About these ads

The Angriest Spearheader? The Wit and Wisdom of Darryl X

It’s back to the caves for you, ladies!

There are a lot of hair-raisingly reactionary dudes on The Spearhead, but perhaps none quite so hair-raising as the prolific commenter who calls himself Darryl X. Here are some of his pearls of wisdom, taken from a recent Spearhead thread. (Many of his comments in the thread were devoted to a sort of mini-vendetta against another Spearhead commenter, Andie, who had committed the crime of commenting while female; I’ve cut out most of that to focus on Darryl’s more timeless thoughts.) Fair warning: This is extreme stuff, even by Spearhead standards.

Back to the Caves, Women!

Since the solution for the past forty-four years was to kill and impoverish and exile and imprison men and steal their kids, I’d say sending women to live in a cave is a generous trade.

This Means War

All women are feminists because all women (without a single exception) have benefited excessively from the legal, political, social and financial machine that feminists have created. And those benefits have all come at the expense of the lives and livelihoods of tens of millions of men and children (in the US alone). When all my financial resources and children which women stole have been returned to me and all women are living on the street to pay for it only then will there be fairness.

Feminism is a hate movement. It is a campaign of hate against men and children. And all women are evil until feminism has been destroyed and every women pays back repairations with interest. …

This is a war. And it will end only one way. The complete utter destruction of feminism and the women who participated in it and/or who sat by passively at let it happen. I have absolutely no sympathy and will demonstrate no mercy for any woman until I and other men have been compensated and women and feminists have been punished for their egregious crimes against humanity (preferably with death sentences). This is a war that women started and it will not end until every one of them has paid. …

Why Andie Must Pay for the Crimes of All Women

She’s a woman. She benefited from feminism more than any man. Even if she represents 20% of women who are not psychopaths, she must be compelled to take an active part in the destruction of feminists and feminism. … She must pay for her complicity … The consequences of her failure to stop feminism must be greater than the retaliation by feminists. Otherwise, there will be no incentive for women to help men. This is a war. If you aren’t fighting feminism and feminists, then you are helping them. Stopping feminism is fundamental to maintaining civilization.

Have You Herd the News?

Women are herd animals. … Women are much easier to control and manipulate than boys … Boys have to be drugged. Girls come pre-drugged.

You Choose, You Lose

Women have choices. If they want rights and privileages, then they must have responsibilities. Presently, women vote. But they are not held accountable for the consequences of their choices when they vote. Most men have no choices. If they want to live. Women are not women today. They are whores. Big difference.

The Perfect Host

Women and feminists are opportunists. They are … looking for someone else at whom to point fingers of blame and cast aspersions and pick up the tab as they now understand that responsible men have nothing left to steal. They’re just looking for the next host on which to parasitize.

We’re Still Hunting the Mammoth to Feed You

[M]ost of the taxes that men are currently paying fund the excessive lifestyles of women … [M]en do all the work and women do little or nothing.

Everyone Needs a Hobby

I have been actively fighting feminism for more than thirty years. I have racked up quite a list of those who have made the mistake of getting in my cross-hairs. … Many a feminist federal employee and university professor have watched their careers and their lives come apart after picking a fight with me. … I don’t have television or cable or internet and cell phone or land line or refrigerator or microwave. Hunting feminists is my hobby.

Unhappy hunting!

About these ads

Posted on September 23, 2012, in antifeminism, armageddon, evil women, grandiosity, harassment, hate, ladies against women, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, reactionary bullshit, the spearhead, woman's suffrage and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 272 Comments.

  1. @cloudiah:

    “1) Emancipation of all men in jail for child support
    2) Cease and desist jailing men for child support
    3) Reinstate all passports and driver licenses suspended for child support
    Not sure how big a problem this is, but I could go for some version of these, as long as the parent demonstrates an inability to pay. Things that make it harder for non-custodial parents to keep working, or find jobs, seem punitive and counterproductive. Maybe keep the passport thing if it looks like the parent might abscond with the kids to another country.

    Except no one goes to jail just for failing to pay child support. Usually what happens is that the guy is shown to be able to pay, refuses to pay, then eventually pisses off a judge to end up in jail for contempt of court. And that usually requires months, if not years, of court orders being blown off by the non-compliant parent.

  2. @Freemage, I know — that’s why I limited punishment for non-compliance to non-custodial parents who do have the ability to pay, and said I didn’t think it was a significant problem anyway. In the cases you describe, the courts should indeed have the ability to compel payment and/or punish non-compliance with court orders.

  3. I mean I guess he could be homeless and posting from the library, but libraries do close something, and they tend to make people leave when that’s about to happen. Are some of the feminists who he’s punished librarians who told him it was time to go? Because I know a whole lot of feminist librarians.

    Possible he’s the douchebag the director at our library had to ban because he threatened to strangle a staff member. Since I’m only there on weekends, I tend to miss most of the worst of these kinds of incidents, and damn, was I really glad I wasn’t there for that guy. Fortunately, to my knowledge, no one’s career has been destroyed, though there are a few people who’ve had to move to nights or weekends only due to life changes, so maybe he thinks people he hated don’t work there anymore.

  4. @ostara321

    I have to laugh at people who think it is so easy to “get someone fired.” I mean, yeah…there are times when a single complaint is bad enough where the person responsible needs to be let go.

    But the “Please don’t engage in X behavior, sir” with the “I’m gonna get you fired!” response is so friggin’ unreal. Businesses and such don’t stay in business when customers don’t show up…but a business also won’t stay in business if they alienate everyone who might work for them. If you really run the risk of getting fired because an angry patron says “I’m gonna get you fired!” it isn’t a place that will last long. That would require pleasing everyone, all the time. With the entitled asshats out there, that just won’t happen.

    And, of course, this is totally different for a library that doesn’t exactly have the same “customer-business” relationship model as an independently owned business.

  5. For what it’s worth, our director is of the mind that we do need to be very customer-business-ish, in the sense that we bend over backwards already to do whatever we can for people, if getting them whatever it is they’re looking for is within our power. He’s also not terribly focused on retention either (really, I could spend a shit ton of comments detailing why he’s not a very good boss, but we’ll just leave it at, “there’s a reason why I only work weekends there now”) but he’s not so much of an asshole that he’s going to fire employees who have been threatened with bodily harm.

    Hell, even when I did work retail, I never got fired for complaints about me, mostly because my supervisors were clued in enough to know that most of the people who would complain about me were the same sorts of people who threw change at me (true story).

  6. Wow, he is angry and driven. So angry and driven, it seems to me, that the only reason he could not be in the news is because he is an enormous internet tough guy who can’t even look anyone in the eye in real life, so his great actions for even greater justice have all been petty, douche-canoe shit done anonymously behind the backs of the people he claims to have destroyed.

  7. What a cute kitty. Wish I’d read this much earlier, I would have suggested “Reynardine” as a name.

  8. Stupid men thinking they have rights to their children. Don’t they realize children are a womans chattel. The only right men have is the right to have women take whatever wealth from a man that she wants. Women aren’t put on this planet to do anything for a man. Ever.

    If a man does more around the house he’s being helpful to women.
    If a woman does more around the house she’s serving a man.
    If a man cooks for a woman he’s good and obedient.
    If a woman cooks for a man she’s his servant.
    If a man does laundry he’s helpful and useful.
    If a woman does laundry it’s unpaid labor and she’s a mans servant.

  9. Hey, NWO. Glad you showed up. Would you be good enough to explain a couple of MRA ideas for me?

    1) What is “sexual equality?”
    2) This: “But they are not held accountable for the consequences of their choices when they vote.” If women do not face consequences for voting, that infers that men do face consequences. If I am in line to vote and the person ahead of me is a woman, what consequences for my vote do I face that she will not?
    3) What does this mean: “The consequences of her failure to stop feminism must be greater than the retaliation by feminists. Otherwise, there will be no incentive for women to help men.”

    Thanks in advance for helping me understand this.

  10. @nowslave: “Stupid men thinking they have rights to their children. Don’t they realize children are a womans chattel.”

    MRA TRANSLATION: How dare women think they have the right to acquire legal custody of a child outside of a marriage when those broads are supposed to be our chattel along with all the children!

  11. Every man that I have ever met who acts as though he has a “right” to his child is usually the sort of person whose children despise him for being an abusive bully.

    My husband was physically, emotionally and verbally abused by his dad. His mom wanted to divorce the shithead but since he knows all the law enforcement and lawyers in town and they all owe him “favors”, he would threaten that he would take my husband away and she would never see him again. Even though my husband hated the shit out of him and would probably ask to live with his mom, she still stayed legally married to him out of fear until my husband turned 18. Meanwhile, he took their house, maxed out her credit cards and took several loans out in her name. The govt garnished her wages for years because of this and he even got alimony in the divorce. So yeah. Forgive me if I have no sympathy for dads who think they have a right to own their kids like objects.

  12. Also from that long thread:

    That feminism be eliminated and now is critical. The entire economy of the developed world is collapsing and that collapse is accelerating.

    I remember about twenty-seven years ago when I was only seventeen and I had predicted the collapse of the housing market and financial institutions around the middle of the first decade of the new millenium. It’s not rocket science.

    Darryl X: stock market analyst & augur-reader. He’s starting to sound a bit like Pell.

  13. Keep beating up that strawman, Owly. Or strawwoman, as the case may be.

    Actually, it doesn’t matter who does what around the house, as long as everyone is OK with how tasks are divided. See, slave, this is the crucial point. The problem feminists have isn’t women doing the housework per se. The problem is when women are expected to do the housework, the childcare, and work full-time, whereas the man is expected to…work full-time, and nothing else. Or when women are expected to be homemakers even if they would prefer to work. Or, even, when men are expected to work when they would really prefer to be homemakers. Obviously, there are always trade-offs and no one is able to do exactly as they please (i.e., there might not be enough money for anyone to be a homemaker in any given family), but it’s the rigid adherence to traditional, binary gender norms to which feminists object.

    Blah, blah, blah…I’m just talking to the wall, aren’t I?

  14. I don’t have television or cable or internet and cell phone or land line or refrigerator or microwave.

    This is, quite possibly, the best line in that rant. So, he has no internet? If he’s using a library, he’s also “mooching” off of the very system that he claims only supports women. He doesn’t even have a land line! Really, how does he think his ex-wife/girlfriend is supposed to call him about visitation? Are they just supposed to email back and forth, when he doesn’t have internet access? I really don’t think “not being able to contact him” is “stealing my children”. And no refrigerator or microwave? Does he lovingly handcraft his meals on the stove, or does he not have one of those too? Does he even have a job? If he doesn’t, then really, no one is taking any money from him, or at least no income tax.

    I have a feeling either he’s lying, he’s projecting, or both.

    (I’ve changed my name, like this one better. I was AbsintheDexterous.)

  15. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    The link cloudiah found for Historphilia is the exact reason I don’t follow the links to the original threads very often.

    Getting the extra misogyny and creep-ified feeling isn’t worth it.

    Me too, Naira. It’s quite enough seeing the selections on here. One time I followed a link Historophilia posted and it was nauseating.

  16. I predicted the housing bubble collapse because well that is what happens when you have bubbles.

    But that was when Paul Krugman told us all that here was a housing bubble a coming so I predicted it in 2003. Of course I also thought Howard Dean was going to win the Presidency so I guess I am fifty fifty for my predictive power.

    Either way, it was well after 1985 so this guy is a lying asshat since the modifications in the FHA had not even been thought up yet because those were created by Secretary Henry Cisneros in Texas before being appointed by Bill Clinton to HUD and eight years after CRA had been passed into law. And those were still not responsible for the lack of responsibility of the banks that occurred starting around 1997 (after the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was passed.)

    So yeah, what a liar.

  17. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    Akkk, my first blockquote fail!

  18. I read through the whole thread. Here’s some brain bleach:

  19. Is it wrong that I cackle whenever someone gets hit by a blockquote fail? I feel evil. :(

  20. I’m afraid that, no matter how true it was or how few other people believed you, I’m not going to be impressed by anyone telling me that they predicted something that happened in the past.

  21. @The Kittehs’ Unpaid Help

    I figured out how to do blockquotes shortly after I started reading this blog a few years ago and then I forgot. And just the other week someone explained how to do it to someone else and I had an “Oh duh!” moment.

    But yeah, following links only proves that what David mocks here is only the tip of the asshat iceberg. That and the trolls, of course. At least many of them manage to be entertaining.

    Darryl X is getting scary to the tune of “I don’t want to be in the same room with him.” And then I begin to wonder if I HAVE been in the room with someone like him and just didn’t realize it. Insert creeped out feeling here.

    I’ve never knowingly met an NWO or Darryl X in real life, which gives me hope in those times when this blog strikes me as depressing, rather than funny.

  22. All of you pursuing that “children aren’t posessions” line. Sure, you keep telling yourself that’s what it’s about. You make out like it’s somehow twisted for fathers to want to stay in touch with their kids.

    Maybe you belive your own BS, but absolutely everyone reading knows that you’re total hypocrites – who would be screaming and crying and wailing – if it was YOU who was cut off from (regular, meaningful) parental contact with your kids by an ex e.g. deliberately alienating the kids from you / repeatedly flouting court contact orders with impunity / moving out of the country along with the kids.

    How about that paternity fraud as well? How about all those cuckolded fellas forced to pay for kids they find out are not even theirs!? And then being told by the courts that because they “acted as the father for X years” they still have to continue paying!??

    Bet you’ll all be arguing that genetics don’t matter. Yeah? How about hospitals just randomly hand out the newborn babies to any of the mothers in the maternity ward? Oh, that’s different, huh? Why? Because then it would be women being cuckolded??

    Hypocrites the lot of you.

    Thank fuck for Durex, at £12 a box, that’s a lot of heartbreak saved for the money.

  23. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    Shade – LOL I get schadenfreude but it’s more with trolls going into meltdown. Yes, you is ebil. :D

    Naira, yeah, I’ve never knowingly met an MRM type, though Ceiling Cat knows there are plenty of sexist losers in the great land of Oz (our Leader of the Opposition being one of them – punching the wall on either side of a woman’s head because she won a student council election is just one of many things about him that says he’s unfit for office). It is some comfort that when commenters here mention that they’ve asked male friends, family etc if they’ve ever heard of the MRM, the reaction generally is not only “no” but a mixture of bafflement, amusement and disgust when they learn what these losers are like.

  24. “Being handed the wrong baby at the hospital” is what the word cuckolded means now? This is going to make reading many older works of literature rather confusing.

  25. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    So, genetics matter more than actually having loved and raised a child, eh, Joe? That’s your line? The child is suddenly just a thing if they’re not biologically related to you? Sounds like there’s no real love involved at all, then, quite apart from your paranoid notion about how many children might have been fathered by someone else.

    Funny how it’s always fine dandy for men to commit adultery, but not for women. The old hypocritical double standard. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

  26. “You make out like it’s somehow twisted for fathers to want to stay in touch with their kids.”

    Nobody said this. We have a problem with ABUSERS being granted access to their children because they’re the father, and how dare a father not get his children. Do you think all these poor victimized fathers are innocent? If so, you;re a dumbass.

    “Maybe you belive your own BS, but absolutely everyone reading knows that you’re total hypocrites – who would be screaming and crying and wailing – if it was YOU who was cut off from (regular, meaningful) parental contact with your kids by an ex e.g. deliberately alienating the kids from you / repeatedly flouting court contact orders with impunity / moving out of the country along with the kids.”

    And how often does this happen, when an INNOCENT parent is defrauded from seeing his or her children? Nobody thinks that’s fair. But there are laws in place to punish parents who are in contempt of court. But seeing how MRAs act and speak of women, and how enraged they become over the stupidest things, I’m really not surprised some have been denied access. A lot of them are monsters, plain and simple.

    “How about that paternity fraud as well? How about all those cuckolded fellas forced to pay for kids they find out are not even theirs!? And then being told by the courts that because they “acted as the father for X years” they still have to continue paying!??”

    Again, because this happens all of the time? Please. But I’ll say it again, no one here thinks that is ok. It’s fraud.

    “Bet you’ll all be arguing that genetics don’t matter. Yeah? How about hospitals just randomly hand out the newborn babies to any of the mothers in the maternity ward? Oh, that’s different, huh? Why? Because then it would be women being cuckolded??”

    Again, no one here believes this, dipshit. No decent person would.

    Since you are so angry, why don’t take all those straw mans outside and kick them around a bit until you calm down.

  27. The reason women falsely believe they are still being hard done by (not that they really have), is because of 40 plus years of feminist propaganda and lies. Even before feminism, women held a privileged place in society, sure there were many women (just like many men), who endured grinding poverty and genuine hardship, no one doubts that. But did women ever have to fight and die in wars?, Work in dirty and dangerous jobs like construction,mining and other hazardous occupations? No.

    The modern woman should be rejoicing that they have been born in these times, as society awards them many priviledges and advantages over men. The classic example is the family court system, where a woman can enter a marriage without a penny to her name, be the worst possible wife, run off with some bad boy and claim cash and prizes, because of the crazy “no fault” divorce laws.

    And don’t get me started on how ridiculously easy dating is for women (even if they are fat and ugly), whenever a woman complains “where are all the good men”, what she is really saying is where all the Brad Pitts and Zac Effrons or exciting bad boys.

    The problem is, the modern woman has way too much power, and too many women are abusing that power (the same way some men abuse power).

    Of course when you confront women with this situation, they will often bring up the “glass ceiling”, and that women earn less than men, which is bullshit because there are many successful women earning very big dollars eg. Australian mining magnate Gina Reinhart is worth $29 Billion, Gail Kelly (the CEO of Westpac Bank), was reported to be earning $8 million p.a.

    Perhaps if western feminized women think that they “have it tough”, maybe they should live in Afghanistan or Pakistan for 6 months, then they will know the real meaning of the word “tough”.

  28. Joe, please, never ever have kids. If the only outlook you have is that they must be genetically yours to get anything from you? You’d be an awful, awful parent.

  29. Wow, Joe1 entered angry this time, eh? Usually it takes him a few posts to work himself up to ARGLEBARGLE.

    Since you are so angry, why don’t take all those straw mans outside and kick them around a bit until you calm down.

    I second Fembot’s sage advice.

    Meanwhile, who knows how many thousands of adoptive & step-parents are happily raising kids they know aren’t related to them genetically, not even realizing that they are all cuckolds. ;-)

    What’s wrong in those scenarios, Joe1, is the deception — there is nothing wrong with a parent forging a bond with a child who isn’t his/her own genetic offspring, and any parent who would abandon a child they had raised as their own just because they later find that out is a total douchecanoe who cares more about him/herself than they do about the needs of a child who loves them.

  30. @katz
    “I’m afraid that, no matter how true it was or how few other people believed you, I’m not going to be impressed by anyone telling me that they predicted something that happened in the past.”

    I predicted the next three countries needing a bail in the EU would be Spain, Italy and Ireland, in that order over 2 years ago and that’s exactly what happened. It is documented in the archives of manboobz.

    I also predicted there would be a hostile Islamic block stretching from Morroco to Pakistan brought about by the gang at the top in that same thread. The gang at the top is crafty. Ya can’t have a big old WWIII unless you run the worlds finances, media, weapons suppliers, education, food, medical, ect. All documented in the pages of manboobz.

    I wonder who’ll get uber wealthy off of war? I guess if there were a coupla hundred families at the top who owned the banking institutions they could lend money, at interest to finance war. A few articles in the media they owned to fan the flames of war would be helpful as well. Probably these same people also own the oil as well, it’s gonna take a lotta feul for war. No doubt a boom for big pharma. I wonder who owns them? Weapons manufacturing, food stuffs, clothing, armor, insurance, shipping. Why all kindsa stuff.

    I mean if I was evil, and I owned all that stuff. War would be pretty damned cool and profitable. I could just print a buncha stuff in the papers to incite the masses, supply weapons and finances to both sides.

    First I’d probably start by systematically inciting rebellion in various countries and supply them with weaponry even if they were too poor to actually afford those weapons. Sure the initial investment would be a loss but the long term gains would be untold trillions. Plus once you have a country beholding to you for trillions you can pretty much tell the puppet politicians what to do afterwards.

    After I had two heavily armed blocs and I’ve incited enough hatred through the power of the media it really wouldn’t take much to ignite the flame. Eventually, through careful media and political manipulation I could literally draw the entire world into a massive deadly conflict. Sweet. It’d be like the masses would be going into debt, paying me to kill each other. Probably by the time it was over, every country in the world would be so indebted to me I’d literally own everything.

    Yup, if I was evil and owned that stuff, that’s what I would do.

  31. someguy bored with your schtick

    Hey David, I think if you were either insightful or intellectually honest you would compare your reaction to this guy with your reaction to the agent orange files, which you largely dismissed: http://manboobz.com/2011/12/22/agentorange-and-the-screencaps-of-feminazi-doom/

    Here’s another view of the Agent Orange Files that points to hate speech much worse than this numbnuts: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/radfem-hub-the-underbelly-of-a-hate-movement/

    Of course, we also have the Biting Beaver and Heart, who wished to abort her 16 year old son because he looked at porn. https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Cheryl_Lindsey_Seelhoff

    But keep on mocking David, keep on mocking.

  32. Does the only 3 comment from Sticky before the banhammer comes down rule only apply if the comments are all on the same post?

  33. I used to be in that trap of hatred but I hated 87/88 people… I’m over it now and all I have to say is this sicko can get over it too, but he won’t because he enjoys his hatred more than he has empathy for other humans. He’s dehumanizing, and that’s usually what comes before a hate crime so this is worrying.

  34. I don’t understand this idea some people have that it if you criticize someone, you must also criticize someone who is the opposite of them, or else you’re not being “fair”. Criticize a Republican? Better find a Democrat who did something similar and mention him, too! Got a problem with something an MRA said? You can only criticize it if you also mention a feminist who said something similar!

    And definitely don’t worry about little things like context. Details like which side does it more often, or if one side seems to be encouraging it, or if one group is actively oppressing the other, shouldn’t keep you from pretending that Both Sides Are Just As Bad.

  35. NWO, Joe; Joe, NWO. You two can go off and trade best tinfoil hat designs or something.

  36. *sprays some troll repellent on the thread, hopes it gets better*

  37. @wrath

    But did women ever have to fight and die in wars?, Work in dirty and dangerous jobs like construction,mining and other hazardous occupations?

    Yes. Many women have fought in wars, sometimes dressing up as men to do it because they were forbidden to do so if they presented as women. Also, many more civilian women were killed in wars. Plus, feminism has been trying arduously to get the army to allow women to serve in combat positions.
    As for dirty and dangerous jobs? Apart from the aforementioned role as soldiers, women have been miners, farmers, nurses, maids, cleaning women, washer women, etc.

    So you’re wrong. On all accounts.

    @Some Guy
    Encylopedia dramatica? Really?

  38. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    Careful, emilygoddess, you’ll make their heads explode!

  39. “Got a problem with something an MRA said? You can only criticize it if you also mention a feminist who said something similar! ”

    Amen! Hey Some Guy, why don’t you start your own blog where you can talk about the dumb shit radfems say. What’s the matter, afraid you’ll fail? You can’t be any worse than David, after all. According to you he set the bar pretty low, so this should be easy for you.

  40. “And don’t get me started on how ridiculously easy dating is for women (even if they are fat and ugly), whenever a woman complains “where are all the good men”, what she is really saying is where all the Brad Pitts and Zac Effrons or exciting bad boys.”

    Seriously? Are you serious? It’s pretty obvious that you don’t know shit about history or women, so fuck right off. Asshole.

  41. Oh right, women always had it so easy, and never worked hard jobs.

    Except, you know, when they did.

  42. I wish the trolls would at least mix it up a little, instead of just coming here and dumping their copy pasta that we’ve seen ad infinitum. (Why do all MRAs have such a hate crush on Brad Pitt?)

    I give Wrath zero points out of 10.

    I give Sticky -4 for being repeatedly boring, and for not updating the blog David generously created for him.

  43. Is there an MRA version of Manboobz where the MRAs expose the extreme misandrist stuff that feminists are saying and with enough material to post daily like Manboobz(and that is because there are only 24 hours in a day and other more joyous things to do) or are they always hanging on the comments from many years ago made by 3 or 4 radical feminists on the radfem hub in an attempt to show that women are obviously worse???

  44. RE: Inurashii

    HEY I KNOW YOU! What’re you doing here? (And did we miss you earlier?) I had no idea we had similar online haunts.

    Also, this thread has discussions of Jimmie Rodgers (I have a CD of his songs), and kittens. Welp, might as well quit the Internet, everything’s been done now.

    Also, wow, some people reaaaalllly don’t know their history. Where are those photos from the child labor forum thread…

    –Rogan

  45. PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

    And don’t get me started on how ridiculously easy dating is for women (even if they are fat and ugly), whenever a woman complains “where are all the good men”, what she is really saying is where all the Brad Pitts and Zac Effrons or exciting bad boys.

    Oh no, feel free to get started, I could use a laugh.

  46. “And don’t get me started on how ridiculously easy dating is for women…”

    This is a double edged sword. If a woman is successful at dating, it is because women have an advantage. If she is unsuccessful at dating then it’s because she only goes for bad boys or is a slut. And what is the definition of success? Marriage? Commitment? Multiple partners? It’s totally not like different women want different things in their love lives. Yeah….

  47. Hey Rogan, I linked to those child labor photos just above. And yay for Jimmie Rodgers fans!

  48. Brad Pitt and bad boys and women having too easy a time of dating? If the word “princesses” is mentioned I’m going to start suspecting a return visitor has decided to bless us with his presence again.

    (Or it could be that they all just sound the same. Maybe there’s a newsletter that they’re copying this boilerplate stuff about Pitt from.)

  49. I’d just like to mention that when my kid ended up in the custody of his father through some pretty dodgy legal manoeuvrings, it was unfair. And so I …

    .. paid my child support, on time, every month, because I care about my kid and want to contribute to his upbringing.

    When I had to fight for the right to see him through the police and courts, I..

    … took the opportunities I could get to hang out with him, and made sure that in between times he got letters and phone calls and presents from me so he’d know that even if he didn’t see me very often, I was thinking about him.

    What I didn’t do was go on the internet and suggest that all men should be punished for what this one wanker was doing, while refusing to support my kid because WAH.

    And when my kid was old enough so he was listened to, and he asked to come live with me, I..

    .. discovered that the cost of raising a kid was more than I’d thought and that the child support I’d paid would not cover half his expenses even though I was paying 18% of a top-tax-bracket income. I’d thought child support was unfairly high. I found out I was wrong. It’s actually mostly too low.

    And no, his father isn’t paying a cent now. I cover the lot myself.

    Just some perspective. Trolls, this is your cue to tell me I’m making it up and that all men aren’t like that. Top tip: I know. Just you lot are.

  50. But did women ever have to fight and die in wars?, Work in dirty and dangerous jobs like construction,mining and other hazardous occupations? No.

    Women did all those things. The only difference was that when payday came the father or husband picked up the womans pay because women were not allowed to own anything up to and including their labor.

  51. Tatjna,

    Whaaaaaaat? You are a woman and you lost custody? Why didn’t you just sit in the street and cry until you got your child back? Does not compute. Does not compute.

  52. Biting Beaver? Srsly? A woman who was hounded and pursued by MRAs hell bent on killing her and kidnapping her son because she said something that pissed them off?
    You already showed us who you are, Slimy Schtick, but thanks for confirming it yet again.

  53. @Fembot Well I did try to get my vagina to mind-control the entire court system into performing my bidding, but oddly enough that didn’t work. Maybe it needs new batteries?

  54. @Tatjna

    I always stick the batteries in in the wrong direction. Gotta make sure to line up the plusses and minuses correctly.

  55. timetravellingfool

    Sigh, you wait and wait for the trolls to come for a little batting practice and this is what they bring us? I already know why no one is going to read sticky’s blog- lazy bastard can’t even be bothered to quote from the sites he links. Dude, you have been trolling the perfect model of how to present hate-speech in a post. I’m just going to go out on a limb and say the woman who said she wanted to abort her son was not actually serious, because, well, he’s about 16 years too old for that. If she genuinely wanted to kill him, she would have said ‘I want to kill him’. But if you disagree, just quote her directly in easy to access text on your blog, and use the link as a citation. It’s easy! Then I may read it and, since you are really not trustworthy, I will verify it.
    nwoslave, Katz just said she is not impressed by people who claim they predicted things but have no proof. Why did you quote her saying this and then list a bunch of shit you claim to have predicted? If you had addressed any other poster you would have had a greater chance of them giving a shit, but you chose the one who outright said she would not care if you predicted stuff. Ugh.
    And wrath- you call that wrath? That was boring as shit! Look, I’m not going to lie, I only kinda skimmed it, but all it was was a regurgitation of some old school mra crap- feminism is evil because it is, women don’t die in war (even though they do), it’s so hard to get laid, try living in a more oppressive country if you want to be more oppressed (um, what does that fix?), and sniff sniff whimper. A serious lack of wrath there, Wrath. Ooh, new user name for you: The Incredible Sulk!
    Anyway, trolls, get your shit together, people. That was just sad.

  56. @Tatjna, What a horrible situation, and yet you show such kindness and grace in writing about it. I want to embroider comment that on a sampler and mail it to every MRA who comes here to complain, but … they are kind of impervious to kindness, grace, and reality. Also, I can’t embroider. Anyway, sorry that happened and I am glad that things appear to have worked out for you and your son.

  57. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    @Timetravellingfool – “Why did you quote her saying this and then list a bunch of shit you claim to have predicted?”

    Short answer: because Owly’s a fuckwit.

  58. Gosh, the trolls are boring tonight…and as usual, prove that they live under rocks.

  59. Gotta love the Zac Efron comment. Because there are only shallow women. No shallow men. Oh wait, when a man whines about having it too hard dating, but he’s only willing to consider model-looking women, he’s just acting on his ‘biological imperative’. But when a woman insists she be physically attracted to someone she date, she’s shallow.

    Dude. Everyone has the right to not be attracted to people, and not date them. And being looks obsessed is hardly the prerogative of one gender.

  60. You could always troll this douchenozzle if you’re bored

    http://governmentsgetgirlfriends.wordpress.com/

  61. Oh, hey! NWO! Honestly glad to see you here. I asked you a question on another thread earlier, but you probably haven’t gone back. It was kinda fizzling out at the time. Anyway, the question is this: what is your story? I remember one thread when you talked about your sister and your niece, and some actual humanity shone through. So what happened? What happened to you to change you from a loving brother to hating everything with a second X chromosome? Most MRA’s and MGTOW’s are more than happy to share how every woman done them wrong. How about you?

  62. I never understood why Brad Pitt was considered so hot in the first place. I think he’s kinda weird-looking, myself.

  63. Hi brother has been the face of Vodafone(?) ads in Australia – I get the NW magazine for the articles, and the ads are in there. I think the brother looks nicer, he smiles a lot in the ads and his face looks like smiling is his natural state.

  64. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    Yeah, Brad Pitt’s not my type, either. For starters I prefer darker colouring, and for another, I keep thinking of him in that horriblehorriblehorrible wig in Interview with a Vampire – puke!

    Now there’s something – if being turned into a vampire meant Instant Curls for Claudia, why didn’t it work for Louis? MISANDRY!

  65. The whole “Oh evil women get married to men and then take them for all their worth” is something that I’m getting fucking tired of. As though abusive assholes are ONLY women? I know men who have married women with good paying jobs and then fleeced them for all they are worth. Hell, I know men who didn’t even MARRY a woman but instead mooched off of her, lived in her house, etc and basically drove her into debt and misery while also being an abusive fuckwad.

    In my mother in law’s situation, her husband was ugly, short, balding and fat. He would probably fit right in with the MRA whining of “Oh, but I’m a NICE GUY and she should LOOK PAST MY FLAWS” because that’s the kind of shithat he is. So yeah. He’s no Brad Pitt, brought no money to the relationship, and basically pissed away every penny of her 150,000 + dollar a year job.

    So.

    This is not a gendered thing.

    This is an ABUSIVE ASSHOLE THING.

    Look, I understand that it’s not entirely your fault if you were naive and fell for a con artist who married you and took you for all you were worth. But the very wrong thing to do after experiencing such a thing is to then extrapolate this bad behavior on the part of one person and then say, “hey, ALL women must be like this! And the solution isn’t for me to do a good job figuring out if this person is an ABUSIVE ASSHOLE before LEGALLY TYING MYSELF TO THEM (and BTW, marriage is not mandatory), it’s to TAKE AWAY THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT ME SO THAT THERE IS NO WAY THAT I WILL BE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF!”

    You know what? Fuck that shit. If you don’t like no-fault divorce, DO NOT GET MARRIED. Get a pre-nup if you ABSOLUTELY WANT TO LEGALLY MARRY. And read the fucking paperwork on your marriage certificate and all the rules it entails before you fucking sign it. IT IS NOT THAT HARD.

    And, for the love of all that walks this Earth, PLEASE marry someone you actually trust and care about, who reciprocates that love and trust.

    It is not up to the universe to give you special favors just because you think you are entitled to them.

  66. Pitt doesn’t do it for me either. He’s objectively very handsome, just not really my type. Also, how do I say this delicately? For women my age he’s not a bad person to pick if you’re going for hottest man in the world OMG, but I kind of question whether the average 21 year old would see him that way. Same when they occasionally bang on about Clooney – yes, he is very handsome, but he is also no spring chicken and thus an odd choice for their purposes. Unless the purpose is to shore up their belief that age is absolutely not a problem for men, nope, they remain as hot as they were at 25 until the day they die and how dare anyone suggest otherwise.

  67. Does anyone else find it absolutely hilarious when “bad boys” are referenced by men who say that women should be reduced to animals in the eyes of the law that men can do whatever they want with?

    I mean, what do they think that shit right there *IS*? Sounds fucking bad to me. :(

  68. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    That’s a good point about the age, Cassandra. I must ask around at the hairdresser’s next time I’m there (totally scientific straw poll) whether the younger women there think either Pitt or Clooney is appealing. I like Mr Clooney, but in an aesthetic-plus-like-what-I-know-of-his-acting-and-politics way, not a pantsfeelings way. Ah, the early days of ER – George Clooney and Noah Wyle! :)

  69. Is it sad that my earliest crush (very young) was Tom Baker as Dr Who? I have finally got the damn scarf pattern off a Ravelry link and have ordered the Vanna’s Choice acrylic. I’ve ordered double the amount I need as my partner wants one too – and I would hate to be accused of misandry re my scarf knitting attempts.

    I must never meet your husband as I had a crush on Inigo, and The Princess Bride is one of my favourite movies…. and wasn’t he also in St Elsewhere as a lovely natured doctor?

  70. I don’t really feel sexually attracted to any movie stars, really. The idea of fucking someone famous just feels really really awkward. I tend not to be attracted to body parts, anyway- it’s combinations of things- mannerisms- the way that people use and move their bodies are much more important than some guy standing there without his shirt on and the 6 pack abs and hair blowing in the wind.

    I think that the main problem here is that these guy who basically objectify women are trying to see how women generally (as the HIVEMIND) tend to look at men and just do this weird Bizarro World reflection of their own weird objectification. The thing is, there are women who objectify men (obviously), but there is a huge variety in how people gauge attractiveness in others, and even if we completely ignore the asexual and the homosexual folks, most heterosexual women who are attracted to the same person will be attracted for different reasons.

    *shrug* I don’t think I’m all that weird being primarily attracted to my spouse to the point that I really see no point in pursuing others, even if that were to be an option.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,034 other followers

%d bloggers like this: