Women! Why must you assault men with your evil sexy outfits?
Women totally slutting it up in provocative waist-cinching attire
Apparently, or so I’ve learned from the manosphere, every single thing that women do is designed to torment men. Yesterday, we learned that women with jobs are leeching off of men just as much as women without jobs.
Further proof of female perfidy can be found in a recent post on the popular manosphere blog In Mala Fide with the provocative title Provocative Female Attire is an Assault Against Men. Guest poster Giovanni Dannato lays it out for anyone who needs convincing:
When a woman walks down a crowded sidewalk in revealing clothing, she is forcing herself on every man nearby.
The woman fully understands the powerful biological drives of men. She knows they cannot ignore her, not even if they want to.
Amazingly, the fact that a woman might show some cleavage does not automatically mean that she wants to have sex with every single man who sees her.
She has chosen to advertise herself to everyone passing by, but she is looking only for a few men. The wealthiest, the most famous, the most powerful men she can attract. …
There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. …
Likewise, a woman who puts her goodies blatantly on display is making false advertisements. Nobody supposes or expects that she could share herself with her entire audience—not even if she wanted to.
That’s right. Women are like gum. Or that pizza Spicoli had delivered to him in class in Fast Times at Ridgemont High that the mean Mr. Hand forced him to share with everyone. And if you gum-pizza-ladies are not willing to share yourself with every horny man (and, presumably, lesbian) who happens to notice you in your slut uniform, you are committing a terrible infraction.
Oh, sure, wearing a totally cute outfit is not specifically against the law, but, as Dannato reminds us,
looking for refuge in explicit written law is inherently disingenuous. …
[W]omen exposing themselves without intent to reciprocate the attention they attract is impolite and inconsiderate – an act of aggression in which they use the power of their sex as a weapon.
So how can men defend themselves against such evil feminine perfidy? By yelling “hey, whore! How much?” or “can I squeeze those titties?” or “Can you give me directions to Pussy Avenue?” Because street harassment – sorry, catcalling – is
a defense mechanism used by lower status men against women flaunting themselves publicly – for the benefit of millionaires only.
What else are men supposed to do?
[M]en are effectively strapped down, gagged, and muzzled while females can flaunt and taunt with impunity. For many men this pretty much sums up every single day of an entire lifetime at school and at work.
And women won’t even admit that when they put on a cute outfit and leave the house that they’re doing it to torment men.
Western Women don’t just abuse their incredible sexual power, they pathologically lie about their inability to understand the effects and implications of their actions. In fact, they seem to derive a sort of sociopathic pleasure from being able to sow unpleasantness and discord without consequence – all while playing innocent. They express their contempt and hatred for men even as they troll the populace for providers. Their enormous power comes without responsibility and they love it that way.
And now these evil women have come up with an even-more-dastardly-than-usual way to torment men “[i]n the most vengeful, derisive, and mocking way they know how.” Yep, you guessed it: The SlutWalks. Large groups of women tormenting men with sexy clothes in unison!
Apparently overwhelmed by contemplation of the sheer feminine evil of the SlutWalks, Giovanni ends his post abruptly at this point.
I admit I don’t have the patience to wade through the comments. If any of you do, please post any of your findings below.
EDITED TO ADD: Ironically, Ferdinand Bardamu (the guy behind In Mala Fide) aids and abets the evil sexy-woman assault on men with his own retro porn site Retrotic. NSFW, of course. And if Dannato’s post is to believed, not safe for straight men generally.
NOTE: This post contains sarcasm.
Posted on November 28, 2011, in $MONEY$, alpha males, creepy, evil women, I'm totally being sarcastic, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, oppressed men, reactionary bullshit, sexual harassment, sluts. Bookmark the permalink. 517 Comments.
everyone is an asshole to some degree or another for different reasons I guess…..
I know Amanda M. is a favorite villain of the MRM, but these two are not really in the same category of feminist at all.
@Joanna
“And they say women can’t control their hormones. Really dudes, get a hold of yourselves!”
Women can’t control themselves in the least. From the time they hit puberty thru their entire lives, they dress and act like an animal in heat with the express intention of sexually exciting all men within eyeshot.
Are there young boys around entering puberty who have no understanding of what’s happening? They don’t care. If they did they’d show the slightest bit of restaint and understanding. Worse, they encourage young girls to imitate their behavior as well.
Do they know their actions of teasing and denial is cruel and degrading? Of course. They enjoy taunting men with sex and then calling men animals as they themselves behave like the cruelest of animals.
They enjoy acting like animals while demanding men behave. They seem to be in their glory when they can excite as many men as possible, but woe to any man who dares touch the sacred chalice he’s been taunted and teased with.
Their animalistic actions of teasing, taunting and denial over and over again brings a perverse pleasure. Young boys, socially awkward men, lonely men; It’s like a game of how many sexually frustrated men you can leave in your wake.
With their animalistic behavior they’ll cause every type of sexual dysfunction possible. All the while screaming behave while laughing at the sexual dysfunction they’ve caused. By the boatload they’ll become the majority coucilors and therapists of every kind to council men on their poor behavior; A final insult.
These same women will scold a child for teasing a dog while she commits and encourages all women to commit the vilest act of taunting and degradation. Truely, modern day women treat a dumb beast with far more love, tenderness and compassion they afford to any man.
Does anyone else hear the Eddie Murphy “Ice Cream Man” bit in their heads when NWO goes off on how women taunt men by being dressed?
“I got some ice cream, and you can’t afford it…”
Seriously, NWO how many women do you know? In real life, personally. Not on the internet.
Mr. Futrelle, fair enough, I was trying to make a point that as there are different ideaologies in Feminism, there are different ideologies in the manosphere….
http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/10/05/lick-that-kitty-you-misogynistic-douchebag/
one of my favorite authors ;)
(except I like the OG version on his blog better than the inmalafide one.)
Okay, NWO, photo time!
This is me: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v92/wolfychan/d0noj.jpg
Am I dressed “animalistically”? (This is so silly. Animals don’t wear clothes.)
Do you feel men seeing me in this manner of dress will be unable to control themselves? Do you feel I’m teasing and taunting men with this presentation? Do you think I deserve to be raped for dangling my tasty temptingness before men in this way?
NWOslave seems to be having theme days lately. Yesterday it was , “Why are you so mean to me, guys?!” and today it’s “women are animals”.
I can’t wait for his upcoming blue period.
And to the guys who want the old way back, are you crazy?
I love the non-contractual sex whoo hoo Lol
I wonder what NWO makes of National Geographic?
random6x7, he probably considers it porn.
I dunno Holly. Those shorts are rather above the knee if you ask me.
“There’s an old elementary school custom…when you bring something tasty to class, it’s understood that you should put it away unless you intend to share it with others. …”
I wanted to link to Brian Griffin (?) saying “Did you bring enough breasts for the rest of the class?” here, but I couldn’t find it on YouTube (and the results of the search were… odd).
Probably just as well, half my posts are just linking to videos. I’m the Wreck-Gar of Manbooz!
Seriously, though, there’s a reason why that custom is associated with elementary school. Adults are expected to be mature enough to deal with not getting everything they want without throwing a temper tantrum over it.
Also, even if you bought into that weird idea about ‘men are only attracted to bodies, women are only attracted to actions’, wouldn’t the male equivalent of dressing sexy be acting cool? Not raping someone, FFS. They’d have to organize CoolWalks where they walk around being all confident and charming and dressing snappily and playing in bands.
“They’d have to organize CoolWalks where they walk around being all confident and charming and dressing snappily and playing in bands.”
Lol!
Let’s be honest folk’s, there really is no intelligence here. Everything is mockery and hatred in the old boobsphere. It’s what you’re all about. Isn’t it? Oh that’s right. I forgot the lip service equality speech. Your little social experiment is about to crash all around you. No biggie, nothing I wanna save anyway. The real fun is about to begin.
Joanna – They’re at the knee! I am a Proper Lady!
…I’m also extremely short. On an average-sized man they’d be above the knee. I guess that makes him sluttier and more animalistic than me.
Gosh Holly, I can see your forearms, and your knees! And if the picture had extended further downward, I might have been able to see your ankles – and everyone* knows that they are extremely sinful to be left uncovered.
* In the 19th century, perhaps.
NWO, thanks for finally waking up to the fact that the purpose of this site is to mock misogyny. You may go now.
NWO: Where the hell do you get this bullshit? Even if every single woman in the world acted like a dog in heat (WHICH WE DON’T), that doesn’t give you (or any man) license to skip the asking permission part of sex. YOU have to take responsibility FOR YOUR OWN BEHAVIOR. Even if a woman is walking naked down the street, YOU need to keep your fucking pants zipped. And it’s the same if there’s a man walking down the street naked, I have to keep MY pants on. See, everybody has to take responsibility for controlling our sex drives.
Hey… if women are interested in money and a provider and that’s our sexual desires, why aren’t there more female thieves? You’d think that if:
A) Rape is the natural result of frustrated male sexuality
and
B) Men are attracted to bodies while women are attracted to $MONEY$,
Then women with frustrated sexuality would steal large amounts of cash all the time. And, I don’t know, masturbate with it or something. Buy themselves shoes and handbags. If women really are all turned on by money and desperate for status symbols, why aren’t women all enormous petty thieves?
(Pre-emptively: No, claiming that dating/marriage/divorce is “like theft” does not count. Yes, I’m sure you can find a news story of a woman stealing something. But it’s definitely not the female epidemic this worldview would predict.)
Yea, Stoner….the different ideologies of the manosphere are which aspects of a woman’s life are appropriate/more useful for men to control.
At the end of the day, MRAs/PUAs/MGTOWs have one uniting belief: that women are subhuman and only men have have the final say on how they should live their lives.
All of them and their “varying ideologies” can go fuck themselves.
You know, I would probably be a miserable person too if I decided everyone walks by and turns me on is doing it on purpose just to taunt me.
If I’m understanding this correctly, women are just doing this to frustrate straight guys, right? So when I see a woman and find her attractive, that’s just a side-effect and I don’t get to be all righteously indignant?
Imagine if a woman was walking down the street naked. Not “like naked,” not with exposed arms or whateverthefuck, seriously buck ass naked. How would you react?
You might be very surprised.
You might be worried about her, particularly if it was cold out or if she seemed confused.
You might be offended, if she was hangin’ it out in front of people who really didn’t want to see that.
You might be curious about why she was doing it.
You might be, if this wasn’t the first time you saw such a thing, completely indifferent and more concerned with getting to the bank before closing or remembering to buy dog food.
You might like yourself a look, sure, if the situation seemed under control and she was your type. Maybe even a dopey grin if she wasn’t looking your way.
But I’m having a hell of a time getting to where it makes any sense to sexually assault her. Just because she’s naked? At the absolute extreme of “slutty appearance,” it still makes no sense in my head.
@KathleenB
” YOU have to take responsibility FOR YOUR OWN BEHAVIOR.”
Indeed you do. if a woman devolves down to animalistic state when she dresses and acts sexually to attract the attention of all men. And a man devolves down to an animalstic state when he takes what sexually attracts him. What is the ration of men-vs-women who have devolved down to an animalistic state?
Responsibilty is for everyone.
NWO, am I “dressing sexually”?
NWO, what’s your explanation for the fact that most people tend to choose mates in their own socioeconomic class? If women went after money, and men went after looks, that shouldn’t be the case.
Quackers,
Fair enough….
I’ve felt, as a male “unfairly judged” many times when reading things by Feminist authors….
“…if a woman devolves down to animalistic state when she dresses and acts sexually to attract the attention of all men.”
Except we don’t. When we dress up, it’s either for ourselves, or for someone in particular, OR we aren’t dressed up fancy, but it just happens to be attractive to someone’s tastes. Since you are the one making the assumption that we do it to attract every man, the burden of proof is on you. It’s not for us to have to defend existing while being attractive to some.
Right, so now I’m just waiting with bated breath for NWO’s predicted Manboobz Apocalypse Fun Times.
*drums fingers impatiently*
How about now?
I’ve taken figure drawing classes before. That includes naked male and female models. Surprisingly, no one has sexually assaulted any of them simply for being naked. In fact, most people are just interested in getting a good drawing done.
Amazing how people have the ability to control themselves! you’d think we have something crazy like free will and common decency to not rape!
@random6x7
Women marry up, men marry down. Or, if you prefer denial of facts in feminist lingo. Ideology good, facts bad.
But that’s not what men and women do. They both marry across. Socioeconomic status has one of the highest correlation coefficients for mate selection – as high as religion and and age. (Diamond, Jared, 1992, The Third Chimpanzee, New York: Harper Perennial, p. 101, before you ask).
“Ideology good, facts bad.”
Isn’t that you’re motto?
NWO: You conveniently skipped the bit where I talked about the responsibility thing going two ways. As in: I have to control my base impulses around men until I get permission to do anything with them. So do you. So does everyone. It doesn’t fucking matter what I’m wearing. Or what anyone else is wearing – we all have to wait for permission to do sexual things with each other. See how it works?
One question before I go.
Since it is a biological fact. Women dressing and acting sexually is merely devolving down to an animalistic state to signify readiness for mating.
Can women control their sexuality?
What does it matter? You won’t respond to anyone, anyway.
NWO’s definition of “fact” is idiosyncratic, to say the least.
Of course we can! We can put on different clothes.
Silly NWO, thinking women couldn’t control which clothes they wear.
It’s not a biological fact. Women in other cultures run around wearing little more than a loincloth, and rape is unknown to them. How does that happen if your assertions are “biological fact”?
When I take over the world, it will be illegal to make biologically deterministic statements about human cultures unless the person so doing can name at least five non-industrialized societies for which it holds true.
NWO: That’s the stupidest fucking question I’ve ever read. Do men control their sexuality? Or do you fall on every woman who turns you on like a wild animal? Because I certainly manage not to molest every person I see who turns me on.
Why do men “marry down”?
@Stoner
I don’t always agree with feminist authors/bloggers either. Once in a blue moon even an MRA blogger say something I agree with, once all that misogyny is out of the way. Unfortunately it is very rare to see something like this on a manosphere blog because so much of it is saturated in misogyny. I’ve never seen feminist bloggers refer to men as children, or say things like “men dont know what they want, they have to be guided” or “men just play at careers, women do the real work” (see David’s previous post to this one)
Occasionally I’ll see something that stands out as misandrous on a feminist blog. Usually other feminists will call whoever made the misandrist post or comment out. On a manosphere blog though, 99% is misogynistic. The MRM likes to say that David only posts the extreme MRA comments, but its all pretty common. I’ve lurked on MRA blogs enough to see this for myself.
@KathleenB
“NWO: You conveniently skipped the bit where I talked about the responsibility thing going two ways. As in: I have to control my base impulses around men until I get permission to do anything with them. So do you. So does everyone. It doesn’t fucking matter what I’m wearing. Or what anyone else is wearing – we all have to wait for permission to do sexual things with each other. See how it works?”
A womans impulse is to act sexually in some way to signify readiness for mating.
Everywhere in the world, that’s how nature works. It really doesn’t matter what animal you are, that’s how it works.
Since this is the case, and all women dress and act sexually virtually all the time. Women are never controlling the base impulse. You are acting like animals with no control over your sexual impulse.
Slavey:
If it’s a fact, someone other than you … oh, right, nothing you say is intended to convey meaning. Like that last sentence there, you saw that said about you, and you saw that everyone thought it was brilliant, so you’re hoping that if you say it you, too, will be brilliant. You don’t even understand that it meant something initially.
That said, in what way is what you just said at all “biology”? Though I don’t even know how to begin to have a discussion on that point with someone who believes citing a source for something makes it wrong.
Like they had their own personal Garden of Eden in Sweden
You mean Garden of Sweden.
NWO, I usually ask these things when you get political, but how do you know these things about women?
Is it from women you personally know? (sorry, I cracked myself up a bit there)
Is it from women you observe in your community?
Did you read it somewhere?
You can’t just know things unless you’re Miss Fucking Cleo. How did you get to know women’s evil ways so well?
NWO: Read a fucking book. Preferably one that contains actual facts instead of words pulled out of the author’s ass. Fuck off. And seriously, get that black hole in your head checked on – it’s going hit critical, and local authorities deserve some notice before cars and lamp posts start getting pulled toward your head.
He can’t read books. I’ve noticed that he ignores me if I cite a book, so I think he’s allergic to either page numbers or the names of publishers. If he tries to read an actual book, he’d probably go into anaphylactic shock.
@random6x7
“When I take over the world, it will be illegal to make biologically deterministic statements about human cultures unless the person so doing can name at least five non-industrialized societies for which it holds true.”
All of pre-industrialized history, all of nature. If a female of any species, can’t excite the male of that species to mate, her genes die. Biology 101.
…So do you believe in evolution now?
HOW COME WE DON’T HAVE SUPERDOGS?
And why do you think “excite the male of that species to mate” is the same thing as “entice random strangers to rape her”? Seems like females could be exerting a little more specificity there.
He mentioned that he’s had several relationships and was engaged at one poit, but didn’t say he was married.
^ That was in response to Holly
“If a female of any species, can’t excite the male of that species to mate, her genes die. Biology 101.”
So why are you yelling about how a woman being an animal is so TERRIBLE all the time? Me and my 31 partners (even the female ones) are just making sure the genes don’t die out! I’M SAVING THE FUCKING WORLD HERE, DAMMIT!
What if it’s a hot day, NWO? ever consider that women wear shorts and tanktops because its hot out? not because they are trying to seduce men? what about all those men who go shirtless in the summer? are they signifying their readiness to mate too?
I know its hard for you to believe, but women don’t always do things with men or sex in mind. Sometimes we wear less clothes for a reason as simple as the weather.
Also how come the beach or the pool isn’t a hotbed for rape or sexual assault? Really NWO, do answer.
Wrong, NWO. Human females actually have hidden a fertility cycle and are always sexually available (in the sense that we don’t have a “heat” time, not in the sense that you can rape at will). We’ve actually gone to a great deal of trouble to hide when we’re most fertile, when those times are usually when, in other animals, the males are most attracted to the females.
Moreover, it’s usually the male animals that have attractiveness displays. Female animals generally just have to show that they’re fertile, and they have their pick of mates. Male animals have to prove that they’re good enough for females to bother with them. That’s why the peacocks have the showy tails while the peahens are a boring brown. And none of that even matters, because humans don’t mate like that.
“If a female of any species, can’t excite the male of that species to mate, her genes die. Biology 101.”
So then why do peacocks (male) have the huge, beautiful feathers while peahens (female) are duller by comparison?
HEY NWO WHAT DO SLUTS DRESS LIKE
Ah! random6x7 beat me to it!
Quackers,
I go to different places to get different opinions and not be in an echo chamber….
as far as AVfM, I don’t particularly think Paul Elam would give a damn if I got prostate cancer as he does seem more interested in belittling Feminists than doing things good for actual men-here’s where I might agree with many here….
I have seen many things I’d consider misandrist by Hugo Schyzer-he is a clever writer, so it is difficult to catch. Perhaps here is where I might be at odds with some here….
As far as my personal opinion of the most “reasonable” place to discuss “gender politic,” that would be Feminist Critics. I imagine many here would have a far different view…
Great minds, Pyena!
I guess Slavey and Dannato are taking the MRAL position that if they are aroused when they see a woman, it is something she is doing to them, and indeed, by being arousing at them and not having sex with them, she is doing something hostile to them.
@Quackers
“what about all those men who go shirtless in the summer? are they signifying their readiness to mate too?”
We went thru that part of biology already. Men is actions/wealth/talent/power. Try to keep up. If women were stimulated by that there’d be a ton of playgirl style mags at the news-stands, but there isn’t. Are there any at all? But run the excuse the corporation doesn’t want to make money off of porn mags for women. Yeah, that’s it. Or maybe they just can’t figure out what turns women on, even with all the women in porn. It just eludes them, all those billions of elusive dollars.
@ random6x7
Indeed! XD
Come to think of it, aren’t the males of most species of birds the pretty, colourful ones?
Hi MRAL
NWO seems to be using the Stephen Colbert “I said it, then I said it again. That’s two pieces of evidence, right there,” method of biology.
I mean, how could he say a thing if it weren’t true? That’s just not good sense.
“..and all women dress and act sexually virtually all the time.”
All the time, eh? Every moment of every hour of every day?
I guess my choice to be celebrate at the moment and not seeking a relationship despite having a few offers and having sexual urges every fucking day makes me some sort of superhuman.
Pretty much. The females have to blend in if they’re going to sit on eggs for months at a time. The male crabs are the ones stuck with the huge claws, too, and male bower birds make the awesome sex huts.
@ NWO
“Biology” is not “shit you just made up”. I’m not even a biology major and I know more about it than you!
Because the colorful plummage of male birds means that they are…unnatural? Ah, appeal to nature fallacy at its finest. Seriously, NWO, go take biology 101. The sexual habits of animals are incredibly variable. Your understanding of basic animal behaviors is lower than that of my not even five year old niece. Shit, the one who is not even two knows more about it than you. Go back to kindergarten and start again.
*celibate