About these ads

Red Piller: Evil sluts not only want to have sex but actually want people not to hate them for it.

Men can also be sexy hamsters.

Men: Can also engage in hamstering

So the Red Pill subreddit, as you may recall, is a place for dudes to discuss the devious and possibly not altogether ethical or even consensual strategies they’ve come up with to … have sex with anyone they want. But their real goal is not just to have sex, but to control other people’s opinions and thoughts of them doing so. They want to silence all critics, and then even demand praise for their morally reprehensible or at least morally questionable actions.

Woah. It feels like my brain was just taken over for a second. Did I even write that? I don’t think I did. I swear I’ve read most of that paragraph before.

Oh wait.

NakedAndBehindYou 28 points 5 hours ago (33|5)  Feminists always say shit like "I wish I could have sex with anyone I want but I can't because patriarchy!!!"  When in reality, if they live in a first world country, they can already have sex with anyone they want. But their real goal is not just to have sex, but to control other people's opinions and thoughts of them doing so. They want to silence all critics, and then even demand praise for their morally reprehensible or at least morally questionable actions, in an effort to silence their own subconscious condemnation of themselves which results in painful self-inflicted guilt and shame.  That is all it really is: they are narcissistic and want to behave immorally, but cannot escape their own guilty consciences, so they try to block out the conscience via mental gymnastics AKA hamstering.

Oh yeah. That’s where it came from. I must have been possessed.

The Red Pill subreddit, where lying to women to get them into bed is perfectly acceptable but a woman having consensual sex is a reprehensible, narcissistic slattern with a gymnastic hamster for a brain.

NOTE: I found this quote through the always helpful Blue Pill subreddit.

About these ads

Posted on September 1, 2013, in antifeminism, are these guys 12 years old?, boner rage, entitled babies, evil sexy ladies, hamstering, hypocrisy, I am making a joke, imaginary oppression, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, patriarchy, PUA, red pill, reddit, sex, shaming tactics, sluts and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 220 Comments.

  1. So, to summarize that ramble – saying that all Baptists are bad people, no and not fair, saying that the Southern Baptist faith as a political force in the US is a problem, truth,

    You just hit the nail on the head right there.

  2. Pretty much. I mean, my hubby still IDs with a lot of Southern Baptist things… but he hasn’t set foot in a Southern Baptist church (or any church) in years. So it’s not like he’s totally fine with them, or still feels loved or supported.

  3. This whole discussion reminds me so much of a good friend’s stories about growing up in the USian Communist Party. Very similar tales of growing up with wonderful, supportive, loving people who would do anything to help a comrade, often at great personal risk. Followed by the realization that the CP itself was propping up a terrible regime, and that CP policies were not in line with her views as a democratic socialist. Followed by the wrenching decision to leave the CP, which was like cutting herself from her family (in actual fact, it did cut her off from her family, many of whom refused to speak to her for a decade or more).

  4. I think that kind of “us against the world” dynamic can actually lead to groups being far more than averagely supportive towards members. The problems happen when a member starts to reevaluate the values held by the rest of the group.

    (Southern Baptists in the US aren’t actually an oppressed group, but they think of themselves that way, so the dynamic still applies.)

  5. RE: CassandraSays

    I think that kind of “us against the world” dynamic can actually lead to groups being far more than averagely supportive towards members. The problems happen when a member starts to reevaluate the values held by the rest of the group.

    Yeeeaaaah. And honestly, what you describe is common enough that I now specifically avoid trans or multi groups. Invariably, it seems think start out swimmingly… right up until you find yourself disagreeing, at which point the backlash goes NUCLEAR.

  6. It truly is amazing how even if you agree with them, Man Boobz can find an angle in which you are somehow saying something negative about them. The mental gymnastics are existing. And what is it with the cat hate, don’t they know cats are great, loyal little balls of sweet fluff.

  7. KittKat: I can’t make head, nor tail, of what you are trying to say.

  8. I think KitKat is using Man Boobz in the UR way David originally established in the FAQ:

    The “Man Boobz” in question are the misogynistic dudes I write about on this blog. The term “boob,” in addition to meaning “breast,” can also mean “a nincompoop.” The title is a double entendre.

  9. I think the cat hate comment shows that KittKat is talking about MRAs. Either that, or xie is horrible at reading comprehension.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,569 other followers

%d bloggers like this: