Johnny Appleseed: A Man Going His Own Way?
How do you like them apples?
So yesterday I quoted some random Spearheader who described women (well, white women in particular) as “complete parasitical whores roaming the landscape spreading VD like Johnny Appleseed and fucking men over.”
One reader wondered if Mr. Appleseed really went about spreading VD. So I did a little research, and it turns out that it is exceedingly unlikely that Mr. Appleseed – who actually was a real person — spread anything other than the magic of apples. And his Swedenborgian beliefs.
Why? Because Mr. Appleseed – real name John Chapman – was what these days we might call a Man Going His Own Way. Seems he didn’t have much truck with the ladies, according to one contemporary account quoted in his Wikipedia entry:
On one occasion Miss PRICE’s mother asked Johnny if he would not be a happier man, if he were settled in a home of his own, and had a family to love him. He opened his eyes very wide–they were remarkably keen, penetrating grey eyes, almost black–and replied that all women were not what they professed to be; that some of them were deceivers; and a man might not marry the amiable woman that he thought he was getting, after all.
So what led poor Mr. Appleseed to these dire thoughts about women? Apparently the underage girl he hoped to some day get with was more into dudes who weren’t him:
Now we had always heard that Johnny had loved once upon a time, and that his lady love had proven false to him. Then he said one time he saw a poor, friendless little girl, who had no one to care for her, and sent her to school, and meant to bring her up to suit himself, and when she was old enough he intended to marry her. He clothed her and watched over her; but when she was fifteen years old, he called to see her once unexpectedly, and found her sitting beside a young man, with her hand in his, listening to his silly twaddle.
That ungrateful little strumpet!
I peeped over at Johnny while he was telling this, and, young as I was, I saw his eyes grow dark as violets, and the pupils enlarge, and his voice rise up in denunciation, while his nostrils dilated and his thin lips worked with emotion. How angry he grew! He thought the girl was basely ungrateful. After that time she was no protegé of his.
But Appleseed, despite giving up on women in the real world, held out hope for the afterlife – explaining to others that he expected to have two spirit wives all his own after he died. Which I guess is the 19th century equivalent of the MGTOWers today who fantasize about the sexy robot ladies who will eventually, it is hoped, make actual human females – with their troubling “thoughts” and “needs” and “desires” of their own – obsolete.
Mr. Appleseed’s quest to remain alone was probably also helped by the fact that – if the illustration I found on Wikipedia is any indication – he looked a bit like Dale Gribble from King of the Hill. Only much, much sloppier, with long hair. Oh, and instead of wearing a baseball cap, he wore “a tin utensil which answered both as a cap and a mush pot.”
So, yeah, a creepy weirdo who hates women — definitely an MGTOWer all the way.
Oh, except that he actually did something with his life — you know, helping spread apple trees to a big portion of the midwest — instead of spending all his time going on about how all women are whores.
Posted on November 4, 2011, in evil women, life before feminism, MGTOW, misogyny, pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles, sexy robot ladies. Bookmark the permalink. 1,000 Comments.
I may have to go over to the Forum to ask Zhinxy about checks and ballances to prevent consolidation of resources or the Tragedy of the Commons.
Johnny Appleseed was also a huge wino, he planted apples that were only fit for making cider. He’s still cool with me, at least he did something nice with his pent-up frustrations.
On to a more prurient topic: CYBERCUTIES!!
I hope DKM trademarks that.
Fatman’s correct, I don’t understand why DKM thinks that virtual companionship will be a bad thing for women. Women are going to NEED ‘cybercuties.’ There are millions of extra dudes in China, India and god knows where else now. It’s either artificial women or human trafficking, and I know which one I’d choose.
I think all the robosexuals on Manboobz should pool their meager earnings to buy this (disturbing) thing:
NWOslave could use his milking machine experience to… you know.
David, you ignorant slut! (Rest assured, I use both “ignorant” and “slut” in their non-pejoritive senses, so unless you are some kind of hyper-sensitive masculinist, the type so tragically common and commonly tragic in this fallen age, you will surely not be offended!!) I laugh quite heartily, threatening the balance of my humours and the smooth functioning of my pyloric valve, at the notion of mere “men” constructing mechanical contrivances to take the place of WOMEN!!!
Let us put aside for a moment the comical idea of men building such devices, as if men possessed human intellect!!!! Without the glorious female presence, how would men survive? Why, without the life-giving rays of a Real Woman, the average man wilts away and loses all his blossoming beauty!!!!!
No, men need simply work harder to please women, and they will be rewarded with a loving and generous jack-boot upon their adorably hairy throats!!!!!! Hie thee to the boudoir and make thyself fluffy, David, and perhaps even you may catch the eye of some dominant woman on the hunt for a properly submissive husband!!!!!!!
As for me, I must tend to my health, as conversing with a mere “man” saps my womanly energies!!!!!!!! O cruel Fortuna!!!!!!!!! Off to tend to my valve!!!!!!!!!
PEACE AND CYBERNETICS!!!!!!!!!!!
SHAENON!!!!!!!!!!!!
A robot mouth makes sense for dental training.
An entire robot body with hair and clothing and moving eyes seems like either stylistic excess, or… evidence that this “dentistry” thing is a flimsy alibi.
I think all the robosexuals on Manboobz should pool their meager earnings to buy this (disturbing) thing:
i really hope that thing has a loud, operation style buzzer that goes off if you do something wrong
@shaenon
beautiful
David K. Meller, you said, “Things can only get worse with feminists and modern women in the coming centuries, and even the most reluctant men will have to undertake action–to preserve their sanity, not to mention sexual relief–to develop something better.”
Then you said, “Of course feminists could make a “husbandbot”, but why should they? They already have a large number of suitably trained, well “programmed”, egalitarian renegade-males, who faithfully parrot the feminist lines as well as any feminist itself!”
These two statements see to be at odds, why would things be worse for feminists if those individuals that prefer the company robots to the company of feminist women were to remove themselves from the human dating pool? Feminists tend to want to be in relationships with feminists, of which you have stated there are already many. You are not a feminist, so why would you, and non feminists like you, choosing to be in relationships with robots cause things to get worse for feminists?
This is the part of the hypothetical that I do not understand.
Fatman: If you’re gonna wait for Meller to catch the clue bus, you might want to bring a book. And some camping gear.
I recommend War and Peace.
“Hie thee to the boudoir and make thyself fluffy, David…”
XD
*hands Shaenon an Internet*
Or an omnibus of the Middle Earth books. Maybe the uncut version of The Stand?
I vote for The Stand. Not enough paranoia in War and Peace.
Or maybe an unabridged edition of Brothers Karamazov, since Slavey enjoys thinking about both men and women being miserable.
Careful, Shaenon, or NWOslave will be forced to regender your misandrist rant.
KathleenB, I just figure I can try and help him to develop a less misery inducing outlook on life, by pointing him toward the realization that his happiness need not be tied to the misery of others. I have no illusions about the likelihood of success, but it does not take much effort to try.
I think it is helpful to remember that on a macro level these MRAs are not our enemies, but our wounded comrades. They have be lied to, tricked into viewing human interaction as adversarial. They view women as a hostile species, and this view hurts not only the women with whom they interact, but it leaves them hurt as well. So I try to help them to cast off the harmful assumptions that they cling to, with the goal of improving life for all of us.
Now, I recognize the value of mocking them, and I appreciate the impulse to lash out at them. Both of those responses are necessary. I just think that dispassionately engaging their arguments might help as well. Since you all are much better at the first two than I am, I stick to the third option.
Wetherby, CassandraSays and,KathleenB, I think Tolstoy would not put me in the right frame of mind for a discussion with David K. Meller. I think I would go for some Gogol, ‘The Overcoat’ or ‘The Diary of a Madman’ come to mind.
I know that there are grammar sticklers here, I apologize to them for the misplaced comma in my preceding post. It should read, “Wetherby, CassandraSays, and KathleenB…”
David commented “On several occasions dudes on one of the MGTOW forums have talked semi-semi-seriously about getting together and buying some land and starting their own little MGTOW commune-thing.
I think they should do it, but on a little island, and only if it’s part of a VH1 reality show:
All Women Are Whores Island
No actually David, MGTOW is a whole variety. Some MGTOW are gender separatists as you wrote. These men just are calling for some type of gender separatist MGTOW is about men”doing their own thing” not conforming to societal norms.
MGTOW can include men who are married, have girlfriends, are gay, bisexual, transgendered. MGTOW is a concept. MGTOW is a way of life. MGTOW is deep.
It is not just men believing that the genders shoud be separated for the good of society.
MGTOW included men who are married, in relationships but have deviated from societal norms in that regards. For example. an MGTOW relationship would be the wife as breadwinner, husband as homemaker.
MGTOW is a way of life. It is in direct opposition to the PUA movement. The MGTOW male often views the PUA as a sycohant wasting his money on seminars. The MGTOW male has a radical mindset of living his life as a man and not needing women’s approval in any area.
An MGTOW man is truly and independent, isolated male who chodses to live a life devoid of traditional gender roles as a man relates to w woman. An MGTOW man is one who is on his own which can include having a female significant other or not. Often it is the latter.
Meller, “Men ARE, as a rule, more intelligent than women, and it bothers some of us to be called “stupid” by members of the fair sex!”
Would it be o.k. if I called you stupid if you had an IQ of 80 and I 130? Or do masculists possess a hive mind (which means that even the most stupid of them is equipped with the IQ of the most intelligent)?
@Fatman
That belief in basic human goodness is such a burden sometimes, isn’t it? “No, you’re wrong, how can you be so WRONG… huff, huff, huff… no, calm down, I bet there’s a decent human being somewhere in there who just lost his way. If I could just calmly point his flaws and… no, dammit, now he’s being a racist,”
I feel your pain.
Oh sweet semen sucking savior. Why does Brandon have to be in IT? I hate it when there are IT nutjobs on the internets…
@Rutee Katreya
“Columbus was fine enslaving Indians”
Citation needed. And preferably one with validity. Somewheres around the late 1400s, early 1500s verifying his enslaving should do. Unlike feminist revision I find actual accounts to be a tish more relaible. And since you’re on about slavers, let’s go to the source, Isabella, who sat at the table with Ferdinand and the pope as they divided up the new world. Now she was a piece of work, she would’ve sent every European man to a watery grave if it meant more exotic jewels, perfumes and silks with which she could adorn herself. Of that we have documentation.
——————
@Holly Pervocracy
“In the 19th century, “I have no time for the wicked ways of women” was a lot more socially acceptable than “women just don’t seem to do it for me.”
This doesn’t excuse the misogyny (there were lots of “confirmed bachelors” who didn’t go on about lying bitches), but it does put it in a slightly different context.”
Yet we’re supposed to excuse the misandric lashing feminists dole out to “white men” on the feminist altar. Ever casually toss out the phrase “white men” when referring to something you consider bad or wrong? Well yes you have. Kinda makes you a vile racist/sexist, doesn’t it?
———————
@Improbable Joe
“Now, to drag this back to the whole Man Going His Own Way business… I wonder if these guys can cook and clean and iron and the whole nine yards of “women’s work” stuff, since they are so very independent. Or do they dress in sweatpants and eat Spaghetti-Os and live in filth.”
Yea, ya never see women walking about in sweats, and every women is clean, tidy and cooks 7 course meals every night. Don’t feminists consider cleaning and cooking beneath them? Why that’s slavery! Why should a woman do anything for a man?
———————-
@Spearhafoc
“Careful, Shaenon, or NWOslave will be forced to regender your misandrist rant.”
Don’t have to. When a womans foul tongue wags incessantly with vile hatred there’s always an excuse. Besides, manboobz bread and butter is hatred, so it’s expected.
———————–
Anyhoo, back to the johny appleseed article. It seems old johny saved a young girl from poverty/possible early death and was rewarded with betrayal. Shocking I tellz ya! Women are so very moral in the modern world, you can tell by this.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056869/Family-law-Fathers-grandparents-denied-right-children-divorce.html
Ahh fatherhood, it’s practcally a crime to be a father in a wowans world. It seems in the UK, father is now synonymous with ATM. The best part is, after any man being completely denied even the slightest contact with his child, women can say men aren’t living up to their duties as a parent. Ain’t that sweet! Deny a man fatherhood then call him a bad parent! As always, the vilest, most misandric laws always seem to proliferate like a feminist plague in the modern world. Why it almost sounds like State endorsed slavery.
Maybe Johny was on to something after all. If ya raise a woman to be loyal and loving you won’t have to live in hell, as a modern day womans wage slave.
Keep up the fine hatred. I can tell things are gonna be juuuuuuust fine.
NWO, I like to cook, and I’m a feminist. Is your tiny mind blown?
So your belief is that if a little kid is raised by someone, they are obligated to have sex with that person when they grow up?
Or is it just unrelated people? Yuck.
NWO, I like to cook, and I’m a feminist. Is your tiny mind blown?
I’m a feminist and I love to cook meals for my partner.
She makes amazing gf pancakes though, so she handles breakfast and I take dinner.
Ah, the magic of equal partnerships!!
Of course he does. This is a guy who wants a slave, so why not raise one up?
New entry for the Book of Larnin.
If you bring up a child, they are morally required to have sex with you. This used to be in the Constitution until feminists passed Title IX, which removed it. Now fathers/stepfathers are not allowed to demand sex from their children, which is proof of misandry.
NWO: Isabella was a woman who captured power (real, temporal power) by playing the political game better than the men around her. Her marriage contract with Ferdinand designated her the sole queen of Castile – they reigned pretty much as co-equals. In Castile, she reformed government, reduced crime, and brought the budget under control. She a hell of a lady. And yes, she did wear perfume and jewels. So did men! In fact, men often wore garments that looked an awful lot like dresses! The horror! And tights! And lace and gaudy-ass trim and furs and jewels!
That should read that Isabella and Ferdinand reigned Spain as co-equals. I has a smart.
Tinker, T., & Freeland, M. (2008). Thief, Slave Trader, Murderer: Christopher Columbus and Caribbean Population Decline. Wicazo Sa Review, 23(1), 25-50.
What is that Slavey? Still failing basic measures of history? This comes as no surprise, considering your utter failures in math too. Sorry, where is your citation? Other then the false information you continually pull from your ass.
I find it hilarious because you never manage to back up anything you say with fact. So, you don’t get to play the citation needed game. You never engaged with honesty to begin with.
@KathleenB
Woman who reigns over a monarchy that enslaved American Indians = good reformist, and apparently good at everything else as well. A real humanitarian!
Man who does the same equals oppressor and slaver. Gotcha.
Funny, no matter the situation, that always seems to be the case.
Keep on hatin!
NWO: Columbus wrote in his log that the Arawaks would make fine servants, and that he and fifty men could subjugate them and make them do whatever the Europeans wanted:
http://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/zinncol1.html
They wanted gold and slaves, and it wasn’t just Isabella though she was there.
None of the feminists I know claim that every woman is perfect (or every feminist). We’re a mixed bunch, just like men.
History
To gauge the veracity of a text, subtract the year the events it described happened by the year it was published. no other factors are relevant. when in doubt, an early 20th century encyclopedia britannica is always acceptable.
@Flib
“Tinker, T., & Freeland, M. (2008). Thief, Slave Trader, Murderer: Christopher Columbus and Caribbean Population Decline.”
I find leftist writings, written 500 years after the fact to be skewed. I’m funny that way. I notice that before feminist indoctrination became public school policy, columbus was celebrated as an expolorer of some note, if I remember correctly.
Of course, what can one expect from the most destructive hate ideology ever concieved. White/man has been the scapegoat of feminism for decades. Black men aren’t immune from feminists vile hatred either, as the previous article about Herman Cain clearly illustrates. He may be exempt from feminists racial hatred, but not their vile hatred of men.
You imbecile, you mentioned her husband and co-ruler but not the king of fucking Portugal? You do know what the Treaty of Tordesilla was *about* right? Spain got half, Portugal got the other half. It wasn’t split between the newly united Castile y Aragon.
This is horse shit, in that this is well documented; her religious fervor was a primary motivating factor in her life. You’re reading your own jackass narratives.
Re: Columbus as a slaveholder, I don’t know why you object to slavery, seeing as you want a coterie of rape slaves yourself, but Columbus’ primary dispute with Spain was that he wasn’t that he wasn’t given a big enough Encomienda to celebrate his efforts of fucking up basic math and assuming he was smarter than every court astronomer. Encomiendas basically involved *slaves*, of the native people and imported variety. And he wanted a bigger one. Apply basic logic.
So… Rick Perry is now a radical feminist? Sure, why not? It makes as much sense as anything.
NWO: You dipshit, I was referring to your comment about her starting wars for perfume and baubles. Let me refresh your memory:
Quit moving the goalposts. Unless that black hole in your head is starting to suck those in along with 9/10ths of what passes through your skull.
Yeah Slavey, heads up those so called “Leftist writings” (one of them folksy Texan words for facts), are published material.
All your facts either come from your ass or, the asses of others and their assorted racist/anti-semitic/misogynistic nerd rage websites as you trawl them.
“I notice that before feminist indoctrination became public school policy, columbus was celebrated as an expolorer of some note, if I remember correctly.”
Do you also remember when schools used to be segregated? The current take on Columbus is an example of America (except for you and your ilk) learning better.
Put down the Star Wars Yungzhan Vong Saga for a bit, and maybe take up some nonfiction.
Maybe star with this:
Christopher Columbus, Mariner (1955) Samuel Eliot Morison
*start
Mr. Kobold: I would also recommend Indian Givers, an excellent examination of what parts of Western culture can be traced to first Nations roots.
Regardless of his human rights fail, it is patently untrue that Columbus had any explorer credentials (Although US schools continually teach this); He was a lucky idiot. He didn’t bravely offer the idea of a round earth to scholars who laughed at him. He offered an inaccurate estimate of the earth’s size to astronomer’s who’d roughly correctly calculated it decades before his stupid ass. That’s why he couldn’t get funding; *He was wrong*. And everyone knew it. He was looking for India, and didn’t pack enough food to get there even if the american continents weren’t in the way
My brother and his mates, definitely Non-Feminist Men, all cook. When they get together they swap recipes and talk about their kids. Mind blown, NWO?
…Does Owly actually think that star wars fiction is good, or was he trolling us?
I know this is a minor thing after his lionization of a jackass slaver, but still.
@Rutee Katreya
“You imbecile, you mentioned her husband and co-ruler but not the king of fucking Portugal? You do know what the Treaty of Tordesilla was *about* right? Spain got half, Portugal got the other half. It wasn’t split between the newly united Castile y Aragon.”
Spain and Portugal? Tsk, tsk, wikigirl. Evil brown people doing evil things. Women included. How horrifying!
To Rutee
Slavey did one of his things way back when where he was all:
“THE BEST NOVELS EVAR ARE!”
And he made a list that included Game of Thrones (okay) and some Star Wars novels.
We proceeded to raise eyebrows at the “whole best novels ever thing” before he left in a sniffling flounce.
I mean, I’ll admit to reading Warhammer 40K fiction every now and then but I am smart enough to treat these and bored day reads instead “BEST NOVELS EVRE!”
What does this even mean?
“Spain and Portugal? Tsk, tsk, wikigirl. Evil brown people doing evil things. Women included. How horrifying!”
Did you just chide her on adding some historical facts?
Jesus I hope, since you have given up recently on the whole “I have a Jewish best friend” and “I am a super smart milk engineer” recently, that you are just a very diligent internet troll, because someone so happily stupid is painful to witness.
I think it’s entirely possible (er, certain, actually) that our historical record is incomplete and politically biased.
I don’t think that substituting it ad libitum with bits from the 1911 Britannica, bits from far-right conspiracy theory websites, and Spackling in the gaps with pure fevered imagination improves matters.
There’s a difference between saying “our knowledge is not completely reliable” and saying “therefore the exact opposite must be true.”
No, actually, the Treaty of Tordesillas was so fucking important that I actually do not need to look at wikipedia before I can name the parties to it by office. I’d have to look at it if I actually about the name of that portuguese king, sure, but that’s a pretty irrelevant detail.
And to consider Portugal brown is so stupid that I’m not sure how to respond to that. Do you know where Portugal is, you arrogant, racist clown? Of course you don’t.
@ Snowy – I think it means that Slavey does not consider Spanish or Portuguese people white?
“Evil brown people”, NWO? from Spain and Portugal? Spain and Portugal are mostly WHITE countries you moron! I should know, I’m from Portugal.
Back in the day NWO claimed that he was multiracial, and then clarified that he was 15/16ths white and 1/16th Spanish. If it was anyone else I’d take that for penetrating satire, but with NWO, I’m pretty sure he meant it.
New addition to the big Book of Larnin?
Evidently Slavey thinks Spain and Portugal are “brown people”.
Yes.
So.
Many.
Brown.
People.
Keep showing the intelligence buddy.
Cassandra, I guess? I usually skim his comments to tell the truth but that one was just absurdist gold.
NWO probably has Spain and Portugal confused with Mexico. Then again, he probably thinks anywhere that isn’t the US isn’t white.
Shit, I just realized that the last picture with the Portuguese soccer fans had little girls in it, now I feel really gross posting that for Slavey.
EWWW
The Scandinavian countries – not very white, overall, according to Slavey logic. Or maybe he just counts anyone with brown hair as non-white?
I’m sure NWO subscribes to the one drop theory. Or brown hair. His world is a scary place.
@Mr. Kobold
“All your facts either come from your ass or, the asses of others and their assorted racist/anti-semitic/misogynistic nerd rage websites as you trawl them.”
You choose to believe leftist propaganda and turn a blind eye to the truth. I hold people accountable for their actions reguardless of race or gender. Your sexist/racist hate ideology won’t permit you to hold any of the preferred gender/race(s) accountable.
Note how anti-semetic holds a special place of honor. Have you ever held a semetic accountable for saying/implying something against a white man just because their white? Such as the constant filth that falls from say the mouth of amused, with her white man this and white man that? Her race, (semetic) holds a privileged position within your ideology of hate. Your knee-jerk reaction is protection of all semetic people reguardless of their actions.
Your mouth professes equality, but your actions don’t. I will expect you to rip anyone a new asshole who ever utter the word of white, (race) or men, (gender) in a deragatory fashion, just because they happen to be men or white.
All feminists are pro-semetic, pro-misandric, pro-racist. It’s your ideology. If your pro-any race/gender that makes you anti everything that isn’t part of your ideology. And that’s hatred. You’ll get hatred in return.
Cassandra: By those standards, despite being mostly Dutch and English, with a bit of Irish and Norwegian mixed in, I don’t count as a white person (I have kind of reddish-brown hair). Odd, that, because I kind of fluoresce in direct sunlight.
Well, he’s got me there, I am pro-Semitic.
NWO: “blahblahblah watch me type all night, keep in mind I am a homophobic liar that thinks YAHOO! comments are mainstream opinion”
I know I said I’m not a regular poster here, but NWO is making it hard, he’s just too fucking funny. He put a Star Wars book on a ‘BEST BOOKS’ list?
TRULY EPIC INTERNET LAUGHS
@Holly Pervocracy
“Well, he’s got me there, I am pro-Semitic.”
Which makes you a racist.
Oh I’m sure Slavey was anti-racist until those evil misandric feminists came on the scene.
Well, actually NWO, being pro-something does not make you anti-everything else. I know it’s a complicated concept, but it’s true.
“You choose to believe leftist propaganda and turn a blind eye to the truth.”
Slavey considering that not only is there the study of scholars who have devote time and study to the matter, but the first hand accounts with Columbus’ own personal writings, and records involving his dispute the Royal Court of Spain, over his treatment and enslavement of the natives, I would just love to hear this “truth” of yours that contradicts all of it.
The rest of your bullshit I won’t even get too unless you can prove (which you can’t) that you aren’t speaking out of your asshole (which you are).
Glad to see though that you dropped your old “I have a Jewish friend, I can’t be anti-semitic,” schtick of yours, and are instead opting for the “holocaust denier talking right before revealing they are a holocaust denier” manner of speaking.
@Rutee Katreya
“Oh I’m sure Slavey was anti-racist until those evil misandric feminists came on the scene.”
I’m the only one here who isn’t racist.
“I know I said I’m not a regular poster here, but NWO is making it hard, he’s just too fucking funny. He put a Star Wars book on a ‘BEST BOOKS’ list?”
Oh twas a good day, MRAL might have put together an absolute best of world literature list too.
Can we get Ami or Sharon or some other cyberpunk internet chronicler to pull that up?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Wait, you’re serious?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
NWO: Holy crap, that’s the best line I’ve heard all day! you’re the only who’s not rascist, do you pay someone to come up with these jokes? ‘Cause they deserve a – wait a second, that’s supposed to be serious? Shit, that’s even funnier! Lulz all around!
Believe what you wish, Owly. It’s the only thing you know how to do.
Wasn’t it like six months ago that NWO declared that I’m racist because I’m not anti-Semitic?
Oh, it’s like old times! I feel the warm glow of nostalgia…