Homeless girls: A frugal alternative to pricey prostitutes!

Fellas! Want sex, but don’t have the money to shell out on prostitutes? Hate the time and effort it takes to talk a non-professional sex-having women into having sex with you? A recent post by Advocatus Diaboli on the always delightful In Mala Fide offered an elegant solution for horny but frugal men. In a post titled Pooning on a Tight Budget, AD explained the technique that has worked for him:

Getting poor, but good-looking, young girls (18-23) to have sex with [you] in return for some timely financial help.

Turns out that women who are poor and desperate can be exploited for your own sexy purposes!

Of course, it’s not always quite as easy as it might seem.

I should be upfront that getting amateur women to have sex for money can be tricky as most of them believe that they are not whores. Moreover, poor young women often have “boyfriends” and white knight orbiters. So I created a set of filters and rules to screen out the most problematic types.

According to AD, all you have to do is to:

Avoid all girls who have obvious and serious drug and mental health issues or have lived on the street for over 6 weeks at a stretch.

Happily for you, that still leaves lots of girls ripe for the picking! AD suggests you focus your attention on:

Freshly homeless young girls, especially those who hangout in mixed groups.

The safest ones are those who are into pot, drumming, dreadlocks et cetera. You can find them in many larger cities in the spring and summer. While I would never trust them with any significant amount of money, many are reasonably decent human beings.

You might not think you’d have much in common to talk about with these women – what with them being “reasonably decent human beings” and you being a “completely reprehensible pile of shit” – but you’d be surprised.

Strike up a conversation with them, engage them and see where it leads. But you must make it plainly obvious that you are interested in them sexually, but that all favors require reciprocation. Once you get to know them, a decent round of drinks, snacks, money for pot, a small necessary item of clothing, decent dinner with booze will almost guarantee you a good lay (or at least a couple of BJs).

And if you crunch the numbers you’ll see it’s really quite a frugal solution.

Your initial financial hit for hanging out with them is very small, and once they are sleeping with you.. it will often work to about $30-60 (cash equivalent or cash) per session. You may also get freebies..

But girls don’t necessarily have to be literally homeless to be desperate enough to sleep with you for money. Nope! You may also find great cost-savings from targeting:

Girls who are not homeless, but are just hanging on.

How do you find these lovely ladies? Keep an eye out for women working really shitty jobs that don’t pay shit! You’ll find them conveniently located

in smaller retail stores or businesses that pay minimum wage with no tips. Build a rapport and be fairly upfront about your interest, but do not come across as desperate. Go to her workplace and talk to her when you are in that area, but do not stalk her.

Yep, it turns out that even desperate women can be creeped out. So play it cool! Stalking’s for fools!

There’s another possible hurdle: other dudes.

Such women often have “boyfriends,” however, they are often just as poor or poorer than her. You can get pussy as long as you are firm about the need for reciprocation. This category of girls might be more willing to give BJs than having ‘real sex.’ But do you really care?

Just remember to keep to your budget!

Restrict your help to less than $200 at any one time AND only after she has put out a couple of times.

And then there’s AD’s favorite category of desperate women:

Girls who are poor, but not homeless and have no “boyfriends” + have moved to the city within the last eight weeks.

You have hit the jackpot! 

Just don’t get carried away. Remember: you’re in charge, and she should know it!

Remember these girls can become de facto GFs, but do not restrict yourself to one. While you do not have to rub it in their faces, they should know that you are always looking around for a better deal. But treat them a bit better than type 1 and 2, they do give more per dollar spent on them.

Your accountant will be so, so proud of you!

Just remember:

They will play by your rules as long as they are not too dehumanizing, and they are often cheaper than professional whores.

Now that’s a motto to live by!

Amazingly, not all of the readers of In Mala Fide appreciated AD’s little treatise.

Simon invoked the c-word, before tossing in some racism:

Mate you are one deadset sad cunt. It’s no surprise to know you’re Indian.

Cathater broke out the other c-word:

Pretty damn creepy. You sound like you have no soul. Actually, you might be the first member of a new species: the perfectly rational, purely selfish utility-maximizing agent (Homo Economicus) that Austrian economists and Randroids have always droned on and on about.

Yes, I was as surprised as you are to read an actually reasonable critique of the post on In Mala Fide.

Don’t worry, though, the rest of the comments mostly lived up to the foul standards of the blog.

Ryu worried about the old slippery slope. If you start by suggesting that PUAs target homeless women, the next thing you know they’ll advocate sex with children! And then down the slippery slope you’ll slide:

This is the direction that PU takes one in. I’m surprised that there haven’t been any PUAs who say that during a dry spell we should go to gay bars and pick up men. Just to keep your dick wet, you know.

Savrola returned to the theme of race:

There’s a problem WNs have yet to deal with. Well off second-generation foreigners like AD taking advantage of your impoverished women of older native stock, after they’ve taken your jobs.

Can’t keep ‘em here, can’t send ‘em back.

What to do?

Blog proprietor Ferdinand Bardamu waded in to take a shot at all the “white knights” sticking up for the gals.

ROFLMAO at all these white knights. …

If you want to blame someone, blame the morally debased white women who would rather blow a stranger for $200 then work honestly (pull yourself up by your bootstraps, slob! nobody owes you anything!).

We’re living in Soviet Amerika (and Soviet Kanada). All of your daughters are whores or will become whores, soon as the price tag gets high enough.

Meanwhile, Stoner With a Boner, who sometimes graces the comments section here with his always trenchant wisdom, took a stand on behalf of the real victims here: dudes paying their own hard-earned money to icky ladies for sex.

Personally, I find the idea of clocking more hours at a job I hate just to hand $200 to a prostitute who would probably leave me dying in the street rather than help degrading.

Men, the forgotten victims once again.

This post contains:

About these ads

Posted on December 20, 2011, in $MONEY$, crackpottery, creepy, I'm totally being sarcastic, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, PUA, racism, rapey, reactionary bullshit, sex. Bookmark the permalink. 602 Comments.

  1. Lolll, ninjaed by the man himself. DKM, I don’t think you’d be quite so comfortable with a man such as myself learning to evolve into a real woman

  2. also, both your urls are pointing nowhere.

    here is doyle’s site

    http://www.surrenderedwife.com/

    I can’t find an official fascinating womanhood site. After andelin’s death, there may be power struggles in the fold XD

  3. Shadow – @Holly

    You wrong DKM so!! If I remember right, he was perfectly willing to accept that women should be allowed to learn to read in order to peruse the many ways in which they can learn to be better and housewives and even maybe a few ways to scintillate that oh so special man (married to you of course) in the boudoir

    ….

    My favorite bit was when I specifically asked about giving my daughter libertarian books. He hemmed and hawwed a bit and then said it was all right, better than the crap she gets at school, but he didn’t know what effect they would have, as women are kind of inherently anti freedom and stuff XD

  4. Hey Meller, you never did explain to me what the positive side to marital rape was. I know that if I were a real woman, I would intrinsically understand this but clearly I need instruction.

  5. @Zhinxy:

    I didn’t grow up in the West so the first time I heard of Rand was when The Simpsons mentioned her, and the first time I heard of libertarianism was when I started reading a couple of feminist blogs so my understanding of it is beyond limited. From what I’ve gathered though there is a lot of emphasis on individual freedom and individual responsibility over rule of government and laws and such. I think he may be worried that, like her mother, your daughter may decide that she herself is an individual and a person, and that this freedom shit may apply to her as well. DKM often seems to believe that personhood is not determined by self-awareness, but rather by being a white, penis-carrying, woman-dominating American.

    Besides, women these days really don’t seem to understand freedom. What greater freedom is there than subdjucating yourself to someone else?!!!!!!

  6. p.s. thanks for the Gallant and Goofus link, but you gave me a sad. There was something deliciously absurd about the newly converted George Sr attempting to biblicise (not sure if this is a word but it lovingly rolled off my mind’s tongue) charicatures of his sons and then having Ron Howard narrate it

  7. I too had trouble today accessing the original fascinating womanhood website. Since lady Andelin’s unfortunate passing, there may be reasons for its suspension while things iron themselves out there, but I think that it will come back stronger than ever!

    At any rate, the wisdom in the books is timeless, whatever happens to the website! Any woman can only benefit from them, whether she is traditionally religious or not, and whether she is inclined toward feminuttery or not!

    As far as “marital rape” goes, there is no positive or negative side to it! Man and wife are (at least spiritually) one, therefore a man can no more “rape” his nearest and dearest than he can “steal” from his left pocket by putting his wallet in his right pocket.

    Needless to say, I should think that his wife’s enjoyment of, and pleasure in the sexual act would be of paramount importance to the husband, and he would be impelled to be as gentle, considerate, and as loving to her as possible, to get the best sex out of her that he could! She would, I should think, respond to actual rape with the same horror, loathing and disgust that any woman would, and no husband in his right mind would want to inflict this on his better half for an instant! He would WANT her love, her appreciation, and her admiration, certainly NOT agony or terror, and hence actual rape, even if attempted, would be utterly contrary to its own purposes!

  8. What greater freedom is there than subdjucating yourself to someone else?!!!!!!

    Well, it was that commie Orwell who said “Freedom is Slavery”.

    Meller’s a commie! Meller’s a commie! Quick everyone get a pitchfork!

  9. wwops. html fail XD

  10. Ah right, so you’re an idealist who deals with the fact that reality doesn’t fit his ideal by pretending it doesn’t exist.

    There’s a word for that – delusional. Thanks for clarifying which category you fit in.

  11. Ugh lol. Coffee fail XD

  12. Shadow – “from what I’ve gathered though there is a lot of emphasis on individual freedom and individual responsibility over rule of government and laws and such.”

    That’s the long and the short of it, exactly. Also, lucky you for Rand innocence! (While she’s an important figure to libertarians, she’s controversial even within, to put it mildly… I don’t exactly like her. XD )

    (In general, I’m sad and endlessly frustrated to say, while there are some wonderfully happy exceptions, feminist blogs are a terrible place to learn about libertarianism, and libertarian blogs are a terrible place to learn about feminism. )

    Oh, I think you’re spot on on what he doesn’t want. On the nose. He just can’t admit that to himself, or me, and so does the dance of BUT WOMEN DON’T REALLY WANT FREEDOM!

    He insists, however, that his totalitarian view is perfectly orthodox libertarianism. Directly by the book! Which is why I’ve tried to offer him publically debating on libertarian turf. We shall see what happens.

  13. Interesting, Meller.

    Bit of an “OUR HISTORY” lesson, if I may? DeCleyre, Harman, Heywood, and many of the other great libertarian founders distinguished themselves as some of the first voices speaking out against the horrors of Marital Rape, as codified by the state … Harman was even jailed for obscenity for publishing the testimonies of doctors who had seen the horrors thereof. *

    http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=17

    http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2001/0220.html

    - *He was fined for many of those, but was jailed for The “Markland letter” to be specific.

    The one that said this –

    “About a year ago F— gave birth to a babe, and
    was torn by the use of instruments in incompetent hands.
    She has gone through three operations, and all failed. I brought her home and had Dr. —- operate on her, and she was getting along nicely until last night, when her husband forced herself into her bed, and the stitches were torn from her healing flesh, leaving her in a worse condition than ever…

    ..”Was the husband’s conduct illegal? Can there be legal rape? Does the law protect married women? If a man stabs his wife to death with a knifte, does not the law hold him for murder? If he murders her with his penis, what does the law do?”

    Of course, real libertarians would realize you’re the one that’s right, and this is silly, as nobody would want to hurt their wonderful watch and get worse sex out of it, yes?

  14. As much as I’m not fond of the whole surrendered wife thing, I suspect that the woman behind that site would dislike Meller just as much as we do. This is after all why he plays with dolls – he literally cannot find a single woman, not even one, who will put up with his steampunk-meets-Gor shit.

  15. Wait… Meller linked to Betty Bowers? So his entire shtick has been one long, pointless piece of performance art. Is this for a thesis, Meller?

  16. Sniper, he didn’t know. The betty bowers was just happily squatting on the domain. Which is super lulzy.

  17. p.s. thanks for the Gallant and Goofus link, but you gave me a sad. There was something deliciously absurd about the newly converted George Sr attempting to biblicise (not sure if this is a word but it lovingly rolled off my mind’s tongue) charicatures of his sons and then having Ron Howard narrate it

    …..

    Awww, true. But did the slash fic help?

  18. Dang. I had such high hopes.

  19. @Zhinxy

    I’ll try to check those out. I have a lot of mind-improving that I’ve been putting off but there’s just so much fiction I have to get through still!! I think it’s almost a moral failure for me to be reading up on economics when there are DRAGONS (why yes, I have been wasting copious amounts of time on skyrim, how astute of you to notice)!! While I am not a fan of slash, your fic had me chuckling at the principal’s office lolll

  20. Dragons are important. Yes, yes they are.

  21. Meller: Since you, along with the other manboobzettes, INSIST upon running this into the ground, I will speculate that, yes, you, like many feminists, are effectively frigid and asexual, and are incapable of stimulating or pleasing (heterosexual) men. I didn’t want to get nasty about this, but the problems associated with close proximity of, and “co-ed” arrangements of sexually active or mature men and women are so self-evident that it should be unnecessary for me, or any observer, to cite warnings about such sexual proximity or rivalries becoming inevitable in such an environment!

    Based on my, non-trivial, experience you are wrong on both of those assertions. Feminist women are certainly not asexual, as a class, and the one’s who have shared my bed have been anything but frigid. What they haven’t been is submissive.

    Of course, in the same passage you said, tatjna, I didn’t want to get nasty about this! Most feminists are either, as a rule, hypersexed and frantically promiscuous so I have no idea which is the truth.

    I’ve been in many mixed sex environments (even in combat, that “most manly” of places) and the presence of women wasn’t an issue. Maybe the problem is you.

  22. I could understand a teenage boy having issues focusing when there were women he found attractive around, but a grown man? Self control is one of the hallmarks of adulthood, Meller. You should look into acquiring some.

    (Or, you know, more dolls.)

  23. “He hemmed and hawwed a bit and then said it was all right, better than the crap she gets at school, but he didn’t know what effect they would have, as women are kind of inherently anti freedom and stuff XD”

    Women tend to be inherantly anti the idea of men having the freedom to do whatever they feel like to us regardless of our own feelings on the matter. Funny how that works.

  24. It’s interesting how someone who is so very P.C. on this blog “called me out” for invoking the term “prostitute,” chiding me that they prefer to be called “sex workers.” I live two blocks from Atlantic City. Where I come from, they do not prefer the term “sex workers;” rather, they refer to themselves as “‘hos.” (As a long time journalist who is well-acquainted with these ladies and gentlemen – yes, gentlemen – I should know.)

    The point is, no matter what you call this “profession,” I am of the opinion that it should be legalized. That way, the MRAs would be held accountable for patronizing these “sex workers,” and those who practice this line of work would be a heck of a lot safer from predators.

  25. I live two blocks from Atlantic City. Where I come from, they do not prefer the term “sex workers;” rather, they refer to themselves as “‘hos.”

    @Alphalady
    Anecdotal, I’m afraid. I live blocks from the Seattle Sex Positive Club with over 13,000 members and most of the professionals prefer to be called “Sex professionals.” ;)
    As a ten year member, I’m just as familiar as any journalist. :D

    So what if someone is too “PC” for your tastes? It’s common courtesy to address people as they ask to be addressed.

  26. How does one live 2 blocks from a city, anyway?

  27. First off surrendered wives really don’t want anything to do with a man that plays with dolls. I know quite a bit about the D/s community and what’s struck me is the difference between online blogs and relationships and people who actually work their relationships into a D/s sphere.

    My understanding of D/s relationships starts with coming of age in the early eighties before the internet. I’ve known many couples of any sexual persuasion who would fall under those guidelines. When they started their relationships by meeting each other, getting to know each other, slowly revealing their kinks and expectations to each other: I won’t say it worked every time but for the most part those relationships were the type that the couple grew into together and were for the most part healthy.

    From my kinked friends I have the understanding that a new breed of couple emerged into the lifestyle via the internet. That born from fantasy not reality. The submissive wanted everything the dominant does to revolve around them like a full time job and the dominant wanted the submissive’s lives to also completely encompass their own. I’m not saying these relationships never worked out but it was interesting to hear what happened once a baby or other obligations entered the mix.

    The reality DKM is if either party in a relationship is selfish in what they decide they need from the other the relationship is going to fail. Forget careers for a moment. You have a child with special needs, a child who gets sick. You have aging parents. You have friends that you love. All these things will take the focus off of you, and you could not handle that.

    On the other hand my husband and I in fifteen years have gone through a child with cancer, a parent dying. Strokes, heart attacks, a brain aneurism in people close enough that one or both of us were bedside during. Child rearing (which is a kick in the pants when you think you can dictate how life has to be).

    The first time we got hit with the life whammy was our daughter having cancer. Our first long conversation after included ” Stats are bad for marriages going through this, I hope we do o.k”. “I hope so too” was the answer.

    So we’ve done it. You haven’t. The best you can do is offering up what might be some sort of strange relationship advice is “I DKM will go play with my dolls because honestly they are the closest thing to a relationship I will have”.

    And that’s the longest post I think I’ll ever make. Bacon’s fried for the seven layer salad thing.

  28. @CassandraSays:

    “How does one live 2 blocks from a city, anyway?”

    The scenario that popped into my mind involves a shotgun and liberal usage of the phrase “Keep moving, city slicker”

  29. I think, “two blocks from Atlantic City” means, The Boardwalk” or whatever the local equivalent to, “The Strip” is in Vegas. That is the part the tourists come to visit.

  30. Was that me, alphalady? If not, it’s not a PC thing. I call any individual sex worker what she wants to be called. Even, in the case of radfem former sex workers who wish me too “prostituted women”. Sex Worker is still the preferred term among activists. This is not a PC thing. I grow very wary and weary when somebody who is a non worker does the whole WELL I KNOW THE PROSTITUTES! I HAVE SEEN THEM CLOSE UP AND TALKED TO THEM ON THE MEAN STREETS! ” Thing. A yawn and another yawn. You don’t get any “seen the real hard truth” cookies from me. Sex Worker is the preferred term among sex workers rights activists.

    Also, decriminalization is preferable to legalization, but this isn’t the advanced class.

    You go investigate on those mean mean streets and see that gritty realism, you hard nosed journalist you!

  31. It’s interesting how someone who is so very P.C. on this blog “called me out” for invoking the term “prostitute,” chiding me that they prefer to be called “sex workers.” I live two blocks from Atlantic City. Where I come from, they do not prefer the term “sex workers;” rather, they refer to themselves as “‘hos.” (As a long time journalist who is well-acquainted with these ladies and gentlemen – yes, gentlemen – I should know.)
    The point is, no matter what you call this “profession,” I am of the opinion that it should be legalized. That way, the MRAs would be held accountable for patronizing these “sex workers,” and those who practice this line of work would be a heck of a lot safer from predators.

    Sex work should be legalized regardless of it’s effects on MRAs, feminists, evangelicals or crocodiles,

    If you had trans friends who were okay with the word “tranny” would you then feel okay with using it here too? o_O I have sex worker friends who DO NOT prefer and ARE offended by “prostitute” being used by a supposed ally, does that change your opinion, or does invoking personal opinion only matter if it suits your word choice? o_O Choosing neutral terms (sex worker, trans person, etc) is the best way to go in mixed company. If people tell you they prefer or are okay with another term, then you can do that, but what’s the harm in erring on the side of sensitivity? :)

  32. By the way that’s not giving credence to the “I have XYZ friends” argument, just showing how silly is it. Does it then become who has the most friends? Is it some sort of weird oppression referendum? o_O

  33. AmiAngelwings… Yeah, seriously. I hate getting into it with people like this, because.. No. I am not going to drag the sex workers in my life into this argument with you, because they are not mine to score points with. Especially when they… You know, really ARE my friends? Who do FRIEND things with me? So they end up being the one going “BUT I KNOW THEM! I KNOW REAL LIVE HOOOOOKERS! “. Like they’ve got some “in” . And well, fuck that.

  34. My previous comment is awaiting moderation. I wonder which word triggered it o:

  35. It was the word “tranny.”

  36. Anti-Moron's-Rights

    Ugh. My partner was homeless at age 19 and actually did resort to sleeping with women a few times for shelter and food. It was not a mentally happy or healthy time for him. Taking advantage of desperate people is never cool.

  37. If women don’t wanted to be treated like whores they need to stop acting like them. When you see a sexy woman with an old ass fat bastard you know what its all about. All women wanted to fuck me when I was rich,then the economy turned.think I’m gettin any now? Women will screw any man who will pay their bills, paint their house and raise their kids. I know. My exs house just got totally remodeled by a man she made fun of. Wish I had tits and a wet hole, I would own this planet. Pussy is like having a neverending a t m between your legs.

  38. What happens if the guy is broke and needs and needs a girl to screw, how does he meet one?

  39. Ever heard of fleshlights? Ever heard of using your hand? You don’t “need a girl to screw”. All you’re looking for is orgasm, and you can do that All By Yourself. Which, given you seem to think women are commodities, would be better for everyone. Sex, btw, is not a need. It’s a drive, or a desire. Food, water, oxygen, are needs: you’ll die without them. Nobody dies from lack of sex.

  40. Wow, this post is like a semiannual asshole parade.

  41. Wow, stephen, I’m floored that you have trouble getting dates these days. You’re such an insightful charmer.

  42. I don’t know, william, how does one find a member of the reclusive species known as half the human population.

  43. Wish I had tits and a wet hole, I would own this planet.

    You have a wet hole. Unfortunately, you never shut it…

  44. What happens if the guy is broke and needs and needs a girl to screw, how does he meet one?

    I talked to them. Treated them like people. Some of them liked me. Some of them liked me enough that it led to sexytimes.

    So if you are having a problem in this dept. I think the problem is personal.

  45. Man… I just realised I let him set the terms of debate. First thing is that I didn’t treat them as, “a girl to screw”.

    That’s probably the point at which the personal problem starts.

  46. What happens if the guy is broke and needs and needs a girl to screw, how does he meet one?

    Dude just pick up the power drill and do the job yourself.

  47. Wow, Stephen, maybe in your case nobody’ll touch you now you’re not rich (cool story, bro) because the money was the only thing you had to recommend you. Whereas other guys who are broke have no problem having and maintaining loving relationships, because ::looks around to see if anyone’s listening:: they have this secret.

    ::whispers:: They’re decent, lovable human beings.

  48. kitteh’s: They don’t need to be lovable, just likable.

  49. Or at least they need to not actively inspire immediate dislike.

  50. I was thinking more of long term relationships, hence lovable. Certainly likable or not actively dislikable is fine for short-term ones. :)

  51. What happens if the guy is broke and needs and needs a girl to screw, how does he meet one?

    I know this is probably a troll, because no one could seriously think THIS BLOG would be the right place for that question, but I’m 99% sure that being broke is not your major obstacle, dude.

  52. Good article. I was expecting you to promote this idea and was glad to find out you didn’t.

    That guy’s wrong about people trying to be white knights. A lot of those guys actually care about the safety of these women. They don’t want to see them taken advantage of or get hurt.

    I actually have experience with this too, as fucking surreal as it is. About a week ago I ran into an ex gf that I dated for 4 years, and lived with for 1. I hadn’t seen her in about a year and a half.

    Well after talking a bit I went over to her place to hang out and catch up. Turns out she left home a few months after we broke up, then she got kicked out of college. While at her place, a shitty motel, I noticed condom wrappers, baggies and syringes. I knew right away what was up. She wouldn’t talk about what she was doing for money, or that she was doing more than smoking pot. (when we dated she was a pot head and occasionally Molly or shrooms)).

    When I got home I got curious so I googled her email addy, unfortunately the things that popped right up were escort ads, with pics of her. :/

    Then I googled her phone #, and got even more backpage ads.

    I didn’t want to embarrass her so I haven’t said anything. I just let her know if she needed a friend or a ride or anything other than money that I’m here for her.

    Yesterday I looked her mom up on Facebook and sent her a message letting her know her daughter needs help, I gave her her email, phone#, & the name and room of the motel she’s staying at. I still haven’t heard back.

    It’s just so crazy. I spent nearly every waking moment for 4 years with this girl, and to see where she’s at now just breaks my heart. I just want to see her safe and happy, ya know?

    I honestly don’t care if a girl wants to sell her body, but when they’re doing it out of desperation because they think they have to, and they aren’t being smart about it, then I definitely see a problem. A heartbreaking one when it’s a person you loved.

  53. Did she ask for your help? You didn’t want to embarass her, you just FB messaged her mom. Your story is not quite adding up for me.

  54. Well, to be fair, even if she doesn’t want help with prostitution the heroin is still a problem that someone needs to know about.

  55. The idea that someone would use their regular email address, that they use for friends and family, in their Backpage ad is ringing my bullshit meter too.

  56. Auggz: if the heroin even happened. Most junkies do not leave their shit out for the world to see, especially not some ex they haven’t seen in years.

  57. And no, I don’t agree that anyone needs to know about it. forcing help very rarely works.

  58. That guy’s wrong about people trying to be white knights. A lot of those guys actually care about the safety of these women. They don’t want to see them taken advantage of or get hurt.

    vs.

    I should be upfront that getting amateur women to have sex for money can be tricky as most of them believe that they are not whores.

    JC, did you even read the original post?

  59. … okay… do you, like, want a cookie? Admiration? Applause? Attention?

    What was the point of posting that?

  60. Argenti: I’m guessing a big fat cookie for that After School Special.

  61. hellkell – I’m not Argenti. :P

    Give me a few minutes, I’ll change it to a lighter avi.

  62. SHIT. I did again. I am so sorry.

  63. It’s the catvatar hivemind, that’s what it is!

  64. Eeeeeeeeeeeeeee Alice’s kitty really is a ghost kitty!

  65. You know, there’s a certain stage of life at which “I’m going to tell your mom” is no longer the solution to someone’s problems.

  66. kittehs – I’m GHOST KITTY FROM THE BEYOND! I hath come to bless the cat-lovers and the animal lovers alike! I promise that I won’t eat string or scratch up your furniture—really!

    hellkell – It’s okay. I mistyped your name too many times, and didn’t notice until someone else pointed it out. :P

  67. I’m guessing the family is not such a great support system if she’s living in a seedy motel. Yet JC seems rather surprised that mom hasn’t snapped to and updated him.

  68. Alice is the Archangel, the Messenger of Ceiling Cat!

    ::genuflects::

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 6,657 other followers

%d bloggers like this: