About these ads

The Spearhead on Occupy Wall Street: It’s just a bunch of man-hating single moms

Ladies are icky.

You might assume that those Occupy Wall Street protests (and their various offshoots) you’ve seen so much little of on the news lately are all about, you know, Wall Street, and the economy, and the fact that the very people who got our economy into the mess it’s in are somehow all still richer (a lot richer) than you or me. But apparently that’s not it at all. Nope! Apparently it’s all about hating on the menz.

How so? Let us turn to the good fellows at The Spearhead for guidance. In a recent post titled Occupy Wall Street Is Just Another Vehicle For Misandry, the blogger known only as Pro Male/Anti-Feminist Tech (PMAFT for short) argues that the movement is overrun by dastardly “single mothers and other women demonstrating high levels of entitlement.” His proof: one lady he found posting her story on the We Are the 99 Percent blog who noted that she had “no job, 3 kids and cannot see a med … let the dudes pay my bills.”

You might assume that by “the dudes” the lady in question is referring to extremely rich dudes – you know, the 1 percent that the “we are the 99 percent” movement is focusing its attention on. But apparently PMAFT knows better than we do, declaring that

she is demanding men subsidize her, not rich men or billionaires (which would be questionable enough) but men in general.

Oh, but she’s not the only entitled princess on display on the 99 Percent blog. Here are two other women — chosen from hundreds of examples from the blog — that to PMAFT seem to epitomize the evils of female entitlement and man-hatred:

Imagine, women actually having the chutzpah to want medical insurance for young children! Blatant misandry at its worst!

The commenters whooped it up in typical Spearhead fashion. “Single mums want to fuck with John and expect Harry to support her and her kids,” complained Nico. “New-age gov-mediated cuckoldry.”

To the redoubtable Uncle Elmer, these women’s pleas were

symptomatic of the feminized educational system and media. Without a manly Patriarchy to call BS on a lot of these entitlement notions, we have several generations of women now sailing into the hard rock of reality. … nobody cares.

Finndistan, meanwhile, wrote a screed nearly as long as the OP, laying out his case against shoe-wearing single mothers. A condensed version:

So, single mom? Should’ve kept your legs closed… should’ve chosen a better man….

I am not in America, but my single friends who get laid by one of your friends once every blue moon are already paying for you and your friends shoes and bastards by the insane amount of taxes imposed on them with threat of imprisonment.

If these guys are the 1%; that makes you, the 99%, parasites….

You, found a dipsh%t welfare boy, made a baby, and we, the 1% as defined by you, who actually want to work and create something useful, not bastards, are getting screwed by the real 1% who steal from us to give to you, so you can buy shoes and create bastards.

As a man … more than one third of my earning … go[es] to feed your shoes and your bastards …

Single mom with shoes and bastards, bought and being payed for by my money.

Occupy Wallstreet just shows that the western man is the pinata of the western world. And then he dies.

This comment got 63 upvotes from the locals, but no shoes or bastards.

AfOR, not quite as longwinded, noted that he found the women’s pictures “hilarious,” adding:

Suck it down bitches.

If you blow me PROPERLY I’ll buy you a 99 cent burger.

This got 58 upvotes from the totally non-hateful readers of The Totally Non-Hateful Spearhead.

EDITED TO ADD:

Speaking of hateful, here’s a comment I somehow missed, from evilwhitemaleempire. Readers of the comments here will recognize him as a dickish dude who posts dickish comments here from time to time. But in this comment he really lets his misogynist flag fly. (TRIGGER WARNING FOR VIOLENT MISOGYNY) Referring to one of the women cited as “entitled” by PMAFT, who had noted that she has “no money to hire a lawyer so I can divorce my abusive husband,” evilshitemaleempire offered this advice:

Heh. If she’s telling the absolute truth about her life on that paper (questionable) then she needs to go back to that abusive husband and start doing some serious dick sucking.
And if he wants anal sex she’d better give it to ‘em.

At last count this comment had 16 upvotes and one downvote. Stay classy, Spearhead.

 

About these ads

Posted on October 13, 2011, in $MONEY$, antifeminism, evil women, I'm totally being sarcastic, men who should not ever be with women ever, misandry, misogyny, MRA, oppressed men, patriarchy, the spearhead. Bookmark the permalink. 346 Comments.

  1. Xtra, I think a lot of them think that. There’s this whole weird concept of the vagina as a cheap elastic waistband (wear it too many times and it’ll never fit right again) among people who either haven’t had first-hand experience with a vagina or weren’t paying attention.

    (I’ve also heard a number of people say that tightness isn’t necessarily correlated with male pleasure anyway, but having no bio-penis myself I can’t really speak to that.)

  2. Maybe it is just some sort of homophobia? Like the immature believe that when you drink from the same bottle, you’re having an indirect kiss, and that’s gross, so having sex with a women who had a lot of sex with different men is like having an indirect gay orgy?

  3. And what’s wrong with gay orgies?

    ahem, I’ve been reading lots of slash…

  4. David K. Meller

    …and you people (feminists and those who agree with them) wouldn’t have to enforce “equality” on everyone through gender (and race/religion/sex-orientation) based favoritism and judicial intervention, you wouldn’t need to brainwash everyone through the movies, schools and colleges, newspapers and periodicals, and the entire apparatus of propaganda available to the criminal elites of modern society!

    Efforts to enforce “equality” would not disorganize society, would not provoke resentment, and would not disenfranchise and dispossess the most capable, efficient, and reliable participants–white men! Indeed, you would not be doing anything, if “equality”, gender based or otherwise, were ‘natural’ that would be any different than what would happen anyway!

    Instead, what do we have? We have cities hit by storms, which used to cause severe damage that could be recovered from in a few weeks; 2-3 months at most,instead hopelessly disorganized after several years. cf. New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Does anyone imagine that K was the very first storm to afflict New Orleans, LA (a city and a state,which, even in better days,was a national joke of corruption, graft and inefficiency? George W. was certainly not the first idiot to infest the White House when disaster struck a part of his kingdom, so his Presidency was responsible for some of what went wrong, but not everything!

    A tiny, little hurricane (Irene) made landfall in New York, with top winds approx 80 mph. The usual ferocity of a hurricane is at least 40% more–with tidal surge to match–and yet there were neighborhoods in outer boroughs which were without power for more than a week! What would have happened in the New York Womynz Republic if a REAL hurricane had pulverized the city?

    The 2003 regional power failure. The same thing, with power and water not restored for many days when it should have–and would have, if the support and technical services were properly MANNED–be restored in 2-3days at most!

    It is worth noting that recovery from mishaps and disasters was much cheaper, more reliable, and complete in times two or three generations ago, when technology was much less developed. That makes the contrast between then and now even more startling.

    I won’t even go into the demoralizing effect of the enforced dispossession and enemployment of (white) men on the larger society. manboobz.com recently posted an account of a horrifying crime (a mass murder commited in Seal Beach CA) with cries of enthusiastic support by other men whose personal situations with family courts, divorce, and paternal alienation were similar enough to resonate among other men from coast to coast!

    As with the Anders Brevik atrocity in Norway some months ago, highlighting alienation of Norway’s men from a feminist, woman dominated government who did nothing about Islamic immigration, do you really want “equality” if it forces the majority of men–who would normally be the most law-abiding, peaceable, and productive people–into supporting, and eventually engaging in, maniacal and paranoic sociopathy? Didn’t we see enough of this in both Europe and America after WWI?

    I go slowly, if I were you! very, VERY slowly, with lots of backtracking where men were most grievously injured!

    By all means, let men be men, and women be women! Don’t bias the results with large-scale brainwashing and herding women in areas which men can do well, have been there for decades or generations, and women don’t belong, these fields are none of their business, and which most of them aren’t psychologically (or perhaps even biologically) equipped to handle anyhow, except for a tiny minority, <5%, with inonospheric level IQs, who are probably mutants anyhow!

  5. Are you smoking crack, DKM? How the hell does feminism affect WEATHER? And I will do whatever the fuck I want to, whether it be cursing, or looking through a microscope at things, or repairing my computer – you can fuck right off with your BIOLOGY IS DESTINY bullshit.

  6. Also, my baking turned out horribly today, and I has a sad. Did FEMINISM ruin it?

  7. DKM

    *unemployment*

    Please, we know already that you are an idiotic anti-semite with racist and misogynistic slavery/genocide dreams, but spellcheck is not that hard to use. Even by a disgusting creature such as yourself.

    Also KB, it wouldn’t be crack (thats for the BLACKS!)

    DKM would have to stick to the more stereotypically “white” drug of crystal meth for this level of brain rot. Which he has to have if he’s on weather conspiracies now. A whole new door of stupid/crazy has just opened.

  8. Also KB, it wouldn’t be crack (thats for the BLACKS!)

    An excellent point! i revise the question: DKM, what the hell drug(s) are you on?

  9. David K. Meller

    I assure everybody that I am drug free! I never said that feminism affects weather. I merely cited the strong possibilities that feminist law and employment policy EFFECTS ability to cope with disaster, whether caused by weather, large-scale electrical power failure, or anything else (outbreak of disease, riots and civil breakdown of law and order, etc.).

    Get yourselves in order. What I wrote may be controversial enough without embellishing it with YOUR hallucinations.

    Mr. Kobold, I leave weather “conspiracies” to lefty loonies like you with your so-called ‘global warming’ and ‘human-caused climate change’ fraud! I certainly don’t need weather to successfully refute feminism–or any other symptom of equality run amok!

  10. Blaming feminism for the weather, Meller? C’mon, I know you’re an aura vibing, tinfoil hat wearing, Nazi, racist, DV rationalizing, wannabe Legree, but you can do better than WEATHER.

  11. You believe in auras but not global warming? WHAT THE FUCK, MAN.

  12. DKM: Feminism made the response to Katrina slower? Seriously, you have lost touch with common reality. That’s… christ, that’s a load of bullshit.

  13. Paternal alienation. Dekraai had what, 54% shared custody? And was he fighting to reduce the access his ex-wife had, when he had more then she did to begin with. This is your example “paternal alienation”? You sicken me.

  14. Apparently all the menz capable of fixing things will not do so unless they have a good woman slave to go home to. So women’s choices are be a house servant fuck toy or the wrath of the menz deprived of their right to a woman slave for their fixerings of stuffs. I think I’ll take my chances with the hurricane.

  15. So, just to be clear about this, David K. Meller does not believe that men can live in a world where they have to play on an equal playing field as women, without “supporting, and eventually engaging in, maniacal and paranoic sociopathy.” (Why does he hate men so much??????)

    Of course, he also believes that feminism causes hurricanes.

    And that I am a mutant. Carry on, David K. Meller! This is fun.

  16. David K. Meller

    It wasn’t Dekraai’s equal paternal custody that they were cheering. It was THEIR OWN problems with divorce, family court, paternal custody, and alienation, and mandatory child-support troubles. Dekraai’ action, despicable as it was, was just the lightning rod! The courts, the spouses, and the lawyers supplied the actual lightning!

    And there is a hugh amount of current, powered by growing and irresistable amperage, that is being built up by a divorce and custody system that horribly exploits men, orphans children, doesn’t do all that much for 95% of divorced women, and massively enriches lawyers, psychologists, ‘marriage counselors, and child-service bureaucracies! This enthusiam for Dekraai would materialize with almost anyone who was at odds with the above, along with the cathartic violence and mayhem!

    Time to put ‘no-fault’ divorce out to pasture, isn’t it?

  17. Oh DKM. I gotta hand it to you–most people who think like you don’t come right out and say they think they’re superior to other people because they’re white and male.

  18. We have cities hit by storms, which used to cause severe damage that could be recovered from in a few weeks;

    DKM, what do you know about recovering from a disaster? It takes a heck of a lot longer than a few weeks to recover from a devastating storm. I live in Joplin, my home was hit by a tornado in May, and believe me it’s going to take a very long time to get things back to normal. Thousands of people need home repairs or to rebuild from scratch after clearing their lots. Hundreds of businesses, a hospital, and many of the schools are now destroyed.

    I think my city, state, and federal government have all done a wonderful job in recovery efforts. Only three months after the tornado, Joplin schools started on time, despite losing 10 building, including the high school! Several businesses that were flattened are already rebuilt! For the past few months, hundreds of special trucks and crews have worked around the clock to pick up tornado debris and haul it away to landfills. I can barely get to my own home because the roads are always blocked while city crews work on clean up. The National Guard did an excellent job finding people and getting them out of rubble. FEMA has set up a trailer park for uninsured people that lost their homes. If you know so much about disaster recovery, please let those of us in Joplin know what should be done differently!

  19. feminist law and employment policy EFFECTS ability to cope with disaster, whether caused by weather, large-scale electrical power failure, or anything else (outbreak of disease, riots and civil breakdown of law and order, etc.).

    DKM, I wholeheartedly agree with you! Feminism is pretty helpful at getting lots of things done!

    (But I suspect you meant “affects”…)

  20. David K. Meller

    Try again, nulIpointer,

    I never said that ” I was superior to other people because I was white and male”. I said that our economy, law, and society was going to hell in a toilet bowl because white men are being systematically excluded, dispossessed, and disenfranchised in the name of “equality”.

    All you have to do is look around, the evidence is available and universal.

  21. DKM

    “‘global warming’ and ‘human-caused climate change’ fraud!”

    Please, we know already that you are an idiotic anti-semite with racist and misogynistic slavery/genocide dreams, but proper facts are not that hard to use. Even by a disgusting creature such as yourself.

    http://www.marketwatch.com/story/global-warming-no-hoax-to-insurance-companies-2011-09-09

    http://uk.ibtimes.com/articles/225395/20111005/global-warming-melting-arctic-ice-opens-new-shipping-routes.htm

  22. @DKM:

    I never said that ” I was superior to other people because I was white and male”. I said that our economy, law, and society was going to hell in a toilet bowl because white men are being systematically excluded, dispossessed, and disenfranchised in the name of “equality”.

    Wow… Cognitive dissonance much? Is your mind capable of comprehending irony? I’m just… gob-struck. Can we put this in the Manboobz hall of fame?

    By saying that our economy, law, and society cannot survive without white men in control, you are saying that white men are superior to others (because only they can run society properly.) Hence, you would be saying that you were superior to others because you were white and male. Logic. It’s not that complicated.

  23. The enthusiasm for Dekraai emerged from a pack of cowardly, self-important Internet Warriors who reflexively side with any man that commits violence against any woman. No wonder you sympathize with them, they’re your kind of people.

  24. Those poor, disenfranchised, excluded white men… my heart bleeds…

  25. Meller never said he was superior because he is white and male, he just said society is going down the drain because white men, the superior people, have to be equal with inferior people.

    Say, DKM, what’s your demographic?

  26. Huh. I hadn’t known that the Great Depression happened because women and people of color and immigrants suddenly took the economic reins from white men, and then gave them back super fast in time for WWII, at which point white men saved the economy again. But I know that to be true now, because DKM is never ever wrong.

  27. NullPointer: I know, so terrible. Ken Burns should make a documentary about how horribly oppressed white men are. I’m sure PBS would pick it up in a heartbeat.

  28. Also, my baking turned out horribly today, and I has a sad. Did FEMINISM ruin it?

    You should have been more pettable! Look at this kitten; it knows what the fuck is up:

  29. No, wait, apparently adorable animals suck at baking:

    Huh. Kathleen, I got nothing. Must’ve been the feminism. :(

  30. DKM, do you ever consider a problem without automatically jumping to the conclusion that “It’s all feminism’s fault”?
    Global warming is feminism’s fault, slow responses to natural disasters are feminism’s fault, ugly women, economic recession and domestic violence are the fault of feminism, is anything not feminism’s fault to you?
    If you hear a song you hate on the radio, do you blame feminism? If you go to a restaurant and get food poisoning, do you blame feminism? If a tree falls in the forest, did feminism make it fall? If you were abducted by aliens, were they influenced by feminism?

    It is worth noting that recovery from mishaps and disasters was much cheaper, more reliable, and complete in times two or three generations ago, when technology was much less developed. That makes the contrast between then and now even more startling.

    [Citation needed]

  31. By the way, DKM, at the end of the month, I will actually be involved in Extreme Home Makeover to help other tornado survivors who did not have insurance like me and are now homeless. Getting involved and helping accomplishes more than using a tragedy as an excuse to bash feminists! People here in Joplin are like family. We all are in this together. I don’t know what disaster recovery was like two or three generations ago, but I think that today it’s actually very good.

  32. … This just proves that the MRM isn’t actually about Men’s Rights. If the Occupy Wall Street protests succeed, it will vastly advance the cause of Men’s Rights. Men will have better employment opportunities, suffer less from poverty, suffer less from the wealth-based inequalities of the court system, be able to earn a living wage, be taxed less (since taxing the ultra-wealthy and corporations will take up a lot of the burden they’re currently left with), will be able to get fair loans and morgates, owning homes may be in their reach again, get social services which will benefit them, etc.

    But this would also benefit women (I’d say women they don’t approve of, but that has near 100% overlap with women), so ti’s evil. Nothing can be allowed to benefit women, no matter how much it benefits men, because the movement is about hating and disadvantaging women, not improving the status of men.

    If it were really about helping men, you might also be willing to cooperate with feminists. Some of the so-called Radical Feminists really are outright hostile to men… but most feminists actually care about and like men, and would be glad to help you with some of the genuine inequalities that face men — especially since many of them can be traced, at least in part, to misogynistic concepts that feminists battle. The fact that women more often get custody in the few divorces that don’t result in joint custody has to do with the misogynistic idea that women are the ones supposed to take care of the children, which leads to their disproportionately being the “primary caregiver” — and family courts favor the “primary caregiver” for custody.

    Higher conviction rates and harsher sentencing for violent crime for men (not that I’ve ever heard MRAs talk about this, despite there being a lot more truth to it than to the custody issue. Odd) have to do with misogynistic attitudes that women are too passive and weak to commit violence, and when they do, it’s an aberration.

    Most feminists would actually love for women to be taken seriously enough that they were thought capable of violence, Most feminists hate that we live in a culture where rape and domestic violence are so taken for granted as things that happen to women than man-on-man or woman-on-man cases are rarely taken seriously or prosecuted. Most feminists hate the toxic narrative that either men or women are in some way “superior” to each other, or irreconcilably different. Shocking, I know, since you seem to think feminism is all about privileging women at the expense of men. It’s not. You might know this if you talked or read about feminism with anyone other than other MRAs.

    In fact, do you know who does love the status quo that domestic violence and rape against men isn’t taken seriously, that women are encouraged to take care of the children (and thus are favored in custody cases where joint custody does not result), where women are considered weak and passive and incapable of violence? It’s not feminists. It’s those rich white heterosexual christian men you adore. It’s the 1% alluded to in the Occupy Wall Street protests. They’re the ones who produce media and marketing denigrating men and women alike, forcing misandrist and misogynist stereotypes on them. They’re the ones pushing the idea that men are useless buffoonish rape machines that can’t be trusted and need women to civilize them — feminists hate that one, since it absolves men of responsibility for rape or for actually thinking and being respectful to women. They’re the ones that are forcing you into terrible jobs. They’re the ones who have let the wage stagnate so you can’t afford to live without both the man and woman working. They’re the ones reinforcing the narratives that lead to higher conviction rates and harsher sentencing for men who commit violent crimes than women. They’re the ones you should be fighting — not feminists that, outside your bizarre rants, are actually pretty powerless in the grand scheme of things and don’t have the pervasive influence required to do all the things you credit to them. The ultra-rich have the power and influence to do what you suggest.

    So… in conclusion, if you’re really in this for Men’s RIghts, not to misguidedly bash women and feminists, you should be supporting Occupy Wall Street, not denigrating it.

  33. DKM, white dudes are doing just fine, and you know this.

  34. Meller: Maybe it’s that men who are against equality are actively sabotaging things?

    Maybe it’s the dudes who are afraid that a majority black city might not elect another republican who sabotaged relief efforts?

    Maybe a penny-wise, pound foolish gov’t gutted the budgets of the power companies (by given tax breaks to the white men who run Wall Street) and drove the more experienced workers out of the company.

    I never said that ” I was superior to other people because I was white and male”. I said that our economy, law, and society was going to hell in a toilet bowl because white men are being systematically excluded, dispossessed, and disenfranchised in the name of “equality”.

    No, you didn’t say “I am better because I am white and male”, you said things suck because white men like me aren’t in charge of everything anymore.

    Big difference that.

  35. DKM, if you’re so convinced that Feminism is the root of all the world’s ills, name one major company, one branch of government, one industry, one form of media that’s dominated by Feminists. And saying X must be because you think it’s hostile to white men doesn’t count. Try something that has a genuine verifiable feminist influence. I mean, if they run everything, there must be some example you can present.

  36. Hellkell, you may be giving DKM too much credit. He may be ignorant and hateful enough to believe the fact that we’ve reached the point where grabbing the first black person you see and hanging them from the first tree you see and having a picnic with the still-fresh corpse is no longer a socially-acceptable response to a crime occurring and domestic abuse is no longer fashionable enough to be romanticized in musicals is a huge loss for white men.

  37. Kathleen: Were they baked bads?

  38. 1) I acknowledged the (admitted) point that Dekraai committed mass murder, had more than his share of paternal custody, and that, for that matter, he did better in the courts than many of the MRMs.
    2) I never suggested that feminists cause hurricanes, electrical blackouts, or any other disasters. I said that hiring, promotion, and emergency response teams are seriously compromised by hiring or promoting women to the exclusion of men.
    3) I NEVER apologised for the Wall St./madison Ave, Washington DC criminals,not in any posts here, on the Spearhead, or ANYWHERE!! I never was, and never will be a shill for debt driven, pseudo capitalist kleptocracy, that earns “money” not by and through production, saving, or entrepreneurship, but through manipulating debt–e.g. interest rate futures, derivatives, mortgages, credit default swaps, etc. They have been the frauds and swindlers that have been responsible for most of the suffering of the past five centuries, while standing aside and often letting REAL producers and entrepreneurs, from John D. Rockefeller to Steve Jobs, from Nikola Tesla and George Westinghouse to Cornelius Vanderbilt and James J. Hill take the blame for their malfeasance!

    Feminists, along with the Wall Street protests, are funded secretly by the above malefactors of great wealth as a sideshow distraction. Ask yourself where the money comes from for the press releases, for the newlettering and pamphleteering, for the lawyers who argue in courts for them, and spring them after their arrests, and on a more rarefied, but much more relevant level, where the millions, if not billions of $$$ come from to shepard their legislation, from Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson to FDR and Truman, to Johnson and Nixon (hey don’t forget the EPA, peacetime wage-price controls, closing the central bank ‘Gold window” on 15 Aug 1971.) along with the
    first major ‘affirmative action” cases, and the court hearings that eventually ended up as Roe v. Wade 1974, the iconic liberal abortion ruling of the US supreme court. In all of these, along with much of the “civil rights” movement, the antiwar movement, the feminist movement, the tax-exempt foundations and family trusts of the super rich and billionaire paper shufflers played a determinative and decisive role.

    Of course, every so often, some, like the Olins in the 1980’s and the Kochs today, go throught the motions of how much theywould love untrammelled “capitalism”, supporting this or that “conservative”, and emitting noises of how much they ‘hate regulation”.

    Such noises mean nothing! They WRITE the regulations they supposedly hate, they staff the regulatory agencies, from top to bottom (mostly top), they–or their corporate law firms, provide the judges that rule on the regulation that they supposedly “hate”, and they elect the President who is supposedly a “traitor to his class” and keep re-electing him as long as he did their bidding!

    It is the same thing when that billionaire court-jester Warren Buffett started babbling that he, and his fellow billionaires, are paying taxes that are “too low”–who do you think OWNS the government that he (and his bankster, lawyer, and insurance pals) are paying ‘higher’ taxes for? To him, and his ilk, paying taxes to Washington, or even to the UN, would be the same as taking money from his left pocket, and amid great fanfare about sharing the wealth, putting it in his right pocket! The only reply that Mr. Buffet deserves is that even progressives are not THAT stupid!

    You are quite right; the feminists–of and by themselves have very little if any power! Theydo, just as much as the Pentagon and CIA, serve as very efficient conduits for the so-far unchallengable power of the bankster/corporate/media criminal elites who are bankrupting and destroying our country, and indeed, the world! For example, they put three consecutive feminist women in the enormously influtential post of Secretary of State, they put three utterly underqualifeid women on the US Supreme court, they installed another woman in the (arguably second or third most powerful position in the Federal government–Speaker of the House, with Nancy Pelosi; they took over the immensely powerful medium of network commercial Television with almost every program (the View and the Talk, daytime TV, Oprah and Ellen DeGeneres, Maury Povich and Jerry Springer, Steve Wilkos and Dr. Phil. Don’t be fooled by the male(?) hosts, absolutely NOTHING appears on their shows, any advertisements, their guests, or the shows’dialogues, that is not calculated to appeal to women, NOT men, and is not calculated to increase the rivalry and stress that women feel toward men, and toward traditonal roles of womanhood! Even shows like “48hours, and “sixty minutes, that had a significant male demographic are carefully monitored and supervised to make sure that no significant masculine virtues, independence, thrift, self-reliance, defence of one’s family and property, and love of country (nowadys, it would probably have to be love of city or even neighborhood, since the country has really been subsumed into the criminal elements of our society since at least 1861 with the election of Abraham Lincoln.

    Speaking of Wall Street,. how many people know that he was a railroad lobbyist and advocate before becoming President, and you know what railroads were like then!

    The 1% alluded to is not even the “white heterosexual men I adore”. They are a transnational, non-racial, globalist, and corporatist elite who has no conception of race, nation, local tradition, sovereignty, or democracy. They are a “new world order” except that they are not very new, and they are not so much OF the world, as over it, exploiting govenrments, corporations, banks, and newsmedia in the pursuit of global domination.

    Feminism is in their pocket, lock stock and barrel. The OWS, even if it “succeeded” would have nothing more to say about its effects tomorrow, than it had yesterday, for the past fourty years, if not since 1920–the year of both women’s sufferage and the Volstead Act!

    Men, as I see it, face a two-front (at least) war, one against feminists, who seek to castrate us, since a race of castrated, mentally crippled, ignorant, brainwashed, tame “sheeple”, hopelessly guilt ridden regarding their race and their gender, is far less of a challenge to our rulers and masters than a race of entrepreneurial, self reliant, innovative, and shrewd revolutionaries! Feminists can do this–at least half of it! They can cause the men to doubt themselves, to doubt our sexuality, its virtue and its power! Your comrades preaching ‘racial equality’ are tasked with a different, but related responsibility: Men will not be at their best against the NWO if we are fighting each other instead of our masters and rulers. “Divide and Rule” works as well today as it did in ancient Rome, and it is easier for them with the apparatus of mass media and mass brainwashing that egalitarianism gives them!

    Please pardon the somewhat unseemly length of this document. It contains a lot that i want to “get off my chest”, and I want to reassure you that I don’t hate women, I am simply angry what some of them are doing when we are all under siege.

    PEACE AND FREEDOM!!
    David K. Meller

  39. You don’t hate them… unless they don’t agree with you. Then you think they are evil, and “unfluffy” and the cause of everything wrong in the world.

    Then, out of love, you think it wonderful; a source of pleasure, if they get cancer and suffer an agonising death.

    You dream of a future where (if they don’t become willing slaves), most of them are murdered, and the rest used as sex-toys; playthings for the powerful.

    Forgive the brevity of this missive, it contains the essence of your beliefs, and assuredly shows how you despise women, and are angry that they don’t worship you, just because you are breathing.

  40. You personally haven’t defended our system, but the MRM in general has.

    Your rant is also remarkably paranoid. You claim that feminism is financed by people who counter it at every turn, based on notions of what Feminism is that would be dispelled in five minutes if you actually did research rather than relying on what your MRM buddies are telling you it is.

    You’re also suggesting that Occupy Wall Street is owned by the people it’s protesting, based on the fact that they can make fliers and newsletters — here’s news for you: printing has become so cheap that damn near everyone who’s not living in a box can make fliers and newsletters. You can get a low-end Inkjet printer for less than $50 dollars, and a computer that’s more than sufficient for throwing together a flier for less than $100. You also refer to the army of lawyers they have fighting for them… but I’ve seen no evidence such an army of lawyers exists outside your accusations.

    There’s this thing called reality. You might try looking into it. Go to the library and check out some books on feminism that aren’t titled something like “Why Feminism is Poisoning America”, just for a start. I’d also suggest you avoid people on the fringes of feminism like Andrea Dworkin, or people who are completely beyond the pale by Valerie Solanas. Although, judging by your tack, you’re probably surprised I don’t worship at their feet. I barely know who Andrea Dworkin is — just that she’s said a few really stupid things, and had lots more credited to her.

    Real research: Try it! It’s fun and far more enlightening than paranoid ramblings.

  41. Nezumi: I know there are lawyers from various human rights and first amendment rights groups at the protests as observers, trying to ensure the NYPD doesn’t fuck constitutional rights any harder than absolutely necessary. The guy who was run over by a scooter a few days ago? The one a newspaper claimed ‘shoved his leg under’ the scooter, despite video and photo evidence otherwise? One of those observers. I’m rather looking forward to that lawsuit…

  42. Sweet zmobie jesus, DKM! For the love of all things holy (and my dwindling Sanity pool), lay the fuck off until you’ve petted some kittens! Or take some fucking tranquilizers or a PMS cure. And you accuse women of being hysterical…

  43. Katz: Not quite that bad, but nothing stick together, the end results were dry as a desert and kinda tasteless. Maybe the weather change… I’m normally a pretty kickass baker!

  44. Or, if checking out a book is too much work, try reading up on Feminism here: http://shakespearessister.blogspot.com/2010/01/feminism-101.html

    Or perhaps any of a number of other online web resources. Shockingly enough, you won’t actually find much on feminist plans to destroy and enslave men — because they don’t actually exist, outside of the diseased minds of the MRM and Valerie Solanas.

    Seriously. Just take a few fucking minutes to read something on feminism that isn’t by one of the “bright lights” of the MRM or those they come through from.

    Oh, and incidentally? Feminism’s actual goals (as opposed to the goals you paranoidly believe it has) are intrinsically opposed to the Top 1%’s goals. They thrive on hatred and inequality, as it keeps people from turning a truly critical eye on them. They’ve been using it for a long time — the promotion of racism in the colonial era is thought by many sociologists to be part of an effort by the privileged to distract poor whites and blacks from their commonalities and keep them from banding together in uprisings. Feminism (real feminism, the kind that actually deserves the label) promotes equality and respect for all… which is bad for business. The MRM, however, promotes hatred and subjugation of women, which is perfect for the Top 1%. If you want to see the sort of things that actually get a boost from the top 1%, don’t look to Feminism or anti-racist movements, or any of that. Look to the MRM, and all the media suggesting that women and men are irreconcilably different, that they can’t truly co-exist in a meaningful fashion without women being subjugated. Look to the White Supremacist movement, and all the media that encourages and reinforces hateful stereotypes of non-whites. Look to the anti-gay movement, and the continued presence of anti-gay jokes and stereotypes in the media long after they’ve achieved acceptance among most. Look to Christian Supremacy, and the proliferation of anti-Islamic messages in media. Look to the anti-trans movement, and the fact that media still rarely acknowledges trans people exist except to portray them as evil or the butt of jokes.

    For every hate group, you’ll find media reinforcing their views, big business and the wealthy overtly or covertly helping it out.

    Take a real critical look at the habits of the wealthy and big business today, and the tactics they’ve used in the past — one that looks at what they’re actually doing, rather than trying to find evidence of what you already “know” they’re doing, and you’ll quickly realize that it sure as hell ain’t feminism or Occupy Wall Street they’re backing. You’re not part of the solution, much as you like to convince yourself of that. You’re part of the problem. They are playing “Divide and Conquer” — and you’re the pawn.

  45. Feminists were secretly given billions of dollars by Nixon, Presidents don’t have term limits, women are like the CIA and try to castrate all men (but I guess are really ineffectual at this?), Jerry Springer and Dr. Phil are hardcore feminists, Abraham Lincoln is the reason “criminal elements” have taken over our society, the richest 1% are non-racial, men are a “race” (an entrepreneurial — except for non-white men, I guess? — race no less), and something something Ancient Rome something, women are terrible at emergency response, but seriously no offense ladies, I don’t hate you!

    Seems totally coherent and reasonable, y’all!

  46. Speaking of Wall Street,. how many people know that he was a railroad lobbyist and advocate before becoming President, and you know what railroads were like then!

    Wall Street was a railroad lobbyist before becoming President?

    1. Wall Street is not a person.
    2. Wall Street was never a railroad lobbyist.
    3. Wall Street was never President.
    4. Wall Street is neither male nor female, it is a street.
    5. Wall Street is named after the street that ran along the inside of the wall of New Amsterdam, which is now New York.
    6. Hell, I’m pretty sure you’re talking about Abraham Lincoln, but I’m going to act like you were talking about Wall Street for the lulz. Did you copy-paste this incorrectly or did you seriously forget to type out half a sentence there? Was the connection to hard to make?
    7. 1-5 are void if in fact you were talking about someone named or nicknamed Wall Street who was a railroad lobbyist and later President and was male. 6 is still true.

  47. Wall Street is DKM’s porn name.

  48. I love your work, Meller. I mean, Mr. Street.

  49. I never was, and never will be a shill for debt driven, pseudo capitalist kleptocracy, that earns “money” not by and through production, saving, or entrepreneurship, but through manipulating debt–e.g. interest rate futures, derivatives, mortgages, credit default swaps, etc. They have been the frauds and swindlers that have been responsible for most of the suffering of the past five centuries…

    Racist dogwhistle. Incidentally, the idea that only production, not trade, makes value is very common among the racist right. Congratulations, DKM, that belief is Marxist.

    Feminists, along with the Wall Street protests, are funded secretly by the above malefactors of great wealth as a sideshow distraction.

    Racist dogwhistle

    [These shadowy conspirators funded] the
    first major ‘affirmative action” cases, and the court hearings that eventually ended up as Roe v. Wade 1974, the iconic liberal abortion ruling of the US supreme court. …along with much of the “civil rights” movement…

    Not even bothering to hide it

    …the unchallengable power of the bankster/corporate/media criminal elites who are bankrupting and destroying our country, and indeed, the world!

    These shadowy conspirators — who will not be named, of course — are not exactly feminine, although they’re not masculine, but they are trying to feminize (White) men. Everything they put out in the media is

    calculated to increase the rivalry and stress that women feel toward men, and toward traditonal roles of womanhood! Even shows like “48hours, and “sixty minutes, that had a significant male demographic are carefully monitored and supervised to make sure that no significant masculine virtues, independence, thrift, self-reliance, defence of one’s family and property, and love of country…

    Did I say “love of country”? How about a racist dogwhistle instead:

    (nowadys, it would probably have to be love of city or even neighborhood, since the country has really been subsumed into the criminal elements of our society since at least 1861 with the election of Abraham Lincoln.)

    And a final fanfare of [racist dogwhistle]:

    The 1% alluded to is not even the “white heterosexual men I adore”. They are a transnational, non-racial, globalist, and corporatist elite who has no conception of race, nation, local tradition, sovereignty, or democracy.

    Identification of the (nudge-nudge, wink-wink) enemy as raceless, nationless, or in some way opposed to fixed racial boundaries. CLASSIC.

    They are a “new world order” except that they are not very new, and they are not so much OF the world, as over it, exploiting govenrments, corporations, banks, and newsmedia in the pursuit of global domination.

    And neither is this post.

  50. This is some of what Meller believes about women:

    Where there are no men, or no true men, to protect them, feminine women will, in a grotesque perversion of nature, be controlled, exploited and dominated by more masculine women, sometimes monsters and mere caricatures of men. Yet even such grosser women, sometimes little more than surrogates for males, can upon occasion, in the hands of a strong uncompromising master, be forced to manifest and fulfill, realizing then for the first time, the depths of their long-denied, long-suppressed womanless.

    and

    While Free Women, technically, are priceless, they are usually, in bed, worthless. They are not worthy of kneeling and humbly holding candles within a thousand pasangs of a slave. To be sure, they commonly hold an inflated opinion of their expertise and desirability.

  51. The National Lawyer’s Guild, a nonprofit group, is giving pro bono representation to Occupy Wallstreet Protesters. Here’s a bit on their history http://www.nlg.org/about/history/ They are traditionally anything but a pro-capitalist organization. “Human rights should be regarded as more sacred than property rights” yeah, that sounds like a pro-corporate greed org to me right there. I suspect Meller’s objections to the NLG have more to do with its history of working a variety of civil rights issues, fighting anti-communist panics, allowing women, Jews, and POC to be members before the ABA and pressuring the ABA to discriminate less in membership.

    Also, the thing about Jerry Springer as proof of feminist social control made me laugh so hard I could hardly breathe.

  52. Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant

    Calm your tits, darksidecat.

  53. MRAL: Calm your hand MRAL… wanking like that is gonna chafe.

  54. It’s like a toddler who just learned a new word. His mom’s gonna be sooo embarrassed the next time she has friends over and he blurts that out! :D

  55. Pecunium, are we playing “which one is Meller and which one is Gor” with those quotes?

  56. Yeah. mister High IQ is stuck repeating someone else’s insults. One might think he can’t come up with his own.

    It’s probably because of the paucity of opportunity for mocking speech in the English Language, which leaves him bereft of possibility for invention.

  57. Men's Rights Activist Lieutenant

    o, u pwned me pecunium

  58. That was a lot of complicated words Pecunium. If you’re gonna make fun of these guys at least dumb it down a little =)

  59. Bagelsan: The sad part is… with those it’s sort of hard to tell that all is Gor. It seems he has internalised the ideas at the heart of Norman’s fantastic ideas of human nature to the point of almost parody.

    Right down to some of the exterminationist lunacies. Having slogged though it (a few thousand words, all found on “Gorean” websites, run by people who use names like, “Tarn Erlis, and Fangobar, without any apparent irony) I figure I am entitled to take some amusement from it.

    I must say it seems more rational than Meller. No more consistent, all sorts of statements about how beloved slaves are, mixed with explanations of how to keep them terrorised, beat them when they fail to amuse/show any spark of agency, and lending them out for “disciplinary rapes”, as opposed to merely casual fucktoys… it’s pathologically incoherent, but we have it on his authority that Meller thinks them valuable as insight to the female psyche.

    So I’ll keep using apposite examples when he tries to tell us how the world is, that we may see what he thinks it ought to be.

    I figure him to end up the property of some “Panther Girl”, in pretty short order.

  60. Joanna: The worst part of it is, I’ve come to the realisation that MRAL, like NWO, and EWME is bringing his A-Game.

  61. Moewicus: “Wall street is neither male or female, it is a street” made me laugh for two minutes straight. I’m still giggling.

    DKM: Man, I wish the NWO agreed with feminism. It’d be a lot easier to get shit done if it was.

  62. Calm your tits, darksidecat.

    I bind them, trust me, they are very well restrained, and will be terminated at the first opportunity regardless. XD

  63. “with a degree no one seems to hire”

    Didn’t you know that beforehand? I think that’s completely your own fault.

    btw, the US will never change, so forget it! They desperately need desperate people for their armed forces (to terrorize the world).

  64. Monsieur sans Nom

    Make no mistake: I am STAUNCHLY pro-choice, despite not being a feminist whatsoever. Even so, the infusion of gender politics and MRA regarding single moms and their relationship to the Occupy movement is fawking ridiculous. But I still stand by the mantra: CAN’T FEED EM? DON’T BREED EM! I honestly wonder WHY that 21-year-old woman didn’t get an abortion, or better yet(assuming that the sex that got her knocked up was consensual)why she didn’t insist that he use birth control since she obviously lacks the means to support the child she’s about to have. I suppose some peeps here might call me a “misogynist” for pointing out that she made some poor choices in life but aren’t women adults too?

    And BlackBloc:

    Skynet is MISANTHROPIC. Which means that the terminators will eliminate the mothers too and not the MRA fathers because their objective is to render humans extinct. ;-)

  65. It’s a wild thread necromancer!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,495 other followers

%d bloggers like this: