Science Corner: Why some self-obsessed douchebags hate the ladies so much
Well, this explains a few things:
Narcissistic Heterosexual Men Target Their Hostility Primarily at Heterosexual Women, the Objects of Their Desires, Study Finds
ScienceDaily (July 29, 2010) — Heterosexual women bear the brunt of narcissistic heterosexual men’s hostility, while heterosexual men, gay men and lesbian women provoke a softer reaction, according to psychologist Dr. Scott Keiller from Kent State University at Tuscarawas. This is likely to be due to women’s unparalleled potential for gratifying, or frustrating, men’s narcissism, the author concludes. They are crucial players and even gatekeepers in men’s quests for sexual pleasure, patriarchal power and status.
More here. The actual study here (subscribers only).
Yes, like a lot of psych studies, it was based on a relatively small sample of college students (104 undergraduate men, to be exact). But after this post yesterday – and, you know, the entire content of this blog — it’s hard not to think that Keiller is on to something.
Posted on August 9, 2011, in douchebaggery, men who should not ever be with women ever, misogyny, oppressed men, pussy cartel, reactionary bullshit. Bookmark the permalink. 506 Comments.









Pecunium: We’ll allow for regional variation. Hot Dog on a Stick for your Southern Californians, sure.
Westish…. they are based out of Utah.
Again, Chuck, I didn’t write the ridiculous screed about women being bullies. You did. Pseudo-intellectual efforts at deflection don’t change that. Still, it’s understandable. If I wrote something like that, I wouldn’t try to defend it, either.
And I’m not really arguing with you; I’m taunting you. People who write ridiculous things deserve ridicule, nothing more. When you write something of substance, then maybe I’ll engage with you seriously.
Pro tip: you’re best bet here is simply not to respond to me. But can you resist the temptation? I await your response…or not.
Now this is interesting… it seems to be a very consistent feature of people with NP’s; they have great difficulty distinguishing unflattering descriptive language (“you’re a misogynist”) from pejorative language (“you’re a hopeless loser”). Of course it is quite possible to be both, and I think that NWOslave fits the bill nicely. As do most of the MRA’s that comment here.
BTW, there was one thing that I found odd: What was it about this post that got under their skin so much? David’s post doesn’t mention MRA’s or the MRM, except obliquely. And Dr. Keillor’s article on the narcissism study doesn’t mention the MRM at all… he may well be unaware of its existence. So on what basis did our MRA friends decide that this post was aimed at them? Curious.
So on what basis did our MRA friends decide that this post was aimed at them? Curious.
Gosh, it seems a little…narcissistic, or something.
~Either all or almost all of the people who posted said they had above-average IQs (some of which claimed they were as high as 140+).~
One day when we were bored at work, some of my coworkers and I took internet-based IQ tests. I got a 145, one of my co-workers got a 180. And then we got deluged with emails asking us to join a club for supah-jenniuses. So maybe that’s how they got to be so smart.
Why is it that so many Americans seem to know what their IQs are, anyway? Do you get tested for that regularly? The only time I’ve ever had a (legitimate) test involving my IQ, it was part of a psychological profile, and they don’t tell you the specific number, on account of it’s mostly irrelevant and can mess with your mental health.
kristinmh, you give the best advice!
*puts on sexy dragon mcdonalds uniform and starts pouncing on men in a submissive fashion while cleaning the house!*
We got an IQ test in high school and I scored 124 or so, which is apparently already quite impressive. Online IQ tests I did for a lark routinely evaluate me at 140+… and then you get spam where they want to sell you certificates attesting your high IQ and stuff.
Now I may just be a lowly 124, but to me that sounds like a scam. And it sounds like all these geniuses MRAs haven’t noticed that they’re scammed.
@ Captain Bathrobe
Captain bathrobe said: Actually, RB, you’ve been gone so long that the whole “dogs in a bag” meme is now ancient history.
RB: Yeah, no one values the classics anymore.
Captain Bathrobe: Nevertheless, we eagerly await new fruits of your fertilized, er, fertile mind. And, what I’m supposed to be a Castrato now? I’ve never even taken voice lessons.
Talk about a wasted opportunity.
RB: I was referring to a way old post where you mentioned getting rid of your toxic sort of mansculinity (if I remember correctly), anywho water under the bridge and all.
Captain Bathrobe: Besides, RB, this is Big League Manboobz. I’m only a small fish here. You’ll want to be trying your stuff out on Ami, Spearhafoc, Pecunium, Kirby, Holly Pervocracy, Johnny Pez and the rest. Captain Bathrobe is so six months ago.
RB: You mean David’s managed to attract an even lower class of feminst than A MAN da “How about some pics of spear chuking Africans attacking white people” Marcotte? Wow, David must be ecstatic.
Captain Bathrobe: There’s also plenty of troll competition, so you’ll have to bring your “A” game. No more half-assing it. Think you’re up to the challenge?
RB: I will try sir, er, maam, er whatever a male feminst considers “himself.” Now educating the retarded and hysterical, aka feminists, is difficult, but hey, I like to give back to the community and anytime someone becomes an ex feminist it’s a win for all decent people anywhere.
Until we snipe at each other again,
Random Brother
Hating feminsts since 1985.
124 is actually quite high. It puts you in the 95th percentile.
Internet IQ tests are worthless. Unless you’ve had the Weschler or the Stanford-Binet (or something similar) administered by a professional, you’ve not had an IQ test.
Still with the girly-man references, RB? Oh, man, you don’t even know what you’re in for…
Excuse me while I go pop some popcorn.
Random Brother’s hatred is so lacking in substance that it’s not really an argument or even an attack. It’s just sort of letting us know. Gosh, you hate us? Too bad. But we know now. …thanks?
Also, there’s a strange obsession with misgendering people. Apparently being a feminist makes you the opposite gender, haw haw.
It’s a little depressing to think that someone with that mindset is old enough to have been alive in 1985.
I got an SB a couple of times (various functions of schooling, and military training).
They said I was smart. But even with a good tester the SB starts to fall apart for accuracy much past about 120 (i.e. one standard deviation) and the most one can say of a score in excess of 130 is, “Damn, yer smart dude”.
RB, Male feminists call themselves men. People who feel threatened by feminists attempt to insult them (mangina/girly men, etc.). But insults are tricky to analyze, because absent context the purpose behind them (defensive, posturing, personal animus, reactive response) is so hard to recognise.
Though there are styles of insult (see above, re mangina, etc.), which are indicative, if not actually dispositive.
@ Trollin MRA’s’
Trollin said: . . . Also, Randumb Brother seems really butthurt that David might be getting more action than him.
I hope Megan Fox responds to your fanmail, RB!
RB: I might be butt hurt if they were, you know, attractive women, meaning not feminsts. I really don’t care if David gets him a couple of feminist “dime pieces” aka one two and a half biller and one three biller, if he strolls around town with them on each arm, looking like a pencil glued between two bowling balls, and if he takes them on a shopping spree to Lane Bryant, and after that he takes them to the local buffet where they shovel their faces while discussing why knives are tools of the patriarchy to devalue the goddesshood of womyn, and if after that he takes them to the motel 6, pays for a reinforced bed and nails the blubbering feminst whales from sundown to sun up, because the “action” he’s getting is from feminsts, which for me, the idea of intercourse with these, false rape accusing, sexually confused, hairy legged, always complaining, promiscuous nut jobs, ranks right up there with having a root canal performed with a chainsaw.
Oh, and BTW all my fan mail goes to Dena Cali and Trish Stratus.
Random Brother
Left for Dead 1 & 2 are some of the greatest video games I have ever played. The “boomers” remind me of feminists.
Sure, feminists are fat and ugly, sure, we’re promiscuous even though no one will sleep with us, sure, we’re all the opposite gender than we say we are.
But are we wrong?
12 lines and not one tiny iota of substance. This blog deserves a better class of troll.
Wow, hating us since 1985!!! I’m… not impressed.
@ Kave
Kave said: Random Brother
I’ve seen you on other sites and trust me you are not normal.
Also I have seen by being black you’ve run across more then a few racist mra’s that have dismissed you, or have decided that by being a black male means you get any white pussy you wish. In other-words you are a thug in mra minds.
I would have thought you’d have gained a touch of empathy by now. Maybe you’re just pissed off that you’re not getting the thug action they say you are entitled to. Maybe you’re just like the study describes.
RB: You know Kave you actually started off your post with some logic and then descended into crap. You are right in this regard, and I have not failed to notice there are a significant amount of bigots who are MRA’s. Also most of the MRA sites are tied to HBD sites which is, IMHO, scientific bigotry and bullshit. So I no longer view myself as an MRA because I don’t support bigots, however, that doesn’t make me a feminist or pro feminsts.
From my point of view you have one movement that has a pro male stance, but also a strong strain of racism.
You have another movement that has an anti male stance, and less, overt, racism.
Just because I have problems with the direction of the MRA movement doesn’t mean I’m ready to join Dave and be a kitchen bitch for some femasupremicist who are actively passing laws to disenfranchise me.
Lastly, as for thug loving and all the white women, I want, well, it seems you, oh feminsts, have shown a few hang ups of your own.
Random Brother
The handing out of free razors to the slut walkers did not go as well as I had planned.
Captain Bathrobe: Can you be Random Brother’s translator? I get the sense that he’s constantly referencing things from the days of yore.
I’m old enough to remember when trolls went by random strings, but not old enough to remember him.
RB: How about you try this (without the spaces)?
or this?
Quoted text
It’ll go a long ways towards making your posts seem less like bizarrely incoherent one-act plays.
Ami said: Hey it’s Random Brother!
I dunno who you are, but I know you’re a former troll from one of the early MBZ seasons… ppl dun rly talk about the old trolls (except Eoghan since he still shows up xD and occasionally I’ve heard David mention Cold) If you stick around I’m pretty sure we’ll get to know each other quite well tho xD A lot has changed while you were gone!
*holds out hand* Hi! I’m Ami, I’m the Rodeocat :3
RB: Wow, your politeness is. . . unsettling. Though I’m not a troll, just against feminism.
Hello Ami, Random Brother, they loyal opposition.
Random Brother
The xbox 360 open tray error is driving me nuts.
@ Katz
How about I post how I want and you STFU, mkay?
And if people really can’t understand what I post when I preface it with my and their names, well that says a lot about the *ahem* intelligence here now doesn’t it?
Cheers.
Random Brother
Breaking the sacred board posting “rules” of Manbooz.
You are indeed welcome to sound like an imbecile and, consequently, be treated like one if you prefer.
@ katz
But I’m an anti feminist, which on this board means I’d be treated poorly regardless of how my text is formatted. So what you’re saying makes no sense.
It’s just your lame way of sniping, “Oh noes! He didn’t do the text properly, and I did, Imma feminist genius” – So good for you missy. You’re the queen of proper format.
Random Brother
Format Terrorist
So, are there any MRAs who are writing about the movement and its philosophies without all the subtle and/or overt bigotry or directly from the perspective of minority men?
Because I’d be really interested in reading that.
@ Holly
Yep you are wrong.
Wrong about patriarchy.
Wrong about rape culture.
Wrong about “verbal violence.”
Wrong about well, hell there’s too much to even put here.
Random Brother
Hopefully this horribly formatted post can be understood by the more confused katz around here.
@ NWOslave
Keep fighting the good fight.
Random Brother
Razors girls, razors.
Sorry guys, this is as good as it gets from RB. He’s NWOslave without the conspiracy theories.
Enjoy…or not.
But without the conspiracy theories NWOSlave is just a pile of unsubstantiated wrong and fail. What a boring troll. Come back when you can substantiate your claims, crank.
“So, are there any MRAs who are writing about the movement and its philosophies without all the subtle and/or overt bigotry or directly from the perspective of minority men? ”
Well, it’s a bit much to expect any movement to produce folks who are free of subtle bigotry. You can find folks who work against it, but I don’t think you can find anyone who is just absolutely not at all racist, sexist, or heterosexist, or cissexist, or ableist, or classist…
Yep you are wrong.
Wrong about patriarchy.
Wrong about rape culture.
Wrong about “verbal violence.”
Wrong about well, hell there’s too much to even put here.
Oh. Well, thanks for letting me know.
I’m convinced now.
I’m bored already. Can’t he link to a fluoride conspiracy web page or start complaining about his hideous facial deformities or something?
I know you don’t like “why” questions because they overtax your powerful manly man-mind, RB, but…
Never mind feminism–why should women shave their legs?
I know it’s funnylarious that feminists have HAIRY LEGS HAW HAW, but nearly every woman’s legs grow hair. It’s natural, clean, and sexually appealing (or neutral) to plenty of men. Why should we remove it?
Shorter RB: feminists are fat and ugly, hur hur blarg!
It’s almost like we have a new Ion!
So he is Slavey without the crank theories? How completely uninspired and boring. I see that he is already throwing insults, and he didn’t even mention that he has starved for 200 days because of FEMINISM.
Random Brother – you claim that you are not a troll, which is great. But if you aren’t a troll…and you aren’t here posting anything of substance or value, what exactly is it that you are trying to do? Obviously you hate feminism (and I’m thinking you may also hate all women, although that is just a feeling I get from reading your various comments)…but rather than post some thought provoking comment on why feminism = bad, you just keep with the personal insults and boring commentary. You are really starting to sound like the adults on Charlie Brown. It seems like your purpose of posting here is to get people upset or something, but so far you are the most boring MRA to write in these comments since I began reading this blog. Step up man!
Wow, your politeness is. . . unsettling
We all find Ami unsettling. We all fear her.
Um . . . hello, Ami. Oh, nothing much. Nothing much.
Um… okay, I’ll be going now.
In terms of translating, the whole “toxic masculinity” debate was sparked, IIRC, by the TV ad depicting the baby and the injunction to raise your boys to not be violent to women. Naturally, the MRAs went ape-shit and accused the sponsor of accusing a baby of being a rapist. I don’t really want to rehash the whole debate, because it was predictably tedious and unproductive, but I think at some point I mentioned the concept of “toxic masculinity”–essentially, the idea that one can be a man without being a dick. Seems pretty straightforward, right? Well, RB seized on that as proof that I was renouncing all masculinity and proceeded to call me “Captain Pink Bathrobe” and a variety of other clever names. To be fair, RB may remember things differently.
I think it was at this point that he came up with rather odd image of David and I as two yapping dogs kept in the handbag of a large, hairy-legged feminist, who occasionally let us out for good behavior. We had some laughs over that one, and then Elizabeth offered me some bacon, and the enduring “bacon” meme was thus established.
So, thanks, RB?
We all find Ami unsettling. We all fear her.
We don’t fear Ami. We just tremble with appropriate respect at the mere mention of her name. There’s a difference.
Um…please don’t tell her I said that.
Rutee, I don’t think that there are any movements are completely free of bigotry. They’d be movements without people and prejudice and bigotry -to a certain degree- are innate aspects of the human condition.
When I started exploring 2nd wave feminism as a teenager I found it really dismissive of Black women. When I dug a little deeper, I found it really dismissive of women of color, generally and found some things that I really had a problem with in terms of people being oblivious about their level privilege. When I started reading the writing of some Radical Feminists, I thought “Yeah, I’m all for equality and education, and voting and shit… but these people are crazy, and I don’t feel like Feminism really speaks to me.”
Then, you know, I began reading more Womanist writers. I discovered Audre Lorde and bell hooks. I re-read all the Morrison I’d read up until that point. Somebody gave me a copy of Blues Legacies and Black Feminism and I got into Angela Davis. The list goes on. And it started to occur to me that the women belonging to any given ethnic group probably have their own take on feminism and I began to explore that as well.
It let me feel that Feminism had a place to me, to examine and dtermine what I identify as the common struggles of women and men, and let me look at mainstream and, eventually 3rd wave, feminism with a more open mind. Not because I agree with anything, because I don’t. And I’m a feminist; it’s not a label I back away from or feel the need to downplay. But, I’m my own type of feminist and I know that my cultural background and ethnic “identity” play a part in that.
So, you know, Random Brother says that he recognizes bigotry within the MRM -and you’d have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to. He claims to be antifeminist but does not consider himself and MRA.
I have curiosity. I’m wondering if there are any modern writers/thinkers/blogges/whatevers within the MRM that write about its issues from the perspective of men of color, or who disavow the some of the bigotry in the more vocal movement.
Thought I’d ask.
Yeah, that should have read “…not because I agree with EVERYTHING, because I don’t.”
Also “… or who disavow some of the bigotry in the more vocal parts of the movement.”
Long day.
@ Nobinayamu
On the forum, Ami did a thread about a black MRA who called himself Samuel X. On the subject of women, he sounded just like the white MRAs.
Really? Where on the forum? I’ve read a lot anti-Racism stuff written by men who were/are total misogynists so I’m not surprised. I’m just curious about the people who are identifying as MRAs or with the MRM.
Secret Room. The thread is called “Samuelx MRA porn author extraordinaire”. It consists of extracts from his literotica stories, which apparently are legion.
Awesome. I’m outta here. See you on the other side.
Nobinayamu, there is one that I know of… “Obsidian” who writes The Obsidian Files. He’s a black man who’s often been vocal in opposition to the racism in the MRM (in fact, saying so got him bounced from In Mala Fide). But when it comes to the topic of women he’s just as bad as any white MRA. And he seems especially contemptuous toward “sistas” who don’t know their place and speak up in public without permission from men.
The weird thing is: I read the piece that got “Ferdinand Bardamu” of In Mala Fide so bothered, and thought it was excellent. It was pointed, insightful, and sarcastic in just the right amount. It was way more truth than someone like “Ferdy” could handle, obviously.
But then the same man writes appalling stupid, bigoted things about women, and about black women at that. What I made of it was that very self-absorbed people can be excellent advocates for their own interests, while being absolutely terrible when it comes to other people’s interests. :/
Are there any Asian, specifically East Asian MRAs? o: I brought this up before, but I know many Asian guys who are pretty angry about the same things, except they feel the entire group of Asian males are considered beta or omega guys… and they blame feminism and everything for white women not dating them and Asian women are traitors and bitches for going against our “race” and that they’re always friend zoned and etc etc etc I know a bunch of my friends in HS discovered ladder theory and thought it was the truest thing this side of … something that’s rly rly true. xD
And I always wondered if there’s a ton of Asian MRAs, or if they’re turned off by it b/c there’s also so much talk in the MRM about going abroad to get Asian wives, or how Asian women like white men, and how effeminate and emasculated Asian men are or etc etc, and it’s turning them off. o:
Chuckedee wrote, “Oh come now ladies. The thing that gets you off is the spice, the risk, the danger and the excitement. No matter how much you say you want a sensitive, kind nurturing dude, the reality is that it’s the fear of the unknown and the thrill of the forbidden that gets you off. That’s why, for all your rhetoric wrt kind, nurturing, sensitive dudes, such as David :) , you’re always vigilant for the formidable, shadowy figure beyond your immediate range of vision. At a deep, viceral level, you want someone who has viceral, authentic dominance over you that you can feel, try as you might to deny it. Consciously, you want sweetness and kindness and predictability, but subsconsciously, try as you might to resist it, you admire, at a gut level, someone who is dominant… that is, dominant over you. It is the formidable bad-boy in the shadows that catches your attention and has you fixating on him, even as you look away, trying to sum him up, trying to work out what it is about him that excites you.”
Chuckedee, I freely admit that I liked to be topped… but I also got to know my current partner for more than six months before we did a scene. This is because I know the difference between wanting rough sex and actual rape or abuse, which you seem to have a great deal of trouble with.
“What am I saying here? What I’m saying is that you ladies are, at heart, bullies. It is the dynamic of the bully that gets you off. That is to say, most often you realize your dominant role against your children, but you secretly enjoy your submission role with your dominant men. Nature has a way of realizing payback.”
I don’t have children, don’t want any. Where’s my need to be topped come from?
Ami, that’s a very good question… I don’t know of any. Perhaps the combination of resentment and entitlement that drives white men (and a few black men) to become MRA’s is not so prevalent in Asian men, or at least among men of East Asian descent in the US. What do you think?
@ mediumdave
mediumdave said: Nobinayamu, there is one that I know of… “Obsidian” who writes The Obsidian Files. He’s a black man who’s often been vocal in opposition to the racism in the MRM (in fact, saying so got him bounced from In Mala Fide). But when it comes to the topic of women he’s just as bad as any white MRA. And he seems especially contemptuous toward “sistas” who don’t know their place and speak up in public without permission from men.
Random Brother:
You are missing a piece of the puzzle with regard to Obsidian’s alleged contempt for sistas, and it has little to do with them daring to getting out of line as you put it. It is in fact that most black women who were posting at his site are part of the BWE or black women empowerment, movement which in a nutshell is black women blaming black men for all of the african american community’s problem and trying to date, marry, and glorify all white men. That’s mostly why he’s rude to these types of women. These women also have a sort of passive aggressive hatred for white women and love to psychoanalyze (negatively) black men who date white women while praising interracial dating for themselves.
There are a couple of blogs like somethingscrewed and blackmenconfrontingtheliesanddistrotions that go into more detail about these “women.”
Random Brother
Red Sox suck.
“What am I saying here? What I’m saying is that you ladies are, at heart, bullies. It is the dynamic of the bully that gets you off. That is to say, most often you realize your dominant role against your children, but you secretly enjoy your submission role with your dominant men. Nature has a way of realizing payback.”
What way does nature manifest? :3 Is this like… brain structure… genetics… hormones… X vs Y chromosome that causes this? o:
Are all women like this? xD Is there variety? o_O
Maybe you should describe the husbands and boyfriends (and girlfriends!) of every female commenter here :D
Like currently I’m rly crushing on 3 guys here… can you guess which 3? :D
Thanks, Summer Snow! I think I should start my own advice column.
Ami, Chuck must be a fundamentalist Christian, since he’s paraphrasing Genesis 3:16:
Random Brother
Blasphemy!
The Red Sox are the only true sports team!
You sir, are not a true sports fan.
Good Day
Oops! Last paragraph is emphatically *NOT* from the Bible. Tagfail!
Ami,
That guy who was identified only by e a long string of numbers was east Asian. He denied being an MRA, but he was otherwise indistinguishable from then.
I found a website that might be relevant to your interests!
http://incorrecthitler.tumblr.com/
today i Contributed to the Internet. *nods gravely*
Also, we’re apparently all banging David now? Why didn’t I get an orgy invite???
There are East Asian MRAs, at least in Japan. They whine on 2ch about how women have done them up. To be fair, in Japan, at least, gender roles have completely fucked up for both genders, but blaming that on women without acknowledging how amazingly screwed up it is to seriously expect a maid and sex doll without any obligations on your part besides buying her food is really, really not cool.
Rachel, in one respect you are correct. However, a woman cannot “decide” to be submissive (though she may be capable of acting submissive). A woman responds reflexively when she encounters a situation that overwhelms her, and this is beyond her control.
While this observation very much reflects mainstream evo-psych type interpretations, this is not what I am saying at all. We all, men and women, have combinations of male and female in us. Nature forces us to commit to particular, well-defined gender roles because this is essential to making the cultural system sustainable. Humans have biological predispositions based on their sex, but gender roles do not really exist beyond the need to subscribe to culture’s requirements as an ecosystem. In other words, gender roles are very much culturally dependent, and however you might care to define the shoulds and should-nots of gender norms, these do not exist as universals etched in tablets of stone. You must always factor in the culture.
A lot of these sorts of interpretations, like Rachel’s, come from assumptions based in culturally-determined norms, and they are understandable. I am, however, addressing the primal basis for the norms that vary across cultures.
Chuckeedee – A woman responds reflexively when she encounters a situation that overwhelms her, and this is beyond her control.
I’m not sure exactly what you’re saying here, but if you’re creating situations for your partners that “overwhelm” them, you’re doing it wrong.
Unless you’re trying to say that everything overwhelms women because we’re so damn delicate, in which case I can only answer that you should really go outside and see how people act sometime.
Humans have biological predispositions based on their sex, but gender roles do not really exist beyond the need to subscribe to culture’s requirements as an ecosystem.
That’s complete gobbeldygook. Culture isn’t an “ecosystem” and gender roles can’t be simultaneously totally cultural and totally natural.
And meanwhile dominant women are just, y’know, out there. Existing.
hahahah on a positive note, nice to see that cap’n bathtub realizes when he’s failed. Too bad he hasn’t the maturity to accept it with grace lol
What is it with trolls today and announcing themselves The Winner?
Welp, looks like the feminists win the thread, the discussion can pretty much end now, it’s a clear decision made by me (an impartial observer, as unlike some, I carry no animus toward feminism) and everyone can relax because we’ve got an outcome. Feminists win, yep.
Thanks for playing, everyone.
Then perhaps you shouldn’t be asserting your opinions until you are sure… ignorant rubbish like:
doesn’t deserve a response.
I can’t believe I’m going to say something in partial agreement of with someone so silly and antagonistic (although, to be fair, I did kind of agree with NWO yesterday that men are great; he just happens to be a fuck-wit) but that description does describe some of the women in the Black Woman Empowerment movement. I don’t think it’s the totality or even the majority. And I have my own ideological differences with some of the writers and bloggers who consider themselves at its helm.*
But that is not an entirely inaccurate description of one of its facets. Still, I haven’t had time to read through Obsidian’s blog at length and determine whether Random Brother’s account is honest.
That said, mediumdave, thanks for the links.
*For the record, my interest in minority men writing within or for the manosphere and MRM notwithstanding, misogyny is misogyny is misogyny. Still worthy of mocking.
Another odd troll habit today:
“You’re wrong because you’re wrong. I substantiate this by stating that you’re wrong and my evidence is that you’re wrong.”
Although Chucky is the first to pull “Clearly you’re not smart enough to understand that women are naturally submissive because culture is an ecological cultural fixed gender norm that varies, and until you keep up with these basic concepts, I just can’t be bothered.”
doesnt everyone respond reflexively in situations where theyre overwhelmed. i know i do…
also chuckeedee answer me are you really carl sagans dipshit little brother or do you just play him on the internet
The winner and still world champion…. Holly!
xD
What’s going on? o_O Somebody seems eager to disengage, hence the victory declaring and “you’re too stupid to argue w/” stuff xD
We all, men and women, have combinations of male and female in us.
What does this mean? That we all can have personality traits that our society may see as “masculine” or “feminine”? :3 Or that there are objective male and female personality traits… or that we all have testosterone and estrogen in us… or..? xD
Ami, I’m not certain about any specifically east Asian MRA movements. But I do remember running across Angry Asian Man a couple of years ago. It wasn’t so much MRM influenced but it did touch on issues of negative stereotyping of Asian men and, to some extent, culture in the West. There was a lot about emasculation and, occasionally, some posts spawned comments sections that expressed a lot of anger toward Asian women and the idea that they’re always dating White guys. I do remember some very misogynistic remarks. I don’t know that I would say it drove the blog.
Not especially helpful, admittedly.
Chuckedee sounds like he just smoked a gram of Sour Diesel.
I know, everyone forgets about the sadistic women!
and who’s going to win the “I win because I’m smart and you’re dumb, and because I said so, and because I said it first” contest? Late entries not accepted :)