40. (If that sounds low, I was a sex worker for less than a year and had repeat clients.) If you *don’t* count people I’ve dated but never had sex with, make that 2 women and 14 men. So far I haven’t been with anyone who identified as nonbinary, unless they neglected to mention it.

²I’ve never been in a MFF threesome. I did once ask my current boyfriend if that were an option, but he’s not into that. I did do an MFM threesome once, though, with one of my earlier boyfriends and one of his other partners. I haven’t done FFF or an orgy either.

Personal anecdotes don’t mean much, of course, and bisexual people are all different, but you know, here’s one more data point against that kind of toxic attitude about bi women.

(One more side note for potential lurkers – if all of the above sounds like a “disease factory” waiting to happen, I have never had an STI. I check regularly, and have always been as safe as possible. “Slutty” doesn’t have to mean reckless.)

Ooglyboggles
Ooglyboggles
8 months ago

*Ceasing to exist*

rv97
rv97
8 months ago

@Surplus to Requirements

What extensions are you using? Ideally I try to avoid the web since I can’t stand what fuckers like the MGTOW crowd and its sympathizers have to say in many places, but my activity can still fuel such predatory practices.

I adblock the web, I use Privacy Badger (I unfortunately have it disabled on a few websites that rely on Google’s APIs, but I don’t visit them often), I use Decentraleyes (to prevent tracking via CDNs) and I use the DuckDuckGo extension (still problematic because the search engine website uses AWS).

Ideally, using an extension like NoScript can help stop these predatory practices from influencing consumers, but since some websites simply stop giving users information without JS, it’s not ideal and is symptomatic of a neoliberal system that really needs to be dealt with.

Catalpa
Catalpa
8 months ago

I can only assume that my asexuality would be considered to be a result of me being unable to attract any high-value men or women or nonbinary folks (assuming these dudes consider nonbinary folks at all, which I’m 99% sure they don’t).

Even if that is the case (I’ve got no idea how to identify “high value” people), I don’t really care. Hell, if I got handed a button that would magically make it so that no one would ever find me sexually attractive, I would push it in a heartbeat. It might cut down on the creepy advances I’ve dealt with.

Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
8 months ago

@Moggie:

Even if you limit your friends to guys as embittered as yourself, you can hardly walk down a city street without seeing couples where the man is average-looking at best. At work, your homely male coworkers talk about their wives and girlfriends.

Ah, but you see, it’s all a vast conspiracy. Those coworkers? They’re talking about wives and girlfriends who don’t exist. The attractive blonde walking arm in arm with a homely guy? Paid escort. All of it to hide the TROOOTH. All paid for by the deep pockets of George Soros, of course. </sarc>

@Naglfar:

They claim it’s based on the Pareto distribution, but a minute of Googling reveals that that is not what the Pareto distribution does (it actually models distribution of wealth, where the rich have a disproportionate share of all wealth).

They see women as possessions rather than people, so they expect them to be included in the Pareto distribution.

@Definitely not Steve:

Have you considered that the behavior you describe may in fact be the result of the behavior of your browser, and not a script written by website designers to deliberately make your life worse?

I didn’t make any changes to my browser configuration that could cause this (or any at all recently, for that matter).

@Oogly:

Everything alright?

Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
8 months ago

@Oogly
Your message is very concerning. What’s going on? Talk to us.

occasional reader
occasional reader
8 months ago

Lesbians only exist because Chad said ‘no’ and didn’t give them attention

Chad ? Incel lingo on MGTOW forum ? Who would have believe that ?! Certainly not me…

@Ooglyboggles
Are you OK ?

Ooglyboggles
Ooglyboggles
8 months ago

@Surplus
@Kat
@occassional reader

Yeah I’m okay. Just busy with trying to get better work and college transfers.

Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
Kat, ambassador of the feminist government in exile
8 months ago

@Ooglyboggles
Glad to hear it. The video you posted was alarming — but it’s easy to misunderstand a message on the Internet. All best wishes.

Lainy
Lainy
8 months ago

The idea of the 20% top men are the only one getting beautiful young women attention is really funny to me. I’m a conventionally attractive young woman and 4 nights ago I had an erotic dream about beetlejuice for some reason and enjoyed it. Only thing i thought about when I woke up was “when the fuck did I last watch beetlejuice. Why was beetle juice in my subconscious all of a sudden” but then the really creepy thing is after I had that dream Pinterest started giving me pins about beetlejuice and i don’t follow Anything about beetlejuice. That’s how deep are phones listen to us it probably heard me talking in my sleep.

@oogly
You are loved here. I hope work and the college transfers goes well for you.

Lainy
Lainy
8 months ago

I’m blazed as a kite right now, so I’m sorry if that was over sharing. I don’t want it to seem like I’m into corpse, it’s just his voice I swear. I like raspy voices. Is he a corpse? He’s a ghost, a ghost corpse demon thing.

Ohlmann
Ohlmann
8 months ago

@Lainy : I think sex with supernatural entity can be icky, but that’s on a case by case entity. He have more personality than a MTGOW so it would up to whether his skin is still in good shape, somewhat supple, and if he don’t stink to all heaven. As a sort-of ghost, he could be very presentable, but I also see him as trying to be repulsive to gross out people.

While saying what would be definitely oversharing, I have had stranger, and ickier, erotic dreams.

Masse_Mysteria
Masse_Mysteria
8 months ago

@Catalpa
I’ve heard “you’re not asexual, no one just wants to have sex with you” used as a put-down. I really don’t get it, since it seems like a win-win situation to a person uninterested in sex.

(I assume people saying things like that don’t know not all asexuals are averse to sexual activities.)

uglykoala
uglykoala
8 months ago

Homosexual woman stares at her hand, shrieking as it slowly fades from existence.

Jackson Ayres
Jackson Ayres
8 months ago

Now, I’m curious, if lesbians and bi-women are just the product of “not having a man”, then what’s the deal with gay and bi-men? Do they just want more of the “top 20%” of men too?

Katamount
8 months ago

Ohhhhhhkayyyy… you know I get that MGTOWs don’t believe women have the same capacity to think as their galaxy-brained selves, but to be incapable of having basic preferences? Misogyny breaks brains, folks.

I hate to say it, but I think there’s some subconscious porn influence going on here. If the only exposure they have to lesbians is the male-gaze-centred adult material around the web, it just reinforces the idea that lesbian attraction is merely for the gratification of men. I might be reading too much into it though.

Naglfar
Naglfar
8 months ago

@Jackson Ayres

what’s the deal with gay and bi-men? Do they just want more of the “top 20%” of men too?

IIRC MGTOWs think that gay men are really horny straight men who can’t find a woman so they start having sex with each other. Or maybe that’s what another branch of the manosphere thinks, they all blend together after a while. It’s wrong in a different way than their view on lesbians, but obviously wrong and homophobic nevertheless.

@Katamount

you know I get that MGTOWs don’t believe women have the same capacity to think as their galaxy-brained selves, but to be incapable of having basic preferences?

It also contradicts another manosphere idea: if women are incapable of having basic preferences, what about the supposedly universal preference for Chads? I’m sure they have an illogical explanation they can pull out of their asses.

I hate to say it, but I think there’s some subconscious porn influence going on here. If the only exposure they have to lesbians is the male-gaze-centred adult material around the web, it just reinforces the idea that lesbian attraction is merely for the gratification of men.

I think you are correct that MGTOWs got their ideas on lesbians, like many other things, from porn. Especially seeing as MGTOWs have previously shown themselves to be very interested in porn. I’m guessing their definition of “going their own way” from women doesn’t include not watching adult content that has women (as pretty much all straight or lesbian porn does).

Viscaria
Viscaria
8 months ago

“You have a dick and they don’t,” wrote rejac218. “They will never know what a woman’s pussy really feels like from balls deep. You should laugh right at them.”

I’m just fascinated by this. What could it possibly even mean? I will never know what a lot of things feel like to other people. I will never know what someone else tastes when they eat cake, and I can eat cake myself. Where does the humour come in?

I think maybe rejac218 is of the opinion that having a penis in a vagina very far is the most pleasure a human being could experience, and so the laughter is because (cis) lesbians will never be able to experience this. I’m not being facetious, by the way; I really do not know for sure what he’s trying to convey. This is just my best guess.

But how does he know that’s the most pleasure someone can have? After all, he will never know what it feels like to have something inside his vagina very far. He will never know what it feels like to have his clit played with or play with it himself. Maybe those are even better! Who knows? Not rejac218.

Ohlmann
Ohlmann
8 months ago

@Viscaria : I agree with your interpretation, and I would add that I have a vague and nauseous feeling that he think of that as some way to brand someone as his property.

I mean, he clearly isn’t concerned by the feeling of his partner at all, but I feel that above simple selfishness he is enjoying substracting something to his partner in some way.

Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
8 months ago

@occasional reader:

Chad ? Incel lingo on MGTOW forum ?

These right-wing groups tend to cross-fertilize each other. By which I mean whatever bullshit one of them comes up with soon spreads to the rest.

@rv97:

When I mentioned not having changed my browser configuration recently, that included extensions (adding, removing, or changing their configurations). Sorry that wasn’t made more clear.

Battering Lamb
Battering Lamb
8 months ago

It also contradicts another manosphere idea: if women are incapable of having basic preferences, what about the supposedly universal preference for Chads? I’m sure they have an illogical explanation they can pull out of their asses.

If I were to hazard a guess they think of women as some kind of sex-dispensing robots programmed to pursue Chad, as opposed to a person with an internal life who has likes, dislikes, feelings etc. Like a man, or something. You know, dehumanizing and objectifying and all that rot.

I feel stupider just having written that down.

Anonymous
Anonymous
8 months ago

I wonder how they would react if they were introduced to their counterparts in the lesbian separatist movement.

Also, they’ve clearly never heard of dildos.

Couch Thing
8 months ago

I guess this counts as magical thinking?

I am glad that this site exists, but every time I come here I feel like like my brain breaks a little more. I have a rut in my forehead from rubbing it. Can we fix these people with education?

Naglfar
Naglfar
8 months ago

@Battering Lamb

If I were to hazard a guess they think of women as some kind of sex-dispensing robots programmed to pursue Chad, as opposed to a person with an internal life who has likes, dislikes, feelings etc.

That sounds like something they’d say, that women would have blind drives but not conscious preferences, while men have something more.

@Anonymous
They probably wouldn’t be fans, simply because the political lesbians are women.

Couch Thing
8 months ago

@Lumipuna (nee Arctic Ape)

You win. I shall not attempt to think of any funny things to say about this issue, because I could never top yours.

Naglfar
Naglfar
8 months ago

Say, if lesbians don’t exist, then how are they taking over Christmas?

Leum
Leum
8 months ago

@Naglfar: it’s simple: lesbians don’t exist so if they take over Christmas, Christmas will also cease to exist.

Beyond Ocean
Beyond Ocean
8 months ago

@Surplus

Were you keeping your browsers up to date? I think I recognize the behaviour you describe and I’m 99% sure it’s a browser optimization, since it happens in every page for me, from quite a few Firefox versions back.

It is possible for pages to detect if they’re visible or not, but it’s also in the name of resource optimizations primarily, because that’s what most people seem to care about most when choosing browsers.

I share your concerns about JS-heavy web pages, but also, you’re not really fighting the capitalist system by keeping pages in an unfocused browser window. Sorry.

Jesalin, Goddess of Lust & Pleasure
Jesalin, Goddess of Lust & Pleasure
8 months ago

Basically, lesbians are women coming their own way.

:heart:

Ingmar
Ingmar
8 months ago

Didn’t have time to read comment so I’m likely ninjaed, but, if women only seek “top 20%” of men otherwise they become lesbian, first there should be close to 80% of lesbians, but yeah I forget, they think this top 20% shares most women.
But even if the fault is how pussified us men are, there would still be technically this top 20% and I guess a part of women who couldn’t share their part of these ones would still turn a lesbian. Or maybe they mean that they are so pussy they wouldn’t as they call it, settle for betabucks?
But I guess their logic is base on the high of the moment, then they choose another one, with no unifying coherence.

Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
Surplus to Requirements, Observer of the Vast Blight-Wing Enstupidation
8 months ago

@Beyond Ocean:

Hold on — are you seriously suggesting that browser manufacturers would silently make a change that broke major functionality? (In this case, the ability to go do something else and come back to it if a page was being slow to load, rather than being forced to single-task then.)

And how would this explain TWN not displaying some data (temperature, current sky conditions) if its site is not kept focused until it’s done loading?

Diego Duarte
Diego Duarte
8 months ago

Imagine being so incredibly insecure and entitled that you think women would go out their fucking and date each other just to spite you?

The fact that this is 2020 and the last 5 years have been an absolute dumpster fire of Nazi resurgence and generalized misogyny, coupled together with ever-growing terrorist attacks against women, and yet women are still into men, should provide the ultime proof that sexual orientation is not a choice.

And that’s not even counting the last 5,000 years of human civilization…

Beyond Ocean
Beyond Ocean
8 months ago

@Surplus

Hold on — are you seriously suggesting that browser manufacturers would silently make a change that broke major functionality?

What can I say, it’s a tradeoff. It allows people to open a hundred tabs and not blow up their memory completely, apparently.

I wouldn’t call the fact that you have to wait for the site to finish rendering after switching back to it “breaking major functionality”. At the end of it, you should end up with the same site after a minor delay. You said as much about Facebook.

I checked TWN quickly, and I wasn’t able to see any breakage. I did see a big delay, and the site made my CPU skyrocket when I clicked anything. It’s probably just a really shitty JS-coded site, so that’s why it probably broke for you.

1 2 3 5