Fellas! Do you have any female friends? Do you hang out with them without having sex?
Well, apparently you’re doing it all wrong, at least according to the world-class relationship expert and Red Pill Redditor Throwaway244555. In a recent post on the Red Pill subreddit, he explained the fundamental rule of male-female friendships, which is that there should be no male-female friendships.
Woman are friends with woman, and they have sex with men. So if you’re her friend, you’re a vagina.
Remember, fellas, women are for sex, so if one of them wants to Netflix and chill without the chill part, tell her she’ll have to Netflix alone. By the way, “chill” in this context means sex. Like coffee, Netflix and chill means sex. And may not involve Netflix at all.
You ask this girl to be your gf, she rejects you but ask if we can still be friends. That’s a insult, she thinks less of you.
If a woman likes you, Mr. Throwaway244555 contends, she will let you put your penis in her. If she says she likes you yet is not interested in your penis she is insulting you to your very core. And if you actually do become friends with her, you are failing so utterly as a man that you might as well be a vagina.
A male and female aren’t suppose to be friends, they’re suppose to be love intrest. So basically you’re a vagina, because girls are suppose to be friends with girls, and fuck men. Also girls are horrible friends, all they do is leech off you, and cause drama.
So when a girl rejects you, and puts you in the friendzone, it’s a insult. Next time she says let’s just be friends, say no thank you.
DO NOT LET HER ROPE YOU IN WITH HER TALK OF “FRIENDSHIP.”
Or, I dunno, you could just go ahead and be friends with her, and look elsewhere for sex and/or romance?
I mean, sure, if you’re in love with a woman who isn’t in love with you, you’ll probably do the both of you a favor if you move on instead of taking her friendship as a “consolation prize,” which is really a shitty thing to consider a friendship to be.
Or if you decide to become “friends” with a woman because you hope to eventually manipulate her into having sex with you, well, that’s pretty shitty too. So stop it, and move on.
All this applies as well with the genders reversed, and in same-sex couples, and indeed in any gender variation possible.
But Jesus H. Christ, dudes, you can be friends with a woman if you want to. You can be friends with her if you don’t want to have sex with her. And you can be friends with her even if you sorta do.
I mean, seriously, dudes, you know that gay men are friends with other gay men that they never actually have sex with, right?
That said, if you’re a Red Pill dude, I would strongly suggest you not become friends with any women at all until you cease to be a Red Pill dude.
I’ll put 50 on “no.”
Deep down, he knows he got utterly demolished, and he knows it would happen again.
I don’t think an ego as fragile as his is capable of doing anything more than claiming an ash-flavored victory because he got banned.
…and I would just like to congratulate Scented Fucking Hard Chairs one more time for a truly awe-inspiring smackdown. I don’t have a slow clap gif handy, but if I did, you’d have earned it in spades.
I think he already is a sock. He called us manboobz. I doubt someone who’s been aware of the site for a couple of years would just finally get around to trolling now.
The troll was showing off his knowledge when he referred to this website by its previous name, Manboobz.
Just like he was showing off his knowledge of Nietzsche, the Stoics, and so on. Of course, as I pointed out to him, he didn’t write those books. At best, he read them.
I have an intuitive sense that he was kidding us. He said that all we Mammotheers would have left after the patriarchs’ (much vaunted, oft touted, devoutly hoped for) Apocalypse was our sense of humor. The fact that he even mentioned our sense of humor was a misstep. I think that anyone as deeply embittered as this troll seemed to be would interpret it more as mockery by silly, deluded women.
I think he was Pell. The pattern fits.
Or googled them. Kind of like he was doing with Yeats.
When the only poem you can quote is one of his most famous, you’ve probably never read his work.
@Chandler, I have one question: why Caligula? Why not Marcus Aurelius?
As for fun reads, I just got Shepherd’s Crown from the library all ready to read over Spring Break. It’s slimmer than I expected.
Man, Chandler turned out to be way more pathetic than expected. He just went on exposing his own insecurities unprompted. No one ragged on him for living with his mom. (Most of the people of this community don’t see that as a personal fault, especially in the current economy.) No one even made reference to it. And then to have to claim the achievements of men collectively implies he has none of his own to boast about. I’m certain he did not build any civilization. There’s just so much bitterness, especially over that job he didn’t get. Is complaining about POC going to get him a job? No, do something productive. Perhaps by talking it over with a mixed group of friends.
@Carr
The whole “they stole my job” mentality is always hilarious, especially when it comes from supposed free market absolutists who love the concept of competition to an almost religious degree.
Like, you do know that – with the hiring process – management is going to choose who they believe is most fitting for the work, right? Apparently these dumbasses don’t. They act as if they should be guaranteed the job and everyone else who applied is unworthy.
It also seems Chandler/Pell/whoever they are doesn’t seem to realize that someone new to the job is going to seem incompetent to anyone who, y’know, doesn’t realize they’re learning at the time.
Speaking as someone who spent years trying to find employment and felt rather hopeless about it at times – I never blamed anyone else for not getting hired. If anything, I was simply curious as to why I was not hired or just assumed it may’ve been my own fault.
Dear SFHC.
That bit of prose was beautiful. Enough so I had to delurk. Much thank. Brava.
I must also add praise for SFHC. I smiled soooo big.
Also I showed Chandler’s initial missives to my son, who is a grad student in philosophy and teaches it to undergrads. He said it didn’t even rise to sophistry. Hee!
@Stories
Personally, I wouldn’t put too much stock into your son’s being a grad student in philosophy and everything; you don’t really need to go to college to study philosophy, and universities are pretty much PC leftist recruiting grounds. It’s very likely that his ability to process and understand philosophy has been stunted by the kind of leftist ‘sophistry’ that passes for thought in these kinds of places.
@SFHC
Belatedly seeing this thread, but absolutely marvelous ditty, and with throwback linguistics to boot.
– Lit grad
@If I’m Green
Belatedly seeing this thread, but sorry to hear your rage at leftists is so impotent. I hear they have a pill for that.
– A human being
PC Leftist Recruiting Ground?
Okay, if I start a new college a cappella group when I move back to conservativeville in conservativestate, that’s going to be our stage name.
SFHC, might I steal you as a lyricist? Because that was a wicked sweet chorus in addition to being a strong burn.
That I could work with.
Chandler’s? No rhyme, no rhythm: making something of it’d be like trying to dance to alternating measures of 5/4 and 3/8.
I grew up as a lefty and had Republican friends for the first time when I was in college.
“PC Leftist Recruiting Grounds” = “Colleges are letting in people who aren’t cishet white dudes and that’s not faaaaiiiiirrrrrr because then kids will have to learn about other people’s world views and experiences instead of just mine!”
Seriously, I don’t see why people whine about “political correctness” when all their whinging translates to is “I want to be a bigot without consequences and no one is letting me!” It’s as transparent as a window without a pane.