About these ads

Tom Martin, UK MRA: Child prostitutes should be prosecuted for “preying” on pedophiles

[Trigger Warning: Child rape]

Tom Martin is doubling down on his own reprehensibleness. You may recall the utterly repellant things the prominent British Men’s Rights Activist – he’s the guy who sued the London School for Economics for “misandry” and got his case thrown out – has been saying in the comments here about child prostitutes, and which I highlighted in a recent post.

Now he has returned with some even worse comments. Here’s his “solution” to the problem of child prostitution. (Emphasis mine.)

Pedophiles should be removed from society and given compassionate treatment for their illness.

Child prostitutes should be put back in school, or if repeat offenders, prosecuted for attempting to profit by preying on the mentally ill pedo population.

Pedos have an incentive not to re-offend – to keep their liberty, and avoid a secure treatment unit.

Child prostitutes should face a choice between their freedom (apart from when at school), or, if they continue avoiding school to go whoring, then incarceration and school.

In another comment, Martin suggests that child prostitutes are economic free agents just maximizing their profit potential:

The child prostitutes say they’re not victims.

And the fact they take money off a punter for sex, says it’s not really rape.

Pimps are not controllers, they are in truth merely agents for the prostitute, so don’t blame them exclusively either.

I’m calling manboobzers human whores. A trait shared with animals, but one humans have the cognitive powers, awaredness, and choice to transcend.

If your 10 year old doesn’t know what a whore is, but is one, then something’s wrong with that kid’s education. Perhaps they’ve been reading manboobz articles and taking Cuntrelle literally in between poundings.

Tom Martin: Worst person in the world?

(Note: Tom Martin has confirmed that this is indeed him posting comments here on Man Boobz by sending an email from the account associated with his website Sexismbusters.org. Also, he’s retweeted quotes from his comments here. Contact him via his web site if you are skeptical.)

About these ads

Posted on July 16, 2012, in antifeminism, evil women, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles, rape, Tom Martin, whores. Bookmark the permalink. 145 Comments.

  1. CassandraSays

    @ Dracula

    As unpleasant as I find pedophiles, I think that the idea that Tom might not actually be one and might just be supporting child prostitution because it’s convenient in terms of his overall narrative is even more nauseating. He seems to be cheerleading for the rape of children not because he wants to rape children, but because it’s convenient for him politically. Which is a level of amoral that’s rather startling, even for a con artist.

  2. And yes, Tom is a parade of shit.

  3. It takes a hell of a lot of privilege to think not being able to say whatever the hell you want at absolutely any time and place equals censorship. Just because your offensive ideas are not allowed to dominate all discourse doesn’t make you oppressed, dude. You have plenty of space and waaaaay more press than you deserve for your bigoted crap.

  4. Strumpets do sound like something to be served with tea. Or at teatime? Tea and strumpets with butter and honey!

  5. Okay, the concept of posing as a child raper because it’s “convenient for him politically” just finally broke my brain.

  6. Sorry jumbofisch, my point was to make fun of Toms fixation with one particular word and his lack of creativity.

    I can see that I’ve tossed sex workers under the bus too, and that’s really thoughtless of me. My apologies.

  7. Actually I wish there was a way to let Tom post what he wants, but automatically replace every incidence of “wh#$es” with “s’mores”, so that he would try really hard to insult people and end up sounding like he was offering them tasty snacks. And then he would stamp his feet in anger and the same thing would happen again.

    This would be totally awesome. Actually, it would be hysterical if there were a lot filtered words that were changed to tasty snacks/baked goods.

  8. Mewling quim translates to “whining c*nt” which is far more offensive that “wh*re”. I missed that in the movie somehow, but it really makes Loki look like a total misogynist. WTF. He was a bad enough character to begin with, now he has to be a woman hater, too?

    What little we see of Asgard is a macho, chauvinistic warrior culture, most likely with all the attendant misogyny thereof. Sif is the Jackie Robinson of female Asgardian warriors, and when Odin is incapacitated, it’s his son and not his wife who takes temporary command. Thor (who’s apparently more feminist than most Asgardians anyway, in that he supported Sif’s candidacy to become a warrior) is able to avoid the worst of this. Perhaps Loki, in his attempts to be “more Asgardian than the Asgardians”, fell right into it.

    Not that his fall through the wormhole, association with Thanos, or utter contempt for anything not-Asgardian did anything to help matters.

  9. I interpreted Loki’s insult as being less sexist (more because I don’t think he differentiates between male and female humans–he hates us all) and more manipulative. He’s trying to upset her, and using misogynist tropes to do so.

    But yeah, I could see where others could see it as over-the-top sexism.

  10. @jumbofish

    I’m sorry too if my use of the W word offended you or any sex workers. I kind of snapped last night reading Tom’s incessant use of the word, and I was just trying to make the point that the word was overused.

    In terms of getting around the filter, I think we were just trying to point out that there were easy enough ways for Tom to avoid it, but he was more interested in using that as an excuse to run away.

    I think Tom’s visit has permanently altered our associations with that word. I for one won’t use it any more.

  11. @ Jumbofish–yeah, I think we all got a little too flippant. I’m sorry.

  12. CassandraSays

    David’s change to the spam filter does seem to have banished Tom, so apparently he’s unable to construct sentences without that particular word. Or maybe he finally went to sleep.

  13. Vocaloid brain bleach.

  14. Argenti Aertheri

    NWO — to answer the main question of your comment, I don’t think any or us (or at least not many of us) were aghast at the idea of licensing sex workers — it was the in detail tirades about what acts children perform and how there are no trafficked sex workers, anywhere, period, and how the adult “clients” of child sex workers should be treated compassionately, but the children punished…etc etc

    As for why children are allowed to be sexual with other children, and not adults, the problem isn’t the sex itself, but the power difference. Should I pull up CT’s laws on this again and remind you that some states do have age brackets? That is, 14 & 16 = ok; 16 & 18 = ok; 14 & 18 =/= ok.

    Oh and you want that analogy about licensing to be comparing sex work to skilled professionals, not cars.

  15. “I’d just like to go over the paragraph you supplied from the americanciminallawreview, whatever the hell that is. It’s really just an opinion piece is all it is.”

    Links to various wingnut sites, as frequently supplied by NWO – totally legit.

    Links to the nation’s premier journal of criminal law – WTF is this shit?

  16. Argenti Aertheri

    Cassandra — NWO doesn’t believe in gov’n data, he actually had a comment where he thought it was just hilarious of him to say he was mocking me, and laughing at my gullibility for citing gov’n sources. I, of course, found this goddamned hilarious.

    Oh wait…is “goddamned hilarious” an insult to him, personally? His whole rant on that one lost me somewhere around calling all of us Jews…

    NWO provides links? I only get BRAINFAX (and assdata) out of him…

  17. TRUBRAINFAX, I really don’t know why I’m so horrid at this, I’m just gonna go fetch some more brain bleach so I can feel like I’m contributing until I have something useful to add.

  18. captainbathrobe

    Slavey’s just jealous of all the attention TM was receiving. Fans, they are fickle after all.

  19. @Argenti Aertheri

    But you didn’t answer my question.
    A 15 year old girl can’t drive a car, she’ll be punished if she does.
    A 15 year old girl can’t drink she’ll be punished if she does. If someone over 21 buys her alcohol they’ll be punished more harshly but she’ll still be punished.
    So if prostitution were legal and a 15 year girl did trade sex for money should she be punished? She knew it was wrong but did it anyway.

    Say prostitution is legalized for everyone 18 and up. Are you telling me only the person buying sex from a girl under 18 is a criminal? What’s to stop every girl at any age from selling sex for money if they are never punished for doing so? If I say are you over 18 and she says yes, then what? Is the man still guilty? What should I do, card her? I wouldn’t know a legit card from a one printed on a home printer. Shall I guess the age?

    Do you see what I mean? The punishment has to go to the person who with full knowlege broke the law. Even underaged people are punished for every other crime. Why should selling sex be hands off, they did no wrong? An underaged girl knows she can’t drink, drive, ect, but when it comes to sex she’s too stupid to up from down?

    “Teehee, I’m just a girl, I didn’t know selling sex for money was wrong.” I mean c’mon.

  20. Well Slavey, if it makes you feel better, Tom completely ignored me too, and never answered any of my questions, so it was pretty much like debating with you. :)

  21. Slavey, I know you’re concerned now that there’s a new shithead in town and all our attention’s going to him, but you can’t just copy his schtick.

  22. Argenti Aertheri

    NWO — you’ve basically decided the debate is really about how minors who commit crimes should be treated…which is fine, but not remotely what we’re upset at Tom over (did anyone argue that minors selling sex shouldn’t be treated as truant from school? Or was it that the places this tends to happen, the places he was citing don’t have mandatory schooling in the first place?)

    But yeah, you’d treat them as any other truant minor, and that entire system needs massive work. It shouldn’t count as truancy, in general, if the parents are so neglectful that clean clothes are not available, for example. We send kids to juvie anyways though, which is BS, and irrelevant to sex work (as Pecunium would put it “but I digress”)

    This — “What should I do, card her? I wouldn’t know a legit card from a one printed on a home printer. ” — is BS though, that’s like saying that you can’t tell if your mechanic’s license is valid or not (it’s called due diligence dude, and yep, it’s on the client to perform it).

    Anyone not NWO know if — “A 15 year old girl can’t drink she’ll be punished if she does. If someone over 21 buys her alcohol they’ll be punished more harshly but she’ll still be punished.” — is even true? I know “buying cigarettes for minors will cost you” but afaik the minor is going to get lectured, not arrested…

  23. Slavey, child prostitution is not underage drinking, or shoplifting cigarettes, or whatever hijinx you want to come up with. Children don’t start hooking out of a sense of rebellion or a need to be naughty. Pretending that being a prostitute is on the same psychological, physical, and social level as getting high with your friends down by the reservoir is really not on.

    When I read your first comment, I googled “why do people choose to become prostitutes” and came up with several iterations of “they mostly don’t CHOOSE it”. Here’s a link to a non-profit organization who know a little more about people who are prostitutes than I do:

    http://www.prostitutionresearch.com/

    There’s not a lot of tee-heeing in selling sex before you’re old enough to actually want sex.

    And keep in mind that Tom Martin was complaining about 10 year old children. Not 15, or whatever your prey base is. Ten.

    Remember when your niece and nephews were 10? Picture them in that situation, and re-think your position.

  24. Argenti Aertheri

    Oh and NWO, you missed that having sex with minors would still be illegal, so it wouldn’t really matter that the minor was an unlicensed sex worker, because minors cannot consent.

    So yeah, I think minors selling sex should be gotten back into the school system, but not as punishment for being an unlicensed sex worker <.>

    lowquacks — I realize he just wants the attention, but he disgusts me less than Tom does (well until he gets back to how mature teenagers are that is, but a hypothetical discussion on what licensing sex work would look like? I see that as a nice distraction)

  25. Argenti Aertheri

    “Remember when your niece and nephews were 10? Picture them in that situation, and re-think your position.”

    Seriously, you’d want them sent to live with a relative who’d actually ensure they had food and clothing and whatnot, and that they went to school, right? And barring that option, into a (hopefully fixed by then) foster care system?

  26. captainbathrobe

    Actually, to be fair, Slavey was on about teenage (and preteen) girls enticing older men with their teen sexiness long before Martin came around. Slavey’s complaint was that he would not legally be permitted to have sex with teenaged girls–who, naturally, would be throwing themselves at him–due to the misandric tyranny of age of consent laws.

    His refrain then later switched to decrying teen and preteen girls who sexually tease men (by, you know, existing) but refuse to have sex with any man who desires them. Oh, and he hates sluts, too, though I’m not sure if this includes or excludes women who are willing to have sex with him.

    Seriously, it must be awfully confusing to be inside his head.

  27. The underage PEOPLE (btw, NWO, I understand that in general we can talk about this as a gendered issue, but you’ve really gone overboard in erasing the boys from this picture altogether.) “entice” clients by simply walking down the street. The cars approach them and ask if they are working. So stop living in a fantasy world.

    Also, it’s been explained the situation the kids are in, so you’re not asking with any honesty. I’ll post a link though. My favorite part of this is how she gets a cheeseburger at the end of the day.

    http://www.npr.org/2010/12/06/131757019/youth-radio-trafficked-teen-girls-describe-life-in-the-game (part 1, listen to part 2 also.)

    (Use of the word trafficked here one: all underage people in this situation are called trafficked, and two they are not on their own home street corner, and rely on others.)

    It’s already been explained to you that generally speaking the kid does not get the money from the transaction, and the second general statement I’ll make is that survival work means they are coerced by survival, and might “keep” the money and buy food or drugs. When you’re addicted to drugs, your body is in fight or flight, except it won’t let you flee. One feels as though they are taking drugs to keep alive. So how about the folks that know good and well that the person is homeless and addicted? AND they were just standing there on a certain street? How are the buyers of sex being pressured here? They are not. They are being pressured in the opposite direction, one via the law (the type of prostitution that could “accidentally” involve a child is illegal almost everywhere, -the street kind) , and two a BULK of these men are married and have steady girlfriends that don’t know what they are up to.

  28. How are the buyers of sex being pressured here? They are not. They are being pressured in the opposite direction, one via the law (the type of prostitution that could “accidentally” involve a child is illegal almost everywhere, -the street kind) , and two a BULK of these men are married and have steady girlfriends that don’t know what they are up to.

    There was a debate about these issues in Britain about twenty years ago when the then Director of Public Prosecutions was caught soliciting sex from a street prostitute.

    He naturally offered his resignation immediately (and quite rightly), but loads of people sprang to his defence and said that this shouldn’t have been a crime in the first place – ignoring the glaringly obvious point that what he was doing was illegal and he was supposed to be one of the country’s human embodiments of the law! In other words, it wouldn’t have mattered if he’d been caught soliciting prostitutes or shoplifting a packet of cigarettes.

  29. “, it wouldn’t have mattered if he’d been caught soliciting prostitutes or shoplifting a packet of cigarettes.”

    Agreed, reminds me of Elliott Ness. He was asked, what are you going to do when prohibition is repealed? And he said, “I’ll have a drink.” The next hurdle for a politician is that the public doesn’t like adulterers. They don’t in the US, that might be different elsewhere.

  30. The next hurdle for a politician is that the public doesn’t like adulterers. They don’t in the US, that might be different elsewhere.

    François Mitterrand famously said something to the effect that not only did he not mind if any of his ministers were adulterers, he’d be more suspicious if they didn’t keep a mistress.

    Which is an attitude that remains widespread in France, which was why there was such a bizarre culture clash over l’affaire DSK last year – and he might well be President now if that hadn’t happened.

  31. Speaking sort-of of Eivind Berge, anything new with -him-?

    It’s just been confirmed that the police have extended his detention by another four weeks.

    That article has one detail I hadn’t heard before: apparently he was arrested at his mother’s house. I wonder what she made of his blog?

    (Of course, she might not understand English, but that’s pretty unusual for a Norwegian.)

  32. NWO,

    Your comparisons aren’t valid. If an adult was employing someone underage illegally, or contracting them to undertake illegal work, they, not the child, would be prosecuted, and rightly so.

    Here’s the thing, exploiting people is bad: exploiting children is even worse.

    Why do MRAs have such difficulty in recognizing this?

  33. @Happy
    “Why do MRAs have such difficulty in recognizing this?”

    It’s not a matter of recognition, it’s a matter of accountability. A 15 year old is accountable for their actions when they do something wrong for everything outside of sex.

    If they drink and ask an adult to buy it for them. The adult was wrong, but so was the 15 year old. The 15 year old is still punished, the adult is punished more harshly.

    Prostitution is illegal. If a 15, 16, 17 year old girl, with no pimp simply goes out at night on her own and offers sex for money. Anytime she’s asked, “How old are you?” She replies, “18.” One night a cop catches her and a man and the man is arrested and serves 6 months. She gets no punishment. She simply goes out again, another man is arrested and he get’s 6 months. She isn’t punished. She goes out again, another man is arrested, this judge is sick of all the bad men and gives the man 7 years. The girl goes out again and again and again.

    When there is no punishment, what’s to stop anyone from doing anything? If you told me it’s wrong to rob a bank but if I get caught I won’t be punished, I’m gonna rob the bank. When the worst I’ll recieve is, “Awww, git on outta here ya little scamp. It’s not your fault.” There ain’t no way in the world I wouldn’t be robbing banks whenever my previous stash of cash ran out.

    Basically what you’re saying is, children, (those under 18), are accountable for all their actions or they’ll be punished. Except they won’t be punished for any sexual misconduct like prostitution.

  34. NWO, what planet do you live on? Teen prostitutes go to juvenile jail. Also, what would you have the penalty be for boy teen prostitutes? You are assuming they do not exist, but they do.

  35. (side note: was previously posting as Molly McGee, will be sticking with this name).

    NWO,
    First of all, there is a large discrepancy in the punishment handed out by the Courts in terms of female prostitutes and male “Johns”. The women are given much more severe penalties (see this study in Denver -though it deals with adult prostitutes and not minors- http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2012/05/prostitution_denver_study_women_johns.php)

    With regard to underaged (ie., under 18) prostitutes I think you have a drastically uninformed view about how most underaged girls (AND boys) end up becoming prostitutes. They are coerced and abused. It is in nooooooo way comparable to a 15 year old kid choosing to go for a joy ride).

    Here’s an article (part one of a series) that discusses the realities of child trafficking/prostitution.

    http://oaklandlocal.com/article/youth-trafficking-part-1

  36. CassandraSays

    “When there is no punishment, what’s to stop anyone from doing anything? If you told me it’s wrong to rob a bank but if I get caught I won’t be punished, I’m gonna rob the bank. When the worst I’ll recieve is, “Awww, git on outta here ya little scamp. It’s not your fault.” There ain’t no way in the world I wouldn’t be robbing banks whenever my previous stash of cash ran out.”

    You realize that this is because you are a deplorably amoral person, right?

  37. If you told me it’s wrong to rob a bank but if I get caught I won’t be punished, I’m gonna rob the bank.

    NWO’s moral compass, in a nutshell.

  38. She gets no punishment.

    What fucking fantasy land does NWO live in that a 15 year old girl picked up by the cops for prostitution gets no punishment?

  39. The fantasy land wherein the fact that he’s not allowed to punish women and girls for everything, means they never get punishing for anything.

  40. *get punished

  41. CassandraSays

    He seems to have forgotten the whole women punching each other on the nose thing this time, I wonder why?

  42. What fantasy land is NWO in where a john would actually get six months?

  43. Argenti Aertheri

    The Owlyverse clearly doesn’t have NPR, NWO, go read the link indifferentsky gave you, it isn’t that long — you’ll find the cops were arresting the teenaged girls, because it was much easier than catching johns.

  44. If you told me it’s wrong to rob a bank but if I get caught I won’t be punished, I’m gonna rob the bank. When the worst I’ll recieve is, “Awww, git on outta here ya little scamp. It’s not your fault.” There ain’t no way in the world I wouldn’t be robbing banks whenever my previous stash of cash ran out.

    Really now? Well I for one am shocked, shocked I tell you that NWO’s much maligned Christian faith wouldn’t prevent him from doing something he knows is wrong.

    They exhibited themselves as righteous on account of being scrupulous keepers of the law, but were in fact not righteous: their mask of righteousness hid a secret inner world of ungodly thoughts and feelings. They were full of wickedness. They were like whitewashed tombs, beautiful on the outside, but full of dead men’s bones. (Matt 23:27-28)

    They professed a high regard for the dead prophets of old, and claimed that they would never have persecuted and murdered prophets, when in fact they were cut from the same cloth as the persecutors and murderers: they too had murderous blood in their veins. (Matt 23:29-36)

  45. If you told me it’s wrong to rob a bank but if I get caught I won’t be punished, I’m gonna rob the bank. When the worst I’ll recieve is, “Awww, git on outta here ya little scamp. It’s not your fault.” There ain’t no way in the world I wouldn’t be robbing banks whenever my previous stash of cash ran out.

    I’m really starting to see Owly’s problem with Big Daddy Government

  46. Argenti: Anyone not NWO know if — “A 15 year old girl can’t drink she’ll be punished if she does. If someone over 21 buys her alcohol they’ll be punished more harshly but she’ll still be punished.” — is even true? I know “buying cigarettes for minors will cost you” but afaik the minor is going to get lectured, not arrested…

    I can speak to Calif. To “pass” alcohol to a minor is a more serious offense than to be the minor with alcohol. This is because (so the theory goes) the adult is aware that what is being done is wrong, in a way the minor isn’t.

    It’s also because the adult is supposed to know the effects of alcohol more than the minor, and so is engaging in a criminal negligence.

    This is a bit flawed, as a theory, when the “minor” in question is, in all other respects, a legal adult.

    Of course NWO says It’s not a matter of recognition, it’s a matter of accountability. A 15 year old is accountable for their actions when they do something wrong for everything outside of sex.

    Which isn’t really true. If a minor takes a job, doing sales, they aren’t punished at all for it. Just made to stop working; even though such work is illegal.

  47. Argenti Aertheri

    Pecunium — I was more questioning it about, you know, actual minors, but thanks for the answer all the same. That last sentence, about jobs in general, is probably more relevant than drinking/alcohol laws anyways.

  48. Argenti Aertheri

    Can we make argumentum ad youtube(m) a thing? (youtubem would be a 3rd declension noun)

    If you’re going to drop random videos, make them cats, or music, or something. Like this —

    Anyone want some of that violin?

    gingersnaps/whataboutthemoonz — that isn’t just fulfilling your request for Enchant, that’s one of my favorite EA songs

  49. How is pedophilia wrong? It’s NATURAL for men to want women when women are at their most fertile ages (ages 12 to 24). God designed women to be most attractive during the same time that they are at peak fertility. Coincidence? Or Intelligent Design?

    I am against child prostitution, but I am very supportive of the concept that women should marry very young. In India, it used to be natural for women to get married as young as 12. And guess what? Such women were far happier than the modern liberated feminazis of today.

    Men should be allowed to MARRY a girl as long as 12.

    This is acceptable according to all the world’s great religions.

    John Rambo
    Boycott American Women.

  50. john, we’re delighted to have your post. i have a few questions to ask
    1) religious justification for pedophilia ticks a point off your argument unless you’re taking this up with the pope
    2) could you ask all the 12-14 year old mothers who have had to have C sections because their pelvises were too narrow to even birth a child how naturally fertile they were at that age, please? we would be delighted to hear of your findings.
    3) “Such women were far happier than the modern liberated feminazis of today.” how many ancient indian preteens in arranged marriages have you asked about this? can you show me the poll results and compare their level of satisfaction to that of today’s modern liberated feminazis? thanks john, keep rockin
    4) your intelligent design statement could be taken by any chump walking down the street and changed to fit their own personal fetish – i could argue that women with a larger proportion of body fat are naturally more attractive because fat creates larger hips and breasts, symbolizing fertility, and is an indicator that the woman doesn’t have any shortage of things for the man to eat. but i’m sure one of the reasons why you boycott american women is because they’re so big and fat and hairy. even though women are also naturally hairy. correct?
    5) why is it that prepubescent or early adolescent girls can often suffer internal damage from sexual intercourse? is that just another indicator of their superior fertility?

    Cheburashka
    Boycott International Fedoras

  51. It’s NATURAL for men to want women when women are at their most fertile ages (ages 12 to 24).

    At 49, I am more fertile than the average 12-year-old because I have periods, and the average 12-year-old does not.

    Also, you have forgotten about one of the people in this “ideal” relationship – her. What about what’s best for her? It’s not marrying an older man.

    If you want to know how actual young girls feel about marrying older men, read any memoir written by a women in the FLDS. I can recommend Escape and Church of Lies. Read both of those and get back to us.

  52. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    why do MRAs and pedophiles keep necroing old threads

    why why why

  53. John, thanks for shitting on a dead rug with your oppressive, retrograde, pedophillic assdata. No need to bother us just because American women quite rightly won’t give you the time of day.

  54. Also, John Rambo, if you think that natural sexual desire consists of a grown man wanting a young girl, you don’t know what desire is. What you’re desiring is power over another person, not sex. There are a hundred different ways to desire, and the vast majority of them are not harmful to the person being wanted. I feel sorry for you that you don’t seem to experience any of them.

  55. Re: John Rambo

    And how do you explain the cougar phenomenon? (Like it’s a goddamn phenomenon. *eyeroll*)

  56. Argenti Aertheri

    “Men should be allowed to MARRY a girl as long as 12.”

    You know, that’s the crux of where all this shit fails, that right there. Men…girls. If teenage girls were at prime reproductive years, so would be boys. Not grown men, but boys of the same age.

    Frankly though, evolution’s thing about teenagers being “prime” probably has a hell of a lot more to do with the average life span for a few thousand years of human evolution, not really an issue any more.

    As for child brides being happier, that must be why so many kill themselves, run away, or plead for amnesty as emigrants / refugees. Go google Indian bride burning and get back to us on whether that’s better than “feminazi” divorce.

  57. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    No need to bother us just because American women quite rightly won’t give you the time of day.

    Not to mention Australian, Japanese, English, Indian, Egyptian, New Zealand, Mexican, Irish, Malaysian, Icelandic, Argentine, Zimbabwean, Moroccan, South African, Scots, Peruvian … how many countries are there in the world again? 197 isn’t it?

  58. Kitteh’s: LOL, but he is specifically boycotting US women. That’s OK though, I belong to Boycott Assholes, so it’s all good.

  59. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    Hellkell – yeah, I know he is, I just wanted to remind him that he might as well give up because the rest of the world’s women won’t want to know him either. :D

  60. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    Mr Rambo “boycotting American women” reminds me of the Romney son saying “Yeah, well, Dad didn’t want that crummy Presidency anyway!”

  61. This depresses me since I currently have cramps. I am 39 and would like those to stop soon, please.

    The whole “boycott American women” thing is so transparently a cover for “go to a country that’s so poor that you can prey on its young girls without punishment”.

  62. Curse you, blockquotes. The bit I meant to quote was “At 49, I am more fertile than the average 12-year-old because I have periods”.

  63. There was nothing natural about being sold into marriage at the age of six or eight or twelve.
    Fred at Slacktivist has been doing a daily post on Biblical marriage that will turn your hair ever since that chick fil a dood claimed that that is what he believes in.

  64. I’m sorry about your cramps, Cassandra.

  65. Also, if we’re going with onset of menstruation as the recommended marriage age, I got my period at 9. John, if you say that men should be allowed to marry 9 year olds then I will seriously consider setting up a registry of internet pedophiles named after you. We can call it John’s List.

  66. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    I’m sorry about those cramps, Cassandra. I hope they do clear up soon. Mine got worse once I hit perimenopause a few months back. There’s a good specific antiinflammatory for them here, Ponstan, though it’s prescription-only, which is a pain in the wallet.

    Yeah, isn’t it extra skeevy that John the Pervo turns up talking about marriage on a thread that’s about Tom Martin talking about ten year old prostitutes? Fertility my eye.

  67. The Kittehs' Unpaid Help

    Gah. That turned into a My Stuff comment when it was meant to be “this is the name of a pill that might be worth knowing about”! :(

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,522 other followers

%d bloggers like this: