Homeless girls: A frugal alternative to pricey prostitutes!
Fellas! Want sex, but don’t have the money to shell out on prostitutes? Hate the time and effort it takes to talk a non-professional sex-having women into having sex with you? A recent post by Advocatus Diaboli on the always delightful In Mala Fide offered an elegant solution for horny but frugal men. In a post titled Pooning on a Tight Budget, AD explained the technique that has worked for him:
Getting poor, but good-looking, young girls (18-23) to have sex with [you] in return for some timely financial help.
Turns out that women who are poor and desperate can be exploited for your own sexy purposes!
Of course, it’s not always quite as easy as it might seem.
I should be upfront that getting amateur women to have sex for money can be tricky as most of them believe that they are not whores. Moreover, poor young women often have “boyfriends” and white knight orbiters. So I created a set of filters and rules to screen out the most problematic types.
According to AD, all you have to do is to:
Avoid all girls who have obvious and serious drug and mental health issues or have lived on the street for over 6 weeks at a stretch.
Happily for you, that still leaves lots of girls ripe for the picking! AD suggests you focus your attention on:
Freshly homeless young girls, especially those who hangout in mixed groups.
The safest ones are those who are into pot, drumming, dreadlocks et cetera. You can find them in many larger cities in the spring and summer. While I would never trust them with any significant amount of money, many are reasonably decent human beings.
You might not think you’d have much in common to talk about with these women – what with them being “reasonably decent human beings” and you being a “completely reprehensible pile of shit” – but you’d be surprised.
Strike up a conversation with them, engage them and see where it leads. But you must make it plainly obvious that you are interested in them sexually, but that all favors require reciprocation. Once you get to know them, a decent round of drinks, snacks, money for pot, a small necessary item of clothing, decent dinner with booze will almost guarantee you a good lay (or at least a couple of BJs).
And if you crunch the numbers you’ll see it’s really quite a frugal solution.
Your initial financial hit for hanging out with them is very small, and once they are sleeping with you.. it will often work to about $30-60 (cash equivalent or cash) per session. You may also get freebies..
But girls don’t necessarily have to be literally homeless to be desperate enough to sleep with you for money. Nope! You may also find great cost-savings from targeting:
Girls who are not homeless, but are just hanging on.
How do you find these lovely ladies? Keep an eye out for women working really shitty jobs that don’t pay shit! You’ll find them conveniently located
in smaller retail stores or businesses that pay minimum wage with no tips. Build a rapport and be fairly upfront about your interest, but do not come across as desperate. Go to her workplace and talk to her when you are in that area, but do not stalk her.
Yep, it turns out that even desperate women can be creeped out. So play it cool! Stalking’s for fools!
There’s another possible hurdle: other dudes.
Such women often have “boyfriends,” however, they are often just as poor or poorer than her. You can get pussy as long as you are firm about the need for reciprocation. This category of girls might be more willing to give BJs than having ‘real sex.’ But do you really care?
Just remember to keep to your budget!
Restrict your help to less than $200 at any one time AND only after she has put out a couple of times.
And then there’s AD’s favorite category of desperate women:
Girls who are poor, but not homeless and have no “boyfriends” + have moved to the city within the last eight weeks.
You have hit the jackpot!
Just don’t get carried away. Remember: you’re in charge, and she should know it!
Remember these girls can become de facto GFs, but do not restrict yourself to one. While you do not have to rub it in their faces, they should know that you are always looking around for a better deal. But treat them a bit better than type 1 and 2, they do give more per dollar spent on them.
Your accountant will be so, so proud of you!
Just remember:
They will play by your rules as long as they are not too dehumanizing, and they are often cheaper than professional whores.
Now that’s a motto to live by!
Amazingly, not all of the readers of In Mala Fide appreciated AD’s little treatise.
Simon invoked the c-word, before tossing in some racism:
Mate you are one deadset sad cunt. It’s no surprise to know you’re Indian.
Cathater broke out the other c-word:
Pretty damn creepy. You sound like you have no soul. Actually, you might be the first member of a new species: the perfectly rational, purely selfish utility-maximizing agent (Homo Economicus) that Austrian economists and Randroids have always droned on and on about.
Yes, I was as surprised as you are to read an actually reasonable critique of the post on In Mala Fide.
Don’t worry, though, the rest of the comments mostly lived up to the foul standards of the blog.
Ryu worried about the old slippery slope. If you start by suggesting that PUAs target homeless women, the next thing you know they’ll advocate sex with children! And then down the slippery slope you’ll slide:
This is the direction that PU takes one in. I’m surprised that there haven’t been any PUAs who say that during a dry spell we should go to gay bars and pick up men. Just to keep your dick wet, you know.
Savrola returned to the theme of race:
There’s a problem WNs have yet to deal with. Well off second-generation foreigners like AD taking advantage of your impoverished women of older native stock, after they’ve taken your jobs.
Can’t keep ‘em here, can’t send ‘em back.
What to do?
Blog proprietor Ferdinand Bardamu waded in to take a shot at all the “white knights” sticking up for the gals.
ROFLMAO at all these white knights. …
If you want to blame someone, blame the morally debased white women who would rather blow a stranger for $200 then work honestly (pull yourself up by your bootstraps, slob! nobody owes you anything!).
We’re living in Soviet Amerika (and Soviet Kanada). All of your daughters are whores or will become whores, soon as the price tag gets high enough.
Meanwhile, Stoner With a Boner, who sometimes graces the comments section here with his always trenchant wisdom, took a stand on behalf of the real victims here: dudes paying their own hard-earned money to icky ladies for sex.
Personally, I find the idea of clocking more hours at a job I hate just to hand $200 to a prostitute who would probably leave me dying in the street rather than help degrading.
Men, the forgotten victims once again.
This post contains:
Posted on December 20, 2011, in $MONEY$, crackpottery, creepy, I'm totally being sarcastic, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, PUA, racism, rapey, reactionary bullshit, sex. Bookmark the permalink. 602 Comments.
I find it hard to believe this guy “practices what he preaches”. Having been homeless, I met a few homeless women in the Boston area. Most of them were mentally ill. One even tried to show me pictures of the house she wanted to buy (it was a penthouse on a beach). The only one even remotely decent was a 21 year old junkie that hung around South Station and tried to get men to give her money. Her “story” was she was from Georgia and she needed 20 bucks to buy a bus ticket home. She lived nearby with her junkie boyfriend and she did this to support their heroin addiction. I talked to her for a while and she made about 300 dollars a day scamming men out of their money.
So even the “best” ones are still damaged.
Also, this dude seriously has no standards when it comes to choosing women to sleep with. Most of the women sleeping on the streets were grimy, unkempt and often stunk. I can’t even imagine trying to have sex with that. Although I also know a few homeless couples that prefer to sleep outside than to go to the shelters. It’s quite sad.
I mainly see the post as trying to be inflammatory for no good reason. It’s one big troll post.
Well, folks, Brandon hath declared the Truth upon this subject. No need for any more opinions.
OK, much as it pains me to almost agree with Brandon, the constrast between “ew, vaginas are so icky” and “but I’d be OK sleeping with someone who may not have had access to a shower recently” is a bit weird. Not that I’d expect logic from an MRA.
see this is why I think MRAs are idiots. MRAs and Vilet and the rest of Radfemhub are two sides of the same coin. I’ve seen MRAs use thinly veiled ominous threats of a future war between the sexes. I’ve seen MRAs call to repeal women’s right to vote. I’ve seen an MRA call for baby girl’s voice boxes to be removed. And lets not forget an anti-feminist named Marc Lepine who shot a bunch of female engineering students for daring to leave the kitchen and for taking men’s “rightful” future jobs in the field. He blamed feminism for ruining his life in his suicide note and claimed he was “fighting feminism”. Sound like a familiar sentiment? I don’t know if the MRM existed in the 80s when the Montreal Massacre happened, but he sure sounded like your typical MRA. Then you have a predator like this piece of shit trying to exploit vulnerable poor women by offering them sex for money…..where is the major outrage against it? why is he not being called out by the MRM? where is his spot as bigot on registerher.com? how hypocritical that they are outraged at the radfems when the MRM is just as bad.
I find MRAs and rad fems both reprehensible and are very angry and/or hurt people. And so alike it makes me laugh. One group is just comprised of male supremacists, the other female supremacists. I’ve read articles on MRA websites, as well as some of the ones on radfemhub…it’s amazing how similar the tone is. The words the use, the hyperbole, the rage, the fear, the hatred.
The only difference here though, is that moderate feminists have largely dismissed radical feminists. While browsing radfemhub I even noticed that the rad fems hate modern sex-positive feminists. They believe we are too nice and wrong for not being completely against PIV sex.
I don’t see many MRAs dismissing their extremists though. Probably around 98% are extremists. Many of us are still waiting to be shown a moderate MRA website, that doesn’t blame feminism and women for everything. That acknowledge that women AND men face double standards.
Real classy, some of the comments here too, once again blaming the person who is so desperate for some food and shelter, rather than the filth who exploit them to get their dicks wet. And yea, that includes exploitation of male or female poor/homeless people. The sad thing is, this doesn’t even surprise me. So much disgusting shit comes out of the MRM that it’s just to be expected. Something even worse than this will come out, and I still wouldn’t be surprised. These are the types of guys who will find an excuse to blame a woman who was murdered. Probably for just looking at a guy funny. They will justify it, as long as the victim is female. I’m sure they think the 60 year old woman who was set on fire in an elevator the other day did something to deserve it too.
When Monsieur sans Nom first appeared, I thought too that he was Ferdinand Bardamu because he attacked me and Ferdinand Bardamu attacked me on other blogs. Now he’s defending the article, so it’s probably him.
Brandon, it was posted originally on Advocatus Diaboli’s blog, he posts on the Spearhead and he has made numerous posts of the same caliber, so I don’t think it was a troll post :
http://dissention.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/why-men-and-women-who-defend-marriage-are-extermination-worthy-liars/
http://dissention.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/about-the-creepy-label/
hahahaha!!! he’s complaining about the word creepy, while simultaneously calling women cunts and writing posts on how to exploit poor/homeless women for as little money as possible.
Advocatus Diaboli is the very definition of a creep and a predator. How he is not aware of this is just sad.
Why no, actually. And I am not defending the article. You’re not too bright are ya, son….:-/
Oh, I think he’s well aware. That’s precisely why he’s trying to discredit the term (and, I think, why so many MRAs protest it). Because they know they’re creepy, and they’re trying to defend their right to be creepy.
Which is, naturally, even more creepy.
Wow, I think this might win the award of creepiest thing ever. And that is considering that there have been you know, a lot of creepy subjects that have been written about here. But this one takes the cake.
Shorter Devil’s advocate whine:
creepy = gendered slur used to shame men!!!1!
cunts = non-gendered slur we can use freely against anyone! It just happens these people happen to be women, and of course the word has no connotations of being against women, where would you get such an idea?
>/sarcasm>
(Yeah, we don’t want a rehash of the argument about gendered slurs, do we?)
“It is my belief that men and women who defend marriage are worthless subhuman liars who, in a rational world, would be tortured and burnt alive for misleading others”
I think even NWO would say, “This guy’s a nut.”
Come to think of it, if it isn’t totally illegal to exploit someone this way,it REALLY should be.
I assumed that in my town and in most big cities it most likely is but I’m no legal eagle.
Holly, I found your blog and read your own story about “suvival sex”. That guy should’ve been hauled to prison for statutory rape; along with your abusive mom.
Brandon:
Funny you only mention her. I suppose he was at home baking cookies for charity and being an all around swell mangina?
The woman that I knew did this (well, something similar anyway) changed her MO from prostitution to robbery specifically because she got the shit beat out of her by a “client” because, surprise! some people are into that and homeless junkie teenagers apparently make good targets.
…
Anyway, I think what this asshole likes is the thrill of being in control. Whether or not it’s a fair contract between two consenting adults (which it isn’t) is irrelevant: it’s still creepy.
if I may derail from this unpleasant topic for a moment. Having major nerdgasms over The Hobbit trailer! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=G0k3kHtyoqc
and Nobby, I never thought of it that way. I think you’re right on the money with that explanation which yes, makes it even more creepy.
On the Hobbit Trailer: Too much Martin Freeman; makes me too happy!
very happy
My other home is in Nicaragua, and while not as bad as some countries being a very poor nation sex tourism is there. Poverty is so deep there that when I see the sex tourists I don’t understand how they cannot see everything around them. They sometimes believe the girl “loves” them.
I like the term survival sex. What the delusion gringo’s don’t understand is their “love” is not just feeding and housing her but also her family.
We don’t own there, we stay at a local bed and breakfast with a great family that is home away from home, away from the capital for a very small amount (480 a month every February).
The sex tourists pay over 200 a night to stay in the capital. You can see them a mile away. They are both pathetic and hyenas at the same time. I wouldn’t hate them as much as a do if they’d give a scrap of money to the countless charities that need it.
We don’t discuss what we give, but there are simple things like leaving medicines you’ve brought with you when you travel back that never enter the pathetic hyenas mind. Luckily except for the capital there are enough ex-pat’s and locals alike to shame away the hyena’s.
By the way except for airfare depending on where you live you can live in Nicaragua on pennies compared to the U.S or Canada. It’s also possible to buy locally and give school supplies on a very limited budget. I know most of the posters here are in their early twenties and just starting out. Don’t go to San Juan de Sur but go!
(so ends my travel slide show and now I feel bad for real actual hyenas)
Hyenas are way cool. They have complex matriarchal social structures and enlarged pseudo-penile clitorises.
I wasn’t nearly as excited by that trailer as I should have been. Hopefully there will be another trailer showing all the fights with giant spiders and dragons soon.
Anyway…
@Ozy
Bonobos also have matriarchal influences in their societies. Lots of sex too minus the slut-shaming. Must be nice. Not surprised the “the monkeys do it like this therefore get back in the kitchen slut” crowd never seem to mention Bonobos.
@Crumbelievable
Really? I got shivers haha. Can’t wait for the next trailer though, I’m sure they’ll have another.
Oh and I forgot to mention, Holly and Kladle – hugs for having gone through what you did and coming out of it as strong and brave people.
@Leni: I only mentioned her because she was the only one I spoke too and interacted with on a daily basis. I saw the boyfriend very briefly and I didn’t speak to him. I only noticed that he was withdrawing from heroin and he was yelling at her about how much money she made scamming people.
Have you been around many heroin addicts? Well, I have. And the last thing I would say about them is they are at home cooking brownies and cleaning the house. They were doing what practically every other active addict does when they are out running…doing whatever it takes to get their next bag of dope.
Lastly, they were both homeless…so to say that he might be at home baking cookies is just absurd on its face.
@leni
help us out. were playing a game right now where we dont acknowledge brandon’s idiot whining. if we ignore him, he tends to go away.
@ Brandon
Yes. And I was one.
So I’m glad you got the sarcasm about the cookie baking.
@ Sharculese:
But he always comes back XD
Brandon is doing the heroin addict thing now?
How hard would it be for you Brandon to say you shouldn’t take advantage of them. It’s a simple concept.
he doesnt if we ignore him. please. ignore him.
Lol. Sharculese, your desperation only makes me wonder if I can ply sex out of you with the shrewd lure of BigMacs XD
(kidding!! (>^^)>)
@Leni: Actually, I thought you were making a snide dismissive comment. It’s like the feminist “eye roll”.
Be a hand up when you encounter people that need help instead of exploiting them. You’d think that would be a basic human reaction.
Not for mra’s or mgtow it seems. These boys see prey, not human.
@Kavette: And when did I ever say it was ok to take advantage of people?
Leni
You are nothing but dirt.
There is no kidding about what you said. You are nothing.
I should have put the sarcasm tag on that apparently. kavette, I was being sarcastic and mocking people who think like that.
hence the “kidding” and little huggy man so Sharculese would know it.
what’s going on?!?! the main point is still stop acknowledging the whinelord!!
And Brandon, it was snide. Because you were being an ass about the female, and the female only, being “damaged goods” and therefore not worthy of pursuing an inherently creepy relationship with.
Brandon.
You’ve always said it was o.k to take advantage of people. Sexual slaves, video taping.
Imagine Brandon that I economically could have what ever I want. Way beyond your imagined means.
Imagine that I don’t want to take advantage of people regardless of their social or economic background.
I’m not a better person then you because of my station in life. I am a better person then you because I do not prey on people.
Understand?
(Prepares for longwinded explanation of why preying on people is not actually a bad thing, as long as those people are not Brandon.)
Also, anyone here remember the whole Open Source Boob Project debacle? It was the post from the dude who spawned the whole mess where he talked about how he manipulated a homeless woman into having sex with him where I went from “OK you are a fucking idiot, but it’s possible you may just genuinely not get why this was a problem” to “nope, you’re just scum”.
Leni
Certain conversations that have reminded me about things long ago have lead me to post here much more then I should have tonight.
It’s no excuse for misreading your post, I’m sorry I did.
Kavette – I like the term survival sex. What the delusion gringo’s don’t understand is their “love” is not just feeding and housing her but also her family.
As I was reading this post I was also drawn to the parallels of a westerner travelling to 3rd world countries for sex/wives something also the MRAs like to promote
Suppose that the words to the linked blogpost were changed and reblogged somewhere else and they said:
I doubt there’d be a peep of outrage by iFeminists….Or any mention of it on this blog. I do wonder if Futrelle and some of the other ostensibly feminist posters have any concern over the sexual exploitation of homeless (male)youth who happen to be straight by older men with money and a place to crash. Apparently, homeless youth of ALL genders are frequently forced into prostitution or more often engage in survival sex where they must barter sex for basic needs. I honestly see no reason why gay men(or even lesbians) might do the same thing that straight men do when it comes to sexually exploiting homeless young people.
It’s ok Kavette, shit happens :) And I could have been clearer. No worries.
Jill:
Ugh. You remind me of something a female traveler friend of mine told me. She is tallish and pretty gender neutral, especially while traveling. It’s just safer to have people mistake you for a man. She live abroad, mostly in Asia for several years. She cut her hair at one point and was often mistaken by locals for being a man. After which she said the number of “you like children?” approaches went up exponentially. Creep-y.
Several of them have expressed worry over that already. One that mentioned the death of several friends, unless that was another thread and I’m mistakes, which is pretty much immatterial.
Exploitation is bad period. I highly doubt anyone here cares what gender the victims are.
Can we just ignore Frenchy too, please?
No name we discuss those men and boys in this very thread for fucks sakes. Try hardr 2 tr@ll.
Monsieur sans Nom
Are you kidding me?
I said things tonight that I have not talked about in literally decades. You are a really sick fuck.
Monsieur Sans Nom said:
“I doubt there’d be a peep of outrage by iFeminists….Or any mention of it on this blog. I do wonder if Futrelle and some of the other ostensibly feminist posters have any concern over the sexual exploitation of homeless (male)youth who happen to be straight by older men with money and a place to crash. Apparently, homeless youth of ALL genders are frequently forced into prostitution or more often engage in survival sex where they must barter sex for basic needs. I honestly see no reason why gay men(or even lesbians) might do the same thing that straight men do when it comes to sexually exploiting homeless young people.”
I had to come out of my longtime lurking so that I can be a part of this “you can’t make this shit up” moment. How dense do you have to be to put this up so late in this particular conversation. My hats off to you sir.
p.s. MRAL, as someone who’s been reading the stuff you’ve posted for a while now, I gotta say I’m happy you’re movin past that stage. Your comments since have been quite incisive as well, I used to wonder wtf you were doing at BU. In the words of the great Abed Nadir, “This character reboot is really gelling for you”
No. Because I’m not going to let that little twit get away with pretending that I don’t care about the males I know who have been exploited ans abused.
If he can’t figure out how to read, that’s his problem. But no one will ever accuse me of not caring about boys and walk away with no answer.
The problem is that this one is a classic, 4chan style troll. The more he upsets us, the happier he will be. He thrives on the pain and distress of others.
In case it’s not clear, I think this particular variety of troll is scum. They’re like leeches, except they feed on negative emotions rather than blood.
@Cassandra- I don’t give a shit. He can’t hurt me and he knows it. Or at least he should if he doesn’t. And he can figure it out on his own time if he doesn’t know now.
What I’m not going to do is get accused of acquiescing to male child abuse and say nothing about it.
He can kiss my ass on both counts, and not get a good quote from me to boot.
Oh Puh-LEEZE! I posted a perfectly reasonable comment prior to my last one and the response I got was to be ignored. So clearly I must troll to get attention
And Leni if you are female I’d be happy to kiss your ass but ONLY in the literal sense(that is, if you have a bubblebooty and are wearing buttfloss :-P).
Nom
You’ll be happy to know you have caused pain today.
But we also know the reality behind people like you… yes?
There is a chance I might know you. Are you on disability from your workplace?
I’m just asking.
You seem to have a great deal of time on your hands without a smart phone. Even without a laptop.
Nah, you could just go find some people who actually find you interesting and want to talk to you. But there are none, and thus you troll, like a toddler throwing a tantrum because mommy isn’t paying enough attention to him.
NSM it would be whatever you fucking got lucky enough to get dealt, and I’d expect you to be happy with whatever came your way.
That is the general MO, no?
Or wait, no. Beggars can’t be choosers…. unless they’re male.
Way to be melodramatic, kavette. I said nothing to you personally or about your situation and I shall not comment on it. Yes I have some issues facing me IRL….But other than that I won’t say more than what I’ve already told(like where I said I have Asperger Syndrome).
I am one of the least whiny, and certainly the least ignorant and ridiculous of all the trolls around here. Mostly because I just disagree rather than constantly provoke and always keep my cool. ;-)
Fixed that for ya. :-P
Way to be melodramatic, kavette. I said nothing to you personally or about your situation and I shall not comment on it. Yes I have some issues facing me IRL….But other than that I won’t say more than what I’ve already told(like where I said I have Asperger Syndrome).
I am one of the least whiny, and certainly the least ignorant and ridiculous of all the trolls around here. Mostly because I just disagree rather than constantly provoke and always keep my cool.>
Of course you are the least whiny, and you must be the least arrogant (not ignorant) or ridiculous of our trolls.
Fixed that for ya
Yup. And I fixed this for you:
Being the least whiny troll on manboobz – a true achievement.
Who do we think wins most whiny? I used to think it was a tie between Meller and Slavey, but the new MGTOW dude may have recently edged into the lead. Arks wins for most creative use of the English language. Brandon is definitely the dullest.
So given all that MSN. Yes or no for having sex with children under the age of 18 in the third world. Yes or no.
Where’s NWO slave when you need him? :-P
Now let’s further complicate this matter shall we? Obviously it’s degrading to have to sleep with someone you’re not sexually attracted to in order to survive. But suppose that a homeless girl encounters a man that she is actually attracted to and takes the initiative to offer him sex in exchange for food and shelter(and perhaps a bit of dough)?
Initiating an offer to a desperate person is as low as it gets, but accepting an offer from someone like this? It isn’t always easy to tell if they’re genuine and people under duress can’t always be trusted to be honest.
Please note that use of the word “buttfloss” is only allowed when decribing a thong if you are willing to actually floss your teeth with it. Some of them are quite thin, you can totally do it if you try hard enough. Pics or GTFO.
OK, who forgot to close their italics tags?
Kavette: The answer is No. So you need not ask again. I am not attracted to underage girls and IDK where you got the impression that I was.
“…people under duress can’t always be trusted to be honest.”
Because regular people, i.e. people who go around trying to ply sex from poor people, are so, so honest and trustworthy.
Thanks for the sympathies, everyone. In retrospect I want to say it wasn’t that bad (and it wasn’t as bad as many other people’s experiences, like Holly’s and Brandon’s, and NWO’s if he’s not lying). But then again when I was typing things out and thinking about it, I was like, “did I really do all of that, Jesus Christ”. I’m not living like that anymore, but due to various circumstances I am still at home. Luckily my mom (and my dad) have calmed down a lot in the past year and I haven’t been seriously scared like that for a while. I still have a “go bag” ready, though, and keep my personal documents hidden just in case I ever have to scoot out of here again.
On the “sex tourism” in developing countries comparison, well, unfortunately some of the commenters on the article noticed.
K says:
He also says:
HP’s original post really put a smile on my face, at least in regard to her sexfriend, as it’s nice to know that once in a while, some of us do get lucky every so often. And when one of us wins, we all win, oh yeah. That’s guy’s a certifiable hero to
Tch tch tch, the sheer misandry in this thread affirms and confirms my own decision as a MGTOW. What, do you expect males to just give strange females money for nothing? What an entitlement complex! THERE AIN’T NO FREE LUNCH, snowflakes, and it’s quid pro quo: ass, cash, or gas, nobody rides for free. And those who advocate women robbing men to having sex with them, well, that just proves how lazy you are. Finally, statutory rape is simply a legal fiction for prudes and prigs, especially at 16, which is the legal age of consent for sex in a majority of the world anyway, EVEN IN THE US…
I’m starting to think that someone posted a perma-link to manboobz on 4chan. Or maybe Kotaku.
@Whatever
No asshole, we expect that men like the OP leave homeless and poor women alone and not prey on them for sex because they know they’re in a bad state money wise.
The OP is the one pursuing these women, not the other way around. See the fourth quote. Why are MGTOWs such hateful, bitter people?