MRA: Who cares if #MenCallYouThings? It’s not like women have any real problems.
Fried rice. Frequently confused with "fried ice."
Oh, ladies, must you complain so much? I mean, who cares if every time you say something on the internet some random dude threatens to rape you? White and Nerdy, the dude behind the Omega Virgin Revolt blog, doesn’t care, and he wants you to know it:
#mencallmethings is just another example of how women (in first world countries) don’t have any actual problems. Between the government and manginas doing everything for women, no woman has any true problems. Any “problem” a woman has is because of one of these reasons:
1. A desire for the equivalent of fried ice. IOW she wants something that is physically impossible.
2. Failed attempts at defrauding, stealing from, or otherwise attempting to enslave men.
That’s it. When a woman has to go through 1% of what a typical non-alpha man has to go through then maybe she can talk about having actual problems. Until that happens women should keep their mouths shut.
Exactly. We need to stop talking about men raping women to focus on the much more important issue of women not having sex with White and Nerdy.
But I am wondering about one thing. Is it possible that the women in question were asking for fried rice instead of fried ice? Because fried rice is totally a thing, and if you call up the proper restaurant someone will literally bring it to your door.
Now I’m hungry.
NOTE: This post may contain 
….
Posted on November 14, 2011, in alpha males, creepy, evil women, I'm totally being sarcastic, idiocy, incel, manginas, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, oppressed white men, pussy cartel, rape, rapey, sexual harassment, threats. Bookmark the permalink. 613 Comments.
Typical feminist, teasing hard-working men with prospects of cake, then just moving on to bigger and bigger castles. And don’t get me started on all those white-knight turtles and hammer-throwing manginas. This game is rom-hack hard.
I want to give him My Little Pony.
Actually, scratch that, it’s not mean enough – I want to give him Audition and then Hostel to see him twist himself up like a pretzel trying to explain how violence is OK sometimes, and not OK at other times, depending on who’s doing it, and to whom.
And then when he’s done with that I want to give him Sympathy for Lady Vengeance, but pretend that it was directed by a woman.
Also, peeps? Fact Finder’s blog is called “Feminismquotes”, and FF is quoting us *in real time*. It’s a lot like being on Tumblr when a new episode of Glee airs.
“Cuntry, you never did explain how lining men up in a field, making them dig a ditch, and slitting their throats on the word of women would be good for men. Or did you have some other idea on how these drink-buying bar-visiting rapists would be liquidated?”
Uh, yes, I did. I explained how if the death penalty was for rape, that only cases which were beyond a shadow of a doubt (DNA and rape kit, not he said/she said) would get that.
A few examples is all we’d need to scare the shit out of men like you from ever acting inappropriately with women. Men would make damn sure before they made a move that the woman wanted it. That would mean more actual consent and less “false allegations” or what you MRAs call “buyer’s remorse”. Therefore its a win/win.
Men might become a tad timid to approach but that’s ok, its 2011 and women can approach. Just because they won’t approach you doesn’t mean anything except that you are unattractive to women and hence, are not “owed” one from a “societal contract”.
As far as hardcore psycho serial rapists and killers, its doubtful whether the death penalty would deter them. But things like “date rape” and raping a woman when she’s too drunk to give consent? Hell yeah we’d see less of these.
Fear is a major motivating factor in animals and humans.
Kapish? Now pass me a kanish.
I see you did not actually mean it, kind of. I have updated the post accordingly.
@Molly Ren:
That makes him quoting me especially surreal. As I pointed out before, if he’s made a profession out of quoting feminists, he should at least know that alpha/beta crap is MRA and PUA territory.
Daww, I got quoted again! This time for my reaction! Sadly, he didn’t quote the entire post. You forgot the excessive number of smiley faces!
@No Cuntry 4 Old Men!: Just… ugh. People on the USian Internet don’t even know what consent *is* half the time, let’s try to get better sex ed programs running before we start killing people, okay?
FF, see here
http://manboobz.com/2011/11/14/mra-who-cares-if-mencallyouthings-its-not-like-women-have-any-real-problems/comment-page-3/#comment-82154
Drac, the “sexual marxism” was someone else’s idea. I thought it was clever. So sue me.
@FactFinder:
“I see you did not actually mean it, kind of.”
“I see you did not actually mean it, at all.”
Fixed that for you.
So feminists use fear to get people to do what they want. Okay, that makes sense.
Just posting FactFinder’s commentary. The whole thing speaks for itself, but there’s something in particular that has left me in very high spirits.
“So it seems she meant it, but meant it ironically. I’ll be sure to try that line out the next time I’m pulled over for speeding. “What? I didn’t mean it, officer, it was completely satirical! You’re a jackass.”
On second thought, the feminist negotiating tactic leaves much to be desired.”
Holy crap peeps, I’m a woman!!! I never knew! FactFinder, either you are scary-awesome at your job, finding facts about me that I myself didn’t know, or terrible at your job. I’m thinking the former, myself.
Yeah, not like misogynists, who use threats. Threats aren’t meant to cause fear.
Nope, not at all. Men who use threats are different. They are justified, some woman, somewhere, might be saying a mean thing about a man (hell she might even be disagreeing with him, or saying something he disagrees with).
That justifies telling her he intends to rape her, or remove parts of her body, or kill her.
Nothing at all related to instilling fear there.
But you, you are all about finding the “bad” things feminists say.
Twit.
@Alek: I notice you guys took the time to kick out the PUAs, but you’re still letting the misogynists and the Stormfront sympathizers (i.e. half of The Spearhead) into the club.
She can see the future. Some day, in another lifetime, you will be a woman, and she knows this, so she’s extrapolating as to what female you will be like in the year 2529. By which time the usual police response to 911 calls will be to line men up in front of ditches and have them slit their own throats. No particular reason really – the cops were just bored and decided this would give them something to do, because in the future all cops are feminist, and thus they thrive on cruelty.
(Whining about me mocking her commences in 3…2…)
@blackbloc
its beyond sympathizers. theyve got david k meller, the Dude Who Was Too Racist For Stormfront
Drac, the “sexual marxism” was someone else’s idea.
I know. And you repeat it, endlessly, without actually making any kind of point. It’s annoying.
A few examples is all we’d need to scare the shit out of men like you from ever acting inappropriately with women.
Okay seriously, No Cuntry, please just go away. This is inexcusable bullshit.
“@Alek: I notice you guys took the time to kick out the PUAs, but you’re still letting the misogynists and the Stormfront sympathizers (i.e. half of The Spearhead) into the club.”
The Manosphere is a wild ride – MRA + PUA + KKK = MGTOW.
Dracula, please don’t shush her. She a devout of the feminist dogma just like anyone else here and her contributions address important issues.
@FactFinder:
She’s a devout of the feminist dogma that only exists in your imagination, buddy.
Also, any comments on the terrific mis-gendering of me on your part? Or am I a woman because all feminists must be women?
In other word, FactFinder, she confirms your asinine preconceptions, despite the fact she represents no one here but herself. Nice to see you admit you’re full of shit.
“She a devout of the feminist dogma just like anyone else here and her contributions address important issues.”
FF, there are several waves and within those waves several strands of seaweed of Feminism. Some of them conflict with each other. Some don’t. Some of them overlap. Some don’t. Some other Feminists here have made it clear that they do not share my opinions on a number of things, nor do I agree with them all the time, so don’t paint us all with the same brush.
“Feminist” means different things to different people.
For example, though I have a positive outlook on sex, I do not agree with much of what I’ve read on “sex pos fem” blogs. Nonetheless, they are Feminists, and so am I.
Ooh, actually FactFinder, better idea! Put this comment of mine up as a pps, and make some more snarky comment about… how terrible it is that a man would contribute to the downfall of his sex… or… something.
I’ve found a commenter known as David K. Meller. No contributions, though. Either way, we believe in open dialogue between everyone and hence enforce a very minimal moderation policy. Due to that, certain extremist elements which are frequently filtered out from feminist forums, such as Feministing.com, will inevitably show up here. I invite you to visit 4chan if you believe it is just the Men’s Rights Movement and not just the lax filtration which has resulted in certain extremist individuals having a voice.
And, indeed, even if an individual holds certain outlandish views, they can still raise important points and contribute to a discussion. A racist rocket scientist who can make a good rocket does have a purpose and, if his views do not get in the way of his job, should at least be allowed a receptive ear to speak of rocket science if not race relations.
Also, any comments on the terrific mis-gendering of me on your part? Or am I a woman because all feminists must be women?
Oh, I can make a mistake just like anyone else. The difference is, unlike many feminists, I can admit I have made a mistake and move on rather than digging my heels in and turning it into a seething power struggle ( http://feminismquotes.livejournal.com/2243.html ). So yes, I guessed you were a woman and clearly was wrong. I apologize. Would you prefer I assume all feminists are now an “it” from here on?
Sooo… FactFinder is… the moderator now? And DKM is a rocket scientist? And 4chan is a reputable source for… well, anything?
My world has indeed gone topsy turvey. At least I have boobs now.
“Okay seriously, No Cuntry, please just go away. This is inexcusable bullshit.”
Seconded.
“And, indeed, even if an individual holds certain outlandish views, they can still raise important points and contribute to a discussion. A racist rocket scientist who can make a good rocket does have a purpose and, if his views do not get in the way of his job, should at least be allowed a receptive ear to speak of rocket science if not race relations.”
So where’s your rocket, FactFinder? It better be good, cuz all you got is some badly edited cut-and-paste.
:D :D :D :D :D
FactFinder, answer me straight now. Am I a man or a woman? You should have ample… facts… to be able to figure it out.
Jeeze, I haven’t had this much fun on the internet for quite a while.
And 4chan is a reputable source for… well, anything?
the spearhead at least isnt as bad as 4chan or only as bad as 4chan. or something.
“Neither virgins nor sluts are any worse or better people due to their virginity or slutdom.”
Are you serious?! This is why the rest of the world (aside from the Anglosphere and maybe the EU) simply doesn’t comprehend Americans.
Whatever, do you consider yourself a MRA?
Somebody: “Neither virgins nor sluts are any worse or better people due to their virginity or slutdom.”
Whatever: Are you serious?! This is why the rest of the world (aside from the Anglosphere and maybe the EU) simply doesn’t comprehend Americans.
Me: Having lived in Asia for a good portion of my life, I can second what you say. Not that I agree with it.
Okay Whatever, this non-American will bite: how does the amount of sex a person has affect their worth as a human being?
OMG!!! The thought of judging a person based on their personality rather than what they do in their sex lives?! why that’s just crazy talk!!!
Still waiting for FactFinder to figure out whether I’m male or female… I suspect I’m gonna have to wait a while…
In the meantime, I’m also curious. How exactly does the amount of sex you have make you a better or worse person? No cheaty “sex before marriage is a sin,” now.
Okay, NC4OM: What does the country of Asia say about sluts?
Also, why does FF assume this is an opinion that’s got mainstream acceptance in America? If it was, we wouldn’t have had to have the Slutwalk.
awwww, poo. I read “guess” instead of “guessed.” Damn, FF got it right eventually after all. He still hasn’t changed his post though… Ah well, all good things must come to an end.
@Shora
“I’m twenty years old and I pay for all of my expenses while going to school full time. I have to balance working enough to eat and pay rent while also leaving enough time to study so I can maybe get a real job after I graduate.”
You pay for all your own expenses plus college on a part time job? Well hell, that’s about what, 40k a year for no more than 20 hours of work a week? Let me give you a piece of advice. Quit school and go full time with your present part time job. With a little overtime, maybe a total of 45 hours of work a week, you’ll pull down a 100k a year.
—————-
@KathleenB
“Sure, men are the only people in this world who are poor, or in constant pain, or unemployed. Only men suffer depression and crippling anxiety.”
If you go by suicides and the homeless, men suffer 4x the depression, constant pain and crippling anxiety. I guess they could go to a therapist only to find out they are at fault for thier depression, much like everyone here confirms.
—————–
@Joanna
“So gamers and MRAs are in two completely different venn diagrams?”
Gamers are just men who are sluts. According to feminists, sluts should be praised. Oh that’s right, men who have sex with lot’s of women just for the sex don’t see women as human. Women who have sex with lot’s of men just for the sex and monetary goodies are pillars of society.
—————–
@Quackers
“These incel losers are even more pathetic because they probably could actually get laid.”
Would these losers become more valuable due to a woman granting them sex? Will they no longer be losers once a woman has sex with them. Will sexual association with a woman disolve their patheticness? Does a womans sexual acceptance translate into social elevation?
——————
@Jill the Spinster
“It’s not MRA vs PUA, it’s MGTOW vs PUA, both of which fall under the MRA umbrella.”
Radfem, militant-fem, communist-fem, butterfly kisses; all fall under the feminist umbrella.
——————
@No Cuntry 4 Old Men!
“MRAs are Marxists: From each according to her ability, to each according to his need.”
There are no MRAs that are pro-State, that’s feminism, many proudly proclaim their communist faith. “Her ability/his need.” Priceless! Actually, I respect you the most of all for at least coming clean with your hatred of men. Well at least you did at first, although you quickly adopted official PC face of feminisim. And when I say respect, I simply mean you’re honest enough to admit your hatred, as opposed to the rest of the members of your hate movement who couch their hatred with flowery niceties.
——————
@FactFinder
“David, has SAVE’s recent political victory against Senator Leahy changed your view of the Men’s Rights Movement?”
I can’t speak for Dave, but shortly after April 4th, I posted a link to sign the petition to stop the tyranny feminists advocated. I was mocked quite often on this very subject. Everyone here liked the idea of men being guilty by default. I gave many links and many chances, all I ever got was ridicule. It isn’t like they were ignorant of the bill, or had no knowlege of it.
Ozys, No Seriously What About Teh Menz blog, the supposed proof, and be all end all of feminist egalitarian aspirations made no mention. She, of course, was one of my most prolific antagonists on the subject. She seems quite adamant on clothing men in dresses, a most pressing problem indeed.
These feminists at manboobz keep insisting they’re the good feminists. Since no feminists signed the petition to stop this madness of tyrannical injustice, there is no difference between the feminists who call themselves good while hating men, and feminists who openly hate men.
NWOslave doesn’t understand the concept of student loans.
Dammit, now I need to figure out how to make fried ice. I am sure it can be done. You just need a batter with a very high heat capacity (something with a lot of sugar in it, maybe) and that’s okay-tasting when a bit raw on the inside, so that all of the heat from the oil stays with the outside part of the batter and doesn’t melt the ice. THEN EAT IMMEDIATELY.
@NWO:
“I can’t speak for Dave, but shortly after April 4th, I posted a link to sign the petition to stop the tyranny feminists advocated.”
And what, pray tell, was this tyranny NWO?
“Gamers are just men who are sluts.”
No, no, no. Gamers are men who are so obsessed with having sex and so oblivious about how people (particularly women) work that they try to reconstruct how real relationships go, and end up failing miserably.
“Radfem, militant-fem, communist-fem, butterfly kisses; all fall under the feminist umbrella.”
Alright, I give up. I googled “butterfly kisses,” but all I got was some song by Bob Carlisle, a teen advice site centered around how to kiss, and some strange flowery crafting blog.
@clair:
The way deep frying works is by boiling away the water to steam (which causes the bubbling), then cooking the outside, and only until the outside is dry does the oil seep in. I think the easiest thing to do is cool down ice to way below freezing, roll it in some bready batter, and fry away! Gotta make sure the ice doesn’t melt though, that much water all at once would probably explode…
NWOconcubine: “Her ability/his need.” Priceless!”
— Finally someone appreciates that! ;)
“Actually, I respect you the most of all for at least coming clean with your hatred of men.”
— NEVER did I say I “hate” men. You must be refering to my view that rape beyond a shadow of a doubt (DNA, rape kit, NOT he said/she said) deserves death penalty. Unless you think all men are rapists, I don’t know where you’d get the idea that I “hate all men” just because I believe rapists, and especially rapists of children and infants (yes, someone raped his own 8 day old infant) need to be taken out.
“Well at least you did at first, although you quickly adopted official PC face of feminisim.”
— Me? PC? LOL.
I don’t care if a man is a virgin or what his “value” is or any of that other PUA gibberish. The last guy I briefly dated said he was a virgin, unfortunately the relationship didn’t go further because he dropped me to be with someone else. So easy being a lady huh? I would have had sex with him too.
Let me make it clear to you: my disgust at incels are not because they are virgins. It’s not because they have a hard time with women. My disgust is because they hate women and blame women for all their problems. I thought that was made clear in my comment. I also hate that they pretend that its “oppression” and worse than rape. It is not. I understand and sympathize with their loneliness, I understand and relate with their anxiety. But once they become hostile assholes towards women and blame them for all their problems, I lose all sympathy. I cannot repeat this enough: WOMEN DO NOT LIKE MEN WHO HATE THEM. It has nothing to do with virginity. It has nothing to do little experience with women. It has everything to do with them having rotten personalities and being misogynists.
@kirbywarp
“Butterfly kisses” is the act of fluttering one’s eyelashes against someone’s skin. Or at least that’s the definition I grew up with. (Sadly, it doesn’t work so well with glasses.)
@Pyena:
Well, you know that, and I know that. But apparently for NWO it conjures within him a terror unbenownst to any other, a terror most heinous, and possibly something to do with NAMBLA. I never bothered looking for the damn thing though.
“NEVER did I say I “hate” men. You must be refering to my view that rape beyond a shadow of a doubt (DNA, rape kit, NOT he said/she said) deserves death penalty. Unless you think all men are rapists, I don’t know where you’d get the idea that I “hate all men” just because I believe rapists, and especially rapists of children and infants (yes, someone raped his own 8 day old infant) need to be taken out.”
1. Do you support having the death penalty for rape because you think it will result in fewer rapes? Or what?
2. Please tell us what other crimes you believe deserve the death penalty
@Pyena:
Comment in moderation for mentioning a certain organization involving love between men and boys, but I think NWO is trying to reference some heretofor unknown shady organization between women and girls… He’s mentioned it before, but I’ve never actually bothered to look up the damn thing.
@Pyena: Yeah, that’s the definition I learned as well. Not really sure how they would fall under the feminist umbrella, though. Maybe because slutty slut temptresses will promise you kisses with their slutty clothes and then will deliver only butterfly kisses instead?
Also I second, third, whatever that I’d like to hear NC4OM and/or Whatever explain exactly what is wrong with virgins and/or sluts. And why disregarding someone’s quantity of sexual partners makes Americans incomprehensible.
Oh, obviously I should have refreshed before posting. Well that’s incredibly horrible if it’s a real thing.
@Kirbywarp
…wait, he’s saying “Butterfly Kisses” is the name of the shady organization? Did I miss something? Then again, I haven’t been trying to make much sense of NWO’s posts lately. It’s just copious amounts of stupid in a word salad.
The butterfly kisses thing is horrible, I mean. Jeez, it’s like it’s my first day on the internet. Or maybe my brain is all messed up from when I gorged myself on the Chinese I ordered for some reason, Mr. Futrelle.
@Viscaria:
That’s the thing though. Given NWO’s tendancy to exaggerate, I have no idea whether this is true or it’s just some benign thingamabob. He’s described bringing in gay people to tell school children that gay people exist as “feminist indoctrinating” and “furthering the gay agenda” and “forcing little boys to take naptime next to another boys” or something. He’s also described Title IX as “a law with its own police force.”
Now that I think about it, I wouldn’t doubt that he’s just blowing smoke.
@Viscaria:
Did you actually find out what NWO was talking about?
“The spearhead isn’t as bad as 4chan”? 4chan is mostly harmless. Also, most of the raging stupidity is /b/. The other boards only have normal internet stupid.
Factfinder has also admitted to being a troll. It’s kind of adorably stupid.
Can we not call PUA Gamers? I keep thinking you guys are talking about me.
How stupid are you, exactly? You do know we’ve had the death penalty for what is literally millenia, and it has *never* served as adequate deterrence for any crime, right? What makes you think it’s going to start now? This is by far not the thing most needed for a reduction in rape occurrence. That would be education and awareness.
@Viscaria
Since butterfly kisses are associated with little kids (for me, at least), clearly this is another way NWO is expressing his rage at all those fourteen-year-old sluts for parading around being all…fourteen-y and stuff.
@Pyena:
This came up a while ago, when NWO was ranting about the evils of homosexuality, and saying that:
1. The organization that shall not be named consists of men wanting to have sex with boys.
2. If you have sex with a boy, you are gay.
3. The organization is full of gay men (1 and 2)
4. That organization is representative of all gay men.
5. All gay people are pedophiles. (1, 3 and 4)
Kind of silly, just with premise 2. (I’ve spent far too long reconstructing arguments… -_-)
Anyway, point being that I don’t even know if the thing exists, or whether its just some mother/daughter crafting circle or something.
@kirbywarp, no, I didn’t find it, I’m just doing a truly horrible job of communicating this evening. I don’t want to look it up in case it is a real thing because I’m not really able to handle that right now.
I think when he talks about feminists supporting pedophilia he’s referring to that one bit of the Vagina Monologues. That’s the entire pro-pedophilia feminist conspiracy.
Well, that and the existence of cute clothing for little girls, which is apparently intended to help them attract the sexual attention of middle aged milking machine technicians.
@Kirbywarp
Okay, that whole argument is ridiculous.
So, the organization- he either made it up or blew something else out of proportion?
@NWOSlave:
Women commit attempted suicide at the same (or greater) rate than men, but men succeed at it at a much greater rate, so men have a greater suicide death rate. The differences in success rate is due to different methods of suicide chosen by the male vs female suicide attempters.
@kirbywarp:
If I recall correctly, “Butterfly Kisses” is (was?) the lesbian version of NAMBLA.
@Viscaria:
You should be alright. A preliminary search with google has been pretty benign… Maybe with safe search off?
…
AH HA! Got it, through the fine folks of urban dictionary!
Looks like it’s just… gone. I’m still completely at a loss as to how this could possibly be a feminist organization, besides it containing/contained women.
Wow, holy shit, I just read back a page. I miss all the outright insanity. And by “miss” I am just “Wow, I accidentally dodged a bullet, go me”. FF, Novy, and NC4OM are apparently colluding to repeat Waiting for Godot, with this as the park. I guess NWO is Lucky.
Hi Kladl!
“1. Do you support having the death penalty for rape because you think it will result in fewer rapes? Or what?”
— YES. I already outlined my reasoning in 2 previous comments and posters here have already expressed dismay at me repeating myself. I know its a drag because this blog gets so many comments and its not easy to look for stuff. Even I lose track. But in short, yes, I do think it would result in less rapes.
“2. Please tell us what other crimes you believe deserve the death penalty”
— Serial killing.
Regarding the “slut” thing, well I can just relay to you the general consensus in the areas of Asia I’ve lived. These were socially conservative areas where many marriages are arranged and there is not really any kind of dating culture in general. The cultures are very family oriented so teens remain under the tight watch of their parents and other elder relatives and their social life revolves around primarily the extended family and friends of the extended family.
They find it very odd how Americans go from relationship to relationship. It appears to lack emotions to them. Divorce is also not easy for them to grapple with. In short, many of them think Americans lack love, bonding, emotions, and family values.
Rutee, you might be interested to see that it looks like a couple of FF’s quotes on zir nutty feminists are nutty blog are from you.
@Pyena:
Nope, turns out he was right! There was indeed an organization called “butterfly kisses,” which is now completely defunct. Kinda strange that a so-called feminist organization would disappear in this current age of gynocracy. [/sarcasm, this one's for you FactFinder]
If you liked the argument for the man-boy love thingy being gay, you’ll love to hear NWO’s argument for them being feminist.
1. Feminists support gay rights.
2. Feminists support all gay groups and activities. (from 1, sorta)
3. That organization is a gay group (from previous argument).
4. Feminists support that organization (2 and 3)
5. That organization, and butterfly kisses by symmetry, are both feminist organizations (4)
I shouldn’t be having this much fun turning crazy into pseudo-logic… I’ve been thinking of changing my handle to “Fisher of Reason.” Thoughts? :P
Yeah, I know, I’m not really worried about it. FF mentioned it when zie did it, I guess trying to intimidate me. FF gets less than zero traffic, and has stopped linking to context after that because they know they still haven’t actually made a meaningful response to my arguments.
Basically zie goes away whenever faced with any challenge, because apparently zie has all the time in the world to try and troll feminists, claim the mantle of reason, and gloat, and not a god damn second to put into making a real point, defending zir claims, or actually saying anything meaningful. It’s kind of like that fable about the gnat and the bull.
@Rutee:
Oooh, did you see when FactFinder quoted me because he thought I was talking about Alphas and Betas for serious? And then did you see how he misgendered me? And then did you see how he still hasn’t changed it?
Speaking of which… FactFinder, care to make one more change to your post? I’d appreciate it.
@kirbywarp
I doubt it was a feminist organization in any sense, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they pulled from lesbian literature or feminist literature to try to support their “cause”. I know the Organization that Shall Not Be Named (what a great name for it) and other so-called “boy love” groups pull from Greek literature that refers to pederasty and some of the very early homosexual-rights stuff about noble friendship between men etc. Some pedophiles get very into justifying their paraphilia with florid allusions to purity and daring to go against the grain and blah blah blah. So it would not surprise me in the least if they had yanked from the woman-power vagina-flower moon poetry 1970s stuff to describe what they were up to.
When I used to be into trawling the seedier side of the internet I ran into a “girl love” group, but I unfortunately (fortunately???) can’t remember what they were called, and I really have little desire to go hunt it down again and find out whether these people called themselves feminists.