About these ads

Do MGTOWers just want to cuddle? (Possibly with robots?)

MGTOW nightmare: Sexy robot ladies turn out to be stuck-up bitches.

Are MGTOWers all a bunch of closet romantics? In a recent discussion of some research which concluded that men value kissing and cuddling more than women in long-term relationships, a number of the regulars on MGTOWforums.com confessed that they … actually missed the affections of women.

BeijaFlor reported

I’ve gotten along for decades without sex OR cuddling. And I miss the cuddling, the snuggly affectionate feel of a loving partner, FAR more than I miss the sex. That’s one reason why I don’t call the call-girls; all they offer is the sex.

Golem added:

I’m going to have to agree with the touch thing, too. Hell, I can cut my own hair, but I’ll still drop the cash to have it done with a wash and a scalp massage just for the contact.

That’s actually just really … sad.

Even Nightstorm2516 — the legendary theorist of the Mousetrap Vagina – offered a poignant confession of his own:

I don’t know anyone elses reasoning for cuddling over sex but my own personal reason would be a huge deprivation in my life of affection. I get zero from women so thats a no-go for me. My male friends think hugging is gay via society programming so men show affection by “bumping fists” and “being cool”. My dad IS anti-affection. My mom showed me some affection, but she was so busy working to the bones, I don’t think I ever got enough. My sister and brother never showed me any love.

I think I value cuddling just because its something I never got to do. 26 Years without affection.. dam thats a long time.

That’s actually sort of heartbreaking – at least until I remember that this is the same guy who once argued that vaginas were like strange venom-injecting mousetraps:

This poison … creeps into the male brain and literally makes him stupid, it shuts down his intellect, and activates all his hormones for more pussy. She’s got the bastard. Now she can slowly but surely take all his wealth and keep pumping more poison into him.

It sucks – I mean really, genuinely sucks — that you got no affection from your parents, dude. But if you view women as monsters secretly plotting to entrap you with their vagina-poison, you’re not likely to get a lot of affection from them.

If you want to live a life that has more to it than bitterness and misery, get yourself off of MGTOWforums.com and find a good therapist.

And whatever you do, don’t listen to avoidwoman, MGTOWforums’ budding futurist, who thinks he’s got a woman-free solution to the affection deficit: perfectly realistic robogirls, which he predicts will be here in 2030. (Let’s just hope they’re a bit more reliable than the Cherry 2000 model.)

Yep, we’re back to the topic of sexy robot ladies.

In several comments in the thread, starting with this one, avoidwomen explained his waiting game:

I personally don’t even care for sex and I never want it. I would love romance, such as cuddling and kissing but not with human women, only women substitutes! …

I will get the chance to cuddle as much as I want by 2030 with robogirls and probably earlier when VR technology becomes advanced enough for the simulation to feel realistic. …

The few times I got the chance to be romantic with women, I really enjoyed it and never thought of going “further” or being “sexual” whatsoever. …

Then we got a reminder of just why he’s not getting affection from real, live human women:

Nowdays I just avoid women like the snakes they are! …

I am no white knight in real life, I will not protect a woman. But when VR and robogirls come, I will hold them in my arms. My robogirl will protect me outside the house and inside the house, I will cuddle and hold her. :)

Someday, his robotic princess will come.

 

About these ads

Posted on August 30, 2011, in evil women, MGTOW, MGTOW paradox, misogyny, nightstorm, sex, sexy robot ladies, vaginas, white knights. Bookmark the permalink. 459 Comments.

  1. theLaplaceDemon

    “There are real and legitimate issues regarding education and young boys that need to be addressed. There are real and legitimate issues regarding education, regardless of gender, that need to be addressed. Artificial wombs and dreams about exploring the great barrier reef, however, are not going to do it.”

    Also, that.

  2. theLaplaceDemon

    “Fact 2: According to the US department of Health and Human services, fathers murdered 138 children and mothers murdered 288 children in 2006. The disparity in murders of children (32% versus 68%) is even greater if all forms of child abuse are included (30% versus 70%).”

    Does that control for time spent with the child?

  3. Empty, empty rhetoric and delusions of grandeur. You people are the quintessential example of someone who couldn’t “…bust a grape in a food fight…”

    All of these absurd grandiose visions of a life of separation between sexes and the “differences” you’re making and none of you can coordinate so much as a drop of organized and constructive activism to support your deeply held convictions. Internet warriors, the lot of you.

    My family participated in demonstrations that shook this nation’s ideas about itself down to its very foundations. You people won’t sully yourselves with so much as an organized boycott, despite having all the tools of modern technology and communication at your fingertips.

    You try to turn the tragedy of Thomas Ball’s self-immolation, a man who abandoned his wife and children after abusing his 4 year old daughter, into your Rosa Parks and then cry foul when the rest of us won’t share your outrage. In your forums you talk of “taking action” while you allow the lunatic fringe of your movement to advocate shooting police officers and bombing family courts.

    Sci-fi, Zarat. That’s the ticket for you. That’s about as seriously as you and your ideas need to be taken. You’re already pretending to be a miraculously unpublished scientist. Take it further and allow yourself to be completely absorbed in your fantasy.

    Just try to step out every so often and play with your boys. Spend as much time being with them as you do fearing for them.

  4. Fuck. I just participated in one of your derails out of sheer disgust.

    Start your own blog.

  5. I sorta doubt robot cuddling is ever going to really work. You’d have to simulate not only skin texture, muscle, fat, bone, breathing, heartbeat, but also scent, pheromones. I mean, ok, not TOTALLY impossible but definitely further away than 2030.

  6. In what shall a man trust in this world?

    Wow, that sounds rather religious. If you’re not a praying man, though, I’d say you can trust that the police, the courts and the legislature which are overwhelmingly male will look after your interests pretty well.

    And those posters? Not misandrist.

  7. “How would you feel, if your SIX YEAR OLD daughter had a poster saying “teach your daughters young and teach them often not to abuse or murder children” in her CLASSROOM?!?”

    Not only would I be fine with that, since my sister is a pediatrician and I have friends who are devoted and underpaid social workers, I would love to have more campaigns targeted to women about the child abuse and neglect.

  8. Nice false dichotomy, AntZ. What is it with MRAs and using children for their arguments? A parent-child relationship is not even remotely the same as a relationship between a boy and a girl who are peers.

    You’re talking about two distinct situations: Boys, who will at that moment in time definitely be interacting with girls, and women who may or may not even have a baby some day.

    Most people teach their daughters not to murder their children. It’s taught to girls by the very way society looks down on such things, to the point where girls are practically brainwashed into believing they’re supposed to grow up to have kids and be loving nurturing mothers regardless of what they really want.

    Society isn’t teaching boys not to be abusive to women. Now it’s finally trying and you’re calling it man-hating? Because people care about our male youth and want them to turn into good men, and so therefore educate them on how to be good men? You are everything that’s wrong with the US, dude.

  9. Plymouth, I was wondering about that. You’re more technologically savvy than I am by quite a bit but, it does seem like a robot that could realistically simulate cuddling -with all the sensory stimulation required- would be incredibly complicated and far into the future. And really, eally expensive.

  10. The robots and virtual reality talk always make me think of this, from the manga Chobits (found link on Google) and I get really sad. :(

  11. “I do believe that, in our current society, men typically hold more power than women (I know you disagree here, and I’d like to avoid that argument at present because it’s not the point).”

    I do not disagree. some Men HOLD the power, all women HAVE the power.

    Also, MRAs do not call these people-with-a-Y-chromosome who HOLD power “men”. They are the wielders of the burning blade of feminist man-hate. They have betrayed their people, in return for which they “hold” power.

  12. all women HAVE the power.

    No, clearly He-Man has the power.

  13. theLaplaceDemon

    That’s fine, Antz, but still completely beside the point.

