How to Hate and Envy Every Single Person in the World, PUAhate edition
Some guys get all the chicks
The regulars at PUAhate.com – we’ve met them before – are a strange and bitter bunch. Most seem to be self-loathing so-called “incels” who blame their lack of romantic and sexual success on their average or below-average looks. Rejecting the basic premise of the pickup artist crowd – that average guys can transform themselves into suave lotharios by mastering manipulative pickup formulas – the PUAhate regulars tend to be true believers in what they somewhat pretentiously call “looks theory,” the odd and obviously untrue notion that women only date men with “male model” looks.
As one PUAhater put it recently:
PUA makes you think that all your problems are because of your personality/behaviour – i.e. things you can control. So when you keep failing, it means that YOU are fucking up and doing things wrong
the reality is that many of us just lost the genetic lottery. we are ugly, the wrong race, the wrong height etc, and that fucked us up. there is NOTHING we can do about it
So, naturally, the PUAhaters spend a lot of their time jealous of tall, good-looking men for their supposed monopoly on the women of the world — whom they also hate.
But the strange thing is that the PUAhaters pretty much hate everyone else as well. They get angry when guys they consider ugly score “hot chicks.” They get angry when guys who are good-looking but not male models get attention from “really hot girls.” And so on, and so on, and so on.
Indeed, many of the regulars seem to walk around in a perpetual state of rage, angry at each and every man who’s managed to pair up with a woman, not to mention the women as well.
One regular recently described his “day from hell” to his comrades:
To start the day I saw a couple where it was an average White guy with an OBESE Asian girl. They were walking around acting like they were trying to prove shit. LMAO. I wanted to kick the guy in the fucking nuts for dating that landwhale. If you’re going to use the racial advantage, at least date a girl who is under 300lbs. Later I go to the gym and see the same tall guys I usually do. Even if I had a good face, how the fuck do you compete with guys who are fucking 6’4”?
Then at the gym there’s this good looking White guy there talking to this Asian dude about how Asian girls are easy and how they approach him. To make things worse after that these fucking frat douchebags come in with their girlfriends to show off . Then to cap off the day a girl I used to know from freshman year walks right past me without even saying anything. I used to fucking live next door to this bitch and now she doesn’t even say anything and acts like a pretentious cunt. She’s an Indian girl dating a White dude lmao. Days like today make you wonder why you even still try in the first place.
Of course, as I’ve mentioned before, most of those posting on PUAhate don’t actually seem to be ugly by anyone’s standards but their own, at least judging from the pictures of themselves they sometimes post to the site, which reveal them to be mostly average-looking guys, with some of the regulars even quite conventionally handsome.
But evidently they would rather believe that they have “lost the genetic lottery” rather than face a more obvious explanation for why the girls don’t like them: because they’re shallow, self-obsessed assholes who hate themselves and hate women and radiate their bitterness from every pore. (And some are even creepier than this, like this pedophile – sorry, ephebophile – who’s angry at me personally because unlike him I don’t chase after 15-year-olds. Link NSFW.)
The PUAhaters often talk about getting surgeries to “correct” their supposed genetic flaws. They would do far better to spend that money on therapy.
Posted on March 19, 2013, in creepy, disgusting women, drama kings, entitled babies, evil fat fatties, incel, irony alert, misogyny, pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles, PUA, racism and tagged misogyny, pickup artists, PUA. Bookmark the permalink. 1,520 Comments.
“Wah! Stop oppressing me with your ebil feminizt definitions!”
“You keep using those words, but they do not mean what you would like them to mean. ”
Yes, because they’re subjective. You’re learning.
Did someone leave a window open?
I am so zen that I managed to get my answer in before his reply.
No, Jeffiepoo. There is an established meaning for those terms and their attendant movements. No amount of petulance and tantrums on your part can change that.
Flip the tape. We’ve heard this side before and it’s boring.
Random thing I learned on PUAhate – some of the PUA guys are using EST/Werner Erhard stuff? Damn. That shit will fuck you up.
HAHAHAHAHA, or, so you can understand it, LOL.
You’re not worthy of hate.You’re the equivalent of sand in one’s asscrack. Easily dealt with.
“No, Jeffiepoo. There is an established meaning for those terms and their attendant movements. No amount of petulance and tantrums on your part can change that.”
Is misogyny a movement now? Oh geez.
Laugh university clippers nursery suicide mobile phone aquarium hanger.
Aw, Ross is trying to run with the big dogs.
Rossiepoo, does it burn your biscuits that us feminists and “manginas” are smarter, faster, and better than you?
“Laugh university clippers nursery suicide mobile phone aquarium hanger.”
A list of all the things you’ve tried and failed at!
I think you’ll find evidence of a movement comprised of misogynists all over this blog, dumbass.
It’s not a list, it’s a recipe for bundt cake. I thought it would cheer you up because we have upset you so much
“Rossiepoo, does it burn your biscuits that us feminists and “manginas” are smarter, faster, and better than you?”
Well, I’ve never called anyone here a feminist or a mangina. I’ve never given my position on such matters. Are you mistaking me for someone else?
I see when Ross gets owned, he gets a bit nasty. Somebody hand him the Boudreaux’s Butt Paste, he’s got sore ass.
“I think you’ll find evidence of a movement comprised of misogynists all over this blog, dumbass.”
Where?
Okay, bored now. Jeffiepoo, I’m really disappointed. The punctuation whine was at least something I haven’t heard fifty times before, the rest of your shtick is tired and old. Come up with some better material and I’ll come back out to play.
So you’re too stupid to click on things?
“Okay, bored now. Jeffiepoo, I’m really disappointed. The punctuation whine was at least something I haven’t heard fifty times before, the rest of your shtick is tired and old. Come up with some better material and I’ll come back out to play.”
Bye bye.
hellkell, I love you. I can always count on you for the perfect turn of phrase to make me laugh!
Gillian is back! I knew she couldn’t stay away.
Thanks, Gillian, Like you, I’m on a major deadline and need to laugh. Ross is good for something.
” Like you, I’m on a major deadline and need to laugh.”
I can’t believe you admitted that you put off something important to talk to me. That is even better than “I love you too”.
Found the EST guy! This is exactly how people act after they’ve done The Forum. Imagine being stuck in an office full of these assholes.
No. Bored now.
Though I do think it’s amusing you find that Gillian was saying she’d leave the site, or even this thread, or even the topic of your astounding lack of merit as a decent troll, rather than simply deciding to no longer engage directly with you–a decision I, myself, concur with.
In other, and more interesting news: This was the first link I got from “Too Damn Cute” in the google bar: http://farm1.static.flickr.com/139/382822633_a1f57d2286.jpg
Hi all!
Hey, just tangentially, did anyone else have that one kid in their English or Literature class? You know the one, you’d be trying to discuss themes in a novel, and someone would say something like “I think it’s interesting how character X’s evilness is called back in chapter 3.” And like clockwork, some douchebag always always ALWAYS had to chime in “But really, good and evil are SUBJECTIVE, so who are we to say character X is evil?”. That kid who would ignore the clear and basic boundaries of the terms we had been working with, ignore all context, and just make everything “But how do we know blue is actually BLUE???”
Remember that kid? Remember how tedious and unoriginal and half-baked those remarks were?
Sorry, that was just a random tangent, I don’t know what on earth made me think of that.
So in your world, women making fun of you is “talking to you?” What is your success rate, goober?
I dislike when men go on and on about how women only like attractive men.
Because as ostara321 attractiveness is subjective. My best friend? She is in to chubby men. My friend who is getting married soon likes men that are thin and tall. And me well I don’t really know what my type is because I’ve gone for chubby guys, models, shorter men, taller men ect. All I know is all the guys I date have lovely eyes. I am such an eye person.
To pretend that all women have a type is ignoring reality.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. No.
@hellkell Looksie was funnier, though. I’ll give the tots one thing: at least they don’t always default to the same old tired lines.
Jeffiepoo, since you are reading comprehension challenged, let me put this in small, simple words. When you come here, you exist to amuse me. When you no longer amuse me, you are a waste of my time. I’m not leaving here, you are just not worthy enough to interest me and so we’re done.
Flail and whine all you want, it’s boring and my cousin’s toddler is better at it.
“So in your world, women making fun of you is “talking to you?” What is your success rate, goober?”
You use hurtful words. Are you sad on the inside?
@freemage I’ll see your sleeping dog and cat, and raise you a sleeping dog and kitten!
Would you just look at it trying to neg and get me to justify myself to him?
Ross, go peddle your shit on young women at the club. Get the fuck out of my face.
FastTalkingKubricStareSalesSpielCultProgramming! Just looking at that dude makes me want to celebrate leaving the job full of Forum people and then go take a nap.
“So in your world, women making fun of you is “talking to you?” What is your success rate, goober?”
I’m sure every interaction with women that he has ends in them laughing at him, so 100%?
I’ve got Aquaphor, is that good enough?
Actually, I’m sorry for the women who have to deal with Ross oozing around him. If dude was any more transparent, he’d be glass.
hellkell, you’d be really pretty if both your pointy ears were orange. /neg
:D
@pseudo_star_17 No, but I did get the one who insisted that you weren’t permitted to interpret anything that the author didn’t explicitly state because, you know, reasons and all, and if the boat was supposed to symbolize freedom, the author would have said so.
I also had a student in one of my classes who would only ever refer to an author as “he” even when we were discussing people like Virginia Woolf and Jane Austen.
“I’m not leaving here, you are just not worthy enough to interest me and so we’re done.”
Hilariously, this is already the second time you’ve announced this, and there will be a third.
“Actually, I’m sorry for the women who have to deal with Ross oozing around him. If dude was any more transparent, he’d be glass.”
I’m not a dude.
Dude. Duder. Duderino. The Dudester. Hey, jackass.
HOW did you guys rack up 500 comments in one day?
I have to go to work, but keep the trolls warm for me, OK? I’d like to have some fun when I get back.
OK, dude, how ’bout I just call you fuckstick?
Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! Sock! 11eleventy1!!
Hi, Ross!
This is indeed a strange place to read you. I occasionally comment here, but have not found it too productive. I am keeping up with your website, although I have not seen you in years. I thank you once again for the self-improvement process of early SpeedSed in the days of old.
Arguing about the meaning of “is.”
@emilygoddess I also was shocked by the 500 comments.
“OK, dude, how ’bout I just call you fuckstick?”
If it helps keep the sad feelings away, then sure!.
@Falconer
LOL, dude. LOfuckingL.
“I also had a student in one of my classes who would only ever refer to an author as “he” even when we were discussing people like Virginia Woolf and Jane Austen.”
You should have called him a misogynist.
Nice punctuation, by the by.
@Gillian: Oh, wow, I haven’t seen Lebowski in years and I wasn’t even thinking about El Duderino.
IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT ZOMG
Delurking to ask if you’d seen this: http://noodlemaz.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/confessions-of-a-former-misogynist/
?
Ephebophile posted a picture of a very nice looking child. The fact of the matter is though most men would turn down a date with her because let’s face it; she’s a child. What a ridiculous world we live in. Young girls are still like boys. I’m not a man but lets face it, a person can’t seriously take up the opportunity to sleep with everything that can move.
Whilst I, too, agree with letting go of the gendered qualities of names, I think it’s damn rude to misgender someone even if they are dead and, in the case of Jane Austen, being foul-mouthed in Hell. :P
Holy hell, dragging this out took a while. Not sure why Scatterbrain would be so difficult to remember!
Ah, the early 90s…
Some of the transphobia here is very disappointing.
@Creative Writing Student Yeah, we talked about using gender neutral pronouns. This chuckleduck was happy enough to refer to women in the classroom as ‘she’, he just would not refer to any author (or, for that matter anyone else who invented or made anything) as anything other than ‘he’. At the time we all thought he was just kinda dumb, but that was before trolls lifted oblivousness to an art form.
You should have handed him an Anaais Nin book and had him read aloud from it, then ask him questions, see how long it took him to lose focus and use the correct pronoun.
LOL! Delta of Venus would have made him utterly lose his shit. He thought D.H. Lawrence was “smutty”.
CassandraSays:
Well, Werner Erhard always said that no one actually needed what he did… still, i’m pretty sure inducing a manic state is not a good outcome for any form of *ahem* therapy.
“LOL! Delta of Venus would have made him utterly lose his shit. He thought D.H. Lawrence was “smutty”.”
You’re obviously not a very good teacher. Would it have been so hard to correct him?
When I worked at the company where they made people do The Forum it was like they’d just done a shitload of coke right after suffering a major concussion. That shit is nasty, it really messes with people’s heads.
Excuse you?
Look, it’s like baby’s first Social Justice Term Rodeo.
“Look, it’s like baby’s first Social Justice Term Rodeo.”
We’ve already talked about your prejudice and blind hate.
I can’t believe I miss the fun troll and get stuck with this asshole. Also, I want a cat on my shoulder, if you’ve never seen a block quote in a book then you aren’t reading the really difficult stuff, I asked the boyfriend out first does this mean I got to choose him twice?, I don’t like the students who call every author by their first name and first name only.
I missed a lot of fun. :( But I loved all the kitties and doggies and comics. :)
It makes me think of the article Martin Gardner wrote on EST years ago (it’s in “Science: Good, Bad and Bogus”). There was a quote from a session where an instructor gets a little old lady to sing a dirty song by saying that once they were done, the audience wouldn’t know the difference between “spaghetti” and “fuck”. (I may be misquoting, but “spaghetti” and “fuck” were definitely involved somehow.)
Ross: dance harder, monkey!
In high school Latin, for some reason we developed the habit of referring to Virgil as “they” which would cause our teacher to explode “The Aeneid was NOT written by a committee!”