Fellas! Protect yourself from these sneaky lady tricks!
Some of them start young.
Courtesy of MGTOWforums.com, here’s a little collection of some of the evil dastardly tricks that women pull on the poor oppressed men of the world. Obviously, most sensible guys know that “housework” is a scam; so-called “housewives” spend most of their time on the couch eating bon bons and watching The View.
But did you know about Arson Night? Or the Cheerleader Ring Drop? Read on, and become enlightened Knowledge is power! STAY SAFE, GUYS!
If a man give his woman 100 dollars a week for food shopping, she will spend say 60 on food and keep the rest. When he enquires why there’s no food in the house come Friday he will get bitched at for not trusting her. And made to feel guilty for accusing her, even though she has deceived him.
They like to lay in bed, and pretend to be sick or sad (which means you won’t be coming in there) and text all their boyfriends.
When they say they are going out with the girls, they could be out doing Anything. This ranges from doing hard drugs to stripping to boinking strangers to sitting alone on a curb to arson. You can never be sure.
How about when they try their version of the Jedi mind trick on you. You know the thing they brag about in private. Trying to make something that’s her idea, seem like it’s *your* idea so that you’ll do it. And then pat you on the back to boost your ego like a trained dog when in reality you did what they for *them* all along.
Sooo many guys fall for this. Suddenly they’re buying crap they don’t need or moving the inlaws in because the woman made it seem like *he* wanted it. Classic.
Short Hair: The Beginning of the End
Women spend so much time on their appearance… why?
That’s right, to catch a sucker into paying the bills. Once the contract is signed, and the babies are popped out, she has you by the balls and doesn’t need to pretend anymore. Next she’ll wear more “comfortable clothes” and cut her hair short. It’s the beginning of the end.
And, yes, The Cheerleader Ring Drop:
In 11th grade high school, I was in the wrestling team. One day, during a water break, this cheerleader next to me started getting panicky and asked me if i could help her find her ring. She “dropped” it and did this just as an opener, i suppose. I ended up ‘being’ with her and it quickly diminished; she was bunk. Another cheerleader came up to me while i was with her and told me “what are you doing her?, you’re way too good for her!”
Luckily, the fella calling himself Tha Big Daddy C-Master, who started the thread, has a simple solution to all this. Well, two simple solutions:
You can always turn the other way, or just use a woman. Human toilets and all.
I couldn’t have said it worse myself!
Posted on December 18, 2011, in $MONEY$, beta males, evil women, I'm totally being sarcastic, men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, misogyny. Bookmark the permalink. 961 Comments.
@ Caraz: If NWOSlave cared about looking like a fool, he would have stopped posting here long ago. He seems to be under the impression that making sense is just a courtesy of sorts and his enemies don’t deserve it.
Well someone invented the hose-so as long as he has no problem with all of his stuff being drenched, using a high powered hose can clean it up.
Sometimes I wonder if it would be okay to have pornographic pictures on the walls. It’s my room, right? Then I realize other people besides myself come into my house, like my housemates, vanilla friends, and my parents. Do Man Caves ever have non-Man visitors?
I think the three women that showed up for their arraignments this morning would be surprised to hear that. Two of whom had to pay fines or risk going back to Maricopa County’s Arpaio Hilton.
I wish I had seen JTK’s wall of text in time to post tl;dr immediately after it. Ah, c’est la vie. I definitely read Amused’s reply, though. Fun!
“Only women are ever mentioned as victims of suffering.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-16099552
“Two people have died in a shooting at Virginia Tech university, including a campus police army veteran who was a father of five.”
You’re lying NWO. Again.
I get it now. This guy has a passion for interior design, but suppresses it because he thinks it’s ‘girly.’ Thus, whenever someone dares critique his decor, he gets ultra-defensive that some knave is insulting his fine taste. The whole I’m-not-going-to-cater-to-the-womens schtick is just to save face.
Winston Wu, you don’t have to hide any longer! Flip through your interior design magazines like a boss! Visit those furniture stores and thrift shops and find those perfect accents! Play Animal Crossing like your life depends on it!
@Dracula
“I am growing extremely weary of the “These guys aren’t misogynists! They’re just irrationally angry at all women for what they claim some women have done!” argument.’
It’s his fault!
————–
@Amused
“Second, when you are in a relationship, you cheat. And you lie to your significant others. And you rationalize it by telling yourself that “everything is manipulation”, that taking steps to be attractive for one’s SO is EXACTLY the same thing as stepping out on them, making false promises and lying through your teeth.”
When a man cheats he making false promises and lying through his teeth. When a woman cheats it because she has sexual agency and isn’t “owned” by a man. He hasn’t lived up to her expectations in some way.
It’s his fault!
—————
@Linds
“There’s a lot of “men don’t like/shouldn’t like/are scared by forward women” messages in mainstream culture, so women are expected to be less forward.”
Society tells us all women are strong, independent and forward, and they are praisworthy. Society tells us men who are forward are rapey, creepy and act as if they’re entitled to a womans attention.
It’s his fault!
—————-
@Stephanie
“Especially the one about how women don’t do housework and instead go shopping all day, and the one about how women take their husband’s money and use most of it on themselves and very little for food.”
And if that is the case society tell’s us, Love. Listen. Support. Give. Work.
It’s his fault!
—————
@VoiP
“Think of women as though they are people and approach all interactions with others in a spirit of respect?”
All women do this by default wherever they interact with men.
It’s his fault!
—————
@KristinMH
“Nice that you acknowledge that a GF might provide something other than an orgasm in exchange for an evening out, BTW. It’s still a coldly transactional view of human sexuality, but nice touch!”
So is going to bars and parties with an empty purse and women using the “possibility” of giving a man sex to get everything paid for. And then if a man is pissed off because he expected sex for the money and entertainment he provided her?
It’s his fault!
NWO: Lay off the kumys, will ya?
When a man cheats he making false promises and lying through his teeth. When a woman cheats it because she has sexual agency and isn’t “owned” by a man. He hasn’t lived up to her expectations in some way.
No, when a woman cheats, she is cheating. Not cool, if you happen to be in a committed, monogamous relationship. If you are in an open or polyamorous (sp?) relationship, then the rules are different. It all depends on terms on which the people in the relationship agree.
Fucking consent, how does it work?
NWO and many of the MRAs featured here can’t seem to imagine ever going out with their girlfriends because going out is fun for everyone involved, rather than because it might earn them enough brownie points that she might “reward” them with sex.
Here’s a tip: in healthy relationships, most of the activities you do together are either to fulfill obligations (like cleaning house) or for mutual enjoyment (like going out, or snuggling on the couch, or having sex.) Occasionally you might do something one partner has a greater interest in than the other in the interest of pleasing them, but if you’re doing it in order to get sex, something that ought to be for mutual enjoyment, you’re doing it wrong; and if you find you’re making that sort of sacrifice for your partner all the time, and they aren’t willing to do something that you’ll enjoy every once in a while, they aren’t a very good partner.
I see NWO has a new catchphrase. It’s slightly less annoying than “Big Daddy,” but the exclamation points make me think of DKM, and that’s never a good sign.
Thanks!
It doesn’t have quite the same ring as ZERO SUM GAME, but I’ll take it.
Somehow I don’t think I’m going to have this Man Cave Interior Decorating problem, because anyone I move in with is going to need to cover all the walls with bookshelves.
Also, the sex only gets boring in a year if you’re dreadfully uncreative and not open to new things.
NWO, my love, I am not actually a sex worker. Therefore, if someone were to buy me a smoothie (I don’t drink alcohol or soda), I am still not obligated to sleep with him, although it would be polite for me to pick up the next round.
@Amused
Here’s the latest from your own blog, encouraging the destruction of anything resembling an intact family.
“The American Psychological Association’s recent announcement that working mothers experience greater levels of happiness and lower rates of depression than their stay-home counterparts is not exactly a revelation. Nor is it surprising that a number of Internet commenters have reacted to the “news” with a faux concern that working mothers make children unhappy, and that there is nothing worse for our kids than this new and dangerous trend of being left with (gasp!) paid strangers for most of the day. Such comments are based on one of the most enduring myths about parenting — that historically, children (at least in the Western world) were raised as nature intended, by their closest family.”
You encourage women to throw children into daycare ASAP, and leave them to be raised pretty much on a communist assembly line. The article you linked to is surprisingly women quoting women quoting women whose study consists of nothingness.
————–
The article you linked to, also links to these fine articles.
Working Moms Multitask More Than Dads — and Like It Less
First of all, I’d like to for once in my life see an empirical study about womens amazing multi-tasking ability. Since no study actually exists, womens multi-tasking skills is based on women saying they have infinite multi-tasking skills. In fact, since men and women are identical in all ability, it’s impossible for either to have any superior skill.
—————
And this article is also linked to
News Flash: Moms Resent Dads for Not Doing Enough at Home
Again we have a womans word that men aren’t doing enough at home. Yet if a man tells a woman to do the dishes he’s a horrible misogynist. If a woman tells a man to do the dishes, he’s sharing in the domestic duties. He’s a good man.
It’s his fault!
Have you had a doctor check you for brain injuries, NWO? It would explain your lack of reading comprehension.
Actually, multitasking makes you less efficient at each individual task, because it takes your brain longer to switch gears from one area to another.
Also, I’ve been to daycare. It’s not a communist assembly line. There are blocks.
And crayons!
NWO Slave: A review of my blog stats reveals that you only read the first paragraph of my post about daycare and didn’t bother to read the rest. I suggest you do. You might learn something — like that medieval elites of Europe apparently practiced “communism” as defined in your Great Book O’Larnin’.
@ozymandias42
The above MSM article Amused linked to is the daily dose of hatred of men.
Men aren’t doing enough. Men aren’t supportive enough. Men aren’t loving enough. Men aren’t giving enough. Men aren’t good enough.
Every day. Every MSM outlet. Every Advert. Every sitcom. Our schools. Our government. Our workplaces. Billboards. Magazines. Posters.
Hatred in. Hatred out.
Instead of promoting feminizing men into your frilly dress strap-on debauchery, you should be dragging everyone of these women out into the street and beating the ever loving crap out of them.
Obviously, much like a timer tick, tick, ticking away. The hatred you promote along with the rest of modern day society will eventually go ding. I wonder what’s gonna happen then?
@Amused
I’ve read your vile promotion of the destruction of the family. It’s the stated goals of feminism. It’s the stated goals of communism.
No, you didn’t read it. WordPress has no reason to lie to me. Funny how you call for women who ask their men to do the dishes to be dragged out into the street and beaten, but you think it’s acceptable for you to lie.
Besides — between your particular brand of “freedom” and communism, I’ll take my chances with the latter.
NWO, the guy who promotes slavery for women, is totally looking out for the best interests of the family! (not really)
He also calls 11 year old kids sluts!
What a stand up guy. (not)
“Instead of promoting feminizing men into your frilly dress strap-on debauchery, you should be dragging everyone of these women out into the street and beating the ever loving crap out of them.”
Achievement unlocked: Reached a new fucking low.
Violence solves everything!
@ozymandias and Lauralot
My daycare had ‘Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?’
I imagine that must be some sort of feminist/communist plot.
@Amused
Here’s a quote from you, from the article.
“Upon a close reading of history, the idea that being cared for and educated by “paid strangers” is bad appears to be quite recent, and today’s working mothers probably have more face-time with their kids than traditional housewives did for most of history.”
That’s right everyone, Amused has closely analysed history. Well thank the goddess for that! But have you closely read it in the form of all history being rewritten as womens oppression?
Do tell? What has this close reading of history entailed where you’ve concluded working mothers probably have more face-time with their kids than traditional housewives did for most of history. What history book have you gotten this from?
——————–
What you should have said, after closely reviewing history was. The promotion of the family as the stabilizing factor for any society should be of paramount importance.
But you didn’t. You promote the destruction of the family. Good for you.
Doesn’t NWO define manhood by presence of penis? So why are men bothering to wear strap-ons, and furthermore doesn’t that just make them extra male, rather than feminized? Are the strap-ons themselves wearing frilly dresses? What does it all mean?
NWO, I’d like a full list of all people you don’t think should be beaten.
At some point it’s just not shocking anymore. “NWO thinks a randomly horrible thing? Must be Monday.”
http://www.theonion.com/articles/marilyn-manson-now-going-doortodoor-trying-to-shoc,459/
@Bostonian
” He also calls 11 year old kids sluts!”
What do you call an 11 year old that dresses and acts like a slut?
@NWOslave
A kid playing dress-up.
That’s totally possible, but since NWO refuses to define what slutty clothing is and has not yet described a single article of clothing that wouldn’t be slutty, it’s also very possible that we would call that kid “a kid dressed for school.”
@Holly Pervocracy
Go to the article that Amused links to. Which also links to
Moms Resent Dads for Not Doing Enough at Home
and
Working Moms Multitask More Than Dads — and Like It Less
Is this something good?
Is this something boys/men should have to see everyday?
Is this something that should be promoted non-stop in our schools, government, MSM?
Do ya think this is love?
What do you think women will get in return for this non-stop media onslaught?
Here’s another one:
What do you call an eleven year old boy in a speedo?
I’ll answer it myself: A boy on the swim team.
@Amnesia
“A kid playing dress-up.”
In public? This is your excuse?
NWO, you call the eleven-year-old a CHILD.
You know what? Men SHOULD be able to wear frilly dresses and strapons if they want to! There is nothing wrong with that! Men should be able to do whatever they want, as long as it doesn’t hurt other people! Just like women!
Actually, he finally specified that girls should be dressed like Mennonites.
“Also, I’ve been to daycare. It’s not a communist assembly line. There are blocks.”
Reason XtyYandZth why I love Ozy.
I’d also like to point out that we’ve seen the silly rant about putting playboy pictures on your wall and why must the wimmenz dictate my decorations? here on manboobz before.
Unlike you, kumys boy, I don’t have a one-track mind.
Mostly, I got this from reading various memoirs and letters written by people who lived a very, very long time ago. What have YOU read on the subject, NWOSlave?
A family that’s founded on the idea that society is evil and should be opposed and avoided does not have a stabilizing effect on society. Clearly.
Also: you are no one to dictate values to me, what with your dreams of beating women to saying they are happy in their family lives.
Should people see it? Well, uh, is it true? If it’s true, then we should be aware of it. If it isn’t, then we shouldn’t, because it is bad to say untrue things.
Pants and a T shirt are not inappropriate for any child. People in general do not dress like Mennonites anymore.
I agree with whoever told him to move to Saudi Arabia.
NWO, you claim that you don’t drink so I’m not sure why you think you know so much about the bar scene but let me explain something to you. Not all women are sex workers. I, for example, am not a sex worker. So, when a man offers to buy me a drink I don’t presume that he literally expects his $5 – $15 (depending on the drink) to be a payment for sex. If a man offers to buy a woman a drink (and, really, I don’t think men should do this) and genuinely expects her to have sex with him in direct exchange for the cost of the beverage then he should be upfront about that. That way, she can politely refuse his offer if she’s not a sex worker or, if she is -and she’s not opposed to offering the man in question a service- explain that what her rates and policies are.
Personally, I’ve turned down more offers for drinks than I’ve accepted but that’s entirely beside the point. We all know how you feel about women who think they’re too good to accept a man’s offer of a drink. That said, I’ve never had a man say “Hey, I’d like to buy you the next martini and I assume that should be sufficient payment for a blow-job in my car.”
Have you?
@Amused
“Also: you are no one to dictate values to me, what with your dreams of beating women to saying they are happy in their family lives.”
Yet you demand the right to dictate values to all men?
My dreams of beating women into saying they are happy in their family lives?
How’s that ghetto lookin for ya? The feminist dream of fatherless families in daycare. I thought you cared about women of color?
NWO, today I am wearing tight-ish purple pants, a baggy black Edward Scissorhands shirt, and a vintage black leather jacket. Except for my feet, hands, neck, and head, all of my body is covered, but you can make out that I have legs and a round ass, although the shirt is too loose to reveal that I have breasts.
Am I dressing like a slut? Am I taunting men by flaunting my sexuality? Am I asking to be raped?
KSA abayas are too form-fitting and therefore slutty. Also, I’ve read that women in Jeddah prance around in knee-length kaftans worn over lose pants, wantonly assaulting men with the sight of their nearly naked bodies. I think rural Afghanistan would be more appropriate. Of course there, some women dye their burkas light blue and cinnabar, and that’s whorish.
“No. You’re making the mistake of tarring the whole of the MRM with the same brush”
I’m not sure the guy whose first post on this website contained veiled threats of starting a rape campaign is the best person to say, “We’re not all so bad.”
NWO, again, are there people you don’t want to see beaten and/or raped?
All I’ve got is “maybe yourself.” Maybe. Obviously all women, but also all men who are in any way feminine or have had any positive interactions with women, or simply failed to beat as many women as they possibly could have.
Any exceptions there?
After we’ve established that you want everyone on Earth beaten, you can no longer shock us by providing us with specifics. “Uh, and… Drew Carey! I think Drew Carey should be beaten! Um, are you shocked yet? Okay… the guy who hosts the Puppy Bowl! How about now?”
I clearly don’t demand such a right — after all, I’m not the one calling for people to be beaten in the streets for their opinions. YOU are doing that.
Nah-uh. You didn’t say you want to beat women into saying they are happy. You said that all women who participated in the survey should be dragged out and beaten in the streets. That would include women who said they are happy balancing work with motherhood.
Wtf does any of this have to do with women of color or fatherless families?
I refuse to accept your assertion that an 11-year old girl in capri pants and/or green shoes is in anyway dressing or acting like a “slut” however you may define that term. I consider capri pants to be completely age appropriate clothing for an elementary-to-middle school aged girl. The style has been around for decades; my 63 year old mother wore pedal-pushers in the 50s.
I refuse to argue within the frame of your fucked up-ness. The fact that you find the sight of bare calves on a barely pubescent girl sexually stimulating does not objectively prove that capri-pants are “slutty” clothes.
I would like to know why in “preserving the family” any consideration of making the family a place where women can thrive is somehow wrong.
Today I’m wearing a tight-ish dark purple Darkwing Duck t-shirt and white, blue, and purple striped pajama pants because I’m on Christmas break and I’m not going to put on jeans unless I’m going somewhere. I’m not wearing socks, but the pants do over up my oh-so-slutty ankles. My arms, however, are almost completely exposed below the shoulder. Oh well. Maybe my freckled skin and ginger complexion will scare off the men folk.
Not all women of color are single mothers, nor are all the women of color who are single mothers poor and living in the ghetto. And many of the poor, single mothers who are living in impoverished cannot and do not send their children to day care because they can’t afford it.
Fathers can drop kids off at daycare too or opt to change off with the mother and care for the kids while she’s at work then no daycare at all. That would take some doing to fit schedules but could be done.
@Nobinayamu
Just because I don’t drink doesn’t mean I don’t go to bars. You’ve turned down drinks from men who don’t meet your approval. Well aren’t you moral? Women by the score sit in bars with no money expecting freebies. Hell, we’ve got articles in major MSM newspapers with women bragging about getting thousands a month in freebies.
There’s been many a time where we’re sitting there at a bar eating and a woman comes sauntering over in a skimpy outfit and says, “what are you drinking?” As in, “buy me a drink” as she just reaches over and grabs a chicken tender and “pleasantly” joins in the conversation as if she’s welcome. Or aren’t women like that?
NWO goes to bars… in his head. I have literally never seen anyone of any gender do what he describes as a common occurrence, especially among strangers.
@Xtra
“Fathers can drop kids off at daycare too or opt to change off with the mother and care for the kids while she’s at work then no daycare at all. That would take some doing to fit schedules but could be done.”
Is that what men can do? I’m told if a woman does that she’s oppressed as a mere “helpmeet” to a man. So what you want is all men to be a lowly “helpmeet” to all woman?
I’m rockin’ the long white bathrobe look today, but I’m not sure it’s slutty since no man can see me. In fact, I’m not sure I even exist if no man can see me. If a woman is sitting on her couch drinking vanilla rooibos, and no man is around to determine how slutty her outfit is, is she really there?
Thanks Bostonian, somehow I missed that. So I guess what I would call an 11 year old girl “dressed like a slut” is “a kid who doesn’t happen to be from a mennonite family.”
“Instead of promoting feminizing men into your frilly dress strap-on debauchery, you should be dragging everyone of these women out into the street and beating the ever loving crap out of them.”
Cute. Answer Holly’s question–who DON’T you want to see beaten?
“Do ya call that love?”
What you know about love could do the hustle on the head of a pin.
NWO, why aren’t you using my citation when you’re clearing pulling your posts out of your ass? Is it because I put it in MLA style? I can do APA if you prefer.
@Bostonian
“I have literally never seen anyone of any gender do what he describes as a common occurrence, especially among strangers.”
Does you experience encompass the world? You’ve never seen it happen so it never happens? What else doesn’t happen?
Does yours?
No, NWO, there are women like that. That’s not what women are like. And, you know what, I don’t care.
It isn’t my responsibility as a woman or as a feminist to police the behavior of women I don’t know. If, in the scenario you presented, a woman makes an explicit or implicit request for a drink then you should tell her “no.” Tell her that taking food of someone’s plate is rude and that she should go sit somewhere else.
NWO’s going a bit overboard with the “women are evil” thing today.
@Xtra
“I would like to know why in “preserving the family” any consideration of making the family a place where women can thrive is somehow wrong.”
Can men thrive as well? Does it matter if men thrive? Are happy? Healthy? Content?
Let’s all make sure women thrive. What can men do so women thrive? Be more supportive? Loving? Caring? More domestic duties? Listen? Be attentive? More giving? Kinder? Gentler? Stronger? More emotional?
Just saying NWO lies through his teeth as usual.
Joanna: I know, right? I’m wondering if he’s envisioning that whole “beating women in the streets” thing like the Holocaust: first there is a massive beating, gang rapes and eleven-year-olds with severed heads and shit, then Owly gets to say it didn’t happen?
What particularly gals me about the ‘traditional family values’ types like NWO is that their conception of family (one man, one woman, and children) is a recent, modern aberration that is less than two centuries old. It is the result of the uprooting necessary in an industrial capitalist society, where men had to be mobile to be able to look for work in far away cities (or even other countries) rather than stick around with their kin for generations and generations. Families used to be multigenerational (3+ generations under one roof) and children were raised more or less collectively by multiple aunts and uncles (and grandparents) rather than only by their mother and father. Capitalism made it necessary to create a more mobile familial unit, just like capitalism made it necessary for women to enter the workforce because one wage was often not enough anymore to feed one’s children.
A few generations past, people would have complained that children couldn’t be properly raised by ONLY one mother and one father.
NWO, do you still stand by your belief that women should be enslaved?
I dunno, treat us as friends and partners?
Sure that works.
Enough domestic duties that they are comparable between the partners.
Given that you are starting from the position of promoting child-rape and summary executions of women, I’d say all of those apply.
Quite the contrary: be less emotional, because you are clearly losing it. Like all MRA’s and misogynists, you are an emotional wreck.
NWO:
Yes, jackass, they can, and most relationships are set up so that both thrive. Sorry you’ve never experienced it.
For a libertarian, NWO is remarkably bad at the concept of “freedom.”