  14. Plymouth,

    I guess the idea is that they don’t have to be perfect, as pretty much anything is better than nothing.

    AntZ,

    I don’t understand you. Women are roughly 50% of people, and a lot of them are really cool people. If anything, robot/VR lovers should make it easier for men and women to get along, as once you get romance and sexuality out of the picture, members of one group are people just like members of the other group. So why the separatism?

  15. For the last effing time, AntZ, all feminists don’t hate men! About a zillion examples of this simple fact have been provided just in the threads I’ve been in, and you refuse to see anything that doesn’t fit with your neat, pre-packaged worldview. I’m beginning to agree with Ginmar – we have no reason to prove something that should be eminently fucking obvious to anyone who’s willing to look.

  16. I suspect that the granfalloon disproportionately subject to negative court outcomes are the poor, and those who otherwise cannot afford to buy superlative representation.

  17. all women HAVE the power.

    I thought it was a babe with the power.

  18. Oh man. I wish I was watching Labyrinth right now.

  19. Nobinayamu: Just for you…

    /me is singing along

  20. Okay, that version is a little effed up toward the end!

  21. Thank you Spearhafoc, I shot water out of my nose at the He-man comment.

    I’d point out that the desire for cuddles/etc. is related to a desire for affection. It’s a generally accepted social thing that humans do, as it is a form of social interaction. Substituting robots for that affection seems… largely to avoid answering that desire.

    What do they want? Is it an intelligent being capable of communication (and additionally, sentience) to physically interact with? Robots seem off just due to the current levels of AI. Unless they just want something touching them. Robots I might understand if it is just entirely touching that is somehow removed from all elements of social interactions around physical touch. But as far as I see it, it is the interaction that is desired. I don’t think AI right now would even provide that interaction.

    I mean, it is difficult for some of us to just avoid human contact to begin with. It’s understandable that the concepts of MGToW would lead to feelings of isolation. But there are many methods to solving that. Having animals around, for instance, is intensely stress relieving.

    I suppose I am questioning if they are understanding what it is they truly want out of the idea of a cuddles interaction. It seems some do, and others suggest something that still has an absence of interaction.

  22. “I mean, it is difficult for some of us to just avoid human contact to begin with. It’s understandable that the concepts of MGToW would lead to feelings of isolation. But there are many methods to solving that. Having animals around, for instance, is intensely stress relieving.”

    I support the “Give A MGTOW A Kitten” campaign! Maybe they’d get better! :D

  23. Anthony, can you give an example of your son being “humiliated and denigrated by the feminist public school system”? And I mean a real example of something that actually happened to him at school, not “there were posters on bus stops in California five years ago that you could interpret as being anti-male if you were being deliberately dense.” A child being harassed at school is a serious problem that needs to be stopped.

    Meanwhile, I continue to have my doubts that your utopia of people interacting with imaginary boyfriends/girlfriends through VR goggles is going to appeal to most people, given that the original post is devoted to guys talking about how much they crave physical contact.

  24. Hee. You guys know the original version, right? (I’ve never tried to embed a video, bear with me.)

    (Come to think of it, The Bachelor and the Bobby-Soxer is oddly relevant to another thread. Cary Grant rejects an 18-year-old Shirley Temple [very gently and while steering her towards a nice boy her own age] and falls in love with her older sister, Myrna Loy [who is a judge - in 1947!]. Yay for age-and-experience-appropriate relationships.)

  25. “Meanwhile, I continue to have my doubts that your utopia of people interacting with imaginary boyfriends/girlfriends through VR goggles is going to appeal to most people, given that the original post is devoted to guys talking about how much they crave physical contact.”

    Antz new invention will be so perfect *people won’t know the difference*! It’ll be just like the Matrix!

  26. I just watched the Dolph Lundgren He-Man movie last night!

    It was actually pretty entertaining, especially when Dolph Lungren flew around on a hoverboard, and also when he said anything.

  27. I don’t think MGTOW want a kitten. They seem more like puppy people. Cats are too independantly minded for the sort of people who get into MRA/MGTOW.

  28. theLaplaceDemon

    @Shaenon
    I think that the idea is that you would have a machine-brain interface giving you the sensation of actual touch.

    Which doesn’t make the overall idea any less silly.

  29. I support the “Give A MGTOW A Kitten” campaign! Maybe they’d get better!

    What did the poor kittens ever do to you? Although our psychotic kitten might have been a match for some of the MRAs… I have visible scars from her. Makes the ‘are you self-harming’ question from the therapist interesting when you have gigantic scratches on your hand and parallel scars, though.

  30. I’d support the idea too, so as long as they actually cared for the kitties as well. It is sad to see abuse.

  31. God being AntZ sons must suck, they have be dealing with all the problems and travails of childhood and teenage masculinity and sociality all on their own because they can’t go to their father for help with any concrete, real world issues. All they’ll get instead is either a sermon on the coming of the all male matrix, or how women are the greatest ill in the world then say: a deluded father who spends all his time commenting on the internet about inventions he’ll can’t ever create while treating their own mother like shit.
    Honestly, if you were just a single, “forever alone” loser like JAUN or Slavey or MRAL all your talk about the misogyny Singularity would be hilarious, but the fact that you have kids makes you, in my opinion, the worst troll on this site to date (even with that banal ‘Meagan’ whatever-it-was).
    And while I know it’s perfectly possible for kids to pick themselves up out rough situations, it would certainly be easier with an actual father beside them, instead of some deluded loser with sad visions of being a “warrior for malekind”.

    (Though what’s stopping me from being completely sad and contemptuous about this is the very real possibility of those two sons and wife might not even exist. Given how AntZ has waxed on about the creation of manufactured realities, maybe he already has a prototype method for doing so? If he did though, I think he just plagiarized the ability from bums who talk to themselves.)

  32. Men and women will finally be rid of each other forever.

    Antsy makes me sad. Antsy has apparently spent so much time working himself up that he is now alienated by default from 50% of the world. This post and this thread just make me sad.

    Here’s a tip, Antsy: your issues are not about the genders.

    Yes. Feminists dehumanize men and women equally. All women are victims, all men are perpetrators. Both are equally dehumanized.

    Does anybody else remember this guy talking about a gendercidal war of annihilation? Was I imagining that? Because you could pretty much switch the male and female around in Antsy’s assessment of feminism and you’d get Antsy’s views.

  33. Nob, you’re supposed to say “What power?”

  34. I agree with Ozy, I find them pitiful and sad. Infuriating often, but pitiful, too. WRT the one man who talks about his male friends not being physically affectionate because of societal programming: that’s one reason I’m a feminist, to free women and men from rigid gender rules.

    And the one who is looking forward to having a fembot in nineteen years. Dear Lord, what kind of a life is it when you’re looking forward to getting affection from a robot in nineteen years? As ugly as his misogyny is, that’s pitiful.

  35. Johnny B: here is my thread: http://manboobz.forummotion.com/t321-game-without-hate It’s got a bunch of women (and some other men) also posting advice in it, some using my format and some not. I do agree with a lot of the advice there, but there have been complaints about the alleged “negativity” of some of the other posters. If that’s a problem for you, I’d much prefer you to respond to the content of my posts rather than complain about what other posters are doing.

    Kilo: The thing is, there are lots of relationships that include cuddling but not sex, like “flirty friends” or “affectionate friends” or sometimes even “supportive friends.” If as these posters say, sex is less important to them than finding a woman to cuddle with, they should avoid PUAs like the plague. PUA tactics lead to only two results” sex, or no relationship. There’s no opportunity to form a cuddly friendship. Also, It’s not clear to me how cuddly it’s possible to be and maintain your “alpha” facade.

    My advice is designed first and foremost to create mutual affection and attraction with as many people as possible. That’s a social asset you can parlay into sex with some ffort, but can parlay into cuddles extremely easily.

  36. Captain Bathrobe

    They are the wielders of the burning blade of feminist man-hate.

    I think I see another Magyc, the Gendering Card…

  37. Captain Bathrobe

    “I want cake. But I do not want to have to gather the ingredients, bake the cake, frost it or do anything at all to obtain the cake. Instead, I will just whine I do not have cake.”

    Cake! I want cake. Why oh why do I have no cake? I have all the cuddles I want, but no cake. :(

  38. Cake! I want cake

    I dunno, I’ve heard rumors that the cake is a falsehood. But you didn’t hear it from me!

  39. I feel bad for people who don’t have cake, in general.

    I feel less bad for people who don’t have cake and hate bakers.

  40. >> >>They are the wielders of the burning blade of feminist man-hate.

    >> I think I see another Magyc, the Gendering Card…

    Sword of PEACE AND FREEDOM?

  41. Kendra, the bionic mommy

    Some of these same guys at MGTOW forums love to taunt women with “Enjoy being alone with all your cats!”. They think women should feel loneliness as a punishment for not catering to their narcissistic desires. Now when they talk about living a lifetime of loneliness, I’m torn between feeling sad for them and thinking “Well it serves them right for being such douchebags”. I really doubt they would offer any sympathy to any woman feeling the pain of loneliness, yet in spite of everything many of us can’t help but feel sympathy for them.

  42. >>> How would feminists react to an anti-child abuse campaign that featured young FEMALE children dressed in gang-like attire and instructed parents to “teach your daughters young and teach them often not to abuse or murder children”.

    Yeah, they probably also think that those “Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them” t-shirts are innocent and hilarious.

  43. Kendra, I suspect the problem here is, we all know that cats are wonderful, yet very demanding, companions.

    It truly sucks to be alone in the world; however, if you are lucky enough to share your home with one or more cats, then you are srsly NOT alone!

  44. “I don’t think MGTOW want a kitten. They seem more like puppy people. Cats are too independantly minded for the sort of people who get into MRA/MGTOW.”

    True. Besides, cats are what chicks like, along with tea and books. None of these things is explicitly French and gay, but they’re all still kind of infra dig, taken separately or together.

    (Cats!! Tea!! Books!! Hot baths!! The horror!! The horror!!)

  45. Damn it, now I really want eat cake and drink tea while reading books with by cat. Well, I suppose all I’m missing is cake. I could make do.

  46. Orion,
    I certainly see your point about the possibility of friendships that include cuddling. I’m not sure that it is a good idea for everyone, though; personally, I can see myself worrying too much about my cuddling friend worrying too much about me using the cuddling as a front to manipulate her into having sex with me. After all, that’s what the cultural stereotype says about people with y chromosomes. The only real way out of this would seem to be establishing that a mutual sexual attraction is present and the possibility of sex generally appreciated, if not necessarily in exactly that setting.

    PU ‘orthodoxy’ is also not quite as single-minded and allows for results other than immediate sex, admittedly often with future success with other people in mind: If you end up having a friendship with a woman, it will increase your odds picking up other people in the future through social proof, and she could even wing for you. As an additional bonus, being with friends improves your state, and should improve your inner game long-term. To de-pickup-speak this: If other people/women (such as your friend) are willing to hang out with you, you are more likely to be perceived as a generally cool person by people/women you don’t know, and your friend can help you getting into contact with them. Plus, you have more fun when you are with friends and thus are more likely to be in a good, relaxed mood, which makes it easier to get to know other people, and in the long term you will feel more confident and secure in yourself when you have many friends.

    I’m also not sure whether there really is a problem with an “alpha” facade and cuddling, unless maybe if one takes a Roissy-style point of view. First, I don’t think that being affectionate and being dominant are mutually exclusive. I’m thinking of blues dance leaders, for example, who can be full of manly, dominant leadership and sensual, caring affection at the same time. Second, once your alphaness is properly established, showing that you have a soft side should only increase that, at least within reason.

    Again, this is mostly keyboard jockeying on theory plus a little timid experimentation; I’m not a PUA, mainly because of some minor ethical concerns and a major helping of approach anxiety (and probably a good number of other bonus anxieties). And I have read and generally enjoyed your posts on your forum thread, so thank you for that.

  47. Johhny said:

    Yeah, they probably also think

    Yes, let’s argue against people by making up things we think they think.

    You probably also think it’s a good idea to put grapes in your nose while singing the national anthem. .

  48. Oh crap, did I end that with the dreaded MRA two-dot period??!

    AGGHHHHHH..

  49. I don’t cuddle with people who hate me, or see me as less than human.

  50. Cake! I want cake. Why oh why do I have no cake? I have all the cuddles I want, but no cake.

    bacon cake?

  51. theLaplaceDemon

    @David – “Oh crap, did I end that with the dreaded MRA two-dot period??!

    AGGHHHHHH..”

    You can’t take it back now! YOUR SECRET IS OUT.

  52. Nope. Hated that tshirt as did many others. Try again, Johnny_B.

  53. Johnny_B, no one here liked the shirt, but feel free to think otherwise as usual.

  54. “Yeah, they probably also think that those “Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them” t-shirts are innocent and hilarious.”

    Wrong. There are a lot of gross and stupid t-shirt designs out there, including ones for small children with nipple tassles and things that say, “I’m a tits man.” And it’s not feminists putting this crap out there.

    “>>> How would feminists react to an anti-child abuse campaign that featured young FEMALE children dressed in gang-like attire and instructed parents to “teach your daughters young and teach them often not to abuse or murder children”.”

    Dude, how in the heck do you interpret gang activity from those photos?! You’ve got one kid in a hooded sweatshirt and another holding a basketball. Is it the hooded sweatshirt? Is it the fact that one boy looks like he might be Hispanic? This says a heck of a lot more about YOU than anything else. The campaign was called “Coaching Boys Into Men” and used athletic images to suggest that boys should be taught to respect girls and women. Oh, how outrageous, preaching tolerance and empathy. And you not only take away the message that boys are dehumanized, but that they’re dressed up like gang members. WOW.

  55. Those T-shirts were created by a man named Todd Goldman. He’s a colossal douchebag. In addition to being a sexist creep, he has a long history of ripping off artists and claiming their work as his own. For the interested, there’s an exhaustive rundown here: http://www.miketyndall.com/todd_goldman/

    So, yeah, not a fan of that guy. But hey, at least he’s an equal-opportunity sexist: his other T-shirt slogans include “No Means No–Well Maybe If I’m Drunk” (which Feministing successfully campaigned to have discontinued) and “Gold Digger: Like a Hooker but Smarter.” Oh, and one time he ripped off the Special Olympics logo, just to prove what a classy guy he is.

  56. I think that the idea is that you would have a machine-brain interface giving you the sensation of actual touch.

    That would almost make sense (albeit still be sad), but in previous threads he specifically described his ideal VR system as a pair of video screens over the eyes that would make you dream about exploring the Great Barrier Reef with your perfect mate. Which is an experience I can approximate right now by falling asleep in front of a “Nature”/”Doctor Who” double feature on PBS.

  57. Does that control for time spent with the child?

    I’m going to go out on a limb and say “no.”

  58. Yeah, they probably also think that those “Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them” t-shirts are innocent and hilarious.

    Nobody’s mentioned yet that we just had an entire thread on this subject:

    http://manboobz.forummotion.com/t399-mark-zuckerberg-is-stupid-throw-rocks-at-him

    The OP thought it was OK; everyone else strongly opposed it. I both opposed it and affirmed the value of protesting, and that protesters should never be belittled because they could be focusing on more “important” things.

  59. I think a big reason for the “women abuse children more” statistic is that when a man can’t deal with his kids, he almost always has the option to leave them with their mother.

    When she can’t deal with them, a lot of the time she’s shit out of luck.

    This doesn’t excuse her abusing them, but it does mean that she’s no worse a parent than the father. They’re equally bad, but her failure to deal with her kids is a crime and his isn’t.

    Paternity leave and generally more support for involved fathers would help this situation a little; good childcare would help it a lot.

    Gnashing your teeth at women and going “see, you’re more badder than us” wouldn’t help even if it were true.

  60. “This is my robogirl. There are many like it but this one is mine. My robogirl is my best friend. It is my life. I must master her as I must master my life. Without me, my robogirl is useless. Without my robogirl I am useless. I must cuddle my robogirl true. I must cuddle with my robogirl harder to defeat my enemy, who is trying to kill me with…..feminism.”

    I know, sorta low. But I just can’t get it out of my mind when reading the end of the post and some of the comments.

  61. <blockquoteLI am living the life of my dreams. I am fighting for the freedom and dignity of my people. I am one of a tiny number of warriors calling for liberty amidst the maelstrom of feminist man-hate. I have lived to see that voice heard.

    Wow, I can just imagine the wank burns left by his non-typing hand…

    I sure hope his kids aren’t real, because apparently all their daddy can offer them is the stench of lotion, ineptitude, misogyny and shame.

  62. Is anyone else getting a Summer Glau vibe from the bot in the picture? All I see is River Tam.

  63. “Is anyone else getting a Summer Glau vibe from the bot in the picture? All I see is River Tam.”

    I was just about to say that! Haha! Of course the first fembot you’d make should look like River Tam. It might even be able to kill you with it’s brain! O.O

  64. I can see it now….

    MRA: Viva La Revolution!

    Cuddly person: *cuddles MRA*

    MRA: ….Well…maybe later then…

  65. David K. Meller

    It is sadly telling about the times in which we live how some, perhaps many, men are already beginning–long before the available technology becomes available in prototype, much less affordable, to talk about sexual–and eventually emotional and spiritual –contact with robots, cyborgs, or androids (“gynoids?”) over what is available to us with modern women. It is a sad commentary of how HATEFUL most modern women are–argumentative, bitter, domineering, obtuse, over-educated, pushy, vulgar, and just plain loathsome–that some men (small numbers today, more and more as feminists continue to pollute relations between the sexes) are seeking such alternatives, even if the likelihood of success in our lifetime is questionable.

    Another alternative, also far beyond today’s foreseeable technology, would, of course, be breeding strains of more agreeable, domestic, playful, and charming women. This may take even longer than the development of robotic technologies, and unfortunately poses unavoidable additional risk to the entire human genome, which makes it a project to be undertaken only in the direst emergency; if perhaps cyberwives turn out to be impractical or unaffordable for most men who need them!

    If you think that I am exaggerating the disagreeable nature of modern women now, just look at most of the posts by them here. One is more rotten than the next! Nowhere is there the slightest awareness on the part of these she-hyenas (my apologies to hyenas) that the male’s pursuit of cybertoys–or further down the road, cyberwives–is a desperate RESPONSE to vicious female–or is it feminist–rejection, ridicule and cruelty.

    Such attitudes on the part of today’s dreadful harpies, have a way of coming back in a most unpredictable and explosive manner! They may not manifest tomorrow, nor next year, nor even in a century, but eventually women (or what man-hating vermin they will have devolved into) will find that they all need men very badly, and the only possible response from our decendents will be tto throw them in the nearest sewer, where they belong!!

    A word to the wise…

    PEACE AND FREEDOM!!
    David K. Meller

  66. Hey women on Manboobz:

    Come the Revolution, can I stay with you? You know, in your all-female utopia? Because the alternative isn’t looking so attractive right now.

  67. Sure, as long as you’re not allergic to cats.

  68. Captain: As long as you don’t get testosterone all over the Mother Goddess Fymynyst Men Are Horrible shrine, I suppose we’ll let you in.

  69. hellkell: That is Summer Glau. She was a Terminator-type robot in some tv series or another. (The Sarah Connor Chronicles?)

  70. Kathleen: I was wondering if the pic was from that–it kind of does and doesn’t look like her.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,495 other followers

%d bloggers like this: