Manosphere blogger blames Obama, Jesse Jackson, and feminists for the Aurora theater shootings. Yes, really.

Scientific geniuses: Always white dudes

We’ve already seen some unusual perspectives on the Aurora theater tragedy courtesy of The Spearhead and the Men’s Rights subreddit. Over on whiskeysplace, the manosphere blogger (and sometime Spearhead contributor) who calls himself Whiskey throws some racism into the mix.

In Whiskey’s view, the whole thing just shows … just how badly treated white men are in America today. And, he suggests, unless we change our evil white-man-hating ways we should expect even worse massacres to come. His basic thesis:

[T]hat an (admittedly crazy) 24 year old White guy with an extremely high IQ would paint his hair red, carefully position his beat up old pickup truck against one emergency exit door, enter through the pre-arranged opened other door, and kill (again as of this writing) 12 people while wounding 58, many seriously, shows how out of hand Obama’s America has become.   …

Who is at fault? In no particular order, Obama, the entire Affirmative Action establishment, Jessie Jackson, feminists, the media, and the American people for taking the easy way out and not removing the former from public life through a hard, brutal political struggle that costs time and effort and more.

 

After a long tirade about “low-IQ” black murderers, Whiskey moves on to consider the life of the (apparently) socially awkward, dateless James Holmes, whom Whiskey assumes was oppressed for being a white guy.

Was James Holmes forced out of the University of Colorado for being too White and male? We may never know. But certainly, being White, male, and applying for science related jobs after graduating with honors led to … McDonalds.

Well, not literally. Holmes didn’t actually work at McDonalds. Very few people with undergraduate degrees in neuroscience do.

So you have a very toxic combination. A man with a high IQ, denied any gainful employment or relationship with the opposite sex. … America has become so debased, so hostile to ordinary White guys, that instead of say, devising his own bat-suit and rescuing someone, this guy figures he’s the Joker, and shoots a bunch of people he has never even met, dead.

And it gets worse, according to Whiskey: The continued oppression of white dudes by Obama, the feminists and, er, Russell Brand, will lead inevitably to more massacres in the future:

The constant demonization of White guys, and destruction of heroism as a model, has real consequences. Guys with high IQs who are intent on killing people are dangerous. They get that way not from “turning evil” like a Joss Whedon character in “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” but because they are turned away from anything positive, socially isolated and alone while a lucky socially dominant few have everything (before he ever got famous, and with a massive drug habit, Russell Brand boasted he was having sex with 80 women a month). These guys study for years, graduate with honors, and end up at McDonalds. Wrong sex and color.

Yes, because so many of those who work in fast food restaurants are white men tossed out of grad school because of their race and gender.

And those massacres in the future? Because white dudes are apparently all so super smart, we should expect them to be way worse than the ones we’ve seen so far. Like, atom bomb worse.

I want to be as clear as possible. The most dangerous man in WWII, was not Patton, or Rommel, or Yamamoto. No, it was nerdy, lanky, unassuming and part prima donna, J. Robert Oppenheimer. A high IQ unmoored by social ties, love, family, relationships, a job that is not demeaning … is a man who is a potential weapon. 

Whiskey then brings us back around to Obama and his (alleged) anti-white dude agenda:

If Obama’s anti-White guy policies, the media’s demonization of (particularly nerdy) White guys, and the legal discrimination against most non-connected Whites were deliberately constructed to create guys far more dangerous than James Holmes, they could not have done a better job.

Whiskey has somehow convinced himself, based on nothing, that Holmes could have been another Jonas Salk:

Let us be clear. James Holmes had the capacity to maybe find a cure for Alzheimers. Yes he was crazy. But he was smart.

While every white man is capable of intellectual miracles, at least in Whiskey’s mind, those with darker skin are somehow incapable of scientific thought:

Meanwhile Trayvon Martin was never going to amount to much of anything. Ever. And neither will all those young Black man just like him. … Literally any number of people you know, could die, in the future because society did not channel James Holmes into a productive outlet: neuroscience.

Uh, dude, even aside from the racism, there’s no evidence that Holmes actually was a genius.

After a bit more bloviating, Whisky brings it back to Trayvon Martin for his stirring conclusion:

[I]t is [a] fantasy that we can have no cost to marginalizing White guys (particularly the smart ones without connections) and that we can continue to have clean water, and air, and food that is safe to eat, and the power always one [sic], by betting it all on the Trayvon Martins.

Why is it that the guys who talk the most about IQ are invariably such complete fucking idiots?

About these ads

Posted on July 25, 2012, in antifeminism, creep-shaming, misogyny, MRA, oppressed white men, racism, reactionary bullshit, threats, violence, whaaaaa?, your time will come. Bookmark the permalink. 210 Comments.

  1. It’s just a general pile of racism on top of more racism. But the Obama hates nerds thing was an interesting bit of racism. I mean, I know some racists think that all black people are ‘cool’, but Obama was a ConLaw professor, right? I’ve taken two semesters of ConLaw and I just can’t associate super cool with ConLaw professor. ConLaw professor and nerd sort of fits right together. Not that my ConLaw professor wasn’t a good professor, he was, but I can’t think of that as making him cool either.

    Full disclosure, we did once have a conversation about lesbian bondage porn (we were on obscenity law in ConLaw 2, it was on topic!).

    How exactly is “wearing dresses” coded as Something Infants Do

    Maybe most MRAs are literally a hundred years old and remember the days when all infants wore those white dresses. http://whowerethey.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/green-fan-album015.jpg

    MRAs need to update their information on infant fashions…the most popular clothes for infants today are one piece outfits made of cotton or synthetic fibers, some of which have long sleeves and enclosed feet, which are fastened with little metal snaps. These outfits are called “onsies” by many people.

  2. @David Futrelle

    You’re right, I did recently post on spearhead for the thread about altruism about the dark knight shooter. Here, I’ll save you the trouble of finding it.
    ————-
    Men are natural protectors, not only of women and children but of men as well. The altruism, valor and honor of men who are willing to sacrifice themselves is a virtue like no other. No other sacrifice can be as great, and men are always on the front lines in any natural or un-natural disaster.

    The systemic problem in modern society is the constant demonization of men. This one incident is a classic example. One man did a terrible thing. The media blasts out messages like, “Why do men kill?” “What is it that makes men mass murderers?” “What turns men into terrorists?”

    The message is men are universally bad. Men are universally demons. Yet three men showed the ultimate sacrifice. Why isn’t the MSM peppering us with headlines like, “Why are men so giving?” What is about men that makes them so honorable?” “What turns men into heros?”

    Everyday we’re told how if one man does something bad it’s men universally being bad, they’re all demons. If one man does something good it’s never men being universally good, it’s a fluke. For the most part, it doesn’t get mentioned at all.

    For women, this symmetry is reversed. The politicians, schools and media reguarly blast out messages of any woman doing anything remotely positive to show how all women are good. Even a woman who does something bad is portrayed as somehow being a victim.

    Men as a whole perform thousands of acts of valor a day in this country. Men as a whole are demonized thousands of times a day in this country. When society hates and demonizes all men, eventually more and more men will hate that society in return. Instead of demonizing men for the actions of a few, men should be praised for the actions of the many.
    ————–

    There’s plenty to ridicule. There might even be a typo or some other incorrect usage of grammar. Knock yourselves out.

  3. @Steele:

    Who is at fault? In no particular order, Obama, the entire Affirmative Action establishment, Jessie Jackson, feminists, the media, and the American people for taking the easy way out and not removing the former from public life through a hard, brutal political struggle that costs time and effort and more.

    This strikes you as “clear, rational and unbiased critical thinking?” Really?

  4. I’ve noticed that Boobzland seems to be driven- as in this case- primarily by irrationality and emotional impulses, rather than clear, rational and unbiased critical thinking, as is utilized in the Movement.

    I don’t think you noticed anything. I think you came into an explicitly misogyny-mocking space with the intent of throwing around explicitly misogynist tropes about gender-essentialism and rationality.

    And I think that based on your behavior, which is observable, and your words, which are observable, and putting things together in a logical and rational and critical manner.


    As for the MRM, only people who don’t understand basic rhetoric think that it’s an example of cogency, rationality, logic, unbiased anything, or critical thinking.

  5. So… this is an extended metaphor? Or literally, this happened?

    C’mon, this NWO we’re talking about. The moment he conceives of a metaphor it becomes his reality.

  6. Diogenes The Cynic

    @freitag

    Agree/disagree with you there. I think raising boys to be able to ask for help isn’t feminism; its raising emotionally healthy children.

    And, I don’t know if anyone has mentioned this before, but if they didn’t make seeking mental health services punative, it would be easier for more people to do.

  7. @Steele:

    I’m pretty sure “clear, rational and unbiased critical thinking” is what led me to leave the MRM.

  8. MorkaisChosen

    Diogenes: And a lot of feminist thinking very explicitly supports raising emotionally healthy children, instead of children who are good at performing the gender roles of Man or Woman.

  9. Tulgey Logger

    Clear, unbiased critical thinking— like insisting that Tom Martin must, must be a feminist plant meant to discredit the MRM!

    I lol’d.

  10. Yeah Owly, I’m sure that Marcotte banned you simply because you dared to disagree with her. (Well, I think that’s what you were trying to get at with your bizarre goddess-worship rant.) Certainly, the fact that your comments over there were your typical inane blatherings had nothing to do with it.

  11. I notice that trolls who talk about rhetoric and critical skills are significantly less likely to use them.

  12. Tulgey Logger

    Creep-shaming never happens, because the MRAs use the term regularly!

    This is the person who honestly tried to argue that “creep(y)” is a gendered insult.

    I also lol’d.

  13. @whataboutthemoonz
    “I think you came into an explicitly misogyny-mocking space”

    Everything is misogyny. Anytime any woman feels any kind of discomfort to her precious feelings, if it’s said by a man, it’s misogyny.

    Manboobz scours the web searching for anything anyone says to prove the rampant misogyny in society. “Look! My pixels were sexually harrassed by his pixels!” His avatar look up the skirt of my avatar.” Oh horrors, when will it ever end??? We need Big Daddy to silence all dissent.

    I mean that is what you do here. Looking for pixels that dare hurt the feelings of other pixels. Tropes against pixels.

    Hey, my feelings are hurt, how about the gang drops a 160K in my lap. Boohoo, my pixels are sad and stuff.

  14. Diogenes The Cynic

    @Morkais, yeah.

    The thing is, most women live in 2012 socially, and most men in the 50’s. Just a month ago I was at a friends house, and we were sitting in his backyard watching his kids play on a hill. One of his sons tumbles down, and begins to cry. He said “suck it up.” He wouldn’t say the same thing to one of his daughters. Its something we largely do to ourselves. :-(

  15. Here’s an great example of “clear, unbiased critical thinking” right here:

    …because they are turned away from anything positive, socially isolated and alone while a lucky socially dominant few have everything…

    Obviously the problem for Holmes was that all the wimminz around him were riding the alpha cock carousel, thereby turning him away from anything positive and made him socially isolated. Pure logic, dontcha see?

  16. To be fair, if it weren’t for the actual guy showing up at court and in videos, it’d be pretty easy to believe Tom Martin was a false-flag robot. Hell, I only ever learnt some crappy VBasic and I reckon I could program an alright Tombot.

    10 PRINT wh*res
    20 GOTO 10 'muahaha the previously entirely credible Mens' Rights Movement is now a joke!

  17. Tulgey Logger

    Creep-shaming never happens, because the MRAs use the term regularly!

    Which, by the way, is a total straw man. It is a straw man which is inexcusable given all the time you’ve spent here, Steele.

    But please do go on about how unbiased you and the MRM are while deliberately misrepresenting others: it amuses me greatly.

  18. @ Diogenes

    Sorry to derail, but I just noticed that a commenter here uses the name of my favourite Classical Greek philosopher as their username and this made my day.

  19. @lowquacks
    “Does Owly even realise that there’s a front-page article on Pandagon right now criticising a woman?”

    You’re kidding right? She’s being criticized for not being feminist enough. Holy crap! That’s the best you can come up with??? Oh poor women, the indignities they suffer. Obviously she’s fell in with a bad crowd. See how patriarchy hurts women. Tell me more. This is too good.

  20. MorkaisChosen

    @Morkais, yeah.

    The thing is, most women live in 2012 socially, and most men in the 50′s. Just a month ago I was at a friends house, and we were sitting in his backyard watching his kids play on a hill. One of his sons tumbles down, and begins to cry. He said “suck it up.” He wouldn’t say the same thing to one of his daughters. Its something we largely do to ourselves. :-(

    Don’t agree with everything you’re saying here- sure, he wouldn’t say ‘suck it up’ to his daughters, but aren’t there any things he’d tell his daughter to do/not do and not his sons?

    This is coming back to my standard There Are Gender Roles And They Are Shitty For Everyone thing, which is why I disagree with “most women live in 2012 socially, and most men in the 50′s.”

    (That or misunderstand what you mean by that.)

  21. Whoa there, Steele! Logic and rationality are tools of the patriarchy. And that’s misogyny.

    Hah! Good one, Slave. These guys are unbelievable.

  22. @Diogenes The Cynic
    “One of his sons tumbles down, and begins to cry. He said “suck it up”

    He’ll be grateful for that toughness when he goes out into the real world where he’s hated on a societal level.

  23. Manboobz scours the web searching for anything anyone says to prove the rampant misogyny in society. “Look! My pixels were sexually harrassed by his pixels!” His avatar look up the skirt of my avatar.” Oh horrors, when will it ever end??? We need Big Daddy to silence all dissent.

    Says the person who scours the web searching for anything/any place where people are talking about women/feminism so he can spew a constant, frothy mix of hate and stupid at everyone who isn’t like him.

    Hey, my feelings are hurt, how about the gang drops a 160K in my lap.

    Plan and produce something that people are interested in, and maybe someone will donate to your project. I doubt you’re capable, but give it a shot.

  24. Whoa there, Steele! Logic and rationality are tools of the patriarchy. And that’s misogyny.

    Hah! Good one, Slave. These guys are unbelievable.

    Oh dear, now they’re starting a mens rights circlejerk on the manboobz comments.

  25. Steele, are you going to respond to any of the questions you’ve been asked regarding your assertion that the “Movement” engages in “…clear, rational and unbiased critical thinking”?

    Or are you just going to spend the thread ignoring the overt racism of what was written by Whiskey while simultaneously trying to suck up to NWO?

    Trayvon Martin was male, wasn’t he? Why isn’t it misandry to claim that his life had no value?

  26. Tulgey Logger

    Whoa there, Steele! Logic and rationality are tools of the patriarchy. And that’s misogyny.

    Hah! Good one, Slave. These guys are unbelievable.

    CLEAR UNBIASED CRITICAL THINKING

  27. @Steele, I’d like to see you analysis of the post under discussion (see top of page) for how Mr. Whiskey’s opinions are logical, rational and, above all, unbiased.

  28. @Nobinayamu
    “Plan and produce something that people are interested in, and maybe someone will donate to your project.”

    OK. Oh, boohoo! All the avatars look so strong and it gives me a bad body image. My feeling are hurt. I’m sad and stuff. I wanna whine about why I’m sad and stuff. Now gimmie a 160K.

  29. Whoa there, Steele! Logic and rationality are tools of the patriarchy. And that’s misogyny.

    Hah! Good one, Slave. These guys are unbelievable.

    DAE LOGIC AND REASON?

  30. Did anyone else read “Hah! Good one, Slave.” and hear “nanny nanny boo boo”?

  31. Steele translator activated:

    “Hah! Good one, pathetic, socially inept, conspiracy theorist with impotent rage issues. PLEASE BE MY FRIEND!”

  32. At first, I was confused as to why Steele was trying to flatter Owly. Why would Steele want to suck up to someone so laughable and absurd? I’d think that anyone would want to distance themselves from Owly as much as they possibly could.

    And then I realized that, ridiculous as Owly is, he’s at least occasionally amusing in his stupidity, while Steele’s stupidity is just boring. Owly has some amount of creativity, which Steele lacks entirely. Owly is also sometimes entertaining, something which Steele can never hope to be.

  33. Did anyone else read “Hah! Good one, Slave.” and hear “nanny nanny boo boo”?

    Nooo … but I did hear Steele slap Slavey on the back and then wipe his hand on his jeans.

  34. Tulgey Logger

    Tom Martin: vile feminist plant to discredit the MRM.
    Owlyslave: totally has our number, hits the nail on the button, etc..

  35. Isn’t Owlyslave just a few hard chairs short of a Tom Martin, though?

  36. I’ve noticed that Boobzland seems to be driven- as in this case- primarily by irrationality and emotional impulses, rather than clear, rational and unbiased critical thinking, as is utilized in the Movement.

    Like how you clearly, rationally, and un-biased-ly decided to let one comment from a naysaying teacher deter you from your dream of becoming a writer, instead of irrationally and emotionally indulging the impulse to say “screw that, I’m going to write anyway”? Or like how you’re still commenting here instead of, you know, writing?

    I mean, I realize comments are written, but you won’t get paid for them as a rule, so they are maybe not the best use of your time if you want to be a writer. I dunno, that’s just my irrational, emotional, and/or impulsive opinion.

  37. Hey, where did Steele go? I wanted the cogent, concise and rhetorically sound analyses of Whiskey’s posts.

  38. OK. Oh, boohoo! All the avatars look so strong and it gives me a bad body image. My feeling are hurt. I’m sad and stuff. I wanna whine about why I’m sad and stuff. Now gimmie a 160K.

    Good start. Now, work on being pro-active. Start a blog/website -it’s free!- and post an outline of the project for which you’d like to receive donations. Be certain that you provide some way for people to donate on your site. On your travels through the man-o-sphere, post links to your blog/website and tell other MRAs and MRA sympathizers about your project. Tell them that you need donations to get started. If they’re interested, perhaps they’ll click the link to your blog/website and make a donation.

    Then you could get paid for all of your whining.

  39. Steele, not unlike other trolls, ignores things he cant refute in order to continue spouting nonsense at things he thinks he can. He also assumes the subject will be dropped if he ignores it enough.

  40. So did Steele just forget how a couple days ago he was claiming Slavey was a fringe extremist who didn’t represent the movement?

  41. Well, if he’s going to tuck tail and not display his awesome logic, I guess I’ll just go and make myself a sammich.

    whataboutthemoonz, nice one. :-D

  42. CassandraSays

    @ Cliff

    Like most other things, consistency is misandry. As is you pointing out his inconsistency. Why must you persecute Mikey so?

  43. Logic itself isn’t misogynist, obviously! But here are some things that ARE misogynist:

    -Claiming men are more logical than women
    -Ignoring women’s emotions completely, because they aren’t “logical.”
    -Claiming emotional actions by men are “logical,” just because a man made them.
    -When a woman is emotional about a subject, but making logical arguments, ignoring the logic and telling her to just calm down.

  44. Tulgey Logger

    For those who weren’t around when it first happened, I would just like to point out that Owly’s “logic and reason are patriarchal” straw man is a reference to a DV organization’s chart that lists “using ‘logic'” as an abusive tactic. Owly claimed it was the law, but it was not. And now Steele is patting him on the back for it while both claiming the mantle of Logic And Reason for the MRM and deliberately misrepresenting others.

    This delicious irony has many layers. It’s a veritable shit onion.

  45. Argenti Aertheri

    -When a woman is emotional about a subject, but making logical arguments, ignoring the logic and telling her to just calm down.

    …a DV organization’s chart that lists “using ‘logic’” as an abusive tactic.

    Huh? I wonder if maybe using “logic” could be abusive? (Hint NWO, point here is that yeah, it can be)

  46. @Cliff Pervocracy

    That’s right, Holly. I’m an extremist. Why I didn’t even bless myself before posting here. Blasphemy for sure. If only I’d get in touch with my feminine side, the good side and leave that slavering beast behind. Toxic masculinity is so hurtful to me. And the patriarchy, don’t even get me started. Dresses and gays and trans and feelings and tolerance. More feminism is what men need to end their evil ways. Teach me, Holly. All about the goodness of women so men can be just like women.

  47. Things that are Misandry:

    ~Citations
    ~Consistency
    ~Not being a doormat
    ~Having a vagina
    ~THE JABBERWOCKY
    ~everthing

    Did I miss anything?

  48. @whataboutthemoonz

    You forgot things that aren’t everything, we have to consider the postmodern MRA fee fees too after all.

  49. Argenti Aertheri

    whataboutthemoonz — context, conditional statements, and statistics

  50. Also this just in, I’m bad at postmodernism.

  51. Raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens
    Bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens
    Brown paper packages tied up with strings
    These are a few misandric things

    Cream colored ponies and crisp apple streudels
    Doorbells and sleigh bells and schnitzel with noodles
    Wild geese that fly with the moon on their wings
    These are a few misandric things

    Girls (MISANDRY!) in white dresses with blue satin sashes
    Snowflakes that stay on my nose and eyelashes
    Silver white winters that melt into springs
    These are a few misandric things

    When the dog bites
    When the bee stings
    When I’m feeling sad
    I simply remember misandric things
    And then I get really really mad and post a shit-ton of comments on Man Boobz calling everyone vile.

  52. Argenti Aertheri

    Oh, right, postmodernism is also misandry. As is the idea that words have meanings. Claiming that contradictory things contradict each other is also misandry.

  53. @cloudiah.

    You handled the lyrics so I figured I’d put up some backing music for anyone who wants to sing.

  54. I’m going to add finding music on youtube to the list of things I really need to get better at.

    http://youtu.be/-MPck1zhKpQ Here’s the proper full version of the song.

  55. …….so should I add “the truth” to the list, or no?

  56. Truth and lies are both misandry.

  57. @Cliff Pervocracy
    “Logic itself isn’t misogynist, obviously! But here are some things that ARE misogynist:”
    “Claiming men are more logical than women”

    Men are more logical than women. That’s not misogyny. That’s factual. See. Right off the bat, a fact has become misogyny. You’ve failed right outta the gate. Still sticking with feminist androgynous theory.

  58. @Freitag:

    Obviously the problem for Holmes was that all the wimminz around him were riding the alpha cock carousel, thereby turning him away from anything positive and made him socially isolated. Pure logic, dontcha see?

    At least they find him cute now.

  59. @nwoslave

    Stallions are more logical than mares. That’s not misogyny. That’s factual. See. Right off the bat, a fact has become misogyny. You’ve failed right outta the gate. Still sticking with feminist androgynous theory.

    Care to back that up with a credible source?

  60. Argenti Aertheri

    aworldanonymous — keep up! Citations are misandry!

  61. Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III

    Holy crap! Was that an actual social interaction between two MRMs?

    There’s a lump in my throat… Excuse me, I have something in my eye.

  62. Tulgey Logger

    Shorter Owly: My bullshit misogynistic asspull is misogynistic, according to you. See how illogical you are?

  63. Unless proof is also misandry, NWO, could you logically prove this to us?

  64. @Cliff Pervocracy

    Womens logic.

    “Raindrops on roses and whiskers on kittens
    Bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens
    Brown paper packages tied up with strings
    These are a few misandric things”

    “Truth and lies are both misandry.”

    “Oh, right, postmodernism is also misandry. As is the idea that words have meanings. Claiming that contradictory things contradict each other is also misandry.”

    “Well, if he’s going to tuck tail and not display his awesome logic, I guess I’ll just go and make myself a sammich.”

    “Steele, not unlike other trolls, ignores things he cant refute in order to continue spouting nonsense at things he thinks he can. He also assumes the subject will be dropped if he ignores it enough.”

    This is all that’s ever posted here. Unrestrained emotional rants of valueless irrelevance. There’s no logic to any of it. It’s pure emotional rage. No one here can ever be engaged in a constructive manner. The emotion arguement will always devolve down to needing more feminism. No matter what it’ll either be, patriarchy, toxic masculinity, women are victims, men are oppressors, women do things better, more feminism, women are good, men are bad, yadda, yadda feminist claptrap.

    Look at the example given me how the feminist site, pandagon is critical of women as well as men. They were critical of her for not agreeing with feminist theory of feminist theory. What a joke!

    There is no logic or critical thinking going on here. Ever. That’s not what this site or any feminist leaning site is about. It’s pure emotional rage.

  65. Argenti Aertheri

    Sir Bodsworth — Steele’s been trying to make friends, it’s almost cute.

  66. NWO, how can you say that when you’re such a clear counterexample? Everyone here can read your long disjointed ramblings and assess your logical reasoning skills for themselves.

    Do you think YOU are logical?

    …You actually do, don’t you. I mean, I know a lot of MRAs are like the Dunning-Krueger effect made flesh, but this is taking it to a whole new level. You, NWOslave, think you’re a logical person.

    That’s just precious.

  67. The only one responsible for this senseless act, is the nutcase that did it.

  68. Tulgey Logger

    Men are more logical than women. That’s not misogyny. That’s factual. See. Right off the bat, a fact has become misogyny. You’ve failed right outta the gate. Still sticking with feminist androgynous theory.

    This is also a great example of using “logic” in an abusive way. I mean, Owly isn’t abusing anyone here except that he is constantly being an utter shit-head to everyone, but I would worry for anyone in a relationship with him if he thinks this kind of “reasoning” is at all acceptable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,804 other followers

%d bloggers like this: