About these ads

Man Boobz Troll (and Trollhunter) of the Year Awards: Send in your nominations!

TROOOOLLLL!!!

Readers! Commenters! I am now (a bit late, I know) collecting nominations for Man Boobz Troll of the Year. Put forward your choice (or choices), and make the case for them, in the comments below. Feel free to make up your own categories for Troll Awards as well; I want to recognize the many and varied contributions of our many and varied trolls.

The winner(s) will receive little tiaras. But they have to go buy them for themselves, with their own money.

I am also collecting nominations for Man Boobz Troll Hunter of the Year – that is, the commenter or commenters here who you think have fought the good fight in the bestest possible ways. Again, you are free to make up your own categories for these awards.

The winner(s) here will receive a FREE viewing of the movie TrollHunter!It’s Norwegian! And really quite awesome, a faux documentary about the life of a Trolljegeren working secretly for the Norwegian government. Scary and hilarious!

Oh, and by “free viewing” I mean you can watch it on Netflix instant, if you’ve got Netflix. Hey, I’m kind of broke here. On the plus side, you can watch it even if you don’t win!

 

About these ads

Posted on December 29, 2011, in self-promotion, TROOOLLLL!!. Bookmark the permalink. 485 Comments.

  1. Sorry, Meller, I still want my silly insane equality.

  2. Meller, my dear, my husband never had to teach me how to be a proper wife, because we love and like each other just fine. The analogy between that and you not answering if you’d use torture if it worked doesn’t hold up.

    Nice try, snookums!

  3. Well that was…. honest

  4. Well that was…. honest

    And all the creepier for it.

  5. David K. Meller

    CassandraSays–January 7, 2012 @ 4:46pm

    “,,,a faux-libertarian opporessor, who douses them in nasty perfume, dresses them in ridiculous outfits, and fondles them in disturbing ways, until they gradually begin to develop consciousness…”

    Their “faux-libertarian oppressor” C-S, is a loving and considerate owner and keeper, they are “doused” (your word) with very nice, fragrant perfumes, dressed in lovely, really feminine, and beautiful clothes, (NOT “ridiculous” at all) that makes the most fashionable couture of today look like rags, and fondle, caress, and love them NOT in “disturbing” ways, but in ways guaranteed to give the bodies of women great pleasure and thrilling enjoyment!

    They are in some ways much smarter than modern women; they know that they couldn’t feed, dress, or otherwise handle themselves without me, they love me, and for that reason, my dominance is assured!

    Unlike you and your sisterhood from hell, my women KNOW how a beloved man enhances their lives, and equality be damned!! Maybe you, and women like you, will be driven out of the house, and your men will find replacements of real women. The Stepford Wives was only a fantasy in 1972, but in 2072 or 2172–one never knows–do one??

  6. fondle, caress, and love them NOT in “disturbing” ways, but in ways guaranteed to give the bodies of women great pleasure and thrilling enjoyment!

    Oh yeah, that’s not disturbing at all.

    They are in some ways much smarter than modern women; they know that they couldn’t feed, dress, or otherwise handle themselves without me, they love me, and for that reason, my dominance is assured!

    But… they’re dolls! This sounds like something out of a horror movie you know that, right?

  7. So, your dolls are smarter because they can’t think. And you wonder why no one takes you seriously?

  8. They are in some ways much smarter than modern women; they know that they couldn’t feed, dress, or otherwise handle themselves without me, they love me, and for that reason, my dominance is assured!

    Though you are regularly as offensive as it gets by insisting that we ought to be like your dolls, your fondness for them is, in itself completely harmless. But I wonder, are you completely delusional, or you just like to pretend you know they’re just inanimate objects with no thoughts, no feelings and no needs?

  9. Who will look after the doll’s when Meller dies? Will they go on forever, unloved, unfed, unfragranced, getting dustier and dustier?

  10. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Also it’s “one never knows, DOES one”. English, learn it

  11. David K. Meller

    Shadow–I was deliberately making a takeoff on a quip from Thomas (Fats) Waller, one of the greatest Jazz pianists in history!

    He wasn’t a Shakespeare scholar, but who cares? I know, and even he probably knew, more English than you ever could! but you can have a little fun once in a while, can’t you?

  12. The Stepford Wives was only a fantasy in 1972, but in 2072 or 2172–one never knows–do one??

    I wondered if you didn’t think that movie was like a Disneyworld BEAUTIFUL WORLD OF TOMORROW reel.

    *added fun in that for those who’ve seen the original movie.

  13. Or read the book.

    Which they should.

    Everything by Ira Levin, really.

  14. If a fondled doll doesn’t have an orgasm and therefore nobody sees it, does Meller even notice?

    Actually his level of disconnection from reality seems to be increasing. I’m starting to wonder if someone from social services should go check on him.

  15. Meller, your dolls don’t love you. You do know that, don’t you?

    Even if they did, do you really think it would be better if women “knew” they couldn’t be fed or clothed without you, assuring your dominance? Not just, chose to be with you, but damn well knew that it was you or starvation? (Or the entertainment house, I imagine).

  16. David K. Meller

    As I mentioned many times before, the only reason that I talk about my dolls or plush-fluffies, is to make it clear to youall how unattractive modern women really are, especially if they are feminists! Normally, I regard this as a largely private hobby, and really don’t like discussing it with people, least of all, modern women, who can’t even appreciate it!

    I naturally think that women, properly cultured and trained, would be considerably better than dolls! However, they all have the delusion, promoted by feminists, that they are capable of human thought, and are about as much fun as a toothache! When youall are, in addition, trained to be archly competitive with men, and programmed to disagree with him at every opportunity, there is no joy in a relationship with the likes of any of you!

    It does, however, serve as a release of pressure to post here and other feminists blogs once in a while, knowing that it irritates you!

    You wouldn’t know this, but feminism has been more of an irritant to me over the past few decades, visible as it is EVERYWHERE, than my little posts ever could be to you manboobzettes!

  17. @Meller

    Well, in that case you have my apologies. As for having fun, believe you me homie, it’s a ball out here!!

  18. ” However, they all have the delusion, promoted by feminists, that they are capable of human thought, and are about as much fun as a toothache!”

    If you honestly believe that women aren’t capable of human thought, why bother talking to us at all? I think you know very well that our brains work just fine, and that’s what irks you. You want so much for us to pretend to be brainless so that you can indulge in your creepy little fantasies, and it vexes you so much that we refuse to do so.

    “You wouldn’t know this, but feminism has been more of an irritant to me over the past few decades, visible as it is EVERYWHERE, than my little posts ever could be to you manboobzettes!”

    Oh no, we know EXACTLY how much feminism vexes you, and we find it highly entertaining.

    What upsets you is that this battle is already long since over, and you lost.

  19. However, they all have the delusion, promoted by feminists, that they are capable of human thought

    How DARE those evil feminists try to delude women into believing that they are actually HUMAN and not just animated dolls.

  20. @CassandraSays

    Was there really a battle over lobotomizing female children at birth? The erasure of this history must have been Feminist conspiracy #609!! Where’s my red pill?!!!

  21. Poor Meller, if only he could go back to, say, the dark ages and prevent society from ever starting to think of women as actual people. Maybe he should build a time machine.

  22. Meller, for god’s sakes, all other things aside in your rambles, your notions of the libertarian critiques of egalitarianism and your notions of rights conceptions in such are as shallow as a kiddy pool for ants.

    Not all feminists are EGALITARIANS!!!! IN THE SENSE EXPRESSED BY THE LIBERTARIAN CRITIQUE OF EGALITARIANISM INSOFAR AS IT IS ABOUT INEQUALITY OF OUTCOME.

    Not about a lack of equality, but about how to define equality, and how to protect it.

    But here’s a start –

    http://mises.org/daily/804

    I will quote some of the stuff relating specifically to feminism, but that’s a beautiful overview of how the critiques by Rothbard, et al of egalitarianism are, in a way that is not often recognized by either our liberal detractors, or racist/sexist/idiotic “supporters” only properly grounded because they are grounded in our own deep belief in Equality, in the Lockean sense.

    [T]he meaning of equality differs within the feminist movement. Throughout most of its history, American mainstream feminism considered equality to mean equal treatment under existing laws and equal representation within existing institutions. The focus was not to change the status quo in a basic sense, but rather to be included within it. The more radical feminists protested that existing laws and institutions were the source of injustice and, thus, could not be reformed…. [T]heir concepts of equality reflected this. To the individualist, equality was a political term referring to the protection of individual rights; that is, protection of the moral jurisdiction every human being has over his or her own body. To socialist-feminists, it was a socio-economic term…. While Marxist class analysis uses the relationship to the mode of production as its point of reference, libertarian class analysis uses the relationship to the political means as its standard. Society is divided into two classes: those who use the political means, which is force, to acquire wealth or power and those who use the economic means, which requires voluntary interaction. The former is the ruling class which lives off the labor and wealth of the latter.[8] ”

    From a libertarian standpoint, socioeconomic egalitarians turn out, embarrassingly enough, to be apologists for the ruling class.

    That libertarian resistance to socioeconomically egalitarian proposals is itself based on an egalitarian ideal is seldom recognized. It is nonetheless true. The only socioeconomic egalitarian I know of who recognises this is Amartya Sen; yet Sen is the exception that proves the rule. For he too misses the point: he glosses libertarian equality as equality of liberty, an interpretation we’ve already seen to be inadequate. Here is how Sen sees the issue:

    Inequality in authority is far more offensive, from a moral point of view, than mere socioeconomic inequality; hence, whenever the demands of socioeconomic equality conflict with the demands of libertarian equality, which they generally do, preference must be given to the latter.

    So I assert. I think this claim can be argued for, not just asserted. But I shall not argue for it at present—both because my time today is limited, and because in a certain sense I do not need to argue for it. For socioeconomic egalitarians themselves show, by their actions if not their words, that they regard inequality in authority as a greater evil than socioeconomic inequality. Most socioeconomic egalitarians of my acquaintance would certainly be more outraged at being robbed or assaulted by a colleague than at learning that the colleague was receiving a higher salary. Hence in practice they clearly recognize which of these inequalities is the greater evil. Indeed, most socioeconomic egalitarians govern their everyday personal interactions by a scrupulous adherence to libertarian principles, and they expect the same treatment in return.

    \….

    You can’t just scream and haw at me about Rothbard’s critique of egalitarianism and hold it over my head while you thrash. I agree with it.

    Which means we are equal. Or should be. So there. :p

  23. @Pam

    How DARE those evil feminists try to delude women into believing that they are actually HUMAN and not just animated dolls.

    What I find funnier is that he actually thinks that someone has to let us know that we are thinking animals. I’m leaning towards the raised by dolls theory now.

  24. That libertarian resistance to socioeconomically egalitarian proposals is itself based on an egalitarian ideal is seldom recognized. It is nonetheless true.

    PS, Sorry, but It really is, dude, so if you made a mistake and wanna leave, it’s cool.

  25. By the way, Meller, sweetums? You’re not irritating me, you’re amusing me. Every comment you post makes me snort with laughter to the point where I have to make sure not to be consuming beverages while reading your comments lest my keyboard get an impromptu shower.

  26. Ooh, here’s another good expression of libertarian equality!!!

    Both these guys are respected libertarian writers AND FEMINISTS who also agree with me that Rothbard’s critique of Egalitarianism is largely correct, and is so because of Equality, btw, so your little high horse lectures about it really could use at least a LITTLE polishing, no?

    Maybe a little scrubbing around the edges?

    http://radgeek.com/gt/2010/03/02/liberty-equality-solidarity-toward-a-dialectical-anarchism/

    My task, then, is to explain what I mean by “equality, rightly understood.” I certainly do not intend to suggest that liberty is conceptually dependent on economic equality (of either opportunity or outcome), or on equality of socio-cultural status.[30] But the equality I have in mind is also much more substantive than the formal “equality before the law” or “equality of rights” suggested by some libertarians and classical liberals, and rightly criticized by Leftists as an awfully thin glove over a very heavy fist. Formal equality within a statist political system, pervaded with pillage and petty tyranny, is hardly worth fighting for; the point is to challenge the system, not to be equally shoved around by it. The conception of equality that I have in mind has a history on the Left older and no less revolutionary than the redistributionist conception of socioeconomic equality. It is the equality that the French revolutionaries had in mind when they demanded egalité, and which the American revolutionaries had in mind when they stated:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men [sic] are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. (Jefferson 1776a ¶ 2)

    Jefferson is making revolutionary use of concepts drawn from the English liberal tradition. Equality, for Jefferson, is the basis for independence, and the grounds from which individual rights derive.[31] Locke elucidates the concept when he characterizes a “state of Perfect freedom”—the state to which everyone is naturally entitled—as

    A State also of Equality, wherein all the Power and Jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another: there being nothing more evident, than that Creatures of the same species and rank promiscuously born to all the same advantages of Nature, and the use of the same faculties, should be equal one amongst another without Subordination or Subjection …. (1690, II. 4. ¶ 2)

    The Lockean conception of equality that underwrites Jefferson’s revolutionary doctrine of individual liberty is, as Roderick Long (2001a) has argued, equality of political authority.

  27. By the way, Meller, sweetums? You’re not irritating me, you’re amusing me. Every comment you post makes me snort with laughter to the point where I have to make sure not to be consuming beverages while reading your comments lest my keyboard get an impromptu shower.

    .;..

    Yeah, srsly. Except then he says I deserved to lose my kid for being abused. But he doesn’t mean ME! But he does.

    But then it’s laughland again. XD

  28. CassandraSays, and I think I’ll try to knock out that scifi story, or similar, but no promises XD

  29. It was particularly funny when he got all HOW MANY FALSE RAPE ACCUSATIONS HAVE YOU FILED? at me and expected me to get all upset and defensive like he does when people ask him if he’s ever, say, hit a romantic partner.

  30. @ Zhinxy – I want to read it! I would help but I’m seriously behind on a couple of deadlines.

  31. So, basically, Meller, since I’ve been a libertarian a while, and as I said, so have most libertarian feminists, do you think that maybe I didn’t need the oversimplified angry old bitter racist sexist man Three Minute version of Egalitarianism As A Revolt Against Nature As A Book That Makes Me Feel Justified? XD

    Thanks! We already read the original and dealt with it! Nice to hear from you, though!

  32. CassandraSays – Yeah, I’ve been trying to get my creative juices flowing, so I’ll try my best!

  33. DKM: You wouldn’t know this, but feminism has been more of an irritant to me over the past few decades, visible as it is EVERYWHERE, than my little posts ever could be to you manboobzettes!

    Oooh, I think we have a pretty good idea of just how far around the bend that feminism has driven you–you exhibit in a myriad of ways, you misogynistic malcontent. I bet feminism has burrowed under your skin and sting you with a million fiery bites every moment of the day.

    You take refuse in imagining the genocide of women (replacing them bots) or the total enslavement of women–and all I can think is, I am going to die much happier than you, you pathetic pustulent pimply prick.

  34. However, it is discovered that women as a class, usually have inferior abilities to pilot a plane then most men, or more precisely, most airline pilots ( to take one of countless examples) who are men.

    You realize you said “as a class” then said “usually” right? xD (presuming you’re correct of course, which you’re not xD )

  35. As a class, Autobots usually have inferior abilities at flying than most Decepticons, therefore discrimination against Autobots who can fly is okay!

  36. And presumption of flight in Decepticons is okay!

    PEACE THROUGH TYRANNY!!!!

  37. So basically… Mellertron’s only a Libertarian b/c of his (erroneous) belief that without government, white straight cis males would take over the world because they are the best at everything xD

  38. Why Mellertron would be rich, successful and famous right NOW if it weren’t for the damn socialist feminist state making it so he can’t use his gun form! XD

  39. I love how even though Zhinxy has bested you every time you’ve debated Libertarian issues, has proven she has more knowledge than you AND revealed that your knowledge of Libertarian writings (mysteriously) stops at the 1980s, you are still pretending like you’re teh expert and Zhinxy needs a good scolding from Father Mellertron Who Knows Best xD

    The cognitive dissonance going on in your brain must be epic XD

  40. Meller: Liberty, in the sense understood by libertarians, is exclusively a negative concept:. Others are FORBIDDEN to interfere with your freedom of action, as long as you observe the prohibition of interfering with their freedom of action.

    So you admit you aren’t a libertarian. You have stated, repeatedly, that you want to restrict women’s liberties.

    QED, you are, by your definition, a self-admitted non-libertarian.

    This, of course, is completely non-related too the nonsense you spout about women being bad at things; made all the funnier by you choosing an example (flying planes, jets at high-G in specific) in which women have been shown to be better than men.

    So we can add ignorant, to your list of deficiencies (along with hypocrite, slavery supporting, torture condoning, etc.)

  41. “Normally, I regard this as a largely private hobby, and really don’t like discussing it with people, least of all, modern women, who can’t even appreciate it!”

    Mellertoad, you’re free to stop discussing it with us at any time. Really.

  42. I naturally think that women, properly cultured and trained, would be considerably better than dolls! However, they all have the delusion, promoted by feminists, that they are capable of human thought

    I think you are getting dolls and humans mixed up

    also you lost the troll contest meller so just give it up

  43. Does it seem to anyone else that Meller’s actually trying convince the women here they should be jealous of his dolls at this point? He just keeps getting more pathetic the harder he tries.

  44. And he’s trying really really hard . . .

  45. Yep, he’s been trying to convince us to be jealous of his various woman substitutes for some time. I believe that both small fluffy animals and Hello Kitty have been mentioned as things we should be jealous of, since our various husbands/boyfriends/etc would surely prefer them to us.

    Meanwhile many of the women here continue to be very happily partnered, and he continues to rant on the internet because it’s his only way to get at the women who make him so very angry. See why I think he’s hilarious?

  46. BUT PECUNIUM! He just hasn’t yet figured out whether or not those liberties can apply to women at ALL!

    Also, his talk about women being so inherently statist and collectivist (to the point where he grudginly allowed my daughter reading libertarian books might be better than watching the view, which of course she does or the crap at school, but probably wouldn’t have any effect on her), might mean that we are so INHERENTLY dangerous to liberty itself, that our containment is REQUIRED for liberty to flourish. All things I want you to expound on, Meller, by the way. Please?

    Nice blast from the past here (Also, I note that I also discussed the libertarian critique of egalitarianism as interpreted by modern left libertarianism earlier in that discussion, but hey, better late than never, eh Meller? ) –

    http://manboobz.com/2011/11/04/johnny-appleseed-a-man-going-his-own-way/comment-page-10/#comment-82073

    “One problem that I am discovering when trying to develop and apply a theory of rights which can safely include women, in a laisssez faire economy and social order, which I (and other libertarians) have given too little thought before, is that women–as a group–seem to lack the rationality, good judgement, and maturity (at least until menopause?) and one is trying to describe–or even advocate–a society for them giving them an equal freedom and personal sovereignty that they are certainly not ready for! Even libertarians acknowledge that children, pets, etc. need some degree of guardianship, and that application of rights appropriate to a fully developed rational entity is NOT appropriate to one whom is not, even though cruelty or neglect may be clearly prohibited.”

    SO SEE! SEE! MELLER IS TOO A LIBERTARIAN! IF WE’RE LIKE DOGGIES OR KIDS! AND WE PROBABLY ARE! SEE! XD

    Also, yeah… We’ve all just not given it enough thought.

    …Yeah.

  47. @Hippodameia

    Mellertoad, you’re free to stop discussing it with us at any time

    Bite your tongue!!! I can’t tell you how much emptier my life would have been if I hadn’t gotten to read this!

    Their “faux-libertarian oppressor” C-S, is a loving and considerate owner and keeper, they are “doused” (your word) with very nice, fragrant perfumes, dressed in lovely, really feminine, and beautiful clothes, (NOT “ridiculous” at all) that makes the most fashionable couture of today look like rags, and fondle, caress, and love them NOT in “disturbing” ways, but in ways guaranteed to give the bodies of women great pleasure and thrilling enjoyment!

    I mean look at it, LOOK AT IT! Then, as if he hasn’t gifted us with enough, he has to top everything off by referring to them as “my women”!

    DELUSION AND HILARITY!!!!!!

  48. Does it seem to anyone else that Meller’s actually trying convince the women here they should be jealous of his dolls at this point? He just keeps getting more pathetic the harder he tries.

    ,,,

    Oh, I think it’s gone beyond SEEMS. Yeah, he’s trying to convince us.

  49. I’m with Shadow, btw. Don’t discourage Meller from talking about his dolls! Where else can you get that kind of entertainment for free?

  50. I’m with Shadow, btw. Don’t discourage Meller from talking about his dolls! Where else can you get that kind of entertainment for free?

    Yes. I especially want to know if any of them sing songs.

  51. And whether this singing corresponds with the “caress, fondle and love them” stage, or if he is not quite as adept as he would like us to believe

  52. I would also like to hear more about how he caresses, fondles, and loves his Hello Kitty plushies, and if the thinks that they have orgasms during said fondling.

    …..I really hope he’s not trying any of this with actual kittens, puppies, etc.

  53. “I don’t know how this will bear up to a would-be “alliance” between feminists and libertarians. Maybe some of these “mothers of invention” will come forward and design, build, and even sell ships, planes, tractor-trailers, spacecraft, and other transporation vehicles that CAN BE safely handled by women better than by men. I doubt it, but I simply don’t know.”

    ….

    I just had to ask, though, what… Specifically will help if a magic girl flown airplane was invented or not invented when it comes to a libertarian feminism? Even in your conception of such.

    WE CAN’T HAVE LIBERTARIAN FEMINISM BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE RIGHTS ETHICS… Okay, it’s simplistic, but it’s… Basically followable. You threw in Girls CAN’T FLY PLANES AS A CLASS, but it could have been a digression or not well made (hilariously not well made) example until you threw it in at the end there, where…. Here, let me simplify –

    What, precisely is up with

    X has a positive rights notion

    Y has a negative rights notion

    X and Y will have problems in forming alliances.

    But X and Y may have less problems if somebody invents a spaceship girls can fly better than boys can…

    ????
    XD

    This isn’t about right or wrong, this is about how hilarious this is as a thing to throw in there, even by the logic (?) of your own argument.

  54. How can someone believe something *without* having thought?
    Or write on a blog for that matter?

    Anyway, Meller, if you can’t understand why no woman would be interested in you while you refuse you admit she’s a human being, you’re a lost cause.
    Even in the worst places and times for women, when they were considered a mix between a sextoy, a slave, a walking uterus and a decoration, everybody admitted they had thought. Feminism didn’t invent that. (how do you invent something if you don’t have thought? How do I write?)

  55. “Okay, it’s simplistic, but it’s… Basically followable. ”

    Well, no, no it wasn’t, but … Barely followable, still.

  56. Meller: You very rarely irritate me. Mostly, you either amuse me or make me sick. Both reactions have the end result of making me incredibly grateful for MrB.

  57. David K. Meller

    Why are modern women and feminists hateful, disgusting, and just plain inhuman?

    See above posts!!

  58. Why is DKM hilariously creepy?

    See above posts!!

  59. You’ll forgive us if we don’t consider someone who spends the majority of his time interacting with dolls as a definitive expert on humanity

  60. Hey Meller, why don’t you try out your garbage at Feministing, Shakesville, or I Blame The Patriarchy? I’m sure they’d love you over there.

    Get real. You need us because we’re the only site that allows you to be the freak you are.

  61. Meller: I’m only hateful to internet asshats and dumbfucks who change lanes without signaling. I quite enjoy civilized conversation, but that’s one thing you seem to be incapable of. So again, with all the heartfelt wishes I can muster: FUCK RIGHT OFF!!!!

  62. “David K. Meller | January 9, 2012 at 12:13 pm
    Why are modern women and feminists hateful, disgusting, and just plain inhuman?

    See above posts!!”

    …………..

    Okay then, so I’ma gonna guess you have no even barely cogent rebuttal to my actual points on negative rights theory and left-libertarian feminist/other leftist alliances, yes?*
    Okay then.

    Now, if all my posts are so hateful, and this itself alarms you to the point of rebutall inability, I suppose this is a very very good time to ask again – Should I have lost custody of my children, for failing to make a happy home and provoking my abuse?

    YES. OR NO.

    *And once again, it’s fine to be out of date. (And I note… The New Deal in Old Rome is a fun read but… That came out in 1947? See what I mean? The historical works are great, and always edifying/fun, but if you’re talking about POLITICS, well, it changes with the times. By definition, yes?)

    You don’t have to be an expert. But you probably should be up to date and ready to back up your assertions if you’re going to be on your high horse explaining to other libertarians “How Libertarianism Works” shouldn’t you? If you weren’t positioning yourself as such a Learned Elder Anti-Statesman, it wouldn’t be so glaring.

    Because it’s pretty dang glaring.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 9,771 other followers

%d bloggers like this: