Mod of Reddit’s Jailbait subreddit shocked – shocked! – that dozens of commenters there were begging for nude pics of a 14-year-old
Ugh. It’s the Jailbait subreddit again. If you’ve been following any of the discussions that have recently been swirling around Reddit’s popular subreddit dedicated to the posting of technically-not-child-porn pics of underage girls, you probably ran across the standard Jailbait apologia: The pics there aren’t nude pics, and besides, most of them were originally posted on the internet by the girls themselves. So it’s all good clean fun, I guess.
It’s going to be a little bit harder for the Jailbaiters to use this bullshit argument in the future. A day or so ago, you see, a Jailbaiter calling himself TheContortionist posted a pic of his (alleged) 14-year-old ex-girlfriend’s ass in a thong. Naturally, the regulars demanded more. The OP noted that the only other pics he had of her were nudes.
So literally dozens of the regulars – I counted around 70 in all — begged him to PM the nudes to them. And … apparently he did send some of them the pics, at least according to a r/jailbait moderator with the charming handle I_RAPE_PEOPLE.
I can only hope that some of the requesters were FBI agents.
Here’s a screenshot of the whole disgusting thread (SFW; in an earlier NSFW screenshot posted to Reddit virtually all of the comments you see downvoted here still had net upvotes).
TheContortionist’s post (and the Jailbaiters’ reaction to it) was first brought to the attention of non-pedo Redditors by Me_bender in ShitRedditSays, then brought to the attention of the rest of Reddit by SRS regular HPLovecraft.
Naturally, this being Reddit, the r/jailbait apologists are still insisting that, hey, even though something like 70 people in r/jailbait publicly requested PMs of child porn, this sort of thing is officially frowned upon by the subreddit’s mods, so, you know, not to worry. As CapNRoddy put it:
The existence of r/jailbait does not mean nudes of children. Those are against the rules. Those posters broke the rules.
And then of course there were various iterations of this non-argument, set forth here by im_only_a_dolphin:
You know what I do about /r/jailbait?
I don’t visit it. Bam. Problem solved.
If by “solved” you mean “ignored, because I don’t give a shit about crimes that harm people other than me,” then I guess, yeah, that is “problem solved.”
I’ve been taking these quotes from the sometimes surreal discussion of the issue on the WTF subreddit. That discussion also produced this rather surreal exchange with I_RAPE_PEOPLE, the r/jailbait moderator I mentioned earlier:
Meanwhile, in another discussion of the topic elsewhere on Reddit, voidsong managed to get more than a dozen net upvotes for a comment that attempted to place the blame for the pics in r/jailbait on “daddy’s little angels slutting themselves up and taking pictures in the mirror” (and, of course, their parents).
I can only hope that the authorities are investigating these creeps, and that the Reddit admins are cooperating fully with them.
Posted on October 10, 2011, in creepy, hypocrisy, idiocy, misogyny, pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles, reddit. Bookmark the permalink. 452 Comments.
God, the more I see this kind of foulness the more I would seriously consider never letting my children outdoors or near a computer. Seriously.
I need a shower.
Also, young women need to see this before they take or agree to let their boyfriends take nude photos of them, because as strongly as they may feel about their boyfriends, they never know if he’s an asshole who will post or give away those photos online until it’s too late.
I didn’t know there was a Jailbait subreddit.
I think I could have lived a long and happy life without ever having known that.
Tabby – Young men need to see thus before posting pictures of their girlfriends online. It’s not a mistake to trust someone, it’s a mistake to violate someone’s trust.
I’m so glad I got through high school before all of this shit. Kids experiment — always have, always will. That does NOT justify adults preying on them like this. It’s hard because you can explain to a 14, 15 year old that boyfriends/girlfriends are not forever but they won’t believe you.
Well, this kind of thing is becoming part of basic educate-kids-about-danger material, I guess. Don’t accept candy, don’t get in the van, don’t give out your real name or address to the internet, don’t let someone post photos of you online… Too bad that pedophiles can so easily find girls’ photos now; at least before the internet they had to hang around middle schools and bedroom windows like proper perverts.
Not that this in any way excuses the actual pedos in question — I’ve run across various pictures people wouldn’t want (or shouldn’t have had) posted online but then you freaking click away you don’t beg for nudes. Disgusting. I really hope this is being pursued as an actual child porn case, ’cause these guys knew she was 14 and requested nude pics anyways; I see no difference between that and any other type of child porn trading.
Dear mods of the jailbait subreddit,
if even 4chan has stricter rules than you regarding pics of underage girls, it’s really, really, REALLY time to reconsider.
(Also, did some of these people asking for the nudes seriously use their main accounts?
I mean, at least the ones using socks seem to be aware that what they are doing it wrong enough to require using a sock account.)
Bagelsan:
I’m going to side with Holly on this one: don’t post someone’s photos online, just like “don’t take advantage of someone who’s drunk at a party” is better protection if followed than “don’t get drunk at a party”
Unless you meant “let” in the volition sense, in which case I side with the people who look forward to the time it’s unusual to not have something embarrassing somewhere on the Internet.
eeeeeewwwwwww… If you need me, I’ll be at the front desk, trying to figure out how to opt out of the human race.
Seriously. Just fucking ick.
Hey, maybe we should arrest all those creepy fucking women who were obsessed with 16 year old Taylor Lautner in Twilight. But wait, we can’t, because they’re women.
My reaction in pictorial format:
wtf? image fail. again.
Sadly, in our brave new feminist world, the sexualization of young females is entrenched in the modern psyche through endless bombardment of scantily clad, barely legal females like Britney Spears, strutting their stuff for rutting bulls, in a state of permanent randiness. Feminism in the form of slut empowerment is the rampaging frankenstein’s monster that is destroying western civilisation. No wonder the Muslims hate us!
It’s disturbing that you read /r/jailbait David. I guess the cover of being a feminist helps.
….Or he heard about it from shitredditsays?
So it’s feminists who are sexualizing young girls? Since when?
Dracula, haven’t you heard? Supporting women participating freely in their own sexuality on their own terms without judgement or descrimination = sexually objectifying young girls!
Since female sexuality/feminism devolved into an empowering act with their bodies, where they get all in touch with their inner vaginalogue.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Right. And that has what to do with teenagers being exploited by creepy misogynist pedophiles?
Yes, feminists caused the sexualization of children that has been present for centuries prior to feminism’s creation and that persists despite our attempts to eradicate. You found us out. Our Time Machines are in the Secret Compound, but you’ll never get its location from me!
You are as misinformed as the imaginary Muslims in your story.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Contra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammed_Reza_Pahlavi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_%E2%80%93_United_States_relations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_%282001%E2%80%93present%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predator_drone
Ugh… I actually try to take a “live and let live” attitude to pedophilia. As long as you’re not actually hurting anyone, you can be turned on by whatever the hell you want, whether it’s children, walruses, walrus children, children riding walruses, children being ridden by walruses, whatever. (Feel free to crucify me) That ends once you actually hurt someone. Such as by, for instance, dating a 14-year-old, then distributing sexual or even outright pornographic pics of her… or trying to acquire said pics. They totally deserve whatever consequences come of this.
On that note, the Jailbait subreddit seems questionable and icky since, from the description, it seems to be about actual photos of actual underage girls. Which… has the potential to be harmful to real people.
For some reason many of you don’t seem to be aware of the common practice of creepy, older lesbian feminists luring underage girls into their twisted lifestyle. This is one of the biggest M.O.s of the feminist lesbian movement. Sadly, in sexualization underage children, which most homosexuals of both genders actively promote, it has also opened the doors for equally as sick hetero male various schoolgirl fantasia.
I find magdelyn’s comment offensive because zie clearly just wants to dismantle Manboobz.
Just kidding, that’s just amusing. I think magdelyn is qualified for the Olympic Straw Clutching events. Go turn straw into some gold medals!
Delta:
Buh?
Care to offer any proof of this, Delta?
I don’t really care to wait for it to come out of moderation, feel free to delete the original david.
Yes, feminists caused the sexualization of children that has been present for centuries prior to feminism’s creation and that persists despite our attempts to eradicate. You found us out. Our Time Machines are in the Secret Compound, but you’ll never get its location from me!
You are as misinformed as the imaginary Muslims in your story. Read about:
The Iran Contra Affair, the Installation of Shah Pahlavi, Israel-US Relations and Israel-Middle East relations, the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq, and the Predator Drone program, as well as the US Army’s ongoing attempts to evangelize the Afghan and Iraqi peoples.
@Shara
“Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?”
Um, you didn’t have a stroke whilst writing this, did you love? It doesn’t seem to resemble anything remotely approaching a proper sentence with a subject and predicate.
EXACTLY
By the way, thank you for playing. Made my day.
For some reason, you don’t seem to be aware of the research disproving the ignorant claim that homosexuality is caused by ‘conversion’. Could it be because you’re a moronic bigot?
When we finish laughing at you, would you mind telling the mass of feminist straights that the lesbians are actually in charge? I’d appreciate it.
Fuck off, bigot. If the most you’re going to do is repeat grossly untrue memes from the 50s, at least have the fucking courtesy to do so somewhere else.
I won’t even get into the recent avalanche of female teachers being arrested for statutory rape of young boys. It’s the 500 lb. gorilla in the living room that the mainstream media would rather wasn’t occurring at such an alarming rate. After all, it completely destroys their meme that only straight men are rapists and child molesters.
I shouldn’t have read this, because I JUST took a shower, and now I feel like I have to take another one. egh
I’d normally try take that sort of “live and let live” thing that Nezumi mentioned, but it’s really hard to when it’s this creepy. Mass PMing for nude pictures of a young teenager=bad. Distributing those pictures=so so so bad.
Is Delta yet another Eogan sockpuppet? Or NWO under yet another name?
@Rutee
Interesting that lefties like you who absolutely hate the Catholic Church are the first to jump on the homosexual priests raping young boys mantra as it suits your needs.
Delta? Can’t we condemn both equally?
Oh right, can, and do. Yanno, all this straw is making my nose itch.
Erm… we don’t call them homosexual priests. We call them pedophile priests. The majority of pedophiles like children regardless of sex — they prey on boys because boys are the easiest to get access to, especially for a male pedophile.
Google ‘NAMBLA’ if you don’t think the homosexual mandate isn’t to try and sexualise underage boys, or you can google “ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH +Child molestation” and then argue your point.
Well, “they” being child molestors, not pedophiles. Sorry for that slip. Given my outlook on the issue, I consider that a very much non-trivial distinction.
They’re pedophiles, not homosexuals, just as it’s not normal heterosexuality to be attracted to 12 year old girls. Further, I don’t think there’s evidence that they actually molest at a higher rate; what lefties like me want is for the church to stop hiding them and aid in their prosecution. I don’t hate them because they had an abuse scandal; I hate them because the role of the church body was to hide and enable that scandal.
Seeing as there is no such thing as a bi-sexual man, I would say that calling them homosexual priests is accurate. They are deliberately going to places where they can get easy access to young boys – this would indicate a preference – of homosexuality! As I said, there is no such thing as a bi-sexual man – if you suck c*ck, you’re gay.
Wow, just when I think you can’t be any more of a dipshit.
Delta – The difference between sexual empowerment and sexualization is the difference between “I like sewing my own dresses and making them fancy just the way I want it” and “I want to work in a garment sweatshop.”
“I like sex” is a very, very different thing from “I like being used for sex.”
@Rutee
“They’re pedophiles, not homosexuals”
Um, given that they are exlusively sodomizing underage boys, I’d say they were homosexuals. In fact, that is the very definition of homosexuality – sodomizing members of your own sex.
The Catholic Church wouldn’t be such a convenient target if it weren’t so involved in and dedicated to the coverup of the molestation of children.
What Nezumi said. In addition,
http://www.internationalorder.org/scandal_response.html
“Sadly, in our brave new feminist world, the sexualization of young females is entrenched in the modern psyche through endless bombardment of scantily clad, barely legal females like Britney Spears, strutting their stuff for rutting bulls, in a state of permanent randiness. Feminism in the form of slut empowerment is the rampaging frankenstein’s monster that is destroying western civilisation. No wonder the Muslims hate us!”
Oh, hey, another visitor from an alternate dimension.
Tell me, are you carbon-based?
So now the Deep South is the “brave new feminist world?” Because I don‘t see a lot of Toddler Beauty Queens or Ms. Teen Beauty Pageants happening along the coastal parts of the US. And of course to use Teh Queen Slutz Britney Spears who was born in McComb, Mississippi, and raised in Kentwood, Louisiana, both bastions of feminism, TOTALLY makes your claims legit.
Bring on the sharia law! It’s the only thing to save up from scientists sewing the body parts of women together and setting them loose on civilization!
As I said, there is no such thing as a bi-sexual man – if you suck c*ck, you’re gay.
Um… if a guy who likes women and men is “gay,” then “gay” means a different thing.
It’s like saying “if an animal goes ‘meow’ then it’s a dog.” You haven’t actually changed anything about the animal, you’ve just used the wrong word for it.
Also you’re a blatant troll and fuck off.
The most hilarious thing about your post is where you’re too dainty to type out the word COCK after expressing some of the most cliched homophobic bigotry.
And girls are also getting molested by these pedophiles, BTW.
Similar automatically generated gravatars, the bane of my existence. Dracula, you and Delta have similar names and similar avatars. You should go get a proper gravatar so that I will stop thinking that Delta has multiple personalities.
As a bi-sexual man: wrong. You are free to be as wrong as you want, but you’re still wrong.
On the other hand, the dictionary says: A person who is sexually attracted to both men and women. You are wrong relative to the dictionary, the definition of homosexual, and the definition of bisexual. Thank you for playing. Please see Sherri in Contestant Relations about your consolation prize.
So lesbians aren’t actually homosexual until they bring in the strap-on and go through the back door? Who knew!
I do not recall ever having a “lesbian feminist” try to lure me to their lifestyle. I have however, since I was 12, had pervy men try to lure me.
“Seeing as there is no such thing as a bi-sexual man, I would say that calling them homosexual priests is accurate. They are deliberately going to places where they can get easy access to young boys – this would indicate a preference – of homosexuality! As I said, there is no such thing as a bi-sexual man – if you suck c*ck, you’re gay.”
Wow, you are ridiculous. How can you possibly say th-
Oh my god, my hands are disappearing! My legs are melting away. OH MY GOD, my ceAG4328-1414jgnklsd
Okay, Delta just GOT to be a poe. I just won’t accept that someone can be this unapologetically bigoted and ignorant.
Hey Delta, the middle ages called!
They said they want you back!
*SNERK* Heh. MHffft!
Ha!
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
red locker, according to Delta, we are like unicorns :D!
@Moeicus – you are a homosexual. I’m sorry to tell you that. If you partake suck c*cks and partake in sodomy, you are fully gay. Being turned on by a puckering male anus is your true sexuality. I’m not condemning you or anything, but if it walks like a duck….
Is anyone else amused by Delta’s lovingly detailed descriptions of the activities s/he despises?
Being obstinately wrong in the face of the facts, however, makes you a moron.
Walks, quacks, etcetera.
I also find it funny that you will type out “puckering male anus” but not cocks. The lulz are strong with this one.
Why do homophobic bigots always feel so inclined to share their explicit homoerotic fantasies?
Seriously, dude.
TMI. Waaaay TMI.
Well you see, Moewicus, there’s nothing obscene about a puckered male anus. In fact Delta spends a great deal of his/her time thinking about puckered male anuses, in a completely non-sexual and appropriate manner, of course.
I’m turned on by a puckered male anus. (Actually, I’m turned on by a relaxed one. If it’s puckering you need to slow things down.)
…am I gay?
I’m so unclear on Troll Logic.
Have you ever wondered why homosexuals and the people who sympathize with them, are the first to attack people by using homosexuality as a shame attack and accusing someone of being ‘gay’ or a ‘faggot’ as if it were a bad thing to be ashamed of, and as a slur meant to elicit scorn? Why is that? If you are so down with gay people, why would you use their lifestyle as a derogatory attack? Doesn’t make any sense people.
“red locker, according to Delta, we are like unicorns :D!”
Then the people who find us must be very, very lucky. ;)
Is anyone else amused by Delta’s lovingly detailed descriptions of the activities s/he despises?
Very much so. I’ve noticed that homophobes do that a lot. It makes one wonder about them; I don’t know about you, but I tend not to spend time thinking about the orifices of people I don’t want to boink, let alone deciding whether those orifices are “puckering.”
…How did we get from “straight men asking for nude pictures of girls” to all this talk about homosexuality anyway?
If you want to prove that pedophilia is all about Teh Ebil Gays, it seems like a post about heterosexual pedophiles is exactly the wrong starting point.
Women, I’ve noticed, are more ephebephilic than the average man. Feminists = pwned.
Holly: Inexplicably, we got there via lesbians.
Was this week declared Obvious Troll is Obvious week and no one told me?