About these ads

Tom Martin, leading UK Men’s Rights Activist: “Pedophiles who pay children for sex are not really rapists, because the child … understand[s] the nature of the contract.”

Tom Martin, child rape apologist

[TRIGGER WARNING: Discussion of child rape]

Tom Martin is one of the most prominent Men’s Rights Activists in the UK. He’s best known for a failed lawsuit he launched against the London School of Economics, charging the school’s gender studies program with, you guessed it, misandry. The case was thrown out of court this March, and Martin celebrated his defeat by calling a lot of people whores on Twitter and, I am proud to say, in the comments here at Man Boobz.

While Martin, known perhaps ironically as @sexismbusters on Twitter, is clearly more famous in the UK than he is here in the states, this peculiar crusader against what he sees as sexism has been celebrated (and his defeat in court mourned) by numerous Men’s Rights sites on this side of the pond. He’s been discussed many times on the Men’s Rights subreddit, where one supporter declared:

And he’s gotten write-ups on an assortment of other MR sites from The Spearhead to MensActivism.org to one Man Boobz favorite, the now-defunct What Men Are Saying About Women. On the website of the National Coalition for Men, one enthusiastic commenter gushed:

Finaly a real man with balls !!! Not like the rest of us . Tom is my hero .

But the Men’s Rights site that has given Martin the most support has been A Voice for Men, which featured Martin on one of its “radio” shows, reposted an article on Martin’s crusade from his website that seems to have been written by Martin himself (in the third person), offered updates on his lawsuit, and even publicized a recent public debate of his in England. The site has also encouraged people to donate to Martin’s legal fund.

One wonders what these supporters will make of some of the strange and awful things Martin has been saying in the comments here on Man Boobz in recent days. (There is no question that it is really him; he confirmed his identity earlier by emailing me from the account associated with his website Sexismbusters.org, and anyone skeptical of any of this is invited to contact him directly through his website.)

Most of the comments he posted here during his first commenting binge were rather risibly misogynist, frequently punctuated with his favorite epithet “whore,” a designation he feels is an appropriate one for 97% of all women and (he had recently added) for 98% of Man Boobzers of either gender. You can see here or here for numerous examples of Martin’s wit and wisdom – including his argument that hard chairs are discriminatory towards men and his now famous declaration that “female penguins are whores.”

His more recent comments, though, haven’t been funny in the slightest. Martin’s new obsession? Child prostitutes – and why they aren’t victims so much as victimizers, willing participants in an activity that makes them big money. Let me put another TRIGGER WARNING here. This is some of the most repellant material I have ever featured on man Boobz.

Here’s Martin’s opening statement on the subject:

The latest establishment scam in the UK, is to describe child prostitutes as “vulnerable children groomed for sexual exploitation”, then talk about them being “passed around” etc, without mention of the fact that these young people agreed to be whores, and are getting paid for it.

In a followup, he elaborated on this logic:

“Yeah, she offered me a job as a prostitute abroad, which would involve me receiving lots of money for taking cock, so I accepted, became a prostitute, and therefor, according to the official fem definition, this makes me a sex slave”.

Grow up!

Even a 10 year old knows, if someone is paying you for sex, that makes you a whore.

And when he talks about ten year olds here, he means this literally; in his mind, trafficked ten year old children aren’t really victims, but economic actors making an economic choice:

I stand by my statement, that child prostitutes know what they are doing, and therefore deserve to be called prostitutes, not victims.

A progressive European country (either Holland or one of the Scandinavian countries, I remember hearing), introduced in the late 90s, the legal principle of no arbitrary minimum age for consent, rather, the legal requirement to ascertain whether lawful sex had taken place was to establish whether the child or young person ‘understands the meaning of consent’ …

Now, if a ten year old is for instance [specific sexual act redacted] for money up front, then there is very much less question whether that whore understands the meaning of consent or not.

In another comment, Martin suggests that ten-year-olds who have been the victims of what some people insist on calling “real rape” would be offended by anyone thinking that ten-year-old prostitutes suffer from rape – when, after all, the child prostitutes have “agreed” to it.

From the perspective of a child who has actually been raped by an adult, how must it seem, to hear the victim-feminist establishment conflate child rape with child prostitution? The raped child remembers having no choice about participating in the sexual activity, of being forced, and then is asked to consider his or her fate or level of agency as similar or the same as that of a child who marketed them self for sex to an adult, took payment, then performed the act.

I don’t think the average 10 year old genuine rape victim would buy the manboobz style analysis that all child prostitution is rape … .

Questions of genuine agency are complicated, but not complicated enough to pass a 10 year old genuine rape victim’s bullshitometer I posit.

Oh, Martin doesn’t actually think ten year olds should be prostitutes. He thinks they should wait a few years, until they’re at least 14.

Should child prostitution from the ages of 13 up be legal?

Nope. I think that prostitution is a potentially dangerous profession for which a basic qualification in health and safety be required, like an NVQ – and that kind of course would not be attainable until after the minimum of secondary school years are completed, so aged 14, 15, 16, 17 or even 18 or more depending on the country.

The real problem, in his mind, is that young girls try to enter into the business when they should be in school:

States with child prostitution problems should be forced to get these children back into schools to complete their education, and child prostitutes who persist should be treated as school truants, a misdemeanor, and given the carrot and stick approach to get them back on the straight and narrow or go to young offenders institutions. If they want to be prostitutes when they’re old enough, then they can go to the careers advise officer, where the pros and cons of the profession can be laid out, and an application for the training course and license can be given.

Martin mocks the very notion that child prostitutes are being exploited:

Imagine you caught your underage 15 year old daughter on the game, what would you say to her?

“Okay darling, obviously you played no part whatsoever in choosing to be a prostitute yourself, so mummy’s going to help catch the nasty pimp who put you up to this, because what you need to learn is when 15 year old girls accidentally suck cocks for money, they should be compensated, with a bit of victims of crime compensation, and, not forgetting, the original £12 cock-sucking bonanza from the punter. That’s right sweety. Double bubble time. Pass me the phone. Now how does this thing work?”

Or… would you ground the whore for 6 months until she passes all her GCSEs?

Well, given that approximately 98% of manboobzers are whores themselves, I’m guessing you’re probably going to want to blame it all on MRAs.

So prostitution should be legal. But since prostitutes are very bad, they should pay high taxes for the privilege of plying their trade, to keep them poor and in order to repay society for the damage they do:

Prostitutes need to be taxed and licensed so heavily, rendering the profession a relatively poor way of making money.

Anyone who practices as a prostitute without the necessary qualification and license, can go to young offenders institute/jail – just like any other persistent illegal unlicensed trader would.

Anyone working on the sly as an escort, should be hunted down by the taxwoman, and if caught, given a huge bill for tax evasion, as well as a fine, and prison for not having a license. Unlicensed tax-evading prostitutes should be hunted down (which would be easy enough).

Anyone choosing prostitution should pay the highest taxes, and know why those taxes are so high – because of the damage prostitution does to the prostitutes and their customers and their environment and the society.

In a followup comment, Martin sees a silver lining in the form of all the tax revenues that prostitution will bring in:

If licensed hookers pay for a massive license fee and heavy taxes, then some of that money can be ring-fenced to research how best to get women (and girls) to renounce prostitution in all its forms, because let’s face it, a lot of housewhores and princess wannabes could do with a little economic activity-inducing work ethic therapy themselves.

Meanwhile, the customers of underage prostitutes – in other words, the child rapists – should be treated gingerly:

[M]en who pay money to have sex with child prostitutes should not be criminalized – but taken out of circulation and treated compassionately for their condition. I’ve heard that most criminal activity peaks with testosterone levels, in the late teens, but paedophillia is the only crime that increases in frequency as these men get older, indicating a growing pathology for them rather than just a typical immature criminal act.

He offers this final summing up of his twisted argument:

[P]edophiles who pay children for sex are not really rapists, because the child consents, then performs the act, indicating they understand the nature of the contract. The elder is still a pedophiles, but the child prostitute is still a prostitute.

If the child is enslaved – it’s rape, or too young or stupid to know what he or she’s doing – rape. But poor, and in need of food? Not rape. A choice. Unwilling to do other hard labour paying 9 times less than the prostitution route? Not rape. A choice.

He then extends his argument to the rest of the alleged 97% of women who, in his mind, are whores:

Whatever your age, follow the golden rule, of never taking money for sex, then prostitution will be eradicated. Only the prostitute can stop charging for sex.

And of course, that means rejecting courtship gifts, engagement gifts, marriage gifts, divorce gifts, and government largess also.

I don’t think many of you are ready to renounce prostitution in all its forms. …

I know a whore when I see one.

He even returns momentarily to his earlier assertion that female penguins are whores:

Someone or other here said I was anthropomorphising human behaviour onto penguin behaviour by calling penguins whores or something.

But the point is, being a whore, is an animalistic trait, that human females should not need to resort to, given they’re at the top of the fucking food chain already. Google “nuptial gifts” and you can read studies about various animals granting sex to those males who provide the most food, or even the most glittery non-edible trinkets etc, or in the case of penguins, rocks to build nests and shelter with.

I’m saying women are better than penguins, or at least would be if they renounced prostitution in all its forms.

I’m sure the women of the world will be happy to hear that Mr. Martin thinks they are potentially better than penguins.

I doubt many of Mr. Martin’s American supporters are familiar with his elaborate apologia for child rape. I would like to invite Man Boobz readers to show this post, or at least some of the more repellant quotations from it, to the proprietors of the various MRA blogs and MRA forums I have mentioned above.

I wonder if any of his supporters will be willing to renounce him publicly once they know what he has said here – and apparently in some recent public debates as well. Surely no legitimate “human rights movement” would want to be associated with anyone who spouts filth like this.

About these ads

Posted on July 13, 2012, in $MONEY$, a voice for men, antifeminism, creepy, evil women, men who should not ever be with women ever, misandry, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles, rape, rapey, reddit, the spearhead, Tom Martin, whores. Bookmark the permalink. 805 Comments.

  1. aworldanonymous,

    I should point out, that for my final year film in my undergraduate film making degree, I conducted an experiment to find out which sex desires more environmentally unfriendly mates – and I was certain it was going to be women, choosing men for their big cars etc – which was true, but on a whole range of other ideal partner lifestyles, women made much more environmentally friendly choices for their ideal man than the choices men made of women – and I dutifully reported it – so, I genuinely don’t know the outcomes of these experiments, but I will set out my hypothesis before we begin, the whores.

  2. ShadetheDruid

    Hahaha.. >.< If it wasn't for Tom wasting £37,000 (or whatever it was), i'd swear he was a parody.

  3. I should point out, that for my final year film in my undergraduate film making degree, I conducted an experiment to find out which sex desires more environmentally unfriendly mates

    Shitthatneverhappened.txt

    Why would you be doing a sociology experiment in a filmmaking class? They want to see your control of visual language and efficient storytelling, not whether you can test some hypothesis.

    so, I genuinely don’t know the outcomes of these experiments, but I will set out my hypothesis before we begin, the whores.

    Okay, so your Y axis is humor and your X axis is WHORE–how do you plan to measure either of these?

    What could a woman do to score above a zero on “humor,” and what in Heaven and Earth could a woman do to score below 100 on WHORE?

    Do you have at least one non-whore woman lined up to interview?

  4. Cassandra said:

    Basically Tom wants to be Ann Coulter when he grows up, but with less hair and more swearing.

    Well Cassandra, there are five new baldness treatments in the pipeline, but no drugs for treating a receding personality, so what are you going to do?

  5. Well Cassandra, there are five new baldness treatments in the pipeline, but no drugs for treating a receding personality, so what are you going to do?

    Aww, he thinks he’s Winston Churchill.

    “Well, madam, I may be drunk, but whaagarrble you’re ugly drunk ugly wow I’m druuuunk.”

  6. CassandraSays

    Tom, love, I hate to break it to you, but there’s no known cure for being a sexist asshole whose every word makes women’s vaginas dry up to the point where they could be reclassified as desert landscapes. Wait, is this why you’re so in favor of child prostitution?

  7. Unimaginative

    Manboobz: We’re not WHORES (you cunts).

  8. CassandraSays

    I feel like (you whores) should be automatically attached to the end of Tom’s comments, like a signature in email.

  9. Cassandra: [blah, blah, blah] – is that why you’re in favour of child prostitution?

    Yeah, I already said I think child prostitution should be illegal, but well done for joining in.

    As for your vagina Cassandra, what you say makes it moist or not, is of little consequence to science – meta analysis of vaginal plethysmograph research shows extremely poor concordance between what women say arouses them, and what their vaginas say – 22% concordance (if my memory serves me correctly), compared to 72% concordance with what men say arouses them and what penile plethysmography reveals (but that’s another documentary).

  10. The fuck is a receding personality?

    Okay, so Tommy got so flustered at the receding hairline dig that he could only respond with “No, you’re an (X)!”

    But lets indulge this idiotic phrase for a bit. When I picture the concept of a receding personality I imagine something like low tide.
    The ocean’s surf pulling back to reveal a myriad assortment of disgusting and pathetic personal characteristics analogous to the trapped bottom feeders in tide-pools and the putrid stench of rotting seaweed.
    Much like the pestilent mind of a certain failed litigant who is super down with paedophilia and sex slavery.

  11. CassandraSays

    Well that was both icky and unnecessarily detailed. Also I love the fact that Tom found a vague reference to his baldness more offensive than being compared to Ann Coulter. I think we’ve found out how to most effectively needle him, though.

  12. As for your vagina Cassandra, what you say makes it moist or not, is of little consequence to science – meta analysis of vaginal plethysmograph research shows extremely poor concordance between what women say arouses them, and what their vaginas say – 22% concordance (if my memory serves me correctly), compared to 72% concordance with what men say arouses them and what penile plethysmography reveals (but that’s another documentary).

    So we can conclude… that vaginal plethysmographs don’t work very well?

    If it’s a steaming July day outside, and the thermometer reads 5º, do you conclude that the thermometer is right and your own eyes and ears are wrong?

  13. CassandraSays

    I await the next rant about how if a woman favors men with a full head of hair it means she’s a whore.

  14. Argenti Aertheri

    aworldanonymous — ““whoriarchy” Is it wrong that I thought of Gallifrey before anything else when I saw that word?” — Oh good! I thought that was just me!

  15. CassandraSays

    2 am in London. I do hope Tom wasn’t planning to begin filming in the morning. He might still be drunk by then.

  16. CassandraSays

    Actually, nearly 3! Clearly he is devoted to making this documentary as excellent as it can possibly be.

  17. I really want to see this YouTube now. Cringe-worthy as it may be.

    I am so looking forward to the shaky cameraphone shots of women brisky walking past as Tom slurs “hey lady… stop and… WHORE! hey lady… talk to me about… SEXIST WHORE!”

  18. CassandraSays

    “Miss! You there! Do you or do you not agree that you are a whore?”

    “What?”

    “A whore. 97% of women are one, but I have faith that women as a group can move beyond this. Are you prepared to declare that from now on you renounce prostitution, right here on camera in front of all of YouTube?”

    “Excuse me?”

    “Look, will you renounce prostitution or won’t you.”

    “Actually I’m an accountant. Look, I was on my way to a friend’s house, so…”

    “Typical woman, refusing to admit what a whore she is. Will you renounce prostitution or not? What’s it going to be?”

    “Huh? Fuck off, you drunken sot, I’m leaving.”

    (Turns to camera)

    “Observe, I have now conclusively proven that women refuse to renounce prostitution in all its forms. Also, she was rude to me, so women are clearly more sexist than men. Please send your donations to Tom Martin Is Amazing.”

  19. Umm, Tommy, what exactly are you planning in these videos, aside from, you know loaded questions and whatnot.

  20. Argenti Aertheri

    “Please send your donations to Tom Martin Is Not A Whore Amazing.”

    Also, you missed the scene where he calls a Muslim woman a whore in front of her husband or a relative and gets punched for it — that’s the scene I’ll be watching for (note, I don’t think Muslims are more likely to get violent in general, just that’s he’s particularly likely to say fighting words to one, considering his thing about Saudi women driving)

    Really though, any “did you just call my [relationship] a WHORE?!” will work.

    “The ocean’s surf pulling back to reveal a myriad assortment of disgusting and pathetic personal characteristics analogous to the trapped bottom feeders in tide-pools and the putrid stench of rotting seaweed.
    Much like the pestilent mind of a certain failed litigant who is super down with paedophilia and sex slavery.”

    I missed that the last time through — tidal pools have infinitely more interesting things than Tom does. And they don’t tend to smell, being below tide line half the time. (I actually miss Long Island Sound because of the tidal pools, fiddler crabs are more interesting than Tom)

  21. @Cassandra- He honestly expects to make a living off of being a caustic asshole? What is he, a deranged Andy Kaufman clone?

  22. Cassandra said:

    Also I love the fact that Tom found a vague reference to his baldness more offensive than being compared to Ann Coulter. I think we’ve found out how to most effectively needle him, though.

    Cassandra, thanks to your receding personality (for which there is already a cure – renunciation therapy), I have decided for my filmed experiment tomorrow to also measure the degree to which each sex is prepared to make physical insults about the other sex.

    Even if you specifically were fat for instance, and it was all your own fault because you refuse to get a job, I would never mention it in a debate with you. I debated an obese woman once. She ordered a pizza whilst we were still on stage, but I did not refer to it at the time, because of the most basic standards of decorum.

    How many manboobzers are prepared now to concur that Cassandra was being a douche by picking on an involuntary physiological characteristic of a debating opponent? And then encouraging others to do the same?

  23. I debated an obese woman once. She ordered a pizza whilst we were still on stage, but I did not refer to it at the time, because of the most basic standards of decorum.

    Never happened.

    How many manboobzers are prepared now to concur that Cassandra was being a douche by picking on an involuntary physiological characteristic of a debating opponent? And then encouraging others to do the same?

    Whores whores whores whores whores… Wait, what was that about decorum?

  24. Okay, so 10 year olds who are forced into prostitution actually have a choice and are therefore WHORES, but a grown man with access to toupees, Rogaine, or that laser treatment thinks CassandraSays is TERRIBLY CRUEL for mentioning his incipient baldness.

    A sense of proportion: you do not have it.

  25. I debated an obese woman once. She ordered a pizza whilst we were still on stage

    If this really happened, she’s got the biggest balls in the universe and I want to be her friend.

  26. Do you think that Tom is going to try and start challenging feminists to boxing matches to “prove” how big of whores they are (something like Uwe Boll who challenged his online commenters to box him to prove that his movies are somehow not shitty)?

    What exactly do you think of the average 9-5 job, where you give of your time and body for money? It’s not like you get to retire and get back that 20 year old body you had when you started. Isn’t that like a form of prostitution under Tom’s definition?

    So, what do you think? People who aren’t unemployed bums are whores?

    Ergo, Tom Martin is not a whore because he’s an unemployed bum?

    So therefore give him your money so he can call you shitty names and act like an ass?

    *snerk*

    This is the most pitiful sour grapes story I’ve ever heard.

  27. Tom, Cassandra would have insult you all day every day for a year and go a lot deeper than your male pattern baldness before ever getting to the level of soulless shitheaded douchebaggery you’ve achieved the past two days.

  28. Any woman who could eat something in Tom’s presence has a stronger stomach than the majority of us.

  29. Tom’s back! Shouldn’t you be resting up for the long day of whoredom ahead of you tomorrow? That 37 grand bill won’t pay itself.

    “Even if you specifically were fat for instance, and it was all your own fault because you refuse to get a job”

    Why would not having a job make someone fat? Just curious.

    “I would never mention it in a debate with you. I debated an obese woman once. She ordered a pizza whilst we were still on stage”

    Pics or it didn’t happen.

    “but I did not refer to it at the time, because of the most basic standards of decorum.”

    Of course! Because there’s nothing that demonstrates decorum better than running around calling people whores.

  30. Stop picking on Cassandra! We all think you’re bald.

  31. And he’s still not offended that I compared him to Ann Coulter? I guess I was right about his life goal. Don’t think Fox News really needs another dude to rant about how awful women are, though, and the swearing might offend some of their viewers.

  32. Does anyone else notice that Tom supposedly didn’t mention that “OMG FATTY ORDERING/EATING FOOD ITZ FUNNY CUZ SHEZ FAT LOLOLOLOL THEREFORE I WIN” because of some chivalrous bullshit “decorum” and not because AD HOM ATTACKS ARE SHITTY DEBATING TACTICS and will likely get you disqualified or at least lose points in a formal debate setting?

    Not only do I think that this didn’t even happen, but I also think that he completely fabricated actually having debated something formally in his entire life.

  33. We don’t even have to think he’s bald, we can just look at the picture.

  34. “for which there is already a cure – renunciation therapy”

    Which I am now selling via my website – have I mention my website yet in this paragraph? – for 200 pounds per online course. No money back guarantee if it doesn’t work – it’s your fault for not trying hard enough not to be a whore.

  35. I don’t give a shit about a man’s head hair status, his penis size, or his height. The status of his character and personality is far more integral to whether or not he’s worthy of respect. And Tom has demonstrated quite clearly for all to see that he is deficient in basic human decency and empathy. Someone like him should be sent off to his own special island where we don’t have to listen to his inane rambling and where he can be free of having to interact with the “whores” he so despises.

  36. Remember how I said how each of the MRA trolls who posts here has a unique personality, I think I’ve figured out Tommy boy’s.

    Tommy is the one who goes around on anonymous chat sites overtly being offensive and then saying “ZOMG GUIZE EPIC TROLOLOLOLOL I PWNED YOUR ASSES HAXXOR SMOKE WEED 4 LYF”.

  37. Also remember how in another thread he told us that women as a group should lose weight since men like us thinner than we like ourselves, or something like that? Truly those are the words of a man who has too much decorum to use a woman’s looks as a put-down.

  38. Bald can be hot, but not when it’s attached to a colossal jackass like Martin.

  39. By the way, there’s been a brain bleach drought so…rotate your owls.

  40. Oh, is it brain bleach o’clock?

  41. Because I have yet to see a person who isn’t amused by seeing corgis bellyflop into water.

  42. I’m back from dinner, and now picturing Tom Martin with Ann Coulter’s hair.

  43. @Cassandra- So if we get thinner, the prize we’ll receive is Tom Martin getting all ERECSHUN in my presence? FUCK THAT SHIT, I’M BREAKING OUT THE ICE CREAM.

  44. Argenti Aertheri

    Tommy is the one who goes around on anonymous chat sites overtly being offensive and then saying “ZOMG GUIZE EPIC TROLOLOLOLOL I PWNED YOUR ASSES HAXXOR SMOKE WEED 4 LYF”.

    While managing to get a bill of 37,000 pounds and counting it as a win. Tom here is serious in other words, not just amusing himself while drunk (though, it’s 4:36 in London, odds of current drunkiness seem high)

    Savannahs = less dangerously stupid hybrid, still not exactly a house pet though. I mean, if you don’t mind a cat that can eat your ceiling fan, that’s one thing, but they can catch the laser pointer on the ceiling, and yeah, have way more energy than a house cat. More like a cat dog than dangerous to humans though (coydog?!)

  45. I debated an obese woman once. She ordered a pizza whilst we were still on stage

    If that woman really exists, she just became my new personal hero. Fucking brilliant.

    (I am also home on a Saturday night here in the US, largely because I only moved here two weeks ago and don’t know where anything is! Yet.)

  46. I’d want a savannah, because I love dogs, and fancy stuff, but I’m allergic to cats.

  47. Is it the dander? If so a Sphinx might work too, and they’re less likely to shred everything in your house.

  48. I just thought of something. Perhaps these videos that Tommy is putting out could be re-edited into a reality, dark comedy sitcom.

  49. Also, remember when Tom said he had tomorrow’s experiment all planned out? Seems odd that he’d change it at the last minute just because a woman on the internet annoyed him, then.

  50. Is it the dander? If so a Sphinx might work too, and they’re less likely to shred everything in your house.

    It probably is, but as far as I can tell what happens is my eyes get really really itchy, and I sneeze occasionally when I’m around cats.

  51. I could actually look into getting a Sphynx, I loved Austin Powers.

  52. Perhaps these videos that Tommy is putting out could be re-edited into a reality, dark comedy sitcom.

    I don’t think it would take much editing, actually.

    it’s 4:36 in London

    I sure hope his documentary shoot doesn’t have an early call time!

  53. Either way, I’ve a long way to go before I consider pets of my own, I’ve got the house dogs, and the sled dog team to tide me over until then.

  54. My dad is allergic, and we have two Devon rexes–they have curly fur and seem to be less likely to cause allergic reactions. However, he has weird allergies–he gets sinus infections, not sore eyes. I’d say if you like cats, look into the Devon rexes, the Cornish rexes (another curly-haired breed), and the Sphinx cats and visit a nearby breeder/rescue to see if they set your allergies off.

    Also, Devons are the best cats ever.

  55. Also remember how in another thread he told us that women as a group should lose weight since men like us thinner than we like ourselves, or something like that?

    I’m Italian-American, and let’s just say I’m “built to factory standards.” I’m not going to endanger my health and feel terrible just so some random dude from England can hate me infinitesimally less than he does already.

  56. Fatness is a choice, ladies, and so is being a whore. Going bald (currently) is not, due to poor efficacy of available treatments, including transplants. That will change, if Aderans, Histogen, Replicel, Allergen and Tsuji-Lab among others have anything to do with it. All you need to do in the meantime is shut the fuck up until they sort it out. The apparent acceptability of attacking the bald though, is a great example of the lack of equality men have. People do not generally attack or humiliate women who are going bald – but when it’s a man…

    Exhibit C, Cassandra.

    [Insert videos of cats when losing argument as usual].

    Here is a video of a cricket player nearly getting his toupee ripped off by a fellow team-mate:

    Can you imagine someone doing that to Dolly Parton or Beyonce whilst they were at work?

  57. You guys realize that our child rape advocate is not actually going to make any documentary at all, right? I mean, I doubt anything will make it to YouTube in the near future.

  58. Fatness is a choice, ladies, and so is being a whore.

    Bro, I’m Italian. My build is bigger than that of another woman my height. Not the flesh, the bones underneath. I can’t not have my bones. You’re dumb.

  59. Child rape: also a choice

  60. Here’s the thing, Tom, she wasn’t making fun of your baldness. She was making a comparison to Ann Coulter and using your physical appearance as a reference point. She included the hair because one of Coulter’s trademarks is her long blonde hair.

    If someone called me a “Short, brunette version of Ann Coulter” it wouldn’t be the (accurate) descriptions of my physical appearance ticked me off because the insult isn’t about being brunette or short but about being a right-wing idiot.

  61. Fatness is a choice

    That’s where you in at least a few cases are wrong, thyroid problems are a very real problem, and in many cases there are severe psychological disorders behind the weight. Do your research before you start writing double standards like that.

  62. People do not generally attack or humiliate [men by calling them whores] – but when it’s a [wo]man…

    Cry me a fuckin’ river.

  63. Well VoIP, obviously not to Tom. We need to be really nice to pedophiles, because they cannot help harming children. The children in question, however, are fair game as long as the pedophile has to pay a pimp to rape them.

  64. All she said was that you had less hair than Ann Coulter. You seem a little sensitive, Tom, for someone who likes to call us all fat whores. Your unattractiveness is due primarily to your personality, dude.

  65. Baldness *can* be a choice. You can always shave your head.

    Also, when even sexist websites like Cracked start posting articles that show that being fat is about as much of a choice as your height or eye color, you know that it’s probably not just a question of putting down the cheeseburger: http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/fat-officially-incurable-according-to-science/ (not that I’d want to give up cheeseburgers just so nasty asshats like Tom here will finally get an erection just from looking at me- since, ya know, that’s all women seem to be good for according to him).

    Once again, it is not your hair follicle count that I find utterly repulsive. It is your lack of basic human decency and tact. Your argument is completely unrelated to the actual PROBLEM.

  66. Argenti Aertheri

    There are perks to just shaving your head Tom, no one will have a clue how bald you are.

  67. Ew, am I the only one that caught that when Tom Martin suggested child rape should be illegal, he meant that raped and trafficked kids should be punished for having been raped and trafficked because he sees them as “whores”.

  68. Wait…..so according to Tom, being a whore is a choice, but 97% of women are unaware that they are whores and must therefore be told by him and therefore realize the errors of their ways and renounce any and all whoredom to his bum self by giving him money?

    And our incentive to subject ourselves to verbal abuse and give our hard-earned wages to this joker is…..?

  69. Also, I find it so strange when men come here and complain about fat women like fat men don’t exist. Not that being fat is a character flaw or even particularly changeable, but it certainly isn’t a sin of just one gender.

  70. I hate to fall into SRS-speak here (as revealing that I read SRS threatens to reveal that Manboobz is all an evil plot by SRS, or vice versa, I forget), but:

    Child rape: LOL
    Hair loss: NO. NOT LOL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 9,493 other followers

%d bloggers like this: