A PUA, living the dream. And by “living the dream” I mean “being a dick.”
Cheating is jerky. But this picture is still hilarious.
Here’s the bravely anonymous alpha blogger behind “Danger & Play ~ An online magazine for alpha males” explaining “Why You Should Cheat on Your Girlfriend.” I’ve bolded my favorite bit:
Haters will tell you to, “Man up! Break up with your girlfriend if you’re not happy.” They are missing the point. You want to have your cake, and to eat it too. Steady, reliable pussy and the occasional strange is the best of all worlds.
Cheating is a lot of fun, and it’s something I highly recommend. It’s way more exhilarating than bungee jumping, and few things feel as good as banging your girlfriend on the same day you banged some strange.
Cheating keeps your game tight. The best way to regulate your girlfriend is knowing you can bang chicks as hot or hotter than your girl. Well, when you cheat, this isn’t hypothetical. It’s reality.
Somehow I’m guessing there’s a lot more “hypothetical” than “reality” going on in this guy’s posts.
You don’t want an exclusive relationship? Fine. There’s no law saying you have to be in one. You can date casually and non-exclusively. You can have an open or polyamorous relationship. There are a lot of people out there in relationships, yet happily fucking other people outside of them. They’re just above board with it.
But that’s not what’s going on with our PUA friend here. With his talk about “regulat[ing]” girlfriends, he seems more interested in fucking over his girlfriend (assuming such a creature really exists) than he is in fucking strangers (sorry, “stranges”).
That’s not “Game.” That’s just being a dick.
But, hey, Nietzsche! He’s BEYOND GOOD AND EVIL! Or, as he puts it in a comment, “Shame and guilt are beta.”
You know, if you have to go around telling everyone what an Nietzschean ubermensch you are, you’re probably aren’t much of a Nietzschean ubermensch.
Posted on October 17, 2011, in alpha males, beta males, douchebaggery, men who should not ever be with women ever, PUA. Bookmark the permalink. 961 Comments.
You could murder hobos, Brandon! You would probably get away with at least a few if you were tidy, and as long as you are not negatively impacted in any way it’s apparently perfectly moral. OMG Brandon’s moral system is so fucking deliciously simple. :D
I’m glad you’ve met a woman you trust btw! :)
“You could murder hobos, Brandon!”
It’s not like it hasn’t been done with hookers…
@Kirby: Because I have a sliding scale of morality when it comes to crime. Someone pirating a video off of piratebay.org…not that big a deal. Someone killing someone, big deal. Someone smoking weed, not important. Some dude pimping out and abusing prostitutes, big deal.
Indeed!
@Molly: Why would I kill a hobo? What benefit would that bring me? Nothing. So the risk is higher than the benefits. Also, murder is pretty much at the top of my list of deplorable crimes
But Brandon, before you knew Ashley well enough to establish this current level of trust, how did you make sure that she couldn’t falsely accuse you of rape? What did you do to ensure that if she did accuse you, you would be able to prove her consent?
And still not anwering the question…but I see that we’re right back to “anything is OK as long as it benefits Brandon”.
Some one videotaping his sex partners without their knowledge or consent, really fucking big deal. Seriously Brandon, this is not subjective. It is violating a person’s right to informed consent.
From now on everybody should bring an EMP device with them when they have sex btw. XD
In all seriousness, let’s think of Piaget’s theory of moral development in childhood for a second. According to that theory Brandon is what, 3? Maybe 5 at best?
Brandon trusts Ashley.
Why then are you “not really” having casual flings instead of not having casual flings?
“Why then are you “not really” having casual flings instead of not having casual flings?”
Because a life without casual sex where you’re afraid of being accused of rape every moment is a life half lived!
Ooh, Brandon, here’s a thought: maybe write up a script for your sex partners? Have her hold up a current newspaper with the date clearly visible — like they do in hostage cases — and make her repeat:
“I [full legal name] on the date of [date] do consent to have sexual intercourse with [Brandon] at his house, address [house address]. I here swear that I will not make any accusation, legal or otherwise, written or verbally, that rape of any form or degree took place during this intercourse. I also promise to both have breakfast in a public location with [Brandon] within 24 hours of the end of our sexual intercourse, and to respond to not-fewer-than 3 text messages in the next two days, in which I will indicate that I had a positive and fully-consensual experience and use at least one smiley face. …Also, if [Brandon] if ever arrested please only take his pot and leave behind his external hard drives, kthxbai.”
…Illegally videotaping women is pretty good, but I think this is airtight. (And since it’s shot hostage-style you can sit just offscreen with a gun or something if you really wanted to, even though I know you never would, because hey you’re a decent thoughtful kinda guy!)
*sultry look* “Babe, I’m about to blow your mind! …And also all your electronics.”
Oh it’s sounds so altruistic when you put like that. But a slut is exactly that, a slut. She dresses and acts sexy and says all kindsa pretty lies for not only sex, but freebie’s as well.
The man is so foamy he can’t even string together a coherent sentence.
@Brandon:
Congrats, everyone, including US law, has the same type of thing going. I don’t think smoking weed is a big deal either, because I don’t think it is immoral. But you do believe that video taping someone illegally while having sex is justified because they may try to accuse you of rape some time later. The murder was an extreme example to get you out of your mode of thinking of “I am justified in doing illegal activities by the fear of someone else doing something illegal to me.”
But of course, you are stuck in a rut with thinking that if you aren’t caught, then there is nothing wrong. Hypothetically, if you took video of someone without their consent, then immediately destroyed the tape afterwards, you would never get caught. It is still immoral, despite not facing consequences. This is what you don’t understand, and why you are a skeevey human being.
All your posturing of weighing consequences and doing a cost benefit analysis fails to convince anyone, because we know that your actions matter to other people, not just yourself. Life isn’t all about you, and when you realize that you should find it very simple to have casual sex with someone and not get accused of rape. Nearly everyone else in the world has figured it out.
For funnsies? I dunno, why are you having creepy sex with women you think will falsely accuse you of rape? I’m universally baffled by your decision-making process; your “mind” is a damn enigma, darling. :p
Anyway, I’m heading off to bed. It’s been real, Brandon, but it’s no fun if you debate by ignoring basic tenets of law and morality… Debate isn’t fun when it consists of “yes it is/no it isn’t.”
Also, Ami is totes awesome. :)
Brandon has been a long time between sexual partners if he’s had any.
How do I know this. He claims to video tape all of his sexual encounters. No sexual encounters outside of camera range?
Ashley. Most generic sounds like a pretty girl name ever. Not buying it.
The topper was him saying I’m not really having casual flings. Screamed of desperation to hopefully have one some day while the fantasy video tapping occurs. Also points to him thinking that no woman would want to have sex with him so any potential sexual partner would the day after cry rape.
Low self esteem. Poor guy.
@Bagelsan: Is there some “this girl will falsely accuse you” app on iTunes that I haven’t heard of? How can I possibly even pinpoint with accuracy if a girl is going to falsely accuse someone or not?
On the top of the list after false rape accusations, amirite?
@Kave: Oh you! What next? Are you going to make the claim that I have a small dick too?
So what system have you been using to protect yourself from false accusations? You claim that despite your advocacy, you have not videotaped your encounters. So what do you do?
Is there some “this girl will falsely accuse you” app on iTunes that I haven’t heard of?
I’m shocked MRAs haven’t made this yet. xD
“Please input the answers to these simple questions.
“Is the person you are with human?” Y
“Is the person you are with a woman?” Y
“Chances she will falsely accuse you: 100%”
@Nobinayamu: None.
@Ami: I would need a few more questions
What questions would your app have? :3
Answer the question, Brandon! If it’s OK for a man to preemptively videotape sexual encounters just in case a woman might accuse him of rape, is it OK for a woman to preemptively videotape sexual encounters just in case a man might rape her? If not, why not? Should those tapes then be admissible in a court of law?
Lol, Ami! An MRA app would never allow you to answer “yes” to both questions!
That’s TRUE!
xD
“Is the person you’re with a feminist?” If Y, better cut out her vocal chords before she accuses you of rape, because you know she will.
Then she will accuse you of cutting out her vocal chords, so you better text her the next day and ask her how she’s healing from her consensual surgery.
Hmmm… open source encryption, no one will ever break that.
Unless they take 30 seconds to browse google…
http://www.securityextra.com/bitlocker-filevault-dm-crypt-and-truecrypt-all-hacked.html
Man I’m glad l33t IT h@x0rz don’t know about that!
Of course that’s assuming that police aren’t the ones creating these “unbreakable” crypts.
Whatever the hell Brandon thinks his awesome computer skills have wrought, I’ll bet you could crowdsource that shit and have access to his files in an afternoon for free, merely for the lulz.
In less then an afternoon if you told people there was porn in them thar files.
Sadly there would be… ^^;
Or strap a bomb to her and aim a sniper rifle at the detonator and then make her call someone and read the statement off the pager! #IAmObsessedWithThatShow
Just wondered what Brandon’s comments would look like concatenated.
Someone male-bodied, can you please grow some stubble, paint bags under your eyes, take your webcam down to the basement/garage, and tape yourself reading this under a flickering bare bulb?
I’m just tagging in to say:
Holy shit Brandon is one of the most creepy, morally bankrupt, and ignorant trolls I’ve ever seen. Seriously Brandon, do you actually understand the concept of empathy? Also, lol! He thinks that the police don’t have officers who specialize in computer crimes!
Oh also, Ami is totally awesome!
I think you’re pretty cool, Ami. (:
Someone brought it up a few pages back, but the tapes wouldn’t protect you, Brandon. Illegally-obtained evidence is inadmissible in American courts. The tapes therefore aren’t evidence at all and couldn’t be used in your defense because you didn’t get permission to videotape.
All in all, your tactic doesn’t work. Now you still have your rape accusation AND illegal videotaping.
I think Ami rocks.
Are we sure it’s not an “always sunny in philly” situation- you know, where the main character had all of his sexual encounters taped and cataloged and rated and every last one was a close-up of his own junk?
Katz … hmmm. You’ve just given me an idea for the next Manboobz super fun video.
Well, if I find our that my partner has videotaped us secretly, without my knowledge and consent while having sex… would sue the person’s ass for sure.
More forgiving when rating attractiveness, but not so forgiving when it comes to who they seek to date via messaging:
“Site-wide, two-thirds of male messages go to the best-looking third of women. So basically, guys are fighting each other 2-for-1 for the absolute best-rated females, while plenty of potentially charming, even cute, girls go unwritten.”
So, there’s that.
Enthusiastic consent, puuuulease. There’s a loaded gun pointed at every mans head.
Funny thing, enthusiastic consent is actually for everyone, not just men. Just yesterday I asked my girlfriend whether I’d have enthusiastic consent from her if I went ahead with a particular activity. She said yes. We both had a great time.
Having sex with an enthusiastic partner is AMAZING :-)
Well… for me the attitude of Owly only suggests that he doesn’t receive such a consent from the people around him ( I wonder why…) so he is bitter about it.
http://unsanesafe.blogspot.com/2011/10/ode-to-contemporary-ubermensch.html
Gosh, I go away for a few hours and come back to this lol.
Oh NWO, perhaps I should have elaborated on my “fess up” earlier. I got harassed by guys for sex a lot. They wouldn’t take no for an answer. So yes, I let them buy me drinks. If they were going to annoy me all night, might as well get something out of it as I wasn’t keen on the sex. Only the smarter guys actually took no for an answer and moved on to someone more willing.
That was a younger, sillier me anyway. Taking advantage of people is wrong, boys and girls, no matter if it’s for a few drinks or to “tear up someones pussy”.
I have read the comments (all 400!) and I’m still stuck on the word “regulate” from the OP. Like, I don’t understand how a gf needs to be “regulated” or what mechanisms are used. I imagine the guy sternly pointing a finger and saying “Hey! No more demands to ‘talk’ or ‘do things together’, or off I go and screw my harem!”
It… just doesn’t make sense.
@Daphne B:
You’ve got to remember, these guys think that women use sex as a psychological weapon, threatening to withhold it at the slightest provocation. As we all know, men cannot live without sex. Therefore, if a dude can get sex in other places, suddenly a woman has no power over him.
…
yeah.
Oh, yeah, I remember an older discussion in which someone posted a no-sex protest from women in Columbia, until a major road is fixed.
This however has been used as some kind of proof how women use sex to manipulate others or how evil they are (obviously the fact that the road was essential for the whole town not just for them was somewhat ingored).
It’s simply absurd.
+1 Awesome vote for Ami.
I’d say the internet is actually a wormhole to another dimension in which we can contact guys like Mr. Danger&Play in their own world.
I sumply refuse to give in to this tactic… is he actually using as an argument “nobody likes you” in a discussion? Are we five? Do we have to expect next sitting him in tehcorner crying, because nobody wants to play with him or possibly accusing someone else that he/she smells or has cooties?
Yeah, the MRA’s love to talk about how women withhold sex to torture men. First it assumes men have a greater libido than women, and that may be true in some cases but it’s not true for everyone. Second, it treats sex like an obligation women fulfill for men rather than a mutually enjoyable experience for both partners. Finally, they don’t stop and wonder why a woman would lose interest in sex in the first place. Maybe she has a hormonal imbalance, is feeling under the weather, or she in unhappy in the relationship. They completely ignore the needs of the woman and instead only see her as a masturbation tool for the man, especially if the couple is married.
That’s similar to how NWO griped about women that accept free drinks and then not have sex with the men who bought the drinks. I don’t care if the man buys a woman a new car. He is not entitled to sex. He shouldn’t buy a woman something with the expectation of sex as a reward of gratitude. I remember when people gave the dating advice to not order lobster, steak, or anything expensive at dinner, or else the person buying dinner will then be entitled to sex. That’s bs.
Eneya: Have you read his “shit test” post? His blog reads like a bad fanfic of his own life. And he stars as Gary Stu.
So you’re having serious flings? See, Brandon, this imprecise use of language you have going on is why everyone here thinks you’re full of shit AND a complete sociopath.
And Ami is awesome!
Wow, those stupid police probably don’t read this blog so there’s no way they’d ever know about any of this.
Oh wait. You do know there are technical people on police forces? They’re not just regular old cops who sit down at a computer tapping at it with their big bear paws wondering what will come out next.
Security and cracking security are their jobs. They do it every day, all day.
On a more practical note, have you considered taping them with their consent before and after sex, saying it’s consensual? This might reduce the number of women willing to have sex with you, but it would not only give you the evidence you’re looking for, it would make it obvious you’re not a secretly-sex-taping creep.
But then it might reduce the number of women willing to have sex with you so probably this doesn’t pass the Brandon-as-center-of-world test.
Brandon… of course you can honey.
I am sure you can do this because you say so on the Internet.
And as we know nobody in the police have ever seen a computer or knows how to use it, especially people from teams who deal specifically with cyber crimes or have to deal with tad more complicated stuff than the hidden porn stache of some random bloke.
Also, obstruction of justice.
But yeah… FRA is this guy main problem.
As one who works as an IT as well this discussion amuses the hell out of me. :)
Joanna, yes, I have read his blog. He strikes me as unable to form a coherent paragraph in a quite defined discussion. His blog… is not an improvement.
Brandon:
Number one, I don’t think you understand how complex computer hacking can be. A talented script kiddie can remotely access your laptop and do whatever they want with it (i.e., taking whatever files they want from it, no matter how they’re encrypted. Interestingly, they can also plant files so as to incriminate someone and falsely accuse them of a crime. Hope that doesn’t give you *another* thing to be paranoid about.)
Also, if you perceive illegally videotaping sex acts to be a plausible means of avoiding “rolling over and letting the legal system fuck you,” consider this: how would you like it if you had a friend who had similar levels of distrust in other people, only instead of being afraid of false rape accusations, they were afraid of, say, people stealing from them? So they put hidden cameras in all of the rooms in their house…including the bathroom. If you somehow found out that all the times you were over there and had to use the toilet or take a shower, you’d been secretly filmed, how would you feel? Even if they promised that they didn’t film you for their own enjoyment, that they’d rather make you feel uncomfortable than risk you stealing from them? Would you just be okay with that?
NWO:
“The gang might love you but they’re an infintesimal minority, and with good reason.”
Implying that people whose views are akin to yours represent some kind of majority…
“The gang might love you but they’re an infintesimal minority, and with good reason.”
Rational minded people are a minority???
“Rational minded people are a minority???”
I didn’t know “rational minded” equals “angry, argumentative and insulting” nowadays. You kids and your crazy lingo. I thought this blog was funny and clever at first, but it’s just mean spirited and the commenters are often just as bad as the people they’re mocking, imo.
No one’s forcing you stick around.
Well, we have different opinions here obviously. I find it normal that people are angry… there is something to be angry about in almost all of the discussions that start even from the most innocent discussion. Mainly when some people roll and start implying that women are the root of all issues. That makes me angry for instance.
Or when other people roll and say men can’t help themselves because that’s how they are wired. That makes my angry as well.
Argumentative… you know, I don’t find this a negative thing. Call me crazy but people who don’t roll over and debate with other people using facts, logic and arguments are actually pretty cool people to hang around… don’t you agree? Would you prefer some social amoebas who have nothing to say or don’t have opinion on anything… or my favorite – change their opinion whit whatever the rest think so they don’t feel excluded?
Insulting… well, I think that it could be some improvement in that department provided the first weapon of choice of the people who disagree with the regulard readers and supports of the site didn’t insult as a way of trying to win arguments or to somehow dismiss other people’s arguments.
Huh… you know, it could be true that such people are minority. If they (we?) weren’t maybe we wouldn’t have had most of the issues feminism is trying to fight in the first place?
Independant of the fact Brandon is a tool, a few things I want to clarify about crypto:
1) Open source cryptography is actually more secure than closed source. In the modern world, where we have separated a crypto system’s key from its algorithm, it is unnecessary to hide the algorithm to preserve a crypto system’s strength. Whereas having the crypto system public makes it more likely that any flaw will be found by crowdsourcing.
2) I’m interested in that attack on disk encryption system. It seems to me this would only matter if you would have consulted the data in question the last time you turned on your computer, though with the possibility of it being persistent across multiple executions, with the likelyhood of the data remaining in memory being inversely proportional to the time spent doing other activities than consulting the data you need to remain secret (it’s similar to how you can retrieve deleted data from a hard disk, the more you actually use the hard disk the less data there will remain to exploit as it will slowly get overwritten). It would theoretically not work for a USB key that is not used at all on your computer but remains in storage, because from the description it seems the attack consists of cribbing the encrypted file by using parts of the plain text that lived on in RAM.
Anyway, the point is that there’s a lot wrong about what Brandon claims he’d be doing without inventing weaknesses in his plan to use strong crypto to keep the fact he’s a creepy douche secret.
@Papr1ka: I understand it well enough to use it to serve my interests. A flash drive dipped in epoxy, using AES encryption with deniable encryption and a password + salt run through md5. Then run the whole thing through SHA-1. It will take a very long time for even IT security personnel to get at the data. Or just use IronKey:
https://www.ironkey.com/secure-storage-products
None of these characteristics are impediments to being rational minded.