About these ads

Warren Farrell is an Ass, Man

Yep, that's a butt on the cover. He put a butt on the cover. Men are oppressed by women's butts.

Yep, that’s a butt on the cover. He put a butt on the cover. Men are oppressed by women’s butts.

You may remember the embarrassing spectacle a couple of months back when Warren Farrell asked the readers of A Voice for Men to help him pick out a cover picture for a new ebook version of The Myth of Male Power, the 21-year-old crackpot bestseller that more or less provided the, er, intellectual foundation for today’s Men’s Rights movement.

It wasn’t just embarrassing because AVFM is a noxious hate site that regularly calls women c*nts and whores and helps to organize informal campaigns of harassment directed at individual women. It was also embarrassing because all three of the pictures were sexualized images focusing on specific female body parts. You can guess which three, and you’d be right: tits, ass, and vagina (the latter tastefully covered in a merkin made of moss).

Well, Farrell ended up rejecting all of these images in favor of … a different picture of a woman’s butt. Yep, the screenshot above features the actual cover of the recently released ebook version of The Myth of Male Power. (You can see it in its full sized-glory over on Amazon.)

The implicit message of the cover couldn’t be clearer: men may seem to run the world, but women can control and exploit them through the power of their sexuality. Male power is undercut by … butt power.

Am I reading too much into a cover image? Farrell doesn’t really believe this nonsense, does he?

Well, in the introduction to the ebook, Farrell writes:

farrellButt1

In case you’re wondering, “genetic celebrity” is Farrell’s term of art for any attractive woman.

But golly, you say, the fact that a dude feels “powerless” because he can’t have sex with every woman with a nice butt that happens to wander across his field of vision doesn’t actually mean that men are powerless or that male power is a myth. Well, Farrell has an answer to this as well. And by “answer” I mean, well, whatever this is:

farrellbutt2
Got that? I’m not sure there’s anything there to get; it’s nothing more than hand-waving to distract attention from the nonsensical nature of his previous statements. In case any Men’s Rights activist ever brings Warren Farrell up as an example of a respectable, “academic” MRA, you may wish to point out that almost nothing Farrell writes ever actually makes any fucking sense.

In the book itself, Farrell repeatedly suggested that male power can be undone almost completely by the sexual power of women. In one oft-quoted passage, he wrote about the effect that a “secretary’s miniskirt power, cleavage power and flirtation power” allegedly has on their male bosses. (Myth of Male Power, p. 21)

While that statement has earned a certain notoriety for its sheer ridiculousness, Farrell went further elsewhere in the book, essentially arguing that men are as addicted to female “beauty” as drug addicts are to the drug of their choice — and as helpless.

“Sexually, of course, the sexes aren’t equal,” Farrell wrote. “[M]any men feel ‘under the influence the moment they see a beautiful woman.” (p. 320, emphasis in original.)

This sort of temporary “intoxication,” Farrell argued, leads men into shackling themselves to these temporarily sexy tyrants for the rest of their lives — thus agreeing to support them (he suggested implicitly) even after they get old and ugly. (p. 85.)

farrellbeautytrap

In Farrell’s original book, this “argument,” such as it is, was merely one of many that he thought undercut the alleged “myth of male power.” Now, with the butt on the cover, he’s put it front and center. Or, more precisely, rear and center.

Warren Farrell, you’re an ass, man.

Oh, awkward segue here, I just wanted to show off the cover to the new edition of my classic book, The Myth of Human Power.

mythhumanpower

It will soon be available for one million dollars in cash in unmarked bills, upon delivery of which I will sit down and write it for you. It will probably be pretty short and not very convincing.

About these ads

Posted on March 7, 2014, in a voice for men, a woman is always to blame, boner rage, butts, creepy, cuteness, evil sexy ladies, I am making a joke, imaginary backwards land, imaginary oppression, kitties, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, sexualization, warren farrell, whores and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 492 Comments.

  1. @theladyzombie:

    Wait. If attractive women render men powerless, then what does he say about unattractive women?

    Right? Like, if Warren Farrell were trying to write a book about the power dynamics between men and women you would think he wouldn’t just compare men to a small minority of women. Course he was actually writing a book about how it isn’t fair that women he wants to have sex with don’t always have sex with him, so his choice to completely ignore women he isn’t attracted to makes perfect sense.

    @emilygoddess:

    If the secretary has all the power in that scenario by virtue of her gender, then why isn’t she the boss? Why accept a subordinate position with less pay, if she didn’t have to?

    I want to get this framed.

  2. Y’know, while we’re talking about the myth of male power, can I just mention that we’re coming up fairly soon upon the 100th anniversary of women demanding and getting the vote here in America?

    It’s going to be a presidential election year.

    I think we all know what we have to do.

  3. The cake wakes me up at 5 am. Do I want to get up at 5 am. No. But I do anyway so the cat can be fed. And then when he gets what he wants he ignores me. Who has the real power I ask you?

  4. Buttercup Q. Skullpants

    She doesn’t have to worry about people feeling she deserves to be physically hurt, financially hurt, and/or emotionally humiliated because her initiation was awkward.

    No, the woman only has to worry about all of that before, during, and after an encounter with a MRA. It isn’t fair, they get off scot free!

  5. Buttercup Q. Skullpants

    *an MRA, sorry. Braining is hard with toddlers in the room.

  6. She doesn’t have to worry about people feeling she deserves to be physically hurt, financially hurt, and/or emotionally humiliated because her initiation was awkward.

    “Initiation”? Into what, the Skull and Bones? Dude’s talking out his ass here, and I don’t even know what he’s trying to say.

  7. It’s really precious that WF doesn’t realize that the convention that men be the pursuers in romantic relationships with women being the passive recipient is actually patriarchy. I’m pretty sure feminists aren’t the ones who oppose women being the aggressor. He also somehow failed to notice that there are currently existing heterosexual relationships in which the woman made the first move.

    Of course, MRAs hate women who are assertive because they aren’t “feminine” enough. I for one am shocked that there is hypocrisy in the MRM!

  8. I remember the days when feminist ideology wasn’t a fascist hate group…

  9. I remember the days when Blah was less relevant and provocative than last week’s hairballs.

  10. How does that clip of Buffy the Vampire Slayer have anything to do with your opinion that feminism is a fascist hate group? Just because some people take issue with that particular plot line, doesn’t make them a hate group lol. It’s called criticism, it’s not a bad thing just because you disagree with the particular criticism.

    It’s also quite off-topic, boring blah troll.

  11. I remember the days where trolls tried to put up links that were vaguely relevant to the subject.

  12. @Blah, you want to maybe define ‘fascism’ for us? Because I don’t think you have a clue what it means. Pro-tip: fascism is not defined as “stuff Blah doesn’t like.”

  13. Sadly, Viscaria, “stuff I don’t like” is a pretty common definition of “fascism”.

  14. I’m a huge Buffy fan. Am I kicked out of feminism now? Please advise fellow manboobzers.

  15. ignotussomnium

    I, too, remember those days, because they happened within the last week.

  16. As usual, the argument that “men turn into helpless puddles of easily bruised id
    in the presence of an attractive woman” suggests that men are so weak and easily confused they shouldn’t be in charge of anything ever because they’re so flighty and unreliable.

    And yet.

  17. At the risk of taking this troll much more seriously than he deserves, I am going to explain why Selfless is not anti-feminist.

    For one thing, feminists don’t advocating murdering every man who dumps or cheats on women. The fact that being a vengeance demon who specializes in punishing unfaithful men is shown as bad is not a pro-MRA anti-feminist message. It’s an anti bloody vengeance message.

    For another thing, the troll completely missed the point of the episode. The point of the episode is plainly stated in the commentary track so there can be no doubt.
    The point is that Anya never had an identity of her own. She always defined herself in relation to men. Hence the episode title; Selfless.

    First her identity was defined by her lover Olaf, back before she became a vengeance demon. Then he cheated on her and she successfully performed a spell to get back at him and as a result was recruited by D’Hoffryn, the male head of the vengeance demons. Then she spent centuries defined by D’Hoffryn’s plan for her. After she lost her powers and became human, she was defined as Xander’s girlfriend and then fiancé. After he dumped her she expended all her energy being angry at him.

    At the end of the episode, Anya realizes she had never truly defined herself and she finally realizes that is what she needs to do. A woman claiming her own identity rather than being defined by relationships to men is actually a very feminist.

    Sorry, troll. You aren’t beat me in a Buffy related argument. You shouldn’t have even tried.

  18. Weiwoodtreehugger: As a long time Buffy fan, BRAVO! YAY!
    *Claps and Wolfwhistles*!

  19. Silly troll won’t ruin International Women’s Day for me.

    Happy International Women’s Day, everyone!

  20. Happy International Women’s Day!

    I am avoiding all triggers for a bit. Miss you all!

  21. Blah,
    That day is called “today” and it will still be the same way tomorrow. Gather up your bruised anti-feminist fee-fees and go play with your silly misogynist friends elsewhere before some woman’s butt comes out of nowhere and passively oppresses you by existing, but not existing expressly for your gratification.

  22. If the secretary has all the power in that scenario by virtue of her gender, then why isn’t she the boss? Why accept a subordinate position with less pay, if she didn’t have to?

    Because the secretary can then MARRY the boss and spend all his money and then divorce him when he, I MEAN she gets bored and draw a hefty alimony payment. You know, like in that classic documentary of 21st century feminism: Mad Men.

  23. Hi Shaun! And Happy International Women’s Misandry Day to all!

  24. Sadly, Viscaria, “stuff I don’t like” is a pretty common definition of “fascism”.

    True. Well, in that case, let me just say that I think Blah is a Lamarkian mess of post-industrial behaviourism, with a strong impressionistic bent.

  25. I know Emilygoddess touched on it, but I’m glad Buttercup Q Skullpants highlighted what I think is one of the main problems w/WF’s mess:
    “She doesn’t have to worry about people feeling she deserves to be physically hurt, financially hurt, and/or emotionally humiliated”
    Women face the possibility of a disgruntled would be suitor trying to hurt or humiliate her all the time. There are even some men who feel that rape and murder are justified by a ‘man with a broken heart’ (like that thread Alice? linked to the other day)

  26. David Futrelle

    LOL! I wonder if warren Farrell will actually take your book seriously.

  27. I’m crawling out of lurkdom to thank you for your brilliant conclusion to this article, David. I melt every time I look at the fluffy one!

    Can we talk about DW’s shitty cover design? There’s a thing called margins, you know. Contrast is also absent. Thin red text over thin white shapes = an unreadable mess. When I looked at the screenshot above, I saw “Myth Male Power.” (I was so hoping he’d go with Marilyn and get slapped with a copyright infringement lawsuit.)

    Amazon reviews:

    AVFM: “Warren Farrell is a modern day prophet and this book is pure gold.” (Gag!)

    Random person: “This is not news. It wasn’t news when the first book was published, and it’s not news now. Don’t waste your money to stroke this misogynist’s ego.” (Yay!)

  28. I remember the days when mascufascist trolls worked harder to make their stupid little points, and didn’t just dig up FICTIONAL TV SHOWS.

  29. Another random Amazon reviewer: “The best book in human history.’

    That’s one thing MRAs are good at. Laughable extreme hyperbole.

  30. Hey, Auntie Alias, good to see you here! I always enjoy your comments on RS (and doesn’t that turn into a misogynistic mess sometimes?)

    Have a Welcome Package!

  31. Thank you, kittehserf! I enjoy seeing your comments there, too. You have a way of getting right to the heart of matters.

    Yes, every once in awhile it turns ugly on RS and it takes me by surprise. I haven’t seen any known men rightsers there, though. I wonder if they’ve all been banned.

    Maybe this has been mentioned on another thread but did you know AVFM has changed to Disqus for commenting? It’ll be interesting to see how that turns out. One of the misters was whining about the unfairness of the upvotes being accessible to all and sundry.

  32. Awww! ::blushes::

    I was thinking more of how even the leftish commenters dump stupid misogynist slurs – like calling Bachmann et al b*tches and so on. The MRAs at least do get thoroughly stomped on when they turn up, which is fun. Lindsay usually rips ‘em a new one. :D

    I didn’t know about AVfM. I never knowingly go to MRM sites, too toxic (and probably chockful of malware as well as malmisters). That’s priceless about them whining about upvotes, though. I’m still scratching my head about why Disqus has bumped the downvotes.

  33. cassandrakitty

    I remember when feminism wasn’t about fascism! It was this morning. Then feminism met Blah, and realized that, hey, if that’s what men are like then what’s the point being nice to them? And thus, feminism became all about oppressing men.

    Your fault, dude. If feminists had never encountered you they’d all be combination mommy/sexbot angels who’d be only too happy to run around after men offering sandwiches and blowjobs, but you just had to ruin it, didn’t you?

  34. Does this mean a book on the power of Blah is in the works?

  35. I don’t think people in this community wants to understand Warren Farrel. The above disclaimer explains that just because someone feel powerlessness to another individual doesn’t automatically means that the person in such a position of power is out to exploit or intimidate them.

    This is more of a criticism of male inadequacy then an off the rails attack on women. David Why can’t you see the simplicity of his argument?

  36. kittey, ah yes, the slurs. I was sure surprised by all the hostility in the article about trigger warnings.

    When I feel strong enough to visit AVFM I do just to get an idea of what they’re up to. I usually can’t wade through entire articles, though. The hatred and the lies are too much.

    There was a statement on the Disqus site saying that doing away with downvotes was to foster a sense of community. Meh. It’s harder to gauge the amount of acceptance each comment has without both scores.

  37. *I meant kitteh. Argh. Sorry!

  38. @budmin, the issue I have with it is that Farrell is narrowing it down to sexual attraction (allegedly the loss of male power) and ignoring every other facet of life in which men hold power over women.

  39. cassandrakitty

    Kumbaya, assholes! Yeah, that’s going to work, especially with a commentariat as angry and dysfunctional as theirs.

  40. @Auntie Alias the only definitive power that men have over women is through violence and that’s about as illegitimate a power base as one could imagine.

  41. Yes, Budmin, we just don’t understaaaaaaaaand Farrell. It couldn’t possibly be that he’s foolish and wrong.

  42. cassandrakitty

    If it’s illegitimate then I guess it’s not real and we should stop talking about it.

    (The stupid, it burns)

  43. Why on earth would anyone want to understand Warren Farrell? He espouses some pretty vile garbage.

  44. Oh, poor Warren…he’s not dumb or clear as mud or way too easily influenced by his own sad boner, he’s just MISUNDERSTOOD!

    And yeah, violence is the only power men have over women. Uh-huh. And the church, the state, and the corporate sector don’t exist, and certainly aren’t male-dominated…uh-huh…surrrrrre.

  45. @cassandrakitty illegitimate as in not sanctioned by the state, prosecutable by law and morally repugnant.

  46. cassandrakitty

    Well, it is useful to understand the motives of the people who want to do you harm, so in that sense, sure. The issue here isn’t that we don’t understand Farrell, it’s that we do, and misogynists don’t like it.

  47. cassandrakitty

    Wow, budmin, I didn’t think you could get any dumber, but you just managed it. Congratulations.

  48. the only definitive power that men have over women is through violence and that’s about as illegitimate a power base as one could imagine.

    Are you kidding with this?

    Men have more money, men are over represented on elected office and this is particularly true in higher, more powerful offices. A disproportionate number of men are movie directors and TV showrunners which means stories are told from a male perspective. Most corporate executives and board members are men, The list goes on and on. But sure, men are oppressed by fine asses.

  49. Cassandrakitty, fair point. I’m just not sure I want to delve deeply into why he believes what he does. As far as understanding what he believes, I think we all do

  50. @hellkell I’mguessing it might mean it’s frowned upon by society, unlike female sexual power.

    Which is equally stupid.

  51. cassandrakitty

    Dumb troll is correct in a way, in that every social group that has systemic power over another group gained that power via violence in one way or another. The part that he’s not capable of grasping is that once the power structure has been established it’s no longer necessary to use violence to enforce it in every situation.

    (But every member of a group that’s low in the power hierarchy knows very well that non-compliance can sometimes be punished by violence, and that the people in power might choose to exercise that option.)

  52. Oh, my pothead reflexes…

  53. “Another random Amazon reviewer: “The best book in human history.””

    Were there books before human history? And how did he manage to write 506 fucking pages of this crap? Is the font size 22? Without actual research, he must be repeating himself a lot.

  54. @weirwoodtreehugger what use is having your gender predominantly represented in government when they don’t represents your interest. Ask Christen Quinn and Hillary Clinton how they lost the womens vote to men and they’ll tell you that they were out campaigned buy men who offered women more security and entitlements.

  55. the only definitive power that men have over women is through violence

    Please tell us more about the other, non-definitive power(s).

  56. “Offered women more security and entitlements.”
    Right. As woman capable of getting pregnant, I have less legal control over my organs than a corpse. I feel very entitled

  57. Ask Christen Quinn and Hillary Clinton how they lost the womens vote to men and they’ll tell you that they were out campaigned buy men who offered women more security and entitlements.

    This sounds like my little brother repeating my father’s bullshit statements about politics without the least idea of what or who is he talking about.

    Go back to your hole, grown-ups are talking.

  58. cassandrakitty

    Yep, that’s definitely what Hilary Clinton would say. Funny how in this scenario she sounds like Paul Elam, I wonder if it’s like all of the commenters here being David in disguise.

  59. cassandrakitty

    Hilary Clinton, secret MRA, who talks entirely in misogynist dogwhistles. Only the MRM could produce a troll this stupid.

  60. that they were out campaigned buy men who offered women more security and entitlements.

    Are you on drugs?

    Yes, a required and invasive trans-vaginal ultrasound before a legal procedure or not getting my basic healthcare needs covered makes me feel so secure and entitled.

    Grow a brain.

  61. Budmin:

    “@cassandrakitty illegitimate as in not sanctioned by the state, prosecutable by law and morally repugnant.”

    Well if the only power men have over women is violence, yet illegitimate due to above reasons, than how is women’s sexual power over men (assuming there is) any more legitimate? It’s also, u stated, not sanctioned by the state, prosecutable by law and morally repugnant. If men’s violence toward women is a non power, then women’s sexual power is equally a non power in your definition.

  62. @Luzbelitx status and wealth comes to mind but even then it’s up to the women to say how long her subservience will be tolerated.

  63. cassandrakitty

    I did like the “out campaigned buy men” part. Nice little acknowledgement of how important money is in running a political campaign, that.

    (Yes, I realize that I’m crediting budmin with far more wisdom than he actually has here.)

  64. status and wealth comes to mind but even then it’s up to the women to say how long her subservience will be tolerated.

    Do you even read the simple-minded shit you type?

  65. I’m starting to think budmin’s kink is being told how stupid he is in public.

  66. it’s up to the women to say how long her subservience will be tolerated.

    Unless, let’s say, she has no “beauty” o “youth” to keep the spell working, amirite?

  67. what use is having your gender predominantly represented in government when they don’t represents your interest

    Citation needed.

    Since you mentioned American politicians, US politics will be what my answer centers on.

    How do giant subsidies to big agribusiness, the military industrial complex and fossil fuel industries benefit women? How does our lack of universal single payer healthcare and lack of required paid maternity leave benefit women? How do labor laws that make it next to impossible to unionize retail, food service and hospitality industries benefit women?

    The US government looks out for the interest of the wealthy and big business (which is male dominated). It doesn’t look out for the interests of women. Except extremely wealthy women.

    Again I ask, are you serious? Please tell me this is some sort of performance art.

  68. cassandrakitty

    I think he may just be the Dunning-Kruger poster child.

  69. @Nitram Good question. This kind’a brings to light my concerns with some of the more myopic aspects of Warren Farrel’s writing.

    It’s not about sex or pussy or friend zones and whatnot. It’s about validation. Men are in search of validation from a commercially attractive women. That’s our undoing and something that I’d love to see disappear from the anals of human existence. #MGTOW.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,478 other followers

%d bloggers like this: