Fellas! Protect yourself from these sneaky lady tricks!
Some of them start young.
Courtesy of MGTOWforums.com, here’s a little collection of some of the evil dastardly tricks that women pull on the poor oppressed men of the world. Obviously, most sensible guys know that “housework” is a scam; so-called “housewives” spend most of their time on the couch eating bon bons and watching The View.
But did you know about Arson Night? Or the Cheerleader Ring Drop? Read on, and become enlightened Knowledge is power! STAY SAFE, GUYS!
If a man give his woman 100 dollars a week for food shopping, she will spend say 60 on food and keep the rest. When he enquires why there’s no food in the house come Friday he will get bitched at for not trusting her. And made to feel guilty for accusing her, even though she has deceived him.
They like to lay in bed, and pretend to be sick or sad (which means you won’t be coming in there) and text all their boyfriends.
When they say they are going out with the girls, they could be out doing Anything. This ranges from doing hard drugs to stripping to boinking strangers to sitting alone on a curb to arson. You can never be sure.
How about when they try their version of the Jedi mind trick on you. You know the thing they brag about in private. Trying to make something that’s her idea, seem like it’s *your* idea so that you’ll do it. And then pat you on the back to boost your ego like a trained dog when in reality you did what they for *them* all along.
Sooo many guys fall for this. Suddenly they’re buying crap they don’t need or moving the inlaws in because the woman made it seem like *he* wanted it. Classic.
Short Hair: The Beginning of the End
Women spend so much time on their appearance… why?
That’s right, to catch a sucker into paying the bills. Once the contract is signed, and the babies are popped out, she has you by the balls and doesn’t need to pretend anymore. Next she’ll wear more “comfortable clothes” and cut her hair short. It’s the beginning of the end.
And, yes, The Cheerleader Ring Drop:
In 11th grade high school, I was in the wrestling team. One day, during a water break, this cheerleader next to me started getting panicky and asked me if i could help her find her ring. She “dropped” it and did this just as an opener, i suppose. I ended up ‘being’ with her and it quickly diminished; she was bunk. Another cheerleader came up to me while i was with her and told me “what are you doing her?, you’re way too good for her!”
Luckily, the fella calling himself Tha Big Daddy C-Master, who started the thread, has a simple solution to all this. Well, two simple solutions:
You can always turn the other way, or just use a woman. Human toilets and all.
I couldn’t have said it worse myself!
Posted on December 18, 2011, in $MONEY$, beta males, evil women, I'm totally being sarcastic, men who should not ever be with women ever, MGTOW, misogyny. Bookmark the permalink. 961 Comments.
But that might be stealing their preshussssss sperm!
Now THAT(in bold) is certainly true. How bizarre of him to put arson as a possible thing that a woman might be doing while out.
I have noticed that more than half of the women out there seem to be a little less direct and lot less confrontational than most men. Men and women really do have differing ways of going about getting what they want.
This is most likely the sort of thing that a parent would tell her(or even his)children during and after a divorce . Heard a lot of stories about how vindictive ex-wives try to turn their children against their father to persuade the judge to grant her custody.
Arguably, a lot of that is cultural socialization. There’s a lot of “men don’t like/shouldn’t like/are scared by forward women” messages in mainstream culture, so women are expected to be less forward. But depending on the community you’re a part of, that’s not always entirely true– for example, New Yorkers as a whole tend to be more forward than, say, American Southerners, so my Brooklynite mother is way more aggressive than, say, my North Carolinian father-in-law. If you grow up with the expectation that you will be confrontational and forward, you put in the effort to learn how to be that way, and vice versa.
I have noticed that more than half of the women out there seem to be a little less direct and lot less confrontational than most men.
More than half of the women, eh? You must know a lot of people. Like, all of them.
Comments like the ones by MGTOWforums are amusing. I don’t really understand why men can be bitter when it comes to dating. I get the bitterness and anger when it comes to divorce, child support and custody issues though.
It’s like these guy’s are just angry about not getting sex and that women are, in general, “dirty toilets”. Here is the solution to that problem:
Use hookers in places where prostitution is legal (Nevada, Germany, etc..). Paying a prostitute is most likely going to be cheaper than having a girlfriend in the long run…and since they have to get tested often(where it is legal), they most likely have a lower rate of infections than the general female population. So 1) cheaper and 2) less “dirty toilets” issues.
Seems like a win-win.
Well, nameless could just know more then half of them, Dracula
Yawn, B_don. Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.
So, basically, Eimos, you’re doing the same “Sure they’re hateful, but you have to UNDERSTAND how ANGRY they are” thing that drove McElroy, etc, away in horror? Okay then. So you really don’t have a better option, you just want us to UNDERSTAND HOW ANGRY they are. Well, like she said and like I said, I been abused, and I’m not gonna be beat up again just cause I came close to try and help or listen. Thankyou and goodnight.
Wow, is it just me, or does it seem like Al Bundy and his “No Ma’am” group are writing about these “tricks”?
Some of these ideas seem like they are straight from “Married with Children.” Especially the one about how women don’t do housework and instead go shopping all day, and the one about how women take their husband’s money and use most of it on themselves and very little for food.
Think of women as though they are people and approach all interactions with others in a spirit of respect?
OH WAIT NO
IT IS THE OPPOSITE OF THAT
Do the sex workers’ feelings about this cross your mind at all? Even a little bit?
I also like “cheaper than having a girlfriend in the long run”. ‘Cuz she’ll never spend money on gas to come see you or buy you presents or nothin’, just demand you get her stuff.
This is Brandon we’re talking about.
@Voip: I would assume most sex-positive feminist prostitutes would like my idea….more business = more money for them.
Also, why do I have to take the sex workers feelings into account? She is providing a service…that is it. As long as she is free to decide whether or not she wants to provide that service, It is up to her if she wants to remain in that line of work. I also don’t take the 7-11 cashiers feelings into account when I am buying gas and a slim jim.
@Molly: That really depends on how high or low your libido is.
Guys, when Brandon-types talk about how much cheaper and safer going to a prostitute is than having a girlfriend, that’s just something intended to get a rise out of people. Pay no attention. Seriously, Brandon’s preference for prostitutes is a blessing for every woman who does not become his girlfriend. As for the sex workers themselves, they can interact with Brandon on a very limited basis and not have to deal with his bullshit in between orgasms.
Presents and visits are dependent upon the libido?
That’s the saddest worldview, like, ever.
@Brandon in general, I’m pretty sure that guys that think that women are dirty toilets don’t make the best costomers.
Also, it’s only about libido? A girlfriend can’t want to come by and spend time/money on a boyfriend for anything else?
@Amused: I have never used a prostitute. I am morally opposed to it.
Well — it’s Brandon we are talking about. What would you do with Brandon? I sure can’t think of anything.
@Amused: I have never used a prostitute. I am morally opposed to it.”
How nice for you. May I ask why?
@Amused: Scientific studies on density?
Brandon probably doesn’t use prostitutes because that would be “fueling their addiction” or whatever he said about promiscuous women.
So prostitutes AREN’T cheaper in the long run because a man MIGHT get presents and gifts? Seems pretty flimsy to me.
By and large, girlfriends are much more expensive than hookers. Although, they also provide things that hookers will not provide. However, if you are only taking money into account and you just want to have an orgasm…hookers are cheaper.
Hehehe, good one!
Wow. Really? That’s remarkable, given that you are not morally opposed to videotaping women having sex with you without their consent. You are just a gift that keeps on giving.
@Zhinxy: I don’t think I should pay for something that should be given freely. The only time where I could even imagine spending money on a prostitute would be if it was a special occasion (e.g sleeping with a famous porn star).
Crap. I hate responding to Brandon like he’s on the same planet or something, but seriously, if a guy wants to pay a sex worker for services, I totally have no problem with that. But it’s weird that for Brandon to submit that traveling to Germany/Nevada, paying for lodging, taking time off work, and paying the sex worker is cheaper than dating, or that having sex with sex workers is going to carry with it less of a chance of STD transmission than, say, having sex within a long-term monogamous relationship.
In fact, people who aren’t sex workers can insist on sex sex practices and partners too! Check it out!
Unfortunately, he’s a gift from Aunt Clara, who has, for years, labored under the delusion that we are perpetually four years old. And fans of pink bunny suits.
@Zhinxy: I don’t think I should pay for something that should be given freely. The only time where I could even imagine spending money on a prostitute would be if it was a special occasion (e.g sleeping with a famous porn star).
—
So how is that moral? This is just about valuation for you. I could feel the same way about non-sex-work-related-massages, and say I think I should get them for free, and only if it was a superduper special masseuse would I pay, but that wouldn’t have anything to do with morals. So it has nothign to do with right or wrong, just what value you put on it. Which is totally fine, but saying you had a moral problem with it was a little confusing, that’s all.
@Bee: Again, it really depends on how high your libido is. If you have a high sex drive, the costs will most likely be far greater. However, if you have a low libido and need sex less frequently, the costs quite possibly would be cheaper. Again, this is only about satisfying your sex drive…nothing else.
Sex Work in Brandonland is as fascinating as all other topics, I see.
Prostitutes aren’t very cheap, dude, especially if you want a sex worker who follows legal regulations and gets tested and who hasn’t been exploited. Let’s say you only visit one once a week, at the very low-end price of $100/hour (usually it’s going to be at least $250, or $100 for a half hour). That’s still $400 a month. I don’t know what the heck you’re buying for your girlfriend, but most people don’t spend that much on their non-spouse, non-dependent partners unless 1. they’re rich or 2. it’s a very special occasion or 3. it’s a long distance thing and one or both people have to travel. Maybe if you go out somewhere expensive every weekend or something, and weren’t watching your budget, you’d hit the $400 bar. But I really doubt you spend $1000 dollars a month ($250 once a week) on Ashley.
Also, always pay your sex worker well, whether you end up saving over a girlfriend or not.
@Zhinxy: Morality isn’t absolute. I think killing people is wrong and I don’t think society should condone it. However, if an army attacked my country, I would have no problem killing them. It all depends on the circumstances.
I originally cut my hair short so it would fit better under a fencing coif. That was before I was even seeing MrB. I’ve grown it out a couple of times, but decided to keep it short because it’s just easier to deal with.
And yes, I have actually asked MrB what he thinks – it seems polite, he see my hair a lot more than I do, and I don’t want to get a cut or color that makes him sick – but he just says to do whatever I want.
I’m surprised girlfriends are so expensive for Brandon…didn’t he say he doesn’t date women that don’t provide for themselves?
Again as to Brandon’s Deep Thoughts On Sex Workers: yaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwn.
I have no idea how much money my boyfriend spends on me – either things specifically for me, or things we enjoy together. I doubt he keeps a log.
@Kladle: Again. It depends on how often you would see a prostitute. Once a week could be more expensive, but once a month could be cheaper.
@Zhinxy: Morality isn’t absolute. I think killing people is wrong and I don’t think society should condone it. However, if an army attacked my country, I would have no problem killing them. It all depends on the circumstances.”
Uh, okay, that’s nice. But what the hell does that have to do with what you said about sex work, and how “i’d be willing to pay in x case but not y” wasn’t at all a moral argument? Unless… You think that WAS a moral argument? If so, why?
You missed zhinxy’s point entirely, Brandon. You saying you don’t want to pay for sex is not a moral judgment, it’s a value assessment. They are two different concepts. Morals are context dependent, yes (or at least can be), but value judgements are a separate concept. They can be linked, but saying “I think that’s priced to high” is not a moral judgement in an of itself.
Even if you’re only talking about incidental costs, how much vacation time do you have? How much do you think plane tickets to Germany cost?
But… aren’t we talking about how much it would cost to have an equal amount of sex? Most people in relationships have sex more often than once a month, so it wouldn’t be more cost-effective.
Not that I know the first thing about what sex workers charge; I’m mostly just going by what Kladle said.
Brandon keeps saying “girlfriend” when he means “hookup” or “fuckbuddy”. No wonder I keep getting confused!
Brandon also wrote, “If you have a high sex drive, the costs will most likely be far greater. However, if you have a low libido and need sex less frequently, the costs quite possibly would be cheaper.”
I’m also kind of wondering what Brandon means by “costs” now. My main costs when I’ve been seeing someone regularly have been transportation to get to/from their house, the occasional dinner out, condoms, and maybe a present for them (and by “present” I mean, I bought two movie tickets or a sweater. What can I say, I’m a bit poor. :P) These costs don’t seem to really be tied to how high my partner’s libido is, though. Hmmm…
Anyone who thinks prostitutes are cheaper than girlfriends has probably been dating the wrong women. Just sayin’.
“Morality isn’t absolute. I think killing people is wrong and I don’t think society should condone it. However, if an army attacked my country, I would have no problem killing them. It all depends on the circumstances.”
I think this is what Brandon means, zhinxy:
@Nobby: I see it as both a value assessment and part of my own personal morality. There are always exceptions to the rule.
@Bee and Viscaria: Again, this won’t work if the man has a high sex drive. Men that have a lower sex drive can supplement prostitutes with porn. So a man could theoretically masturbate for the entire month, then see a hooker at the end of the month.
The notion of couples having more sex is also disputed. Sure, if you are in a happy relationship, I am sure you might get more than average. However, if you are in an unhappy relationship (and many are), you might not be getting any sex.
This really isn’t a debate about how much sex a man can get. It is about how much sex he needs to satisfy his own libido. Sure he might have sex twice a week, but that doesn’t mean he will be unhappy if it gets cut down to once every 2 weeks.
But why does it have to feel like that, Molly?
Oh, well, i suppose Brandon had better go get his armor.
Again, this won’t work if the man has a high sex drive.
Seems like you’re assuming the woman can’t also have a high sex drive.
I don’t think once a month for couples is average, but I suppose I get what you’re saying. Which is to say, I think it’s very very stupid, but in an internally consistent way.
“Again, this won’t work if the man has a high sex drive. Men that have a lower sex drive can supplement prostitutes with porn. So a man could theoretically masturbate for the entire month, then see a hooker at the end of the month.”
This is so confusing now. Did Brandon mean “prostitute” instead of “girlfriend” when he said how much you spent on your girlfriend depended on your libido? Or are there hidden costs to a girlfriend we’re not understanding yet?
@Dracula: Umm…no I am not. Just because I say a man might have a high sex drive, that doesn’t mean that I think women are incapable of having a high sex drive as well.
But your response to zhinxy still odes not actually include a moral component. It would be like saying Starbucks charging $5 for a latte is a moral affront. That, by itself, has no moral component.
Also, did you know that sometimes people, both men and women, go for months, or even years without sex? Crazy, I know!
I used to wear my hear in a pixie cut, like Halle Berry or Winona Ryder. I’ve grown it out again to go down my back. My husband actually liked it better short. He says it looked sassy and wild. I’m wearing it long because I like having more options for styling it, but sometimes I’m tempted to go short again. I’m even more tempted knowing that short hair repels and annoys douchebags.
It won’t embed? I have a moral problem with that!!!
…that better work ;)
And for the record, pixie cuts are great. In general, I have absolutely no conception of this idea that short hair on girls can’t be good. It just… makes no sense to me at all.
I tend to keep my hair somewhere between chin- and shoulder-length, because I’m too lazy to do anything other than wash-and-wear. If I grow it longer I either have to style it or be content with looking like I’m in high school. I guess I can’t trap any men into marriage with promises of Blake Lively tresses :(
Brandon – “I see it as both a value assessment and part of my own personal morality. There are always exceptions to the rule.”
Okay, but, there’s still two different categories of… Oh, just never mind.
Well, we have the start of another great Brandon thread here.
Brandon: This problem, I will solve it by doing x
Everyone else: Doing x will not necessarily solve that problem and is a) dumb, and b) creepy*
Brandon: [doubles down to defend x]
Everyone else: *head-scratching*
And by morning the thread hits 500!
*I don’t think visiting a sex worker is necessarily stupid or creepy, just that it doesn’t replace a relationship, if that’s what you’re looking for – and the fact that our friend here thinks it could is super-creepy.
@Kristin: I never said it was to replace a relationship.
Oh, and in terms of arsonists, I went to high school with one. He became obsessed with an actress from “The Young and the Restless”, believed he was possessed by demons, and then…set some fires. Fortunately nothing serious and no injuries. He got light sentence, mainly probation, and treatment, and AFAIK I know recovered completely.
He also played Captain Von Trapp in our production of “The Sound of Music”. Make of that what you will.
I wish I could post the Doctor Who episode Battlefield. The seventh Doctor, Ace, The Brigadier and Arthurian Legends: awesome!
As for hair ideal length, it depends on the face. I generally prefer long, but I know some women who definitely look better with short hair. The only examples I can think of off the top of my head are people I know, and posting Facebook photos would be creepy, so I’ll just leave it at that.
Brandon, why is having a girlfriend so costly? Why are you unable to split the costs? (Is someone doing all the traveling/buying dinner/buying movie tickets?) What are you buying more of if you’re hornier?
Using a prostitute in place of having sex with/spending money on a girlfriend is not replacing a relationship, apparently.
@Zhinxy: Morality isn’t absolute. I think killing people is wrong and I don’t think society should condone it. However, if an army attacked my country, I would have no problem killing them. It all depends on the circumstances.”
That response makes no sense Brandon. xD How is that a response to what she said? xD
You know… I just bought a Playbook b/c it went down from 500$ to 200$… was that a moral judgement too? XD
As for the arsonist line…
I’m a geek. So sue me.
I never said it was to replace a relationship.
Paying a prostitute is most likely going to be cheaper than having a girlfriend in the long run…
Dude…even for you, this is a rather sad dodge. “I didn’t say it was an alternative to a relationship! I just said it was an alternative to having a girlfriend! Totally different!”
So it’s in *addition* to a relationship, then, Brandon? But then how are you saving money?
I mean, I thought the logic was “In order to have sex with a girlfriend I have to spend money on her by taking her out on dates etc; depending on my libido, it might end up being cheaper just to visit prostitutes and skip the dating altogether”. Am I wrong here? If that isn’t what you meant, than what does
mean?
Nice that you acknowledge that a GF might provide something other than an orgasm in exchange for an evening out, BTW. It’s still a coldly transactional view of human sexuality, but nice touch!
@Laura: Prostitute = purely sex.
Relationship = sex, love, caring, kindness, etc…
If you want love and affection, you will certainly not get that from a prostitute (well, unless she can act well..but it is fake). It might work on naive men…maybe.
If you just want to have an orgasm and don’t have that many needs for intimacy, then sleeping with a prostitute can be more cost effective since you would only be dating a woman to have sex with her, all the while she might think you are in a “relationship”.
Plus the man isn’t “stringing along” a woman because he is only dating her to have sex.
That’s all well and good, but your scenario seems to hinge on a man with high sex drive dating a woman with a low one, and this leading to sex costing more. So she’s doing what, exactly? Having sex she doesn’t enjoy in exchange for gifts? Really, the whole relationship you describe reads as a financial transaction. Wouldn’t it be much more sensible to suggest that people try to find a partner with a compatible level of sexual desire